Effect of treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency using rapid palatal expansion on oral health-related quality of life in children: complementary results for a controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of rapid palatal expansion (RPE) using Haas-type expanders on children's oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) and compare said effect with that previously reported for the use of Hyrax-type expanders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty participants aged 8-10 years with transverse maxillary deficiency were treated using Haas appliances. OHRQOL was measured using the CPQ8 - 10 before RPE, during RPE (T1), at the end of RPE (T2), and 1 month after appliance removal (T3). Generalized mixed models were fitted to assess the effect of the Haas-type expander compared to previously collected data (a nontreated and a Hyrax-type expander-treated group). RESULTS: RPE with Haas-type appliances had a negative impact on overall OHRQOL at T1 and T2 (P = 0.001), and a positive impact at T3 (P = 0.001). The Haas-type expander had a significantly greater negative impact on OHRQOL than the Hyrax-type appliance during RPE. At T1, overall scores using the Haas-type expander were 1.08 times the scores using the Hyrax-type expander (i.e., 8% increase; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17; P = 0.033). Patients using the Haas appliance had 1.24 times the scores of those using Hyrax-type devices for the oral symptoms domain at T1 (i.e., 24% increase; 95% CI, 1.06-1.46; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Correction of the transverse maxillary deficiency by RPE using the Haas appliance in children 8-10 years improves OHRQOL. The Haas- and Hyrax-type devices temporarily worsen OHRQOL during treatment, however, the negative impact is less with the Hyrax-type expander than with the Haas-type expander, because it causes fewer negative oral symptoms. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: From a patient-centered perspective, the use of the Hyrax over the Haas appliance may be suggested as it causes less negative oral symptoms during use.

Adult Herbst-multibracket appliance treatment-how stable are the results very long term?

AIM: To investigate the post-treatment (Tx) changes (≥ 15 years) in adult Class II patients treated with Herbst appliance and subsequently a multibracket appliance (MBA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Of 51 potential patients 31 could be located and participated (19 II:1 and 12 II:2). At a mean age of 21.8 ±â€…7.3 years (T0), Herbst-MBA Tx had been started. The mean post-Tx observation period was 19.8 ±â€…3.6 years. Study models from before and after Tx (T1, mean age: 23.6 ±â€…7.4 years), after 3.0 ±â€…2.8 years of retention (T2, mean age: 26.8 ±â€…8.3 years) as well as after recall (T3, mean age: 43.4 ±â€…7.5 years) were evaluated using the PAR index as well as standard occlusal variables. RESULTS: Pre-Tx, the mean values of the 31 participants were: PAR score = 26.1 ±â€…9.6 points, Class II molar relationship (MR) = 0.7 ±â€…0.2 cusp widths (CW), overjet = 6.9 ±â€…2.3 mm and overbite = 4.8 ±â€…2.6 mm. After Tx, the mean PAR score was 5.3 ±â€…2.8. A Class I MR (0.0 ±â€…0.1 CW) was present while overjet and overbite had decreased to 2.1 ±â€…0.7 and 1.3 ±â€…0.8 mm, respectively. At recall (19.8 ±â€…3.6 years post-Tx), a slight PAR score increase (+ 3.1 points) had occurred (final value: 8.4 ±â€…3.7); this was mainly due to mild increases in overjet, overbite (final values: 3.3 ±â€…1.4 mm and 2.5 ±â€…1.7 mm) and changes in sagittal MR (0.2 ±â€…0.2 CW). LIMITATIONS: The sample size and the participation rate as well as the unavailability of a comparable control group can be considered as limitations. In addition, no long-term radiographic data could be obtained, and the retention protocol was not uniform. The majority of these issues, however, should be acceptable to due to the duration of the observation period and the uniqueness of the data. CONCLUSION: In the present sample, Herbst-MBA Tx enabled Class II correction in adults with very good occlusal long-term stability.

Comparison between clear aligners and twin-block in treating class II malocclusion in children: a retrospective study.

The study herein evaluated and compared the efficacy of Clear Aligners (CA) and Twin-Block (TB) appliances as the early orthodontic treatments of developing class II division 1 malocclusion. Twenty-four patients each for CA (11.73 ± 0.33 y) and TB (11.87 ± 0.34 y) groups were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The cephalometric X-rays and intraoral photos were taken for the patients after nearly 12 months of treatment. Treatment impacts were evaluated by the molar correction and overjet reduction. The vertical and sagittal changes were analyzed through cephalometric measurements. Sella-nasion-point B angle (SNB), point A-nasion-point B angle (ANB), Wits Appraisal (AO-BO) and overjet were statistically significant regarding the sagittal changes analyzed before and after the treatments in both groups, respectively. So, no significant difference was noted in the sagittal changes between CA and TB groups. However, for the vertical changes, OP (occlusal plane) angle of CA group and OP angle, AFH (anterior facial height) and PFH (posterior facial height) of TB group were statistically significant. Moreover, the Z angle and cranial facial difficulty (C.F. difficulty) were also statistically significant in both groups. Class II children with retrognathic mandible are effectively treated by employing the CA, which has almost the same impact as of TB in sagittal and vertical changes. Resultantly, the patient profile is improved. The CA and TB treatments thus minimize the subsequent treatment difficulty by reducing the C.F. difficulty.

Wilson curve modification in permanent dentition: a retrospective comparison between clear aligners and continuous archwire treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate leveling of the Curve of Wilson (COW) by two different treatment appliances (clear aligners [CA] and continuous archwire fixed appliances [FA]) in a permanent dentition sample of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digital casts of 40 patients (CA group = 20 patients; FA group = 20 patients) were collected. Angular values for COW, right and left vertical height difference of lower first molars, and linear distance between lower teeth and the WALA ridge were analyzed for pre- (T1), posttreatment (T2) and on final virtual (ClinCheck) models (T2-CC) of the CA group. An unpaired t-test was used to evaluate significant intergroup differences (P < .05), while a paired t-test was used for posttreatment CA intragroup comparison. RESULTS: FA group showed better control of second molar crown positions compared to CA group (47-WALA = -0.2 ± 0.1 mm, 37-WALA = -0.6 ± 0.3 mm). No significant difference was detected for linear distance of lower first molars and the WALA ridge or for vertical height difference. CA group showed a greater reduction of distance between lower premolars and the WALA ridge (mean difference: -0.5 mm for both 45-WALA and 35-WALA; mean difference: -0.5 mm for 44-WALA, -0.6 mm for 34-WALA). Predictability for the CA group was high for every measurement (87% Right COW, 89% Left COW, 88% 46 Vertical Diff, 87% 36 Vertical Diff). CONCLUSIONS: Clear aligner and continuous archwire mechanics were effective in leveling COW. FA was more effective in changing crown position of lower second molars with respect to the WALA ridge, while CA provided a greater distance reduction between lower premolars and WALA ridges compared to FA.

Miniscrew anchorage versus Class II elastics for maxillary arch distalization using clear aligners.

OBJECTIVES: To identify whether intramaxillary miniscrew anchorage could achieve a better maxillary arch distalization effect in clear aligner treatment compared to Class II elastics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty adult patients with Class II dentition who were treated with whole maxillary arch distalization using clear aligners were collected. Either intramaxillary miniscrew anchorage (miniscrew group, n = 17) or intermaxillary Class II elastics (Class II elastic group, n = 13) were used to support maxillary arch distalization. Three-dimensional predicted and achieved displacements, and angular changes of maxillary posterior teeth and anterior teeth, were measured and compared. RESULTS: The achieved distalization efficiency was 36.2%-43.9% in the posterior teeth and the retraction efficiency was 36.9%-49.4% in the anterior teeth. No statistically significant differences were found in maxillary arch distalization efficiency between the groups. The miniscrew group achieved less incisor extrusion and posterior tooth distal tipping than the Class II elastic group. Both groups achieved comparable arch expansion, posterior tooth buccal inclination, and anterior tooth lingual inclination. CONCLUSIONS: Intramaxillary miniscrew anchorage and intermaxillary Class II elastics achieved comparable efficiency in maxillary arch distalization. However, the miniscrew anchorage showed better vertical control in anterior teeth and mesiodistal tipping control in posterior teeth.

Comparison of alveolar bone morphology after expansion with hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the buccal and palatal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth produced by hybrid hyrax (HH) and conventional hyrax (CH) expanders in growing patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 32 patients with posterior crossbites in the late mixed dentition was recruited and randomly allocated into two groups. Group HH was composed of 18 individuals with a mean age of 10.7 years (six female, 12 male) treated with a hybrid expander with two anterior parasagittal miniscrews. Group CH was composed of 14 individuals with a mean age of 11.4 years (six female, eight male) treated with a conventional Hyrax expander. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exams were obtained before expansion (T1) and after 11 months when the expander was removed (T2). Buccal and palatal bone plate thickness and height of maxillary posterior teeth were measured. Intergroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney tests (P < .05). RESULTS: The CH group showed greater decreases of the buccal bone plate height (mean change: 1.27 mm) at the maxillary first premolars compared to the HH group (mean change: 0.11 mm, P = .001). No intergroup difference was found for changes in the buccal and palatal bone thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid expanders showed a tendency to cause less negative impact on the buccal bone plate height of first premolars compared to conventional Hyrax expanders. However, the difference was not clinically significant. Both hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders are safe for the alveolar bone morphology in the late mixed dentition.

Optimization of three-dimensional printing parameters for orthodontic applications.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of build orientation, increased layer thickness, and dental crowding on the trueness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed models, and to evaluate how these parameters affect the fit of thermoformed appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six dental models were printed horizontally and vertically on the building platform using different 3D-printing technologies: (1) a stereolithography (SLA) printer with layer thicknesses of 160 µm and 300 µm and (2) a digital light processing (DLP) printer with layer thicknesses of 100 µm and 200 µm. Each printed model was digitalized and superimposed on the corresponding source file using 3D rendering software, and deviations were quantified by the root mean square values. Subsequently, a total of 32 thermoformed appliances were fabricated on top of the most accurate 3D-printed models, and their fit was evaluated by digital superimposition and inspection by three blinded orthodontists. Paired t-tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Significant differences (P < .05) between printing technologies used were identified for models printed horizontally, with the SLA system achieving better trueness, especially in crowded dentitions. No significant differences between technology were found when models were printed vertically. The highest values of deviation were recorded in appliances fabricated on top of DLP-printed models. The results of the qualitative evaluation indicated that appliances fabricated on top of SLA models outperformed the DLP-modeled appliances. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional printing with increased layer height seems to produce accurate working models for orthodontic applications.

Evaluation of maxillary dimensional changes in the mixed dentition: clear aligners vs acrylic expanders.

OBJECTIVES: To compare changes in upper arch dimension and molar inclination between Invisalign First (IF) and removable acrylic expander (RE) treatments during the mixed dentition period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients meeting inclusion criteria underwent IF treatment and were age matched with a group that received treatment with a removable acrylic expander (RE). Intercanine width (ICW), intermolar width, arch depth, buccolingual inclination of the first molars (MI), surface area (SA) and volume (VAP) of the anterior palate, and expansion were compared before and after treatment. The predictability of expansion was calculated for the IF group. Analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess differences. RESULTS: The ICW increased significantly by 2.14 mm in the IF group and 3.49 mm in the RE group, with no significant intergroup difference. Both groups exhibited significant increases in intermolar width (P < .05), except for intermolar distopalatal width in the IF group (P = .246). Mesiobuccal rotation of the first molar was observed with IF treatment. Although SA and VAP increased in both groups, the changes were not significant for the IF group (P > .05). The RE group exhibited significantly higher increases (P < .05), with an SA increase of 34.32 mm2 and VAP increase of 119.15 mm3. MI changes were in the opposite directions. The prediction accuracy of expansion was 70.28% for canines and 34.12% for first molars. CONCLUSIONS: Both appliances effectively expanded the intercanine region in growing patients. Expansion predictability was lower in first molars than in canines for the IF group. Removable acrylic expanders could be a choice of preference for expansion targeted to the molar region.

Effects of transpalatal arch wire dimension and temporary skeletal anchorage device position on maxillary molar intrusion.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of transpalatal (TPA) wire dimension and temporary skeletal anchorage device (TSAD) position on maxillary molar intrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The maxillary molar intrusion measurement system included a maxillary acrylic model, TPA, TSADs, and a three-dimensional Force/Moment (F/M) sensor. The intrusion patterns were categorized into six groups: buccal-mesial, buccal-distal, buccal-mesiodistal, palatal-mesial, palatal-distal, and palatal-mesiodistal. TPA wire dimensions were designed to be 0.7 mm, 0.9 mm, and 1.2 mm. The force and moment loads of the maxillary first molar were measured by the F/M sensor. RESULTS: Single buccal or palatal TSADs induced torquing movement, and single mesial or distal TSADs tended to promote tipping movement. Mesiodistal TSADs would have eliminated tipping, but accentuated torquing movement. The TPA significantly reduced the force and moment experienced by the maxillary first molar along three-dimensional axes. The thicker the TPA wire, the smaller the force and moment to which the maxillary first molar was subjected. CONCLUSIONS: Precise placement of TSADs might have a substantial influence on tooth movement and should be determined in accordance with specific clinical requirements. Increasing the TPA wire dimension could diminish the tipping, torquing, and rotation during TSAD-assisted maxillary molar intrusion, but these tendencies could not be completely eliminated.

Nonsurgical synergistic full-arch vertical intrusion treatment of bimaxillary protruded hyperdivergent skeletal Class II malocclusion using aligners.

A bone-borne full-arch vertical control strategy using miniscrews was deployed with aligners to treat a case of skeletal hyperdivergent Class II malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion. Miniscrews were inserted in the posterior buccal and palatal regions and the anterior buccal region of the maxilla to distribute vertical intrusive force through the upper arch by anchoring vertical elastics from the miniscrews to the aligners. Synergetic lower anterior intrusion was completed using bilateral posterior miniscrews to counteract the extrusive force generated. Substantial full upper arch and lower anterior vertical intrusion was achieved. In conjunction with en masse anterior-posterior retraction, synergetic posterior and anterior vertical intrusion facilitated counterclockwise rotation of the mandible, creating significant esthetic improvement. Anterior vertical elastics also provided flaring of the anterior teeth, reducing the side effect of lingual tipping from en masse retraction, while successfully controlling overbite and incisor torque during space closure. The bone-borne full-arch vertical intrusion strategy can work well with aligners to address hyperdivergent skeletal Class II malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion.

Skeletal effects of posterior crossbite treatment with either quad helix or rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To assess skeletal and dental effects and evaluate possible side effects of maxillary expansion with two different appliances, directly after expansion and 1 year postexpansion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with unilateral posterior crossbite (mean 9.5 ± 0.9 years) were randomized to either rapid maxillary expansion (RME) banded on the deciduous second molars and bonded to the primary canines or slow expansion with quad helix (QH) on the permanent first molars. Cone-beam computed tomography records were taken at baseline, directly after correction of the posterior crossbite and at follow-up 1 year after expansion. RESULTS: All patients were analyzed. RME opened the midpalatal suture more anteriorly and inferiorly (mean 4.1 mm) and less posteriorly and superiorly (mean 1.0 mm). No effect on midpalatal suture could be shown in the QH group after expansion, P < .001. Buccal bone width had significantly decreased (P < .001) in the QH group compared with the RME group. Buccal fenestrations and root resorption on the left first molar had a higher prevalence directly after expansion finished in the QH group (P = .0086, P = .013) but were not significant at 1-year follow-up (P = .11, P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Opening of the suture with RME was more anterior and inferior, and the QH did not open the midpalatal suture at all. More buccal bone loss and fenestrations were seen on the permanent first molar in patients treated with conventional QH than RME anchored to deciduous teeth.

Evaluation of anchorage loss after en masse retraction in orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate anchorage loss after en masse retraction in bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion patients using friction vs frictionless mechanics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion needing extraction of upper first premolars and en masse retraction with maximum anchorage were included in this two-arm, parallel, single-center, single-blinded randomized clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio using fully sealed opaque envelopes. Friction group retraction utilized elastomeric power chain between miniscrews and hooks crimped mesial to upper canines on 17 × 25 stainless steel archwire. Frictionless group used customized T-loop springs loading upper first molars indirectly anchored to miniscrews. Activation was every 4 weeks until full retraction. The primary outcome assessed was anchorage loss evaluated at cusp tip and root apex of the first molar. First molar rotation, incisor tip and torque, and root resorption of anterior teeth were evaluated on digital models and cone beam computed tomography taken before and after space closure. RESULTS: Anchorage loss at crown of first molar was significantly more in frictionless group by 2.1 mm (95% CI = -0.4 to 3.5), (P = .014), while there was no significant difference in anchorage loss at root apex between groups. Significant mesial in molar rotation of 6.672° (95% CI = 12.2-21.2), (P = 0.02) was greater in the frictionless group. Both groups showed comparable tip, torque, and root resorption values. No severe harms were reported. There was mild gingival overgrowth and inflammation in the frictionless group due to T-loop irritation. CONCLUSIONS: Extra anchorage considerations are needed during en masse retraction when frictionless mechanics is implemented as higher anchorage loss and molar rotation were detected. No difference in tip, torque, and root resorption was observed.

Influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp utilization on deep bite correction and root length in adults.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp use on skeletal deep overbite correction and root length and volume of maxillary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 60 adults with skeletal deep overbite. Patients were divided into three groups: Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with precision bite ramps (Invisalign with Bite Ramps [IBR] = 12), Invisalign with no bite ramps (INBR = 22), and full-fixed appliances (FFA = 26). Cone beam computed tomography records at T1 (pretreatment) and T2 (posttreatment) were used to measure eight skeletal, nine dental, and three soft-tissue cephalometric variables. Maxillary anterior teeth root length (mm), root volume (mm3), and percent root volume loss between T1 and T2 (%) were also recorded. RESULTS: Significant changes from T1 to T2 among the three groups were seen in ANB(o), lower face height (%), ODI (overbite depth indicator) (o), and U1-SN (o). Reduction in root length was significantly less (P < .001) in the INBR and IBR groups compared to the FFA group. Reduction in root volume and percent volume loss were significantly higher in the INBR group compared to the IBR group (P < .001), but the difference between the two Invisalign groups and the FFA group was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal deep overbite correction using Invisalign with or without bite ramps is comparable to FFA. Reduction in root length was significantly less with Invisalign compared to FFA. Bite ramps influenced root volume and volume loss but not root length.

Vertical and transverse treatment effects of Invisalign First system compared to Hyrax maxillary expanders with fixed appliances in mixed dentition patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare vertical and transverse changes in mixed dentition patients treated with the Invisalign First System (IFS) to those treated with a banded hyrax expander with fixed appliances (Hyrax) and control groups, and to assess the efficiency rate of dental arch expansion with IFS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 80 mixed dentition patients, with 40 in each group (IFS and Hyrax) and 40 controls from the American Association of Orthodontists Foundation Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collection. Skeletal and dental vertical dimension changes and arch width changes between pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) were evaluated. RESULTS: Age at T1, time interval (T1-T2), sex, and Angle class did not significantly differ among the groups. Mandibular plane angle changes showed a similar reduction for the control and IFS groups, with no changes in the Hyrax group. However, the differences among the three groups did not reach statistical significance (P = .06). The Hyrax group showed significantly greater expansion in maxillary intermolar width compared to the IFS group, 4.4 vs 2.5 mm, respectively. The efficiency of maxillary expansion using IFS ranged from 52.3% to 76.87%. CONCLUSIONS: During the mixed dentition stage, no significant changes occurred in vertical dimensions among the control, Hyrax, and IFS groups. Although there was a trend suggesting a greater reduction in mandibular plane angle in the IFS group compared to the Hyrax group, this may not be clinically significant given the less than 1° difference. IFS can be a viable option for addressing mild arch width deficiencies, with a predictable increase in intermolar width of approximately 2.5 mm.

MARPE expander activation load with different configurations of extender arms heights: in-vitro evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the load mini-implants exert on the artificial bone when expanding the MARPE EX in three different extension arm configurations. METHODS: A device simulating the human palate was fabricated and attached to a universal testing machine, for conducting tests with different MARPE expanders (n=5): non-adjustable/control (MARPE SL, Peclab) or with low, intermediate, and high extender arms (MARPE EX, Peclab). The expanders were manually activated until failure of the device occurred, and maximum load values were recorded. Load averages were also calculated for every five activations until the twentieth activation. RESULTS: The generalized linear mixed model for repeated measures over time showed that there was significant increase in load with activations for all expanders (p=0.0004). Up to the twentieth activation, the expander with low extender arms presented higher load than the others, while the expander with high extender arms showed lower load values (p<0.05). There was no significant difference among expanders regarding the number of activations (p=0.0586), although there was a trend towards fewer activations until fracture for the control expander. It was observed that the higher the configuration, the lower the force the mini-implants delivered to the bone. The control expander provided a force magnitude similar to that of the adjustable expander when positioned at the intermediate height. CONCLUSIONS: The activation load of MARPE expanders is influenced by the type of presentation of the extensor arms, with higher configurations resulting in lower force delivered by the mini-implants to the bone.

[Design of nonlinear locking mechanism for shape memory alloy archwire of miniature orthodontic device].

The locking mechanism between bracket and shape memory alloy (SMA) archwire in the newly developed domestic orthodontic device is the key to controlling the precise alignment of the teeth. To meet the demand of locking force in clinical treatment, the tightening torque angle of the locking bolt and the required torque magnitude need to be precisely designed. For this purpose, a design study of the locking mechanism is carried out to analyze the correspondence between the tightening torque angle and the locking force and to determine the effective torque value, which involves complex coupling of contact, material and geometric nonlinear characteristics. Firstly, a simulation analysis based on parametric orthogonal experimental design is carried out to determine the SMA hyperelastic material parameters for the experimental data of SMA archwire with three-point bending. Secondly, a two-stage fine finite-element simulation model for bolt tightening and archwire pulling is established, and the nonlinear analysis is converged through the optimization of key contact parameters. Finally, multiple sets of calibration experiments are carried out for three tightening torsion angles. The comparison results between the design analysis and the calibration experiments show that the deviation between the design analysis and the calibration mean value of the locking force in each case is within 10%, and the design analysis method is valid and reliable. The final tightening torque angle for clinical application is determined to be 10° and the rated torque is 2.8 N∙mm. The key data obtained can be used in the design of clinical protocols and subsequent mechanical optimization of novel orthodontic devices, and the research methodology can provide a valuable reference for force analysis of medical devices containing SMA materials.

Evaluating the efficiency of mandibular molar protraction using Herbst appliances versus temporary anchorage devices: a retrospective case-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Mandibular second premolar agenesis is a common problem in orthodontics and is often treated in conjunction with maxillary counterbalancing extractions. However, in cases without maxillary crowding or dental protrusion, space closure may pose challenges leading to compromised occlusal results or patient profile. Multiple techniques have been described to treat these patients; nevertheless, there is a paucity of data comparing effectiveness of space closure utilizing various anchorage techniques. The goal of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the Herbst device during mandibular molar protraction and compare it to the use of temporary anchorage device (TADs) in patients with mandibular second premolar agenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 33 patients with mandibular premolar agenesis treated without maxillary extractions. Of these patients, 21 were treated with protraction Herbst devices and 12 with TADs. Changes in molar and incisor positions, skeletal base positions and occlusal plane angulations were assessed on pretreatment (T0) and post-treatment (T1) lateral cephalograms. Scans/photographs at T0 and T1 were used to evaluate canine relationship changes representing anchorage control. Space closure and breakage/failure rates were also compared. Data was analyzed with paired and unpaired t-tests at the significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Within the Herbst group, changes in mandibular central incisor uprighting and mandibular molar crown angulations were statistically significant. However, no significant differences were noted between the Herbst and TAD groups. Protraction rates as well as overall treatment times were comparable (0.77 mm/month vs. 0.55 mm/month and 3.02 years vs. 2.67 years, respectively). Canine relationships were maintained or improved toward a class I in 82.85% of the Herbst sample, compared to in 66.7% of the TAD sample. Emergency visits occurred in 80.1% of the Herbst group, with cementation failures or appliance breakages as the most common reasons. CONCLUSION: The Herbst device could be a viable modality in cases with missing mandibular premolars where maximum anterior anchorage is desired, or if patients/parents are resistant to TADs. Furthermore, they could be beneficial in skeletal class II patients with mandibular deficiency who also need molar protraction. However, the increased incidence of emergency visits must be considered when treatment is planned.

The dimensions of preformed nickel-titanium archwires measured at the bracket positions corresponding to the central incisor, canine, and first molar.

INTRODUCTION: Variation in the thickness of commercially available preformed rectangular archwires at the bracket positions has not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, this study measured the edgewise (height) and flatwise (width) dimensions of preformed rectangular nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires at bracket positions corresponding to the central incisor, canine, and first molar and compared them among bracket positions. METHODS: Sixty types of preformed rectangular NiTi mandibular archwires indicated as 0.019 × 0.025-in were obtained from 14 manufacturers. The height and width dimensions of archwires were measured at 4 points (3 bracket positions corresponding to the central incisor, canine, and first molar, and 1 terminal end) of each side of each archwire using a micrometer and compared with the indicated dimensions using 1-sample t tests. Furthermore, the measured dimensions were compared among the 3 bracket positions using a 1-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post-hoc test. RESULTS: The measured dimensions were significantly smaller than the indicated dimensions for all points except the central incisor point for height and significantly smaller than the indicated dimensions for all points for width. Comparisons among points showed that for height, the central incisor point was significantly larger than the first molar and terminal points. However, no significant differences were found for width at any point. CONCLUSIONS: The measured dimensions of preformed NiTi archwires at the bracket positions were generally smaller than the indicated dimensions, with variations observed not only among products but also among manufacturers.

Assessment of the unwanted tooth movement associated with an extended maxillary fixed retainer (3D analysis).

BACKGROUND: Posttreatment changes after orthodontic treatment are challenging. One of the main reasons for such a phenomenon is the lack of patient compliance with removable retainers especially in the maxillary arch, due to palatal coverage, deterioration of speech, decreased masticatory efficiency, and loss of retainers. Fixed retainers have been introduced to overcome patient compliance and provide longer stable results. However, teeth still show movements when a six-unit fixed retainer is in place. Thus, in this study, an eight-unit fixed retainer was evaluated in an attempt to eliminate unwanted movements. THE AIM OF THIS RESEARCH: was to assess short-term positional changes associated with an eight-unit extended maxillary fixed retainer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-arm clinical trial was conducted to address the aim of the study. This research was approved by the institutional review board of the Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University (IORG:0008839, No-0479-8/2022). The registration date of this study was 5/06/2023. Twenty-eight patients (19.8 ± 4.5 years) who had finished the active orthodontic phase and started retention had an eight-unit extended maxillary fixed retainer that was bonded to the palatal surface of the maxillary incisors, canines, and the first premolars or the second premolars. Pre-retention and one-year post-retention intra-oral scans were made to produce STL files that were superimposed to determine the amount of tooth change. Additionally, analysis of digital casts and lateral cephalometric radiographs was performed. RESULTS: Statistically significant changes in all planes and the rotation of teeth after one year of retention were found. The upper right lateral incisor exhibited the most evident change in the vertical plane, while the upper right central incisor exhibited the greatest change overall. Minimal changes in the cast measurements were observed. Lateral cephalometric measurements showed minimal changes after one year of retention, and these changes were not statistically significant except in the interincisal angle and the angle between the upper incisor and the line connecting the A-point to the pogonion. CONCLUSION: Increasing the extension of maxillary fixed retainers did not eliminate unwanted tooth movement in the first year of retention.

Homemade CAD-CAM surgical guide for palatal mini-screw insertion for maxillary molar distalization providing anchorage. A two times original protocol / Pose de mini-vis palatines par chirurgie guidée à l'aide d'un guide CFAO in-office. Description d'un protocole original en deux temps.

Introduction: Temporary Anchorage Devices have revolutionized our approach to anchorage management. However, their placement may carry risks, such as root perforation, damage to the periodontal ligament, buccal-nasal communication, etc. The aim of this article is to describe an original protocol in two times for the placement of a palatal mini-screw through guided surgery using a guide created by Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) followed by the transfer of placement information to the laboratory for the fabrication of a Custom Medical Device (CMD) for distalization. Materials and Methods: A two-stage protocol is described and illustrated step by step. Phase 1 comprises 7 steps (including superimposition of maxillary cast and profile teleradiography, surgical tray design), followed by phase 2, which involves 3 final steps (including production of impression for laboratory, production of laboratory model with transfer of mini-screw position). Results: Although the position of the mini screws remains precise, a discrepancy between the planning and the intraoral situation exists. The addition of a second step therefore enables the distalization appliance to be fitted precisely and without pitfalls. Finally, this protocol ensures safe placement, making work easier for the practitioner and, ultimately, for the patient. Conclusion: In a two-stage process, the placement of palatal mini screws through guided surgery using a guide created by CAD/CAM followed by the transfer of this information to the laboratory for the fabrication of a CMD for distalization proves to be a relevant approach.

Introduction: Les dispositifs d'ancrage temporaires ont révolutionné notre vision de la gestion de l'ancrage. En revanche, leur mise en place peut comporter certains risques (perforation radiculaire, communication bucco-nasale, lésions vasculaires…). Cet article vise à décrire un protocole original, en deux temps, de pose de mini-vis palatine par chirurgie guidée à l'aide d'un guide réalisé par conception et fabrication assistée par ordinateur (CFAO) in-office suivie du transfert des informations de pose au laboratoire pour la confection d'un appareil de distalisation. Matériel et méthodes: Un protocole en deux temps est décrit pas à pas. Le temps 1 comprend sept étapes (dont le placement virtuel des mini-vis et la création de la gouttière chirurgicale), suivi du temps 2 qui implique trois étapes (dont la réalisation de l'empreinte pour le laboratoire et l'élaboration du modèle de laboratoire avec transfert de la position des mini-vis). Résultats: Bien que la pose puisse être considérée comme précise, une différence existe entre la planification et la situation clinique. L'apport d'un second temps améliore l'adaptation de l'appareil de distalisation. Enfin, ce protocole offre une pose sécurisée et apporte ainsi un confort de travail pour le praticien et, in fine, pour le patient. Conclusion: Réalisée en deux temps, la pose de mini-vis palatine par chirurgie guidée à l'aide d'un guide réalisé par CFAO in-office suivie du transfert de cette information au laboratoire pour la confection d'un appareil de distalisation s'avère être une approche pertinente.