Resistencia antibiótica de Escherichia coli y Staphylococcus saprophyticus en la infección urinaria de un hospital público / Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus saprophyticus in urinary tract infection in a public hospital

La resistencia de antibióticos puede llegar a causar una amplia morbilidad y complicaciones. Objetivo: Determinar el perfil de resistencia antimicrobiana de Escherichia Coli y de Staphylococcus Saprophyticus, en pacientes con infección urinaria hospitalizados en el servicio de Medicina Interna del Hospital Municipal Los Olivos. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo de corte transversal. Se realizó en el servicio de Medicina Interna del Hospital Municipal los Olivos (HMLO). Participantes: historia clínica de pacientes hospitalizados con infección urinaria en el servicio de Medicina Interna. Intervenciones: Según los criterios de inclusión y exclusión se obtuvieron, 96 historias clínicas (HC) del año 2013. Se utilizó un instrumento de recolección validado. Se realizó el análisis descriptivo con software estadístico STATA versión 25. Resultados: De las 96 HC, la edad promedio fue 55,04 años, los agentes microbianos más frecuentes fueron: la Escherichia coli con 85,3%, Staphylococcus saprophyticus 4.2% y Klebsiella pneumoniae 3,1%. La prevalencia de productores de betalactamasa espectro extendido (BLEE) fue 10,4%. Los antibióticos más resistentes fueron: trimetoprim/sulfametoxazol 89,6%, ampicilina 86%, piperacilina 84,6%, tetraciclina 79,2% y ciprofloxacino 70,8%. Los antibióticos más sensibles fueron: amikacina 100%, imipenem 100%, ertapenem 98%, meropenem 96% y piperacilina/tazobactam 96%. Conclusión: El uropatógeno más frecuente en pacientes con ITU hospitalizados fue la E. coli. Los antibióticos que presentaron resistencia a la E. coli fueron: trimetoprim/sulfametoxazol, ampicilina, piperacilina, tetraciclina y ciprofloxacino, y para el S. Saprophyticus fueron: amoxicilina/ ácido clavulánico, trimetoprim/sulfametoxazol, ceftriaxona y ciprofloxacino(AU)

Resistance to antibiotics may actually cause extensive morbidity and complications. Objective: To determine the antimicrobial resistance profile of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus saprophyticus, in patients with urinary infection hospitalized in the Internal Medicine service of the Los Olivos Municipal Hospital. Methods: Descriptive, retrospective cross-sectional study. It was carried out in the Internal Medicine service of the Los Olivos Municipal Hospital (HMLO). Participants: clinical history of hospitalized patients with urinary infection in the Internal Medicine service. Interventions: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 96 clinical records (HC) from 2013 were obtained. A validated collection instrument was used. Descriptive analysis was performed with STATA version 25 statistical software. Results: Of the 96 CHs, the average age was 55.04 years, the most frequent microbial agents were: Escherichia Coli with 85.3%, Staphylococcus saprophyticus 4.2% and Klebsiella pneumoniae 3.1%. The prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers (ESBL) was 10.4%. The most resistant antibiotics were trimethoprim / sulfamethoxazole 89.6 %, ampicillin 86 %, piperacillin 84.6 %, tetracycline 79.2 % and ciprofloxacin 70.8 %. The most sensitive antibiotics were: amikacin 100%, imipenem 100%, ertapenem 98%, meropenem 96% and piperacillin / tazobactam 96%. Conclusion: The most common uropathogen in hospitalized UTI patients was E. coli. The antibiotics that showed resistance to E. coli were: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, piperacillin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin, and for S. saprophyticus they were: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, trimethoprim / sulfamethoxazole, ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin(AU)

Uso racional de antibióticos para tratamento de infecção urinária em porcas / Rational use of antibiotics for treatment of urinary infection in sows

O caráter endêmico das infecções urinárias (IU) em porcas faz com que seja rotina o uso de terapias antimicrobianas coletivas via ração, as quais geram subdoses que não promovem a cura e contribuem para a seleção de bactérias resistentes aos antibióticos. O uso de terapia individual é procedimento mais adequado a ser realizado nos animais com IU. Com este estudo objetivou-se avaliar a ocorrência de IU em matrizes alojadas na região Oeste do Paraná e a eficácia e custo-benefício do tratamento individual. Foram selecionadas 353 fêmeas, de cinco rebanhos distintos, submetidas à coleta de urina no terço final da gestação pelo método de micção espontânea. As amostras foram analisadas física e quimicamente com o uso de tiras reagentes, sendo que a presença de nitrito foi determinante de positividade para IU. Os animais com IU tiveram a urina submetida a avaliação bacteriológica, foram tratados com medicação parenteral (marbofloxacina - dose única - 8 mg/kg) e submetidos a nova coleta de urina 24h, 48h e sete dias após a primeira. IU foi observada em 4,53% das fêmeas avaliadas (16/353). Escherichia coli e Stretococcus sp. foram os agentes isolados com maior frequência. Sete dias após o uso da marbofloxacina 87,5% (14/16) dos animais foram negativos para IU, o que demonstra a eficácia do controle parenteral da IU. O diagnóstico associado à terapia individual em detrimento da medicação coletiva apresentou custo-benefício altamente vantajoso, possibilitou reduzir drasticamente o número de animais medicados e apresentou eficiência no controle da IU. Desta forma se conclui que é possível fazer uso racional de antibióticos mediante o tratamento apenas de porcas comprovadamente positivas para IU. Isto reduz o número de animais medicados desnecessariamente e reduz o custo em função do uso de antimicrobianos apenas em animais enfermos.

The endemic character of urinary infections (UI) in sows makes collective antimicrobial therapies via feed a routine. This, however, generates sub-doses unable to heal and contribute to the selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The use of individual therapy is the most appropriate procedure to be performed on animals with UI. With this study, we aimed to evaluate the occurrence of UI in sows housed in the western region of Paraná and the efficacy and cost-benefit of individual treatment. A total of 353 females were selected from five different herds, submitted to urine collection in the final third of pregnancy by spontaneous urination method. The samples were analyzed physically and chemically with the use of reagent strips, and the presence of nitrite was a determinant for positivity for UI. The animals with UI had urine submitted to a bacteriological evaluation, were treated with parenteral medication (marbofloxacin - single dose - 8 mg/kg), and submitted to a new urine collection 24h and 48h after the first. UI was observed in 4.53% of the females evaluated (16/353). Escherichia coli and Streptococcus sp. were the most frequently isolated agents. Seven days after the use of marbofloxacin 87.5% (14/16) of the animals were negative for UI, which demonstrates the efficacy of UI parenteral control. The diagnosis associated with individual therapy at the expense of collective medication was highly cost-effective, made it possible to drastically reduce the number of medicated animals, and was efficient in controlling UI. Thus, it is concluded that it is possible to make rational use of antibiotics by treating only sows that are proven to be positive for UI. This reduces the number of unnecessarily medicated animals and reduces the cost due to the use of antimicrobials only in sick animals.

Consenso Argentino intersociedades de Infección Urinaria 2018-2019 - Parte I / Consenso Argentino Intersociedades de Infección Urinaria 2018-2019 - Parte I

La Sociedad Argentina de Infectología y otras sociedades científicas han actualizado estas recomendaciones utilizando, además de información internacional, la de un estudio multicéntrico prospectivo sobre infecciones del tracto urinario del adulto realizado en Argentina durante 2016-2017. La bacteriuria asintomática debe ser tratada solo en embarazadas, a quienes también se las debe investigar sistemáticamente; los antibióticos de elección son nitrofurantoína, amoxicilina, amoxicilina-clavulánico, cefalexina y trimetoprima-sulfametoxazol. Ante procedimientos que impliquen lesión con sangrado del tracto urinario se recomienda solicitar urocultivo para pesquisar bacteriuria asintomática, y, si resultara positivo, administrar antimicrobianos según sensibilidad desde inmediatamente antes hasta 24 horas luego de la intervención. En mujeres, la cistitis puede ser tratada con nitrofurantoina, cefalexina, o fosfomicina y no se recomienda usar trimetoprima-sulfametoxazol o fluoroquinolonas; en pielonefritis puede emplearse ciprofloxacina, cefixima o cefalexina si el tratamiento es ambulatorio o ceftriaxona, cefazolina o amikacina si es hospitalario. En los hombres, las infecciones del tracto urinario se consideran siempre complicadas. Se recomienda tratamiento con nitrofurantoina o cefalexina por 7 días, o bien monodosis con fosfomicina. Para la pielonefritis en hombres se sugiere ciprofloxacina, ceftriaxona o cefixima si el tratamiento es ambulatorio y ceftriaxona o amikacina si es hospitalario. Se sugiere tratar las prostatitis bacterianas agudas con ceftriaxona o gentamicina. En cuanto a las prostatitis bacterianas crónicas, si bien su tratamiento de elección hasta hace poco fueron las fluoroquinolonas, la creciente resistencia y ciertas dudas sobre la seguridad de estas drogas obligan a considerar el uso de alternativas como fosfomicina.

The Argentine Society of Infectious Diseases and other scientific societies have updated these recommendations based on data on urinary tract infections in adults obtained from a prospective multicenter study conducted in Argentina during 2016-2017. Asymptomatic bacteriuria should be treated only in pregnant women, who should also be systematically investigated; the antibiotics of choice are nitrofurantoin, amoxicillin, clavulanic/amoxicillin, cephalexin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In procedures involving injury to the urinary tract with bleeding, it is recommended to request urine culture and, in the presence of bacteriuria, antimicrobial treatment according to sensitivity should be prescribed from immediately before up to 24 hours after the intervention. In women, cystitis can be treated with nitrofurantoin, cephalexin or fosfomycin, while trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolones are not recommended; pyelonephritis can be treated with ciprofloxacin, cefixime or cephalexin in ambulatory women or ceftriaxone, cefazolin or amikacin in those who are hospitalized. In men, urinary tract infections are always considered complicated; nitrofurantoin or cephalexin are recommended for 7 days, alternatively fosfomycin should be given in a single dose. In men, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone or cefixime are suggested for pyelonephritis on ambulatory treatment whereas ceftriaxone or amikacin are recommended for hospitalized patients. Acute bacterial prostatitis can be treated with ceftriaxone or gentamicin. Fluoroquinolones were the choice treatment for chronic bacterial prostatitis until recently; they are no longer recommended due to the increasing resistance and recent concerns regarding the safety of these drugs; alternative antibiotics such as fosfomycin are to be considered.

Consenso Argentino intersociedades de Infección Urinaria 2018-2019 - Parte II / Argentine Intersociety Consensus on Urinary Infection 2018-2019 - Part II

La segunda parte del Consenso Argentino Intersociedades de Infección Urinaria incluye el análisis de situaciones especiales. En pacientes con sonda vesical se debe solicitar urocultivo solo cuando hay signo-sintomatología de infección del tracto urinario, antes de instrumentaciones de la vía urinaria o como control en pacientes post-trasplante renal. El tratamiento empírico recomendado en pacientes sin factores de riesgo es cefalosporinas de tercera generación o aminoglucósidos. Las infecciones del tracto urinario asociadas a cálculos son siempre consideradas complicadas. En caso de obstrucción con urosepsis, deberá realizarse drenaje de urgencia por vía percutánea o ureteral. En pacientes con stents o prótesis ureterales, como catéteres doble J, el tratamiento empírico deberá basarse en la epidemiología, los antibióticos previos y el estado clínico. Antes del procedimiento de litotricia extracorpórea se recomienda pesquisar la bacteriuria y, si es positiva, administrar profilaxis antibiótica según el antibiograma. Cefalosporinas de primera generación o aminoglúcosidos son opciones válidas. Se recomienda aplicar profilaxis antibiótica con cefalosporinas de primera generación o aminoglúcosidos antes de la nefrolitotomía percutánea. La biopsia prostática trans-rectal puede asociarse a complicaciones infecciosas, como infecciones del tracto urinario o prostatitis aguda, principalmente por Escherichia coli u otras enterobacterias. En pacientes sin factores de riesgo para gérmenes multirresistentes y urocultivo negativo se recomienda realizar profilaxis con amikacina o ceftriaxona endovenosas. En pacientes con urocultivo positivo, se realizará profilaxis según antibiograma, 24 horas previas a 24 horas post-procedimiento. Para el tratamiento dirigido de la prostatitis post-biopsia trans-rectal, los carbapenémicos durante 3-4 semanas son el tratamiento de elección.

The second part of the Inter-Society Argentine Consensus on Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) includes the analysis of special situations. In patients with urinary catheter, urine culture should be requested only in the presence of UTI symptomatology, before instrumentation of the urinary tract, or as a post-transplant control. The antibiotics recommended for empirical treatment in patients without risk factors are third-generation cephalosporins or aminoglycosides. UTIs associated with stones are always considered complicated. In case of obstruction with urosepsis, an emergency drainage should be performed via a percutaneous nefrostomy or ureteral stenting. In patients with stents or ureteral prostheses, such as double J catheters, empirical treatment should be based on epidemiology, prior antibiotics, and clinical status. Before the extracorporeal lithotripsy procedure, bacteriuria should be investigated and antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered in case of positive result, according to the antibiogram. First generation cephalosporins or aminoglycosides are valid alternatives. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis with first-generation cephalosporins or aminoglycosides before percutaneous nephrolithotomy is recommended. Transrectal prostatic biopsy can be associated with infectious complications, such as UTI or acute prostatitis, mainly due to Escherichia coli or other enterobacteria. In patients without risk factors for multiresistant bacteria and negative urine culture, prophylaxis with intravenous amikacin or ceftriaxone is recommended. In patients with positive urine culture, prophylaxis will be performed according to the antibiogram, from 24 hours before to 24 hours post-procedure. For the targeted treatment of post-transrectal biopsy prostatitis, carbapenems for 3-4 weeks are the treatment of choice.

[Consenso Argentino Intersociedades de Infección Urinaria 2018-2019 - Parte I]. / Argentine Intersociety Consensus on Urinary Infection 2018-2019 - Part I.

The Argentine Society of Infectious Diseases and other scientific societies have updated these recommendations based on data on urinary tract infections in adults obtained from a prospective multicenter study conducted in Argentina during 2016-2017. Asymptomatic bacteriuria should be treated only in pregnant women, who should also be systematically investigated; the antibiotics of choice are nitrofurantoin, amoxicillin, clavulanic/amoxicillin, cephalexin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In procedures involving injury to the urinary tract with bleeding, it is recommended to request urine culture and, in the presence of bacteriuria, antimicrobial treatment according to sensitivity should be prescribed from immediately before up to 24 hours after the intervention. In women, cystitis can be treated with nitrofurantoin, cephalexin or fosfomycin, while trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolones are not recommended; pyelonephritis can be treated with ciprofloxacin, cefixime or cephalexin in ambulatory women or ceftriaxone, cefazolin or amikacin in those who are hospitalized. In men, urinary tract infections are always considered complicated; nitrofurantoin or cephalexin are recommended for 7 days, alternatively fosfomycin should be given in a single dose. In men, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone or cefixime are suggested for pyelonephritis on ambulatory treatment whereas ceftriaxone or amikacin are recommended for hospitalized patients. Acute bacterial prostatitis can be treated with ceftriaxone or gentamicin. Fluoroquinolones were the choice treatment for chronic bacterial prostatitis until recently; they are no longer recommended due to the increasing resistance and recent concerns regarding the safety of these drugs; alternative antibiotics such as fosfomycin are to be considered.

La Sociedad Argentina de Infectología y otras sociedades científicas han actualizado estas recomendaciones utilizando, además de información internacional, la de un estudio multicéntrico prospectivo sobre infecciones del tracto urinario del adulto realizado en Argentina durante 2016-2017. La bacteriuria asintomática debe ser tratada solo en embarazadas, a quienes también se las debe investigar sistemáticamente; los antibióticos de elección son nitrofurantoína, amoxicilina, amoxicilina-clavulánico, cefalexina y trimetoprimasulfametoxazol. Ante procedimientos que impliquen lesión con sangrado del tracto urinario se recomienda solicitar urocultivo para pesquisar bacteriuria asintomática, y, si resultara positivo, administrar antimicrobianos según sensibilidad desde inmediatamente antes hasta 24 horas luego de la intervención. En mujeres, la cistitis puede ser tratada con nitrofurantoina, cefalexina, o fosfomicina y no se recomienda usar trimetoprima-sulfametoxazol o fluoroquinolonas; en pielonefritis puede emplearse ciprofloxacina, cefixima o cefalexina si el tratamiento es ambulatorio o ceftriaxona, cefazolina o amikacina si es hospitalario. En los hombres, las infecciones del tracto urinario se consideran siempre complicadas. Se recomienda tratamiento con nitrofurantoina o cefalexina por 7 días, o bien monodosis con fosfomicina. Para la pielonefritis en hombres se sugiere ciprofloxacina, ceftriaxona o cefixima si el tratamiento es ambulatorio y ceftriaxona o amikacina si es hospitalario. Se sugiere tratar las prostatitis bacterianas agudas con ceftriaxona o gentamicina. En cuanto a las prostatitis bacterianas crónicas, si bien su tratamiento de elección hasta hace poco fueron las fluoroquinolonas, la creciente resistencia y ciertas dudas sobre la seguridad de estas drogas obligan a considerar el uso de alternativas como fosfomicina.

[Argentine Intersociety Consensus on Urinary Infection 2018-2019 - Part II]. / Consenso Argentino Intersociedades de Infección Urinaria 2018-2019 - Parte II.

The second part of the Inter-Society Argentine Consensus on Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) includes the analysis of special situations. In patients with urinary catheter, urine culture should be requested only in the presence of UTI symptomatology, before instrumentation of the urinary tract, or as a post-transplant control. The antibiotics recommended for empirical treatment in patients without risk factors are third-generation cephalosporins or aminoglycosides. UTIs associated with stones are always considered complicated. In case of obstruction with urosepsis, an emergency drainage should be performed via a percutaneous nefrostomy or ureteral stenting. In patients with stents or ureteral prostheses, such as double J catheters, empirical treatment should be based on epidemiology, prior antibiotics, and clinical status. Before the extracorporeal lithotripsy procedure, bacteriuria should be investigated and antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered in case of positive result, according to the antibiogram. First generation cephalosporins or aminoglycosides are valid alternatives. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis with first-generation cephalosporins or aminoglycosides before percutaneous nephrolithotomy is recommended. Transrectal prostatic biopsy can be associated with infectious complications, such as UTI or acute prostatitis, mainly due to Escherichia coli or other enterobacteria. In patients without risk factors for multiresistant bacteria and negative urine culture, prophylaxis with intravenous amikacin or ceftriaxone is recommended. In patients with positive urine culture, prophylaxis will be performed according to the antibiogram, from 24 hours before to 24 hours post-procedure. For the targeted treatment of post-transrectal biopsy prostatitis, carbapenems for 3-4 weeks are the treatment of choice.

La segunda parte del Consenso Argentino Intersociedades de Infección Urinaria incluye el análisis de situaciones especiales. En pacientes con sonda vesical se debe solicitar urocultivo solo cuando hay signo-sintomatología de infección del tracto urinario, antes de instrumentaciones de la vía urinaria o como control en pacientes post-trasplante renal. El tratamiento empírico recomendado en pacientes sin factores de riesgo es cefalosporinas de tercera generación o aminoglucósidos. Las infecciones del tracto urinario asociadas a cálculos son siempre consideradas complicadas. En caso de obstrucción con urosepsis, deberá realizarse drenaje de urgencia por vía percutánea o ureteral. En pacientes con stents o prótesis ureterales, como catéteres doble J, el tratamiento empírico deberá basarse en la epidemiología, los antibióticos previos y el estado clínico. Antes del procedimiento de litotricia extracorpórea se recomienda pesquisar la bacteriuria y, si es positiva, administrar profilaxis antibiótica según el antibiograma. Cefalosporinas de primera generación o aminoglúcosidos son opciones válidas. Se recomienda aplicar profilaxis antibiótica con cefalosporinas de primera generación o aminoglúcosidos antes de la nefrolitotomía percutánea. La biopsia prostática trans-rectal puede asociarse a complicaciones infecciosas, como infecciones del tracto urinario o prostatitis aguda, principalmente por Escherichia coli u otras enterobacterias. En pacientes sin factores de riesgo para gérmenes multirresistentes y urocultivo negativo se recomienda realizar profilaxis con amikacina o ceftriaxona endovenosas. En pacientes con urocultivo positivo, se realizará profilaxis según antibiograma, 24 horas previas a 24 horas post-procedimiento. Para el tratamiento dirigido de la prostatitis post-biopsia trans-rectal, los carbapenémicos durante 3-4 semanas son el tratamiento de elección.

Exposure to sub-inhibitory ciprofloxacin and nitrofurantoin concentrations increases recA gene expression in uropathogenic Escherichia coli: The role of RecA protein as a drug target.

Sub-inhibitory concentrations (sub-MIC) of antimicrobial agents can lead to genetic changes in bacteria, modulating the expression of genes related to bacterial stress and leading to drug resistance. Herein we describe the impact of sub-MIC of ciprofloxacin and nitrofurantoin on three uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Disk-diffusion assays with different antimicrobial agents were tested to detect phenotype alterations, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to analyze the expression of ompF and recA genes. Significant reduction on the susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and nitrofurantoin was detected on disk diffusion test. The qRT-PCR results revealed a 1.2-4.7 increase in recA expression in all E. coli studied, while the ompF expression varied. Because RecA was pointed as an important component to the development of drug resistance, molecular docking studies were performed with three experimentally known inhibitors of this enzyme. These studies aimed to understand the inhibitory binding mode of such compounds. The results confirmed the ADP/ATP binding site as a potential site of inhibitor recognition and a binding mode based on π-stacking interactions with Tyr103 and hydrogen bonds with Tyr264. These findings can be useful for guiding the search and design of new antimicrobial agents, mainly concerning the treatment of infections with resistant bacterial strains.

Eficácia da água versus antisséptico para limpeza periuretral na realização do cateterismo urinário de demora: revisão sistemática / Water effect versus antiseptic for periurethral cleaning in the performance of indwelling urinary catheterization: a systematic review / Eficacia del agua vs. el antisptico para la limpieza periuretral en el cateterismo urinario: revisión sistemática

As infecções do trato urinário relacionadas ao cateterismo urinário de demora estão entre as mais frequentes em hospitais. Existem várias recomendações para a prevenção de infecções, porém ainda se questiona a necessidade de utilizar antissépticos para a limpeza periuretral. Objetivo: este estudo objetivou analisar as evidências, na literatura, acerca do tema. Método: foi realizada revisão sistemática utilizando-se as bases de dados Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Medline, Embase, Web of Science e Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature. Foram incluídos ensaios clínicos que avaliaram as taxas de infecção do trato urinário/bacteriúria e que utilizaram soluções antissépticas e água na limpeza periuretral. Resultados: de 211 estudos, três foram considerados metodologicamente adequados de acordo com a Escala de Jadad. Todos os estudos mostraram que não há diferenças significativas nas taxas de ITU/ bacteriúria quando comparado o uso de água com antisséptico (clorexidina ou povidona-iodo). Conclusão: concluiu-se que o uso de água na limpeza periuretral parece não aumentar o risco de adquirir infecção/bacteriúria.(AU)

Urinary tract infections related to indwelling urinary catheterization are among the most frequent in hospitals. There are many recommendations for the prevention of infections, but the need to use antiseptics for periurethral cleaning is still questioned. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the evidence on the theme in the literature. Method: A systematic review was performed using the following databases: Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature. Clinical trials were included which assessed the infection rates of the urinary tract/bacteriuria and which used antiseptic solutions and water in the periurethral cleaning. Results: Of 211 studies, three were considered as methodologically adequate according to the Jadad Scale. All of the studies showed that there is no significant difference in the rates of UTI/bacteriuria when compared to the use of water with antiseptic (chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine). Conclusion: It was concluded that the use of water in the periurethral cleaning seems not to augment the risk of acquiring infections/bacteriuria.(AU)

Las infecciones del tracto urinario relacionadas con el cateterismo urinario permanente se encuentran entre las infecciones hospitalarias más comunes. Existen recomendaciones para la prevención de infecciones, pero aún se cuestiona la necesidad de usar antisépticos para la limpieza periuretral. Objetivo: analizar la evidencia en la literatura sobre el tema. Método: se realizó una revisión sistemática utilizando las bases de datos de la Biblioteca Virtual de Salud, Medline, Embase, Web of Science y Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature. Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos que evaluaron las tasas de infección urinaria / bacteriuria y el uso de soluciones antisépticas y agua para la limpieza periuretral. Resultados: de 211 estudios, tres se consideraron metodológicamente adecuados según la escala de Jadad. Todos los estudios mostraron que no hay diferencias significativas en las tasas de infección urinaria / bacteriuria en comparación con el uso de agua antiséptica (clorhexidina o povidona yodada). Conclusión: el uso de agua para la limpieza periuretral no parece aumentar el riesgo de contraer infección / bacteriuria.(AU)

Absceso renal en pediatría: reporte de 2 casos / Kidney abscess in pediatrics: 2 case reports / Abscesso renal em pediatria: relato de dois casos

Resumen Introducción. Los abscesos renales tras una infección urinaria en pediatría no son frecuentes. Reporte de los casos. Se trata de dos niñas con infección urinaria, de 13 y 8 meses, que desarrollan abscesos renales. En ambas, después de un uroanálisis sugestivo de infección urinaria, se inicia manejo empírico con amikacina. El reporte del urocultivo muestra crecimiento de Escherichia coli (E. coli) >100 000 UFC/ml, sensible a dicho antibiótico, con ecografía renal inicial normal en el primer caso y en el segundo con nefromegalia derecha. A pesar del manejo antibiótico persistió la fiebre por más de tres días, por lo que se sospecha una complicación supurada. En el primer caso, la ecografía renal de control refleja imágenes sugestivas de absceso renal, pero en el segundo, a pesar de ecografías seriadas, solo se reportó la nefromegalia, que llevó realizar una tomografía abdominal con contraste para confirmar el diagnóstico. El antibiótico inicial, a pesar de la sensibilidad in vitro, no fue capaz de controlar la formación de abscesos renales. En el primer caso, el proceso infeccioso se controló utilizando amikacina y ceftriaxona, pero en el segundo fue necesario meropenem y amikacina. En ningún momento se alteró la función renal. Es de anotar lo infrecuente que es el absceso renal en niños en nuestra institución, ya que no se ha encontrado ningún caso en varios años. Conclusiones. El absceso renal en pediatría no es frecuente, se desarrolla principalmente tras una infección urinaria. Son necesarios una alta sospecha y un adecuado diagnóstico para orientar su manejo, ya sea solo médico o asociado a drenaje quirúrgico.

Summary Introduction: Renal abscesses are not common in pediatrics after urinary tract infections. Case reports: The two cases involve two 8 and a 13 month old girls with urinary tract infections, who also develop renal abscesses. In both cases, after a urinalysis shows signs of urinary tract infections, empirical management with amikacin is initiated. The uroculture report shows a growth of Escherichia coli (E. coli) >100,000 CFU/ml, sensitive to the given antibiotic, with a normal initial renal ultrasound in the first case and right nephromegaly in the second case. Despite the antibiotic treatment, the fever persisted for more than three days, which is why a suppurative complication is suspected. In the first case, the renal ultrasound from the control suggests the presence of a renal abscess, but in the second case, despite serial ultrasounds, only nephromegaly was reported; therefore, an abdominal tomography with contrast was performed in order to confirm the diagnosis. The initial antibiotic, despite in vitro sensitivity, was not able to control the formation of renal abscesses. In the first case, the infectious process was controlled using amikacin and ceftriaxone, but in the second case, meropenem and amikacin were necessary. At no point in time did the renal function change. It is important to note how infrequent renal abscesses in children are in our institution, given that there have not been any reported cases for several years. Conclusions: Renal abscesses in pediatrics are not frequent; they develop mainly after a urinary tract infection. A high level of suspicion along with an adequate diagnosis is needed in order to guide its management, be it only medical or associated with surgical drainage.

Resumo Introdução. Os abscessos renais após uma infeção urinária em pediatria não são frequentes. Relatório dos casos. Trata-se de duas meninas com infeção urinária, de 13 e 8 meses, que desenvolvem abscessos renais. Em ambas, após uma análise de urina sugestiva de infeção urinária, se inicia manejo empírico com amika-cina. O relatório da cultura de urina mostra crescimento de Escherichia coli (E. coli) >100 000 UFC/ml, sensível a este antibiótico, com ultrassonografia renal inicial normal no primeiro caso e no segundo com nefromegalia direita. Apesar do manejo antibiótico persistiu a febre por mais de três dias, motivo de suspeita de uma complicação supurada. No primeiro caso, a ecografia renal de controle reflete imagens sugestivas de abscesso renal, mas no segundo, apesar de ultrassonografias seriadas, só foi reportada a nefromegalia, que levou a realizar uma tomografia abdominal com contraste para confirmar o diagnóstico. O antibiótico inicial, apesar da sensibilidade in vitro, não foi capaz de controlar a formação de abscessos renais. No primeiro caso, o processo infecioso foi controlado utilizando amikacina e ceftriaxona, mas no segundo foi necessário meropenem e amikacina. Em nenhum momento foi alterada a função renal. Vale anotar que o abscesso renal em crianças em nossa instituição é pouco frequente, já que não há registro de caso algum em vários anos. Conclusões. O abscesso renal em pediatria não é frequente, se desenvolve principalmente após uma infeção urinaria. É necessário uma alta suspeita e um adequado diagnóstico para orientar seu tratamento, seja somente médico ou associado à drenagem cirúrgica.

Sensibilidad antibiótica de los uropatógenos de los pacientes ambulatorios atendidos en el Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza en el año 2015 / Antibiotic sensitivity of the uropathogenic of the outpatients attended at the National Hospital Arzobispo Loayza in 2015

Objetivo: Determinar la sensibilidad antibiótica de los uropatógenos hallados en los urocultivos que fueron solicitados a los pacientes ambulatorios atendidos en el Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza con resultado positivo en el año 2015. Método: Se realizó un estudio de tipo descriptivo, observacional y retrospectivo. Se analizaron los urocultivos positivos realizados en el año 2015. Resultados: De una población de 5929 urocultivos positivos y mediante la fórmula de poblaciones finitas se tomó una muestra de 306 urocultivos positivos, de los cuales 245 (80,1 por ciento) fueron mujeres y 61 (19,9 por ciento) varones; la edad media de la muestra fue 55,3 años. En el 66,7 por ciento de los urocultivos positivos de la amuestra se aisló E. coli, esta bacteria tuvo sensibilidad alta para Amikacina y Nitrofurantoína. Conclusiones: Se encontró predomino de sexo femenino en la muestra tomada de los urocultivos positivos con una relación de 4/1 respecto del género masculino. Predominó el sexo femenino. La bacteria que se aisló con mayor frecuencia fue E. coli, la cual presentó gran sensibilidad a antibióticos como nitrofurantoína y amikacina y fue resistente en mayor porcentaje a las fluoroquinolonas, Sulfametoxazol y Ampicilina.

Objective: To determine the antibiotic sensitivity of urinary pathogens found in positive urine cultures that were requested to outpatients treated at the Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza positive urine culture results in 2015. Method: Descriptive, observational and retrospective study was performed. Positive urine cultures we revised in 2015. Results: A total population of 5929 positive urine cultures of which a sample of 306 cultures was selected from the 306 patients with positive urine cultures included, 245 (80.1 per cent) were women and 61 (19.9 per cent) men; the average age of the sample was 55.3 years. In 66.7 per cent of positive urine cultures, E. coli was isolated the bacteria had high sensitivity to amikacin and nitrofurantoin. Conclusions: Female predominate in the sample taken from positive urine cultures with a ratio of 4/1 with respect to the male. E coli was the most frequently isolated bacteria, which presented great sensitivity to antibiotics such as nitrofurantoin and amikacin and had a higher resistance percentage to fluoroquinolones, sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin.

Incidência de infecção do trato urinário relacionada ao cateterismo vesical de demora: um estudo de coorte / Incidence of catheter-related urinary tract infecions: a cohort study / Incidencia de infección del tracto urinario relacionada con cateterismo vesical de demora: estudio de cohorte

Estudo de coorte não concorrente com informações de 301 de pacientes internados em centros de terapia intensiva de dois hospitais públicos de Belo Horizonte. O objetivo foi analisar os aspectos epidemiológicos das infecções do trato urinário em pacientes submetidos ao cateterismo vesical de demora, estimar a taxa de incidência nos dois hospitais, identificar possíveis fatores de risco relacionados à infecção e aos microrganismos causadores. A amostra constituiu-se de todos os pacientes internados nas duas unidades e que foram submetidos ao cateterismo vesical de demora no período de seis meses. Dos 301 pacientes, 23 desenvolveram infecção, sendo 56,52% do sexo masculino e com idade superior a 60 anos. A incidência global de infecção do trato urinário foi de 6,70 infecções/1.000 cateteres-dia. O hospital que utilizou água e sabão para a higiene periuretral apresentou maior incidência do que o hospital que utilizou antisséptico (14,01 e 3,05 infecções/1.000 cateteres-dia, respectivamente). O fator de risco identificado foi a higienização periuretral com água e sabão. Os microrganismos mais prevalentes nas uroculturas foram Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17,39%) Candida sp. (13,04%), Escherichia coli (13,04%), e Proteus mirabilis (8,70%). O resultado encontrado neste estudo contradiz os achados da literatura e reforça a necessidade de estudos primários que identifiquem a solução mais eficaz para a realização da limpeza periuretral com vistas à redução da infecção do trato urinário relacionada ao cateterismo vesical de demora.

This is a non-concurrent cohort study that uses data from 301 patients admitted to the intensive care unit of two public hospitals in Belo Horizonte.It aimed at analysing epidemiological aspects of urinary tract infections amongst patients with indwelling bladder catheterization, evaluatingthe incidence rate of the infection in the two hospitals and identifying possible risk factors related to the infection. Sample consisted of patientsthat underwent indwelling catheterization for a period of six months. Of the 301 patients, 23 developed infection: 56.52% were male and aged60 years and over. The overall incidence of urinary tract infection was 6.70 infections/1000 catheter-days. The hospital using water and soap forperiurethral cleaning presented higher incidence of urinary infection than the hospital using antiseptic (14.01 and 3.05 infections/1000 catheterdays, respectively). Risk factor identified was periurethral cleaning with soap and water. The most prevalent microorganisms in urine cultures were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.39%), Candida sp. (13.04%), Escherichia coli (13.04%), and Proteus mirabilis (8.70%). This study results contradict theliterature which demonstrates the need for primary research aimed at identifying the most effective solution for periurethral cleaning in order toreduce catheter-related urinary tract infections.

Estudio de cohorte no concurrente con información de 301 pacientes internados en centros de terapia intensiva de dos hospitales públicos de BeloHorizonte. El objetivo fue analizar la epidemiología de las infecciones del tracto urinario en pacientes sometidos a cateterismo vesical permanente,estimar la tasa de incidencia en cada hospital, identificar posibles factores de riesgo relacionados con las infecciones del tracto urinario e identificarlos microorganismos causantes de la infección. La muestra estuvo constituida por todos los pacientes de las unidades sometidos a cateterismovesical permanente en un período de seis meses. De los 301 pacientes, 23 desarrollaron la infección, siendo 56,52% del sexo masculino y edad superiora 60 años. La incidencia global de infección del tracto urinario fue de 6,70 infecciones/1.000 catéteres/día. El hospital que utilizó agua y jabón para lalimpieza periuretral presentó mayor incidencia que el hospital que utilizó antiséptico (14,01 y 3,05infecciones/1.000 catéteres/día, respectivamente).El factor de riesgo identificado fue la utilización de la técnica de limpieza con agua y jabón. Los microorganismos más prevalentes en los urocultivos fueron Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17,39%) Candida sp. (13,04%), Escherichia coli (13,04%), and Proteus mirabilis (8,70%). El resultado encontradocontradice los de la literatura y refuerza la necesidad de estudios primarios que identifiquen la solución más eficaz para la limpieza periuretral conel fin de reducir la infección del tracto urinario relacionada con el cateterismo vesical permanente.

The Bacterial Spectrum and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Female Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: How Different They Are From Sporadic Single Episodes?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the etiological uropathogens and the susceptibility profile findings on urine culture between sporadic cases of community-acquired, uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) and recurrent UTI cases in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1629 women with uncomplicated UTI evaluated at our hospital between January 2007 and December 2012. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) no recurrent UTI and (2) recurrent UTI. We analyzed the microbiological findings and compared susceptibility profiles between groups. RESULTS: A total of 420 women were included. Group 1 had 233 (55.5%) patients and group 2 had 187 (44.5%). Escherichia coli was the most common agent in both groups (76.4% and 74.3%, respectively; P = .625), whereas Staphylococcus saprophyticus (8.2%) was the second most common in group 1, and Enterococcus faecalis was the second most common in group 2 (8.0%). Nitrofurantoin was the only oral agent that maintained the susceptibility profile in both groups (87.1% and 88.7%, respectively; P = .883). For E coli infections, only nitrofurantoin and amoxicillin/clavulanate maintained susceptibility rates more than 90% in both groups. CONCLUSION: UTI episodes in patients with recurrent UTI had similar bacterial spectra, but different susceptibility profiles compared with those from patients with nonrecurrent infections. The susceptibility rate for nitrofurantoin in patients with recurrent UTI remained high and comparable to the observed in patients with sporadic UTI, reinforcing its indication for empirical treatment while waiting for urine culture results.

The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

PURPOSE: The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics against selected bacteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two established uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, UTI89 and CFT073, and two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, PA01 and Boston-41501, were studied to establish a reliable biofilm formation process. Bacterial growth (BG) was determined by optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) using a spectrophotometer, while biofilm formation (BF) using crystal violet staining was measured at OD 550. Next, these bacterial strains were treated with clinically relevant antibiotics, ciprofloxacin HCl (200 ng/mL and 2 µg/mL), nitrofurantoin (20 µg/mL and 40 µg/mL) and ampicillin (50 µg/mL) at time points of 0 (T0) or after 6 hours of culture (T6). All measurements, including controls (bacteria -1% DMSO), were done in triplicates and repeated three times for consistency. RESULTS: The tested antibiotics effectively inhibited both BG and BF when administered at T0 for UPEC strains, but not when the antibiotic administration started 6 hours later. For Pseudomonas strains, only Ciprofloxacin was able to significantly inhibit bacterial growth at T0 but only at the higher concentration of 2 µg/mL for T6. CONCLUSION: When established UPEC and Pseudomonas bacteria were allowed to culture for 6 hours before initialization of treatment, the therapeutic effect of selected antibiotics was greatly suppressed when compared to immediate treatment, probably as a result of the protective nature of the biofilm.

The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Purpose The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics against selected bacteria. Materials and Methods Two established uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, UTI89 and CFT073, and two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, PA01 and Boston-41501, were studied to establish a reliable biofilm formation process. Bacterial growth (BG) was determined by optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) using a spectrophotometer, while biofilm formation (BF) using crystal violet staining was measured at OD 550. Next, these bacterial strains were treated with clinically relevant antibiotics, ciprofloxacin HCl (200 ng/mL and 2 μg/mL), nitrofurantoin (20 μg/mL and 40 μg/mL) and ampicillin (50 μg/mL) at time points of 0 (T0) or after 6 hours of culture (T6). All measurements, including controls (bacteria -1% DMSO), were done in triplicates and repeated three times for consistency. Results The tested antibiotics effectively inhibited both BG and BF when administered at T0 for UPEC strains, but not when the antibiotic administration started 6 hours later. For Pseudomonas strains, only Ciprofloxacin was able to significantly inhibit bacterial growth at T0 but only at the higher concentration of 2 μg/mL for T6. Conclusion When established UPEC and Pseudomonas bacteria were allowed to culture for 6 hours before initialization of treatment, the therapeutic effect of selected antibiotics was greatly suppressed when compared to immediate treatment, probably as a result of the protective nature of the biofilm. .

Retinal hemorrhages and intermediate uveitis in a patient with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome: a case report.

PURPOSE: To report a case of drug reaction (or rash) with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome in association with intraretinal hemorrhages and intermediate uveitis. METHODS: Single case report. RESULTS: A 22-year-old Hispanic woman developed a facial rash and blurry vision after the use of oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for a urinary tract infection. Fundus examination revealed bilateral +2 vitritis and intraretinal hemorrhages in all four quadrants. An oral mucosal biopsy revealed V-shaped coagulative necrosis, intraepithelial and superficial acute and lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, consistent with drug hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSION: Drug reaction (or rash) with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome can present as cutaneous rash, mucosal lesions, eosinophilia, intermediate uveitis, and intraretinal hemorrhages. In such cases, vitreoretinal manifestations may be considered as diagnostic criteria instead visceral involvement.