Ventilatory Assistance Before Umbilical Cord Clamping in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Providing assisted ventilation during delayed umbilical cord clamping may improve outcomes for extremely preterm infants. Objective: To determine whether assisted ventilation in extremely preterm infants (23 0/7 to 28 6/7 weeks' gestational age [GA]) followed by cord clamping reduces intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or early death. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, 1:1, parallel-stratified randomized clinical trial conducted at 12 perinatal centers across the US and Canada from September 2, 2016, through February 21, 2023, assessed IVH and early death outcomes of extremely preterm infants randomized to receive 120 seconds of assisted ventilation followed by cord clamping vs delayed cord clamping for 30 to 60 seconds with ventilatory assistance afterward. Two analysis cohorts, not breathing well and breathing well, were specified a priori based on assessment of breathing 30 seconds after birth. Intervention: After birth, all infants received stimulation and suctioning if needed. From 30 to 120 seconds, infants randomized to the intervention received continuous positive airway pressure if breathing well or positive-pressure ventilation if not, with cord clamping at 120 seconds. Control infants received 30 to 60 seconds of delayed cord clamping followed by standard resuscitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was any grade IVH on head ultrasonography or death before day 7. Interpretation by site radiologists was confirmed by independent radiologists, all masked to study group. To estimate the association between study group and outcome, data were analyzed using the stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for relative risk (RR), with associations summarized by point estimates and 95% CIs. Results: Of 1110 women who consented to participate, 548 were randomized and delivered infants at GA less than 29 weeks. A total of 570 eligible infants were enrolled (median [IQR] GA, 26.6 [24.9-27.7] weeks; 297 male [52.1%]). Intraventricular hemorrhage or death occurred in 34.9% (97 of 278) of infants in the intervention group and 32.5% (95 of 292) in the control group (adjusted RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.81-1.27). In the prespecified not-breathing-well cohort (47.5% [271 of 570]; median [IQR] GA, 26.0 [24.7-27.4] weeks; 152 male [56.1%]), IVH or death occurred in 38.7% (58 of 150) of infants in the intervention group and 43.0% (52 of 121) in the control group (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.68-1.21). There was no evidence of differences in death, severe brain injury, or major morbidities between the intervention and control groups in either breathing cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: This study did not show that providing assisted ventilation before cord clamping in extremely preterm infants reduces IVH or early death. Additional study around the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of assisted ventilation before cord clamping may provide additional insight. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02742454.

Umbilical cord milking and delayed cord clamping for the prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Placental management strategies such as umbilical cord milking and delayed cord clamping may provide a range of benefits for the newborn. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of umbilical cord milking and delayed cord clamping for the prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia. METHODS: Three databases and five clinical trial registries were systematically reviewed to identify randomised controlled trials comparing umbilical cord milking or delayed cord clamping with control in term and preterm infants. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycaemia (study defined). Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB-2). Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis using a random effect model was done using Review Manager 5.4. The review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD42022356553). RESULTS: Data from 71 studies and 14 268 infants were included in this review; 22 (2 537 infants) compared umbilical cord milking with control, and 50 studies (11 731 infants) compared delayed with early cord clamping. For umbilical cord milking there were no data on neonatal hypoglycaemia, and no differences between groups for any of the secondary outcomes. We found no evidence that delayed cord clamping reduced the incidence of hypoglycaemia (6 studies, 444 infants, RR = 0.87, CI: 0.58 to 1.30, p = 0.49, I2 = 0%). Delayed cord clamping was associated with a 27% reduction in neonatal mortality (15 studies, 3 041 infants, RR = 0.73, CI: 0.55 to 0.98, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%). We found no evidence for the effect of delayed cord clamping for any of the other outcomes. The certainty of evidence was low for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: We found no data for the effectiveness of umbilical cord milking on neonatal hypoglycaemia, and no evidence that delayed cord clamping reduced the incidence of hypoglycaemia, but the certainty of the evidence was low.

A randomised controlled trial comparing umbilical cord milking to delayed cord clamping at birth in preterm infants 28-36 weeks gestational age.

Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is an established practice in perinatology with multiple benefits. However, in instances where the implementation of DCC is not viable, it needs alternatives, especially during caesarean deliveries. A non-inferiority randomized, non-blinded, trial was conducted at a tertiary care referral unit in South India among the preterm newborns (28-36 weeks) randomized to DCC as opposed to intact-umbilical cord milking (UCM). The primary objective was to compare the mean haemoglobin values between the two groups, and the secondary outcome was to compare death and/or major IVH (> Grade II). Of the 132 eligible newborn infants, 99 were randomized to two study groups. Of the 59 and 40 randomised to UCM and DCC, 54 and 36 received the allocated intervention respectively. Preterm infants who underwent UCM had significantly higher haemoglobin (19.97 ± 1.44) as compared to DCC group (18.62 ± 0.98) p-0.0001. The rates of mortality and/or major IVH were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: UCM may be a feasible alternative to DCC especially in settings where the latter is not achievable, without increasing the risk of adverse effects to the preterm infants, this finding needing further confirmation with larger sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI (Clinical Trial Registry-India) registration number: CTRI/2020/04/024566 (registered prospectively on 13/04/2020). WHAT IS KNOWN: • Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is recommended as a standard of care for all the stable term and preterm newborn babies at birth. WHAT IS NEW: • Intact umbilical cord milking may be a reasonable choice of cord management when DCC is unsuccessful, without increasing adverse effects for the new born.

Multicentre, randomised controlled trial of physiological-based cord clamping versus immediate cord clamping in infants with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (PinC): statistical analysis plan.

BACKGROUND: Infants born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) are at high risk of respiratory insufficiency and pulmonary hypertension. Routine practice includes immediate clamping of the umbilical cord and endotracheal intubation. Experimental animal studies suggest that clamping the umbilical cord guided by physiological changes and after the lungs have been aerated, named physiological-based cord clamping (PBCC), could enhance the fetal-to-neonatal transition in CDH. We describe the statistical analysis plan for the clinical trial evaluating the effects of PBCC versus immediate cord clamping on pulmonary hypertension in infants with CDH (PinC trial). DESIGN: The PinC trial is a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in infants with isolated left-sided CDH, born ≥ 35.0 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome is the incidence of pulmonary hypertension in the first 24 h after birth. Maternal outcomes include estimated maternal blood loss. Neonatal secondary outcomes include mortality before discharge, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy, and number of days of mechanical ventilation. Infants are 1:1 randomised to either PBCC or immediate cord clamping using variable random permutated block sizes (4-8), stratified by treatment centre and estimated severity of pulmonary hypoplasia (i.e. mild/moderate/severe). At least 140 infants are needed to detect a relative reduction in pulmonary hypertension by one third, with 80% power and 0.05 significance level. A chi-square test will be used to evaluate the hypothesis that PBCC decreases the occurrence of pulmonary hypertension. This plan is written and submitted without knowledge of the collected data. The trial has been ethically approved. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04373902 (registered April 2020).

Extended period of ventilation before delayed cord clamping augments left-to-right shunting and decreases systemic perfusion at birth in preterm lambs.

Previous studies have suggested that an extended period of ventilation before delayed cord clamping (DCC) augments birth-related rises in pulmonary arterial (PA) blood flow. However, it is unknown whether this greater rise in PA flow is accompanied by increases in left ventricular (LV) output and systemic arterial perfusion or whether it reflects enhanced left-to-right shunting across the ductus arteriosus and/or foramen ovale (FO), with decreased systemic arterial perfusion. Using an established preterm lamb birth transition model, this study compared the effect of a short (∼40 s, n = 11), moderate (∼2 min, n = 11) or extended (∼5 min, n = 12) period of initial mechanical lung ventilation before DCC on flow probe-derived perinatal changes in PA flow, LV output, total systemic arterial blood flow, ductal shunting and FO shunting. The LV output was relatively stable during initial ventilation but increased after DCC, with similar responses in all groups. Systemic arterial flow patterns displayed only minor differences during brief and moderate periods of initial ventilation and were similar after DCC. However, an increase in PA flow was augmented with an extended initial ventilation (P < 0.001), owing to an earlier onset of left-to-right ductal and FO shunting (P < 0.001), and was accompanied by a pronounced reduction in total systemic arterial flow (P = 0.005) that persisted for 4 min after DCC (P ≤ 0.039). These findings suggest that, owing to increased left-to-right shunting and a greater reduction in systemic arterial perfusion, an extended period of ventilation before DCC does not result in greater perinatal circulatory benefits than shorter periods of initial ventilation in the birth transition. KEY POINTS: Previous studies suggest that an extended period of initial ventilation before delayed cord clamping (DCC) augments birth-related rises in pulmonary arterial (PA) blood flow. It is unknown whether this greater rise in PA flow is accompanied by an increased left ventricular output and systemic arterial perfusion or whether it reflects enhanced left-to-right shunting across the ductus arteriosus and/or foramen ovale, with decreased systemic arterial perfusion. Anaesthetized preterm fetal lambs instrumented with central arterial flow probes underwent a brief (∼40 s), moderate (∼2 min) or extended (∼5 min) period of ventilation before DCC. Perinatal changes in left ventricular output were similar in all groups, but extended initial ventilation augmented both perinatal increases in PA flow, owing to earlier onset and greater left-to-right ductal and foramen ovale shunting, and perinatal reductions in total systemic arterial perfusion. Extended ventilation before DCC does not confer a greater perinatal circulatory benefit than shorter periods of initial ventilation.

Effect of Placental Transfusion on Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Premature Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology and the potential risks of placental transfusion (PT) differ substantially in preterm infants, necessitating specific studies in this population. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PT in preterm infants from the perspective of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search using placental transfusion, preterm infant, and its synonyms as search terms. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Embase were searched until March 07, 2023. Two reviewers independently identified, extracted relevant randomized controlled trials, and appraised the risk of bias. The extracted studies were included in the meta-analysis of long-term neurodevelopmental clinical outcomes using fixed-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 5612 articles were identified, and seven randomized controlled trials involving 2551 infants were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with immediate cord clamping (ICC), PT may not impact adverse neurodevelopment events. No clear evidence was found of a difference in the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment (risk ratio [RR]: 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 1.03, P = 0.13, I2 = 0). PT was not associated with the incidence of cerebral palsy (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.59 to 2.57, P = 0.79, I2 = 0). Analyses showed no differences between the two interventions in cognitive, language, and motor domains of neurodevelopment. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of long-term neurodevelopment, PT at preterm birth may be as safe as ICC. Future studies should focus on standardized, high-quality clinical trials and individual participant data to optimize cord management strategies for preterm infants after birth.

Deferred cord clamping to improve neonatal blood values: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Practices related to umbilical cord clamping at birth should be evidence-based. Deferred cord clamping, compared to immediate cord clamping, shows benefits for preterm neonates but this may also apply to healthy term neonates. Different blood sampling techniques are used to measure effect of deferred and immediate cord clamping. OBJECTIVE: To assess the statistical and effect size differences between blood biomarkers from umbilical cord and capillary blood samples of healthy term neonates following either immediate or deferred cord clamping. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The databases PubMed, Medline, CENTRAL, CINAHL and EMBASE were systematically searched. We included studies with a randomised clinical trial design comparing deferred and immediate cord clamping among healthy term neonates born by a spontaneous vaginal birth, reporting on blood biomarkers. Studies including caesarean births and premature births/neonates were excluded. Study attributes, sampling technique, blood biomarkers, mean differences, and standard deviations were extracted. The standardised mean differences (SMD) and sampling errors were calculated for effect size estimation. Meta-analyses were performed if ≥2 studies reported the same outcome using RevMan 5. Subgroup analyses distinguished effects from umbilical cord and capillary blood samples. Moderator tests and publication bias analyses were performed using JASP. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included for analysis. The biomarkers haematocrit, haemoglobin, and bilirubin were reported in ≥2 studies and thus eligible for pooling. No differences were found in haemoglobin (SMD -0.04, 95%CI -0.57 to 0.49) or bilirubin values (SMD 0.13, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.28) between umbilical cord blood samples collected after deferred or immediate cord clamping. Deferred cord clamping led to lower haematocrit values (SMD -0.3, 95%CI -0.53 to -0.07). Higher haematocrit (SMD 0.67, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.97) and haemoglobin values (SMD 0.76, 95%CI 0.56 to 0.97) from capillary blood samples, collected 2 to 72 h postpartum, showed when cord clamping was deferred. No effect was found on bilirubin values (SMD 0.13, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.28) irrespective of the sampling technique. CONCLUSIONS: Blood collected after deferred umbilical cord clamping showed increased haemoglobin and haematocrit values up to 72 h after birth, opposed to bilirubin values. Clinical evaluation of blood biomarkers from the umbilical cord shows different values compared to capillary blood. Sampling time and technique therefore seem essential in estimating the effects of deferred cord clamping. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: This meta-analysis shows that sampling time and technique are essential in estimating the effects of deferred cord clamping on neonatal blood values.

Delayed cord clamping vs cord milking in elective cesarean delivery at term: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cord clamping has significant beneficial effects on the neonate and its transition to extrauterine life and, therefore, is common practice at vaginal births in the Netherlands. In 2015, 16% of neonates were born via cesarean delivery; moreover, in 81% of these cases, the umbilical cord was clamped and cut immediately. Neonatal benefits of delayed cord clamping are an increased circulating volume of 25 to 30 mL/kg, leading to a higher preload of both the right and left ventricles during the transition from umbilical circulation to pulmonary circulation, thus maintaining a stable left ventricle output, and to higher neonatal hemoglobin and hematocrit levels 24 to 48 hours after birth. Currently, little is known about whether the abovementioned neonatal benefits of delayed cord clamping could apply to neonates delivered by cesarean delivery. In these cases, possible negative effects on neonatal outcomes (ie, neonatal hypothermia, lower Apgar scores, and hyperbilirubinemia) and maternal outcomes (ie, increased maternal blood loss and higher postoperative infection rate) should also be taken into consideration. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether clamping the umbilical cord after 2 minutes is superior to cord milking during elective cesarean deliveries at term, taking both short- and long-term neonatal and maternal outcomes into consideration, and to determine whether cord milking could be an appropriate alternative to delayed cord clamping. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a large secondary care center in the Netherlands (Amphia Hospital in Breda) from October 2020 to April 2022. A total of 115 patients who underwent an elective cesarean delivery between 37 0/7 and 41 6/7 weeks of gestation were included. The primary outcomes were neonatal hemoglobin and hematocrit levels at 48 hours after birth. The secondary outcomes were divided into neonatal and maternal outcomes. RESULTS: After randomization, 58 participants were treated with cord milking, and 57 participants were treated with delayed cord clamping. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics between both groups. There was no significant difference in the primary outcomes, with a mean hemoglobin level 48 hours after birth of 12.1 mmol/L in the delayed cord clamping group and 12.2 mmol/L in the cord milking group (P=.80). Regarding our secondary outcomes, there was no significant difference regarding Apgar score, neonatal body temperature, maternal blood loss, and postoperative infection rate between our intervention groups. CONCLUSION: Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels at 48 hours after birth showed no significant difference when comparing delayed cord clamping with cord milking. Delayed cord clamping did not lead to increased maternal blood loss or postoperative infections compared with a method with a much shorter timeframe between delivery and clamping of the umbilical cord, namely, cord milking. In addition, delayed cord clamping did not lead to a lower Apgar score or neonatal temperature compared with cord milking. Our research suggests that delayed cord clamping can be safely performed during elective cesarean deliveries at term. If intraoperative circumstances do not allow for delayed cord clamping, cord milking can be an appropriate alternative for the neonate at term.

Effects of timing of umbilical cord clamping for mother and newborn: a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: This narrative review was performed to evaluate the correct timing of umbilical cord clamping for term infants. It was intended to determine any advantages or disadvantages from early or delayed cord clamping for newborns, infants or mothers. METHODS: A systematic search on two databases was conducted using the PICO pattern to define a wide search. Out of 43 trials, 12 were included in this review. Three of the included studies are meta-analyses, nine are randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Early or delayed cord clamping was defined differently in all the included trials. However, there are many advantages from delayed cord clamping of at least > 60 s for newborns and infants up to 12 months of age. The trials showed no disadvantages for newborns or mothers from delayed cord clamping, except for a lightly increased risk of jaundice or the need for phototherapy. CONCLUSION: Delayed umbilical cord clamping for term infants should be performed. Further research is needed to improve knowledge on physiological timing of umbilical cord clamping in term infants, which also leads to the same advantages as delayed cord clamping.

Placental cord drainage vs delayed cord clamping at elective caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Placental cord drainage (PCD) after vaginal birth accelerates placental delivery by 2.85 minutes, but reduces blood loss by only 77 mL. AIMS: To determine if PCD at elective caesarean section accelerates placental delivery, compared to delayed cord clamping (DCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomised controlled trial randomised 100 women undergoing elective caesarean sections to receive either PCD for 60 sec after birth, or DCC for 60 sec. The primary outcome was time from birth until placental delivery. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative haemoglobin drop, rates of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), manual removal of placenta and blood transfusion. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in timing of placental delivery (PCD 122 sec vs DCC 123.5 sec, P = 0.717). There were no significant differences in EBL (PCD 425 mL vs DCC 400 mL, P = 0.858), postoperative haemoglobin drop (PCD 12 g/L vs DCC 15 g/L, P = 0.297), PPH rate (PCD 45.8% vs DCC 44.4%, P = 0.893, relative risk (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-1.62), manual removal rate (PCD 2.1% vs DCC 4.4%, P = 0.609, RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.04-4.99) or transfusion rate (PCD 4.2% vs DCC 0%, P = 0.495). CONCLUSIONS: PCD did not accelerate placental delivery at caesarean compared with DCC. Given that both PCD and DCC groups had faster placental deliveries than quoted in the literature at caesarean (200 sec), it could be postulated that DCC is mimicking the effect of PCD through passive transfusion to the neonate. This supports routine use of DCC at elective caesarean section.

Delayed umbilical cord clamping in elective and nonelective term Cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is recommended for preterm and term neonates, regardless of delivery mode. After impression of increased maternal blood loss following DCC implementation during Cesarean delivery (CD) concerns arose about maternal safety, particularly in term CDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study by reviewing birth records from our tertiary hospital in Kuopio, Finland including 914 women with singleton term CD and recorded estimated blood loss. Early cord clamping (ECC) occurred from January 2016 to December 2019, while DCC (30-60 s) from January 2020 to December 2020. We evaluated maternal and neonatal outcomes for ECC vs. DCC and assessed severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (≥1500 ml) and its potential clinical risk factors. RESULTS: In total, 914 women were included (DCC N = 152; ECC N = 762). Estimated mean maternal blood loss showed no significant difference between DCC and ECC groups (697 ml vs. 750 ml, p < 0.96). Severe PPH was less frequent in the DCC group (4.6% vs. 10.5 %, p < 0.024). Neonatal outcomes were similar between groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that women with placenta previa (OR 5.63, p < 0.001), macrosomic neonate (OR 2.75, p < 0.001), and intrapartum infection (OR 2.00, p < 0.057) had an increased risk for severe PPH. Earlier CD was associated with less severe PPH (OR 0.36, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DCC (30-60 s) during term CD did not increase maternal blood loss in singleton pregnancies and demonstrated no short-term adverse effects on neonates. Our findings support the general practice of DCC during both elective and nonelective term CD.

Comparing the safety and effectiveness of various umbilical cord milking techniques and delayed cord clamping in full-term and preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

We compare the hematocrit, hemoglobin, need for transfusion, recurrent phototherapy, serum bilirubin level, and serum ferritin at different time frames for the umbilical cord milking (UCM) and delayed cord clamping (DCC) in both full-term and preterm infants. A comprehensive search through various databases aimed to compare UCM and DCC studies until May 2nd, 2023. Cochrane and NIH tools assessed RCTs and cohorts, respectively. Meta-analysis employed Review Manager 5.4 software, calculating MD and RR with 95% CIs for continuous and dichotomous data. We included 20 studies with a total of 5189 infants. Regarding preterm infants, hematocrit level showed no significant difference between intact Umbilical Cord Milking (iUCM) compared to DCC (MD = -0.24, 95% CI [-1.11, 0.64]). Moreover, Neonatal death incidence was significantly higher with the UCM technique in comparison to DCC (RR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.01 to 1.62]). Regarding term and late preterm infants, Hematocrit level showed no significant difference between the iUCM or cUCM techniques compared to DCC (MD = 0.21, 95% CI [-1.28 to 1.69]), (MD = 0.96, 95% CI [-1.02 to 2.95]), respectively. UCM led to a higher risk of neonatal death in preterm infants compared to DCC. However, the incidence of polycythemia was lower in the UCM group. Additionally, UCM was associated with higher rates of severe IVH events. Based on these findings, DCC may be preferred due to its lower incidence of severe IVH and neonatal death.

Nous comparons l'hématocrite, l'hémoglobine, le besoin de transfusion, la photothérapie récurrente, le taux de bilirubine sérique et la ferritine sérique à différentes périodes pour la traite du cordon ombilical (UCM) et le clampage retardé du cordon (DCC) chez les nourrissons nés à terme et prématurés. Une recherche complète dans diverses bases de données visait à comparer les études UCM et DCC jusqu'au 2 mai 2023. Les outils Cochrane et NIH ont évalué les ECR et les cohortes, respectivement. La méta-analyse a utilisé le logiciel Review Manager 5.4, calculant le MD et le RR avec des IC à 95 % pour les données continues et dichotomiques. Nous avons inclus 20 études portant sur un total de 5 189 nourrissons. Concernant les nourrissons prématurés, le niveau d'hématocrite n'a montré aucune différence significative entre la traite du cordon ombilical intact (iUCM) et la DCC (DM = -0,24, IC à 95 % [-1,11, 0,64]). De plus, l'incidence des décès néonatals était significativement plus élevée avec la technique UCM qu'avec la technique DCC (RR = 1,28, IC à 95 % [1,01 à 1,62]). Concernant les nourrissons à terme et peu prématurés, le niveau = 0,21, IC à 95 % [-1,28 à 1,69]), (DM = 0,96, IC à 95 % [-1,02 à 2,95]), respectivement. L'UCM a entraîné un risque plus élevé de décès néonatal chez les nourrissons prématurés par rapport au DCC. Cependant, l'incidence de la polyglobulie était plus faible dans le groupe UCM. De plus, l'UCM était associée à des taux plus élevés d'événements IVH graves. Sur la base de ces résultats, le DCC peut être préféré en raison de sa plus faible incidence d'IVH grave et de décès néonatals. d'hématocrite n'a montré aucune différence significative entre les techniques iUCM ou cUCM par rapport à la technique DCC (DM.

Effect of different timings of umbilical cord clamping on the level of CD34+ cells in full-term neonates.

Despite the fact that delayed cord clamping (DCC) is recommended by many international organizations, early cord clamping is still widely practiced worldwide. The overarching goal of the DCC practice is to maximize neonatal benefits as achieving higher hemoglobin levels and decreasing the incidence of anemia as well as avoiding the adverse consequences. The current study was conducted to identify the effect of of DCC on the number of CD34+ stem cells in cord blood of full term neonates after two different timings (30 and 60 s after birth). One hundred and three full-term (FT) newborn babies (gestational age 37-40 weeks) delivered by elective cesarean section were randomly assigned into 2 groups: Group 1: babies were subjected to DCC 30 s after birth (50 newborns). Group 2: babies were subjected to DCC 60 s after birth (53 newborns). Neonates in group 2 had significantly higher levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, total nucleated cells and CD34+ cells compared to those in group 1. The practice of DCC 60 s after birth achieved better CD34+ stem cells transfer in FT neonates than clamping the cord after 30 s.

Delayed cord clamping versus cord milking in vigorous neonates ≥35 weeks gestation born via cesarean: A Randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is the recommended strategy in neonates not requiring resuscitation, but umbilical cord milking (UCM) can also be used in term babies. DCC has been found to offer advantages more than just placental transfusion. OBJECTIVE: To compare the neonatal outcomes of DCC and UCM at birth in vigorous neonates ≥35 weeks born via cesarean section. METHODS: We included all vigorous neonates born ≥35 weeks of gestation through the cesarean section in this open-label randomized controlled trial. They were randomized into Group-A (DCC-cord was clamped 60 s after birth) or Group B(UCM). For neonates in Group B, the intact cord was milked at 25 cm from the stump 3 times towards the neonate and then clamped. The primary outcome was hematocrit at 72 h of life. Secondary outcomes were serum ferritin between 6 and 10 weeks of life, serum bilirubin at 72 h of life, need and duration of phototherapy, respiratory distress, hypoglycemia, hypotension, and sepsis. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups. The mean hematocrit at 72 h was more in the DCC group compared to the UCM group [(55.60±4.50) vs (53.89±4.44), MD (95% CI) = 1.71 (0.26, 3.16); p = 0.021]. There was no significant difference in median serum ferritin between the groups [102.88(84.67-173.24) vs 137.93(85.15-230.40); p = 0.173]. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: In neonates born via cesarean section, DCC resulted in improved hematocrit levels by 72 hours compared to UCM. DCC results in better placental transfusion.

Deferred cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping at preterm birth: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord clamping strategies at preterm birth have the potential to affect important health outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of deferred cord clamping, umbilical cord milking, and immediate cord clamping in reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity at preterm birth. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched medical databases and trial registries (from database inception until Feb 24, 2022; updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping for preterm births (<37 weeks' gestation). Quasi-randomised or cluster-randomised trials were excluded. Authors of eligible studies were invited to join the iCOMP collaboration and share individual participant data. All data were checked, harmonised, re-coded, and assessed for risk of bias following prespecified criteria. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We performed intention-to-treat one-stage individual participant data meta-analyses accounting for heterogeneity to examine treatment effects overall and in prespecified subgroup analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640. FINDINGS: We identified 2369 records, of which 48 randomised trials provided individual participant data and were eligible for our primary analysis. We included individual participant data on 6367 infants (3303 [55%] male, 2667 [45%] female, two intersex, and 395 missing data). Deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduced death before discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0·68 [95% CI 0·51-0·91], high-certainty evidence, 20 studies, n=3260, 232 deaths). For umbilical cord milking compared with immediate cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (OR 0·73 [0·44-1·20], low certainty, 18 studies, n=1561, 74 deaths). Similarly, for umbilical cord milking compared with deferred cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (0·95 [0·59-1·53], low certainty, 12 studies, n=1303, 93 deaths). We found no evidence of subgroup differences for the primary outcome, including by gestational age, type of delivery, multiple birth, study year, and perinatal mortality. INTERPRETATION: This study provides high-certainty evidence that deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduces death before discharge in preterm infants. This effect appears to be consistent across several participant-level and trial-level subgroups. These results will inform international treatment recommendations. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Short, medium, and long deferral of umbilical cord clamping compared with umbilical cord milking and immediate clamping at preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant data.

BACKGROUND: Deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping can improve survival of infants born preterm (before 37 weeks of gestation), but the optimal duration of deferral remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of umbilical cord clamping strategies with different timings of clamping or with cord milking for preterm infants. METHODS: We searched medical databases and trial registries from inception until Feb 24, 2022 (updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing cord clamping strategies for preterm infants. Individual participant data were harmonised and assessed for risk of bias and quality. Interventions were grouped into immediate clamping, short deferral (≥15 s to <45 s), medium deferral (≥45 s to <120 s), long deferral (≥120 s), and intact cord milking. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We calculated one-stage, intention-to-treat Bayesian random-effects individual participant data network meta-analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640. FINDINGS: We included individual participant data from 47 trials with 6094 participants. Of all interventions, long deferral reduced death before discharge the most (compared with immediate clamping; odds ratio 0·31 [95% credibility interval] 0·11-0·80; moderate certainty). The risk of bias was low for 10 (33%) of 30 trials, 14 (47%) had some concerns, and 6 (20%) were rated as having a high risk of bias. Heterogeneity was low, with no indication of inconsistency. INTERPRETATION: This study found that long deferral of clamping leads to reduced odds of death before discharge in preterm infants. In infants assessed as requiring immediate resuscitation, this finding might only be generalisable if there are provisions for such care with the cord intact. These results are based on thoroughly cleaned and checked individual participant data and can inform future guidelines and practice. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Umbilical Cord Milking Versus Delayed Cord Clamping in Infants 28 to 32 Weeks: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or death among preterm infants receiving placental transfusion with UCM is noninferior to delayed cord clamping (DCC). METHODS: Noninferiority randomized controlled trial comparing UCM versus DCC in preterm infants born 28 to 32 weeks recruited between June 2017 through September 2022 from 19 university and private medical centers in 4 countries. The primary outcome was Grade III/IV IVH or death evaluated at a 1% noninferiority margin. RESULTS: Among 1019 infants (UCM n = 511 and DCC n = 508), all completed the trial from birth through initial hospitalization (mean gestational age 31 weeks, 44% female). For the primary outcome, 7 of 511 (1.4%) infants randomized to UCM developed severe IVH or died compared to 7 of 508 (1.4%) infants randomized to DCC (rate difference 0.01%, 95% confidence interval: (-1.4% to 1.4%), P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial of UCM versus DCC among preterm infants born between 28 and 32 weeks' gestation, there was no difference in the rates of severe IVH or death. UCM may be a safe alternative to DCC in premature infants born at 28 to 32 weeks who require resuscitation.