The comparison of the suture materials on intestinal anastomotic healing: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: This experimental comparative study was to evaluate the local effects of three different suture materials on in-testinal anastomosis healing. METHODS: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Ethical Committee (E-60758568-020-176720). A prospective, experimental comparative analysis was conducted on 24 rats. They were divided into three equal groups; Group 1 underwent colonic anastomosis with Vicryl suture material, Group 2 underwent colonic anastomosis with polypropylene suture; and Group 3 underwent colonic anastomosis with polydioxanone (PDS) suture. The second operation underwent the 7th post-operative day. Adhesion score, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bursting pressure, hydroxyproline levels, and histopathologic examination were evaluated. RESULTS: All animals survived, and no leakage, intestinal obstruction, or wound infection was observed during the experiment. The adhesion score was evaluated according to the Diamond classification and same in all groups. Median anastomotic bursting pressure was 125.75 mmHg (10-241) in the Vicryl group, 159.25 mmHg (113-190) in the polypropylene group, and 154.50 mmHg (20-212) in the PDS group. Hydroxyproline tissue concentrations were in the Vicryl group 1699.92±220.8 ng/mg (range: 1509.81-2186.47), in the polypropylene group 1126.24±607.12 ng/mg (range: 53.22-1815.63), and 1547.86±335.2 ng/mg (range: 973.66-1973.2) in PDS group. There was no difference among groups regarding the inflammatory response evaluated by histopathology. There was no statistical significance in all variables evaluated. CONCLUSION: This experimental study demonstrates that suture materials did not worsen tissue healing during intestinal anastomosis. Absorbable, slowly-absorbable, and non-absorbable suture materials could be used safely in every situation.

Effect of intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement suture on the prevention of anastomotic leakage of double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The use of sutures to strengthen the anastomosis after rectal cancer surgery to reduce the possibility of anastomotic leakage has been debated. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the influence of intraoperative anastomotic reinforcing sutures on anastomotic leakage of double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify literature examining anastomotic leak as the primary outcome to compare studies of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using the double-stapling anastomosis technique with or without intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement with sutures. RESULTS: A total of 1122 rectal cancer patients from 5 nonrandomized studies were included in the research. In the combined trial, intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement sutures significantly reduced the incidence of anastomotic leakage in patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55; p < 0.0001). With or without intraoperative anastomotic reinforcing sutures, the incidence of postoperative reoperation for anastomotic leak did not differ substantially (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.08-1.21, p = 0.09). Moreover, the surgery was prolonged due to anastomotic reinforcement with sutures (OR, 6.64; 95% CI, - 6.18 to 19.47, p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement with sutures may be associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage. The amount of research evidence is limited because most of the studies analyzed did not include patients with factors such as neoadjuvant therapy or prophylactic stomas. Therefore, additional multicenter randomized controlled studies with larger size samples are needed to support the validity of the approach.

The QUILT study: quilting sutures in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial study.

BACKGROUND: Seroma is the most common complication following breast cancer surgery, with reported incidence up to 90%. Seroma causes patient discomfort, is associated with surgical site infections (SSI), often requires treatment and increases healthcare consumption. The quilting suture technique, in which the skin flaps are sutured to the pectoralis muscle, leads to a significant reduction of seroma with a decrease in the number of aspirations and surgical site infections. However, implementation is lagging due to unknown side effects, increase in operation time and cost effectiveness. Main objective of this study is to assess the impact of large scale implementation of the quilting suture technique in patients undergoing mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: The QUILT study is a stepped wedge design study performed among nine teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. The study consists of nine steps, with each step one hospital will implement the quilting suture technique. Allocation of the order of implementation will be randomization-based. Primary outcome is 'textbook outcome', i.e.no wound complications, no re-admission, re-operation or unscheduled visit to the outpatient clinic and no increased use of postoperative analgesics. A total of 113 patients is required based on a sample size calculation. Secondary outcomes are shoulder function, cosmetic outcome, satisfaction with thoracic wall and health care consumption. Follow-up lasts for 6 months. DISCUSSION: This will be one of the first multicentre prospective studies in which quilting without postoperative wound drain is compared with conventional wound closure. We hypothesize that quilting is a simple technique to increase textbook outcome, enhance patient comfort and reduce health care consumption.

The potential of microalgal sources as coating materials: A case study for the development of biocompatible surgical sutures.

Sutures are considered as surgical materials that form excellent surfaces to integrate the postoperative parts of the body. These materials present suitable platforms for potential bacterial penetrations. Therefore, coating these biomedical materials with biocompatible compounds is seen as a potential approach to improve their properties while avoiding adverse effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate Arthrospira platensis, Haematacoccus pluvialis, Chlorella minutissima, Botyrococcus braunii, and Nostoc muscorum as potential surgical suture coating materials. Their crude extracts were absorbed into two different sutures as poly glycolic (90%)-co-lactic acid (10%) (PGLA) and poly dioxanone (PDO); then, their cytotoxic effects and antibacterial activities were examined. Both N. muscorum-coated sutures (PGLA and PDO) and A. platensis-coated (PGLA and PDO) sutures did not induce any toxic effect on L929 mouse fibroblast cells (>70% cell viability). The highest antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus was achieved with N. muscorum-coated PGLA and A. platensis-coated PGLA at 11.18 ± 0.54 mm and 9.52 ± 1.15 mm, respectively. These sutures were examined by mechanical analysis, and found suitable according to ISO 10993-5. In comparison with the commercial antibacterial agent (chlorohexidine), the results proved that N. muscorum extract can be considered as the most promising suture coating material for the human applications.

Severe penile fibrotic reaction secondary to a non-absorbable suture: a case report. / Reacción fibrótica peneana severa secundaria a una sutura no absorbible: reporte de un caso.

INTRODUCTION: Circumcision is one of the most frequent urological surgical procedures in the pediatric population globally. Complications, although rare, can be severe. CLINICAL CASE: We present the case of a Senegalese 10-year-old male patient who had undergone ritual circumcision in his early childhood and developed a progressive circumferential tumor in the penile body with no further associated symptoms. Surgical exploration was carried out. A fibrotic-looking penile ring, which was interpreted as an injury secondary to the non-absorbable suturing material used in the previous surgery, was identified. The tissue involved was removed, and on-demand preputioplasty was conducted. Due to technical limitations, the resected tissue could not be analyzed, which means diagnosis could not be histopathologically confirmed. The patient had a favorable progression. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates that the medical personnel in charge of performing circumcisions should be adequately trained in order to prevent severe complications.

INTRODUCCION: La circuncisión es uno de los procedimientos quirúrgicos urológicos más frecuentemente realizados en la población pediátrica en todo el mundo. Las complicaciones, aunque infrecuentes, pueden ser graves. CASO CLINICO: Presentamos el caso de un paciente varón senegalés de 10 años que fue sometido a una circuncisión ritual en la primera infancia y que desarrolló una tumoración circunferencial progresiva en el cuerpo del pene sin otra sintomatología asociada. Se realizó una exploración quirúrgica y se identificó un rodete peneano de aspecto fibrótico que se interpretó como lesión secundaria al material de sutura no absorbible utilizado en la cirugía anterior. Se realizó una exéresis del tejido afecto y una prepucioplastia a demanda. Por limitaciones técnicas, no se pudo analizar el tejido resecado y por tanto no se pudo confirmar histopatológicamente el diagnóstico. El paciente evolucionó favorablemente. CONCLUSIONES: Este caso pone de manifiesto la necesidad de formar adecuadamente al personal que realiza la circuncisión para evitar complicaciones severas.

Abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia prevention in midline laparotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia (IH) is the main complication after laparotomy. In an attempt to reduce this complication, mesh techniques and studies in which the closure technique is modified have been proposed. Both types are characterized by comparison with the closure described as standard or conventional: 1 × 1, mass, and continuous closure. For this study, modified closure techniques (MCTs) were considered as those techniques in which an extra suture is placed (reinforced tension line (RTL), retention), the closure point is modified in distance (small bites) or shape (CLDC, Smead Jones, interrupted, Cardiff point) and which aim to reduce these complications. The objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate the effectiveness of MCTs for reducing the incidence of IH and abdominal wound dehiscence (AWD) to provide objective support for their recommendation. METHODS: An NMA was performed according to the PRISMA-NMA guidelines. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of IH and AWD, and the secondary objective was to determine the incidence of postoperative complications. Only published clinical trials were included. The risk of bias was analyzed, and the random-effects model was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Twelve studies comparing 3540 patients were included. The incidence of HI was lower in RTL, retention suture, and small bites, these techniques showed statistical differences with pooled ORs (95% CI) of 0.28 (0.09-0.83), 0.28 (0.13-0.62), and 0.44 (0.31-0.62), respectively. Associated complications, including hematoma, seroma, and postoperative pain, could not be analyzed; however, MCTs did not increase the risk of surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Small bites, RTL, and retention sutures decreased the prevalence of IH. RTL and retention suture decreased the prevalence of AWD. RTL was the best technique as it reduced both complications (IH and AWD) and had the best SUCRA and P-scores, and the number needed to treat (NNT) for net effect was 3. REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42021231107.

Management of postpartum hemorrhage in a patient with bicornuate uterus using the B-Lynch suture. Case report and review of the literature / Manejo de la hemorragia posparto en una paciente con útero bicorne con la sutura B-Lynch. Reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura

Objectives: To describe the use of the B-Lynch suture in a case of postpartum hemorrhage of a woman with bicornuate uterus, and to carry out a review of the literature on PPH control strategies in patients with müllerian anomalies, maternal outcomes in terms of hemorrhage control, as well as early and late complications. Material and methods: Case report of a patient with bicornuate uterus who presented to a regional referral hospital with postpartum hemorrhage following a cesarean section, which was successfully controlled using the B-Lynch suture. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Medline, Google Scholar and LILACS databases. The MeSh terms used were: "Uterine Atony," "Postpartum Hemorrhage," "Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage," "Bicornuate Uterus," "Müllerian Anomalies," "Müllerian Duct Abnormalities". Case reports and case series of patients with müllerian malformations and PPH not responding to initial pharmacological management in whom conservative surgical procedures were used to control bleeding were included. A narrative analysis of the findings was carried out based on study characteristics, techniques used and complications. Results: Five studies were selected, 4 case reports and 1 case series which included 12 women with uterine malformations who developed PPH and in whom surgical management (uterine compression sutures) or devices (intrauterine balloon) were used for hemorrhage control. Bleeding was successfully controlled in 11 cases, with hysterectomy required only in one case (8.3 %). No long-term complications were reported. Conclusions: The literature on PPH management in women with müllerian uterine malformations is limited to case reports in which either compression sutures or medical devices such as intrauterine balloons were used. The B-Lynch-type compression suture appears to be a good option for controlling PPH in these women in order to preserve fertility, with a low rate of complications. Further documentation of these types of cases is needed in order to build the evidence regarding the usefulness of this technique for controlling postpartum uterine bleeding in this population.

Objetivos: describir un caso de manejo con sutura de B-Lynch en una mujer con útero bicorne que presenta hemorragia posparto (HPP), y realizar una revisión de la literatura acerca de las estrategias de control quirúrgico de la HPP en pacientes con malformaciones müllerianas, los resultados maternos en términos de control de la hemorragia, así como las complicaciones tempranas y tardías. Materiales y métodos: se reporta el caso de una paciente con útero bicorne, atendida en un hopsital de referencia regional, que, posterior a parto por cesárea, presenta hemorragia posparto, la cual es controlada con éxito empleando la sutura de B-Lynch. Se realizó una búsqueda en las siguientes bases de datos: PubMed, Embase, Medline, Google Scholar y LILACS. Se emplearon los términos MeSh: "Uterine Atony", "Postpartum Hemorrhage", "Immediate Postpartum Hemorrhage", "Bicornuate Uterus", "Mullerian Anomalies", "Mullerian Ducts Abnormalities", "Uterine Compression Suture". Se incluyeron reportes y series de casos que hubieran incluido pacientes con malformaciones müllerianas con HPP que no respondieran al manejo farmacológico inicial, con uso de procedimientos quirúrgicos conservadores para el control de la hemorragia. Se hace análisis narrativo de los hallazgos respecto a las características de los estudios, técnicas utilizadas y complicaciones. Resultados: se seleccionaron 5 estudios, 4 de tipo reporte de caso y 1 serie de casos, que corresponden a 12 mujeres con malformación uterina que desarrollaron HPP, en las cuales se empleó manejo quirúrgico (suturas de compresión uterina), y con dispositivo (tipo balón intrauterino) para el control de la hemorragia, logrando controlar el sangrado en 11 casos, solo una (8,3 %) requirió histerectomía. No se reportan complicaciones a largo plazo. Conclusiones: el manejo de la HPP en mujeres con malformaciones uterinas müllerianas cuenta con una literatura limitada a reportes de casos, con uso tanto de suturas compresivas como dispositivos médicos tipo balones intrauterinos. La sutura compresiva tipo B-Lynch parece ser una buena alternativa en el control de la HPP en estas mujeres con el fin de preservar la fertilidad, con baja tasa de complicaciones. Se requiere continuar documentando este tipo de casos con el fin de consolidar evidencia de la utilidad de esta técnica en el control del sangrado uterino posparto en esta población.

The effect of reinforcing sutures and trans-anal drainage tube on the outcome of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: propensity score­matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is currently the predominant treatment modality for rectal tumors, with an ongoing focus on reducing the incidence of postoperative complications. In an effort to decrease the occurrence of anastomotic leakage, two additional steps worth considering are reinforcing the anastomosis with a barbed suture and retaining an anal drain as part of the procedure. The results of the operation were analyzed by comparing them to cases where the anastomosis was performed with a stapler alone. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery between July 2020 and March 2023. The patients were categorized into three cohorts based on the postoperative management following instrumented anastomosis: cohort A, the instrumented anastomosis alone group; cohort B, the reinforced suture group; and cohort C, the reinforced suture and indwelling transanal drainage tube group. Propensity score matching was performed twice in a 1:1 ratio, comparing cohort B to cohort A and cohort C to cohort B. The objective was to compare the benefits and drawbacks among the different groups in terms of operative time, postoperative outcomes and operative costs. RESULTS: 529 patients with laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer were eligible for inclusion. the instrumented anastomosis alone group, reinforced suture group and the reinforced suture and indwelling transanal drainage tube group were performed in 205 patients, 198 patients and 126 patients, respectively. Cohort A and Cohort B differed in three variables after PSM: total operative time (p = 0.018), postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.001) and incidence of anastomotic leakage (p = 0.038). Cohort B had a longer total operative time, shorter postoperative hospital stay and a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage. Similarly, cohort C had less postoperative drainage (P = 0.01) and a longer postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.003) when cohort B and cohort C were matched for propensity scores. There was no significant difference in the cost of surgery between the three cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of barbed suture reinforcement significantly reduces the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgeries. On the other hand, although trans-anal drainage was used as an additional measure to the reinforcement suture of the anastomosis, the utilization of trans-anal drainage tubes does not demonstrate a significant improvement in surgical outcomes.

Does Intestinal Peristalsis Cause Suture Failure After Instrument Suture?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is a standard treatment for gastric cancer. Anastomotic leakage remains a potentially fatal complication of gastrectomy. Forceful stapler extraction may cause anastomotic complications. We focused on the duodenal peristalsis, as we hypothesized that it might cause forceful stapler extraction. We then retrospectively investigated duodenal peristalsis and reviewed videos of Da Vinci system cases to clarify the relationship between peristalsis and anastomotic complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine cases with stored videos of laparoscopic surgery using the Da Vinci system from 2015 to March 2021 were included. Peristalsis was defined by repeated contraction and expansion that was clearly visible three or more times in a row. The duodenum was investigated because it is frequently observed during gastrectomy. Suture failure was evaluated in cases with and without peristalsis. RESULTS: The study population included 49 patients [male, n=32; female, n=17; median age, 71 (42-82) years]. Duodenal peristalsis was observed in 14 (28.6%) cases. Three patients experienced complications. A comparative study of cases with and without complications showed significant peristalsis in cases with complications (p=0.0198). CONCLUSION: A new definition to evaluate duodenal peristalsis was established. Anastomotic complications were significantly more frequent in cases with peristalsis (p=0.0198). Our results suggest the utility of manual over-sewing or the use of reinforcement material.

Can triclosan-coated sutures reduce the postoperative rate of wound infection? Data from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Wound infections are typical postoperative complications with considerable therapeutic consequences and high personnel and financial costs. Previous meta-analyses have shown that triclosan-coated sutures can reduce the risk of postoperative wound infection. This work aimed to update previous meta-analyses with a special focus on different subgroups. METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (registration: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022344194). The search was independently performed in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane databases by 2 reviewers. A critical methods review of all included full texts took place. The trustworthiness of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the suture material was carried out. RESULTS: In this meta-analysis of 29 randomized controlled trials, the use of triclosan-coated suture material resulted in a significant reduction of postoperative wound infection rate (24%) (random-effects model; risk ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: [0.67-0.87]). The effect was evident in the subgroups according to wound contamination class, underlying oncologic disease, and pure preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. In the subgroup analysis by the operating department, the significant effect was visible only in the abdominal surgery group. CONCLUSION: Based on the randomized controlled clinical trials reviewed, triclosan-coated sutures reduced postoperative wound infection rates in the main study and most subgroups. Additional costs of up to 12 euros for the coated suture material appear to be justified to generate an economic benefit for the hospital by reducing postoperative wound infections. The additional socioeconomic benefit of reducing wound infection rates was not investigated here.

Suture versus open mesh repair for small umbilical hernia: Results of a propensity-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to compare the outcomes of open mesh repair versus suture repair for small (≤1 cm in diameter) umbilical hernia. The primary endpoint was the 30-day outcomes including pain, and secondary endpoints were the 2-year outcomes including recurrences and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: This propensity-matched, multicenter study was carried out on data collected prospectively in the Hernia-Club database between 2011 and 2021. A total of 590 mesh repairs and 590 suture repairs were propensity score matched (age, sex, body mass index) at a ratio of 1:1. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Verbal Rating Scale-4 and 0‒10 Numerical Rating Scale-11. RESULTS: Mesh insertion was intraperitoneal in 331 patients (56.1%), extraperitoneal in 249 (42.2%), and onlay in 10 (1.7%). The rate of 30-day complications and Numerical Rating Scale-11 pain scores on postoperative days 8 and 30 were similar between the groups, including surgical site occurrences (2.2 vs 1.4% after suture repair). At 1 month, postoperative discomfort (sensation of something different from before) was significantly (P < .0001) more frequent after mesh repair, whereas the rate of relevant (moderate or severe) pain (mesh repair: 1.1% vs suture repair: 2.6%) and the distribution of Numerical Rating Scale-11 scores did not differ between the groups. At the 2-year follow-up, mesh repair patients had fewer reoperated recurrences (0.2% vs 1.7%; P = .035) and no more pain or discomfort than suture repair patients. CONCLUSION: Both techniques are effective and safe. Mesh repair is likely to reduce the rate of recurrences. Concerns about postoperative pain and infection might not prevent the use of mesh in smallest umbilical hernias.

Clinical outcome analysis of modified B-Lynch sutures in the fundus uteri and part of the corpus uteri for the prevention of intraoperative haemorrhage during caesarean delivery in women with twin pregnancy: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of modified B-Lynch sutures in the fundus uteri and part of the corpus uteri for the prevention of intraoperative haemorrhage during caesarean delivery in women with twin pregnancy. METHODS: This retrospective analysis covers the clinical data of 40 women with postpartum haemorrhage caused by uterine inertia during caesarean section in women with twin pregnancy in our hospital from January 2018 to May 2022. These women were divided into the group with modified B-Lynch sutures at the fundus and part of the corpus uteri (Group A, 20 patients) and the group with classic B-Lynch sutures (Group B, 20 patients) according to the treatment received. The treatment effect and safety of the two uterine compression sutures were compared. RESULTS: In this study, no statistically significant differences were found in the outcomes of haemostasis or intraoperative and 24-h postoperative blood loss between the two uterine compression suture groups (P > 0.05). Compared to Group B, Group A showed a significantly reduced operative time, postoperative hospital stay, puerperal morbidity rate, pain score and duration of lochia. CONCLUSION: Modified B-Lynch sutures at the fundus and part of the corpus uteri can achieve a haemostatic effect similar to that of the classic B-Lynch suture, while it allows for a shortened operative time and reduced postoperative complications. Modified B-Lynch sutures can serve as a safe, rapid and effective haemostatic method for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage during caesarean section in women with twin pregnancy, showing certain validity for promotion in clinics.

Emergency cerclage using double-level versus single-level suture in the management of cervical insufficiency (Cervical Occlusion double-level Stitch Application, COSA): study protocol for a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical insufficiency accounts for 15% of recurrent pregnancy losses between 16 and 28 weeks of gestation. The aim of the study is to verify the effectiveness of emergency double-level cerclage with vaginal progesterone in cervical insufficiency treatment in terms of the prevention of preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial is a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised study with 1:1 allocation ratio. The study is conducted at tertiary perinatal care departments in Poland. It will include patients with cervical insufficiency with the fetal membranes visible in the open cervical canal or protruding into the vagina between 16+0 and 23+6 weeks of pregnancy. They will be randomised into two arms: emergency single-level cerclage with vaginal progesterone or double-level cerclage with vaginal progesterone. All will be administered antibiotics and indomethacin. The primary outcome is the rate of deliveries below 34+0 weeks of gestation, while secondary outcomes include gestational age at delivery, neonatal outcomes, maternal outcomes according to the Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth and cerclage procedure complications. The planned number of participants according to the power analysis is 78. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was written in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statement. It was created according to the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki for Medical Research involving Human Subject. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education (no. 1/2022). The study protocol was approved and published by ClinicalTrials.gov (posted on 24 February 2022). All participants gave a written informed consent. After completion of the study its results will be published in a peer-reviewed English language journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05268640.

Feasibility of Robotic Mitral Valve Repair Using Barbed Nonabsorbable Sutures: A Preliminary Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Barbed nonabsorbable sutures have been widely adopted for tissue closure in noncardiac robotic surgery to improve intraoperative efficiency. Here, we examine the profile in robotic mitral valve repair (rMVR), which utilized barbed nonabsorbable sutures. To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe clinical outcomes for rMVR with barbed nonabsorbable sutures. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 90 patients who underwent rMVR using barbed nonabsorbable sutures at our center between 2019 and 2021. The primary outcome measure was dehiscence, while other relevant outcomes included 30-day readmission and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: In addition to fixation of the mitral annuloplasty band, barbed nonabsorbable sutures were employed commonly in concomitant pericardiectomy closure (100.0%, 90 of 90), atriotomy closure (100.0%, 90 of 90), and left atrial appendage closure (if eligible; 98.8%, 83 of 84). One patient who underwent mitral valve annuloplasty using only barbed nonabsorbable suture required reoperation for annuloplasty ring dehiscence. Immediate postoperative ring dehiscence was not observed in any patients after the routine reinforcement of barbed nonabsorbable sutures with everting pledgeted polyester sutures, and no additional patients required reoperation for suture-related complications. Clinical signs of dehiscence were not observed after pericardiectomy, atriotomy, or left atrial appendage closure with barbed nonabsorbable sutures. The 30-day readmission rate was 3.3% (3 of 90), and 30-day mortality was 0% (0 of 90). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the initial feasibility of barbed nonabsorbable sutures in robotic cardiac surgery, specifically within rMVR. Further research is necessary to explore the long-term safety and efficacy profile of such approach.

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Primary Suture and T-Tube Drainage in the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones.

Background: At present, T-tube drainage or primary suture for common bile duct stones is common management. Methods: The clinical data of 100 patients who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and T-tube drainage or primary suture for common bile duct stones from 2019 to 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, including 50 cases of primary suture and 50 cases of T-tube drainage. Results: The operation time and postoperative hospital stay of patients with primary suture were lower than those in T-tube drainage group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and hospitalization expenses between the two groups (P > .05). Conclusions: It has been suggested that the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic primary suture is better than that of T-tube drainage; although they have different indications, they should be selected according to the specific individual situation of patients.

Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Uterine closure technique can affect scar healing, potentially resulting in unfavorable gynecologic and life-threatening obstetrical outcomes. Double-layer continuous unlocked suture has been demonstrated to promote optimal residual myometrial thickness. Recently, the purse-string uterine suture technique has emerged as a viable method to enhance the healing of scars. However, the current lack of randomized trials assessing the relevance of this technique warrants further investigation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of purse-string uterine sutures on scar healing after cesarean delivery when compared with double-layer continuous unlocked suture. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial; 126 patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing primary cesarean delivery were enrolled in 2 groups. The primary outcome was the mean residual myometrial thickness measured by saline infusion sonography 6 months after surgery by 2 sonographers blinded to uterine closure techniques. Operative time, calculated blood loss, total number of needed threads, and perioperative scar width were used for the perioperative analysis. Healing ratio and cesarean scar defect measurements were used for the 6-month analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of residual myometrial thickness (9.38±2.3 vs 8.4±3.9 mm; P=.187), blood loss (540 [146-982] vs 495 [241-903] mL; P=.815), or operative time (6.2 [5.2-7] vs 6 [5.3-7] minutes; P=.977). Achievement of purse-string uterine suture required significantly fewer threads (1 [1-1] vs 2 [1-2]; P<.001) and fewer hemostatic complementary sutures (1 [1-1] vs 1 [1-2]; P=.013). Scar width was significantly lower with purse-string uterine sutures (50 [40.5-50.5] vs 70 [60-70.5] mm; P<.0001). Purse-string uterine sutures allowed a higher healing ratio (1 [0.9-1] vs 0.84 [0.59-1]; P=.003) and significantly fewer cesarean scar defects (12% vs 35%; P=.018) compared with double-layer continuous unlocked suture. CONCLUSION: Despite resulting in no difference in residual myometrial thickness, purse-string uterine closure seems to be associated with better uterine scar healing on the basis of a higher healing ratio, and a lower rate of cesarean scar defects compared with double-layer continuous unlocked suture.

B-Lynch Suture Management among Patients with Postpartum Hemorrhage in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Postpartum haemorrhage is the most life-threatening complication during pregnancy and atonic postpartum haemorrhage being the commonest one, often poses difficulties in management. B-Lynch suture with a high success rate has emerged as a life-saving measure in uncontrolled atonic postpartum haemorrhage refractory to uterotonics. The objective of this study was to find out the prevalence of B-Lynch suture management among patients with post-partum haemorrhage in a tertiary care centre. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a tertiary care centre from 1 April 2017 to 1 April 2021 after taking ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee of the same institution [Reference number: 497(6-11)C-2077/078]. All patients with post-partum haemorrhage during the study period were included in the study. Patients with traumatic post-partum haemorrhage, congenital malformations, complete placenta previa/accreta, bleeding disorders, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and retained bits of placenta were excluded from the study. A convenience sampling method was used. Point estimate and 90% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Out of 72 patients, 19 (26.39%) (17.85-34.93, 90% Confidence Interval) underwent B-Lynch suture management for atonic post-partum haemorrhage. Uterus salvage was done in 18 (94.74%) whereas 1 (5.26%) underwent a cesarean hysterectomy. Conclusions: The prevalence of the use of B-Lynch suture was similar to other studies done in similar settings. B-Lynch suture is a valuable addition for controlling intractable atonic primary postpartum haemorrhage refractory to uterotonics, thus saving the life as well as preserving the future fertility of the woman. Keywords: cesarean section; postpartum haemorrhage; suture.

The effect on incisional hernia of absorbable barbed suture for midline fascial closure in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal and gastric cancers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia following abdominal surgery is a frequent complication of midline laparotomy. This complication is strongly associated with the technique and material used for suture. While a monofilament absorbable suture is recommended to prevent incisional hernia, it can lead to suture loosening or surgical-knot breakage. Although barbed sutures can be an alternative suture material in abdominal fascial closure, evidence for its safety and effectiveness is lacking. Therefore, we designed a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of absorbable barbed sutures for midline fascia closure in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal and gastric cancers in comparison with conventional absorbable monofilament sutures. METHODS: A total of 312 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for colorectal and gastric cancers will be randomly allocated to either the absorbable barbed or monofilament suture group for abdominal fascia closure in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is incisional hernia rate within 3 years after surgery, as verified by physical examination and computed tomography. Postoperative complications, including surgical site infection, postoperative pain, and quality of life, will be compared between two groups as secondary outcomes. The investigator will examine the patients until discharge and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial to compare absorbable barbed sutures with monofilament sutures for midline fascia closure in minimally invasive surgery. If absorbable barbed sutures demonstrate superior results to those of monofilament sutures, this type of suture material may be recommended as an alternative option for abdominal fascia closure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: KCT0007069. Registered on January 30, 2023.