Drug-resistant tuberculosis treatments, the case for a phase III platform trial.

Most phase III trials in drug-resistant tuberculosis have either been underpowered to quantify differences in microbiological endpoints or have taken up to a decade to complete. Composite primary endpoints, dominated by differences in treatment discontinuation and regimen changes, may mask important differences in treatment failure and relapse. Although new regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis appear very effective, resistance to new drugs is emerging rapidly. There is a need for shorter, safer and more tolerable regimens, including those active against bedaquiline-resistant tuberculosis. Transitioning from multiple regimen A versus regimen B trials to a single large phase III platform trial would accelerate the acquisition of robust estimates of relative efficacy and safety. Further efficiencies could be achieved by adopting modern adaptive platform designs. Collaboration among trialists, affected community representatives, funders and regulators is essential for developing such a phase III platform trial for drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment regimens.

La majorité des essais de phase III relatifs à la tuberculose pharmacorésistante soit n'étaient pas assez puissants pour quantifier les fluctuations au niveau des critères microbiologiques, soit étaient trop longs, se poursuivant parfois pendant dix ans. Les critères primaires composites, dominés par des différences dans l'interruption du traitement et les changements de schéma, pourraient dissimuler d'importantes variations en termes d'échec thérapeutique et de rechute. Bien que les nouveaux traitements contre la tuberculose pharmacorésistante semblent très efficaces, la résistance aux nouveaux médicaments évolue rapidement. Il est donc nécessaire d'opter pour des traitements plus courts, plus sûrs et mieux tolérés, y compris ceux actifs contre la tuberculose résistant à la bédaquiline. Délaisser la multitude d'essais opposant un schéma de traitement A à un schéma de traitement B pour se diriger vers un unique essai plateforme de phase III de grande envergure permettrait d'obtenir plus vite des estimations solides concernant l'innocuité et l'efficacité relative. En outre, adopter des modèles de plateforme modernes et adaptatifs contribuerait à de meilleures performances. Enfin, la collaboration entre investigateurs, représentants des communautés concernées, bailleurs de fonds et organismes de réglementation est essentielle à l'élaboration de ce type d'essai plateforme de phase III sur les traitements contre la tuberculose pharmacorésistante.

La mayoría de los ensayos en fase III sobre tuberculosis resistente a los fármacos no ha tenido la potencia suficiente para cuantificar diferencias en los criterios de valoración microbiológicos o ha tardado hasta una década en completarse. Los criterios de valoración principales compuestos, dominados por las diferencias en la interrupción del tratamiento y los cambios de régimen, pueden ocultar diferencias importantes en el fracaso del tratamiento y la recaída. Aunque los nuevos regímenes de tratamiento para la tuberculosis resistente a los fármacos parecen muy eficaces, la resistencia a los nuevos fármacos está apareciendo rápidamente. Se necesitan regímenes de tratamiento más cortos, seguros y tolerables, incluidos los activos contra la tuberculosis resistente a la bedaquilina. La transición de múltiples ensayos de régimen A frente a régimen B a un único gran ensayo de plataforma en fase III aceleraría la obtención de estimaciones sólidas de la eficacia y seguridad relativas. Podrían lograrse mayores eficiencias si se adoptaran diseños de plataforma adaptativos modernos. La colaboración entre los autores de los ensayos, los representantes de las comunidades afectadas, los financiadores y los reguladores es esencial para desarrollar un ensayo de plataforma en fase III de este tipo para los regímenes de tratamiento de la tuberculosis resistente a los fármacos.

A randomized phase III trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients with up to 10 oligometastases and a synchronous primary tumor (SABR-SYNC): study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Emerging randomized data, mostly from phase II trials, have suggested that patients with oligometastatic cancers may benefit from ablative treatments such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). However, phase III data testing this paradigm are lacking, and many studies have examined SABR in the setting of metachronous oligometastatic disease. The goal of the SABR-SYNC trial is to assess the effect of SABR in patients with oligometastatic cancers and a synchronous primary tumor. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between standard of care (SOC) palliative-intent treatments vs. SOC + ablative therapy (SABR preferred) to all sites of known disease. Randomization will be stratified based on histology and number of metastases at enrollment. SABR may be delivered in 1-, 3- and 5-fraction regimens, with recommended doses of 20 Gy, 30 Gy, and 35 Gy, respectively. Non-SABR local modalities (e.g. surgery, thermal ablation, conventional radiation) may be used for treatment of the primary or metastases at the discretion of the treating physicians, if those modalities are clinically preferred. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, time to development of new metastatic lesions, time to initiation of next systemic therapy, quality of life, and toxicity. Translational endpoints include assessment of circulating tumor DNA and immunological predictors of outcomes. DISCUSSION: SABR-SYNC will provide phase III data to assess the impact of SABR on overall survival in a population of patients with synchronous oligometastases. The translational component will attempt to identify novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers to aid in clinical decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05717166 (registration date: Feb. 8, 2023).

Secondary Endpoint Utilization and Publication Rate among Phase III Oncology Trials.

Secondary endpoints (SEP) provide crucial information in the interpretation of clinical trials, but their features are not yet well understood. Thus, we sought to empirically characterize the scope and publication rate of SEPs among late-phase oncology trials. We assessed SEPs for each randomized, published phase III oncology trial across all publications and ClinicalTrials.gov, performing logistic regressions to evaluate associations between trial characteristics and SEP publication rates. After screening, a total of 280 trials enrolling 244,576 patients and containing 2,562 SEPs met the inclusion criteria. Only 22% of trials (62/280) listed all SEPs consistently between ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial protocol. The absolute number of SEPs per trial increased over time, and trials sponsored by industry had a greater number of SEPs (median 9 vs. 5 SEPs per trial; P < 0.0001). In total, 69% of SEPs (1,770/2,562) were published. The publication rate significantly varied by SEP category [X2 (5, N = 2,562) = 245.86; P < 0.001]. SEPs that place the most burden on patients, such as patient-reported outcomes and translational correlatives, were published at 63% (246/393) and 44% (39/88), respectively. Trials with more SEPs were associated with lower overall SEP publication rates. Overall, our findings are that SEP publication rates in late-phase oncology trials are highly variable based on the type of SEP. To avoid undue burden on patients and promote transparency of findings, trialists should weigh the biological and clinical relevance of each SEP together with its feasibility at the time of trial design. SIGNIFICANCE: In this investigation, we characterized the utilization and publication rates of SEPs among late-phase oncology trials. Our results draw attention to the proliferation of SEPs in recent years. Although overall publication rates were high, underpublication was detected among endpoints that may increase patient burden (such as translational correlatives and patient-reported outcomes).

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus contributes to organ damage beyond the nervous system: a post-hoc analysis of 5 phase III randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) and SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI) items, especially non-neuropsychiatric items. METHODS: Baseline data from five phase III trials (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-SC, BLISS-NEA, EMBRACE) were analysed. NPSLE involvement was defined as NP BILAG A/B/C/D (n = 272); NP BILAG E denoted non-neuropsychiatric SLE (n = 3273). We employed multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, and ethnicity. RESULTS: The median (IQR) and mean ± SD SDI scores were 0 (0-1) and 0.62 ± 1.09. Compared with the non-neuropsychiatric SLE group, NPSLE patients were more likely to develop damage (adjusted (a)OR = 2.86; 95% CI = 2.28-3.59). This held true also after suppression of the NP SDI items (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.36-2.12). Beyond the neuropsychiatric domain, NPSLE was associated with damage in the cardiovascular (aOR = 2.63; 95% CI = 1.75-3.95), musculoskeletal (aOR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.43-2.52), and skin (aOR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.06-2.22) SDI domains. Dissecting domains into items, NPSLE was associated with coronary artery disease (aOR = 3.08; 95% CI = 1.44-6.58), myocardial infraction (aOR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.54-6.27), muscle atrophy (aOR = 3.34; 2.16-5.16), scarring alopecia (aOR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.19-2.70), bowel infarction (aOR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.20-3.26), retinopathy (aOR = 2.23; 95% CI = 1.15-4.32), and premature gonadal failure (aOR = 2.10; 95% CI = 1.11-3.90). CONCLUSION: The intricate association between NPSLE and damage accrual extends beyond the nervous system to also comprise the musculoskeletal, skin, and cardiovascular organ systems.

Protocol for a phase 3, randomised, active-control study of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus frozen plasma in bleeding adult cardiac surgery patients requiring coagulation factor replacement: the LEX-211 (FARES-II) trial.

INTRODUCTION: Reduced thrombin generation is an important component of post cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) coagulopathy. To replenish coagulation factors and enhance thrombin generation in bleeding surgical patients, frozen plasma (FP) and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) are used. However, the efficacy-safety balance of 4F-PCC relative to FP in cardiac surgery is unconfirmed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: LEX-211 (FARES-II) is an active-control, randomised, phase 3 study comparing two coagulation factor replacement therapies in bleeding adult cardiac surgical patients at 12 hospitals in Canada and the USA. The primary objective is to determine whether 4F-PCC (Octaplex/Balfaxar, Octapharma) is clinically non-inferior to FP for haemostatic effectiveness. Inclusion criteria are any index (elective or non-elective) cardiac surgery employing CPB and coagulation factor replacement with 4F-PCC or FP ordered in the operating room for bleeding management. Patients will be randomised to receive 1500 or 2000 international units of 4F-PCC or 3 or 4 units of FP, depending on body weight. The primary endpoint of haemostatic treatment response is 'effective' if no additional haemostatic intervention is required from 60 min to 24 hours after the first initiation of 4F-PCC or FP; or 'ineffective' if any other haemostatic intervention (including a second dose of study drug) is required. An estimated 410 evaluable patients will be required to demonstrate non-inferiority (one-sided α of 0.025, power ≥90%, non-inferiority margin 0.10). Secondary outcomes include transfusions, bleeding-related clinical endpoints, coagulation parameters and safety. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the institutional review boards of all participating centres. Trial completion is anticipated at the end of 2024, and results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations in 2025. The results will advance our understanding of coagulation management in bleeding surgical patients, potentially reducing the need for allogeneic blood products and improving outcomes in surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05523297.

Clinical Trials in Gastroesophageal Cancers: An Analysis of the Global Landscape of Interventional Trials From ClinicalTrials.gov.

PURPOSE: To describe the global landscape of clinical research into interventions for gastroesophageal cancers (GECs), with examination of trial characteristics, geographic distribution of trial sites, and factors associated with trial termination. METHODS: We queried ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all completed or terminated phase III interventional studies investigating GECs (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [ESCC], esophageal adenocarcinoma [EAC], gastroesophageal junctional [GEJ], and gastric adenocarcinoma). Data on all reported trial characteristics were extracted. Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare differences in completed and terminated trials. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated predictors of termination. RESULTS: A total of 179 trials were identified; of these, 90% were therapeutic. Most included sites in Asia (61%) and Europe (32%); few included sites in Africa (4%). Thirty percent included sites in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Most (70%) focused on gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, 13% on EAC and ESCC, and 9% on ESCC alone. Sixteen percent (n = 29) of trials terminated prematurely. In multivariate analysis, study site number, location of recruitment sites, and patient population emerged as predictors of termination. Trials recruiting from US-based sites were more likely to terminate (odds ratio [OR], 7.22 [95% CI, 1.59 to 32.69]). Trials conducted exclusively in LMICs were less likely to terminate (OR, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.59] v conducted in high-income countries [HICs] alone). Studies on ESCC were more likely to terminate (OR, 17.74 [95% CI, 1.49 to 210.69]). CONCLUSION: Although 80% of GECs occur in LMICs, trial activity disproportionately occurs in HICs. Few trials focus on EAC/ESCC despite being highly fatal, highlighting an unmet need. Overall, this study highlights (1) a missed opportunity to recruit patients from high-incidence regions globally; and (2) a pressing need for increasing funding, infrastructure, and support for GEC trials in LMICs.

Promising first-line immuno-combination therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death all over the world, and brings a heavy social economic burden especially in China. Several immuno-combination therapies have shown promising efficacy in the first-line treatment of unresectable HCC and are widely used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, which combination is the most affordable one is unknown. Our study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the immuno-combinations as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC from the perspective of Chinese payers. METHODS: A Markov model was built according to five multicenter, phase III, open-label, randomized trials (Himalaya, IMbrave150, ORIENT-32, CARES-310, LEAP-002) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of tremelimumab plus durvalumab (STRIDE), atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B), sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) (S + B), camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (C + R), and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (P + L). Three disease states were included: progression free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD) as well as death. Medical costs were searched from West China Hospital, published literatures or the Red Book. Cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were evaluated to compare costs among different combinations. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robust of the model. RESULTS: The total cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of C + R, S + B, P + L, A + B and STRIDE were $12,109.27 and 0.91, $26,961.60 and 1.12, $55,382.53 and 0.83, $70,985.06 and 0.90, $84,589.01 and 0.73, respectively, resulting in the most cost-effective strategy of C + R with CER of $13,306.89 per QALY followed by S + B with CER of $24,072.86 per QALY. Compared with C + R, the ICER of S + B strategy was $70,725.38 per QALY, which would become the most cost-effective when the willing-to-pay threshold exceeded $73,500/QALY. In the subgroup analysis, with the application of Asia results in Leap-002 trial, the model results were the same as global data. In the sensitivity analysis, with the variation of parameters, the results were robust. CONCLUSION: As one of the promising immuno-combination therapies in the first-line systemic treatment of HCC, camrelizumab plus rivoceranib demonstrated the potential to be the most cost-effective strategy, which warranted further studies to best inform the real-world clinical practices.

A randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study to Determine the effectiveness of the type I interferon receptor antibody, Anifrolumab, In SYstemic sclerosis: DAISY study design and rationale.

OBJECTIVES: The type I interferon pathway is a promising target for treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Here, we describe the design of a multinational, randomised phase 3 study to Determine the effectiveness of the type I interferon receptor antibody, Anifrolumab, In SYstemic sclerosis (DAISY). METHODS: DAISY includes a 52-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, a 52-week open-label active treatment period, and a 12-week safety follow-up period. The patient population includes a planned 306 adults with limited or diffuse cutaneous active SSc who satisfied American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology 2013 SSc criteria. Use of standard immunosuppressants, including mycophenolate mofetil, at a stable dose prior to randomisation is permitted in addition to weekly subcutaneous anifrolumab or placebo. Efficacy will be assessed at Week 52 via Revised-Composite Response Index in SSc (CRISS)-25 response (primary endpoint). Lung function and skin thickness will be assessed via change from baseline in forced vital capacity in patients with SSc-associated interstitial lung disease and modified Rodnan Skin Score, respectively (key secondary endpoints). CONCLUSIONS: The DAISY trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab as a first-in-class treatment option for patients with both limited and diffuse cutaneous SSc and will provide insight into the contributions of type I interferon to SSc pathogenesis. Revised-CRISS-25 can account for improvement and worsening in a broad set of validated clinical measures beyond lung function and skin thickness, including clinician- and patient-reported outcomes, capturing the heterogeneity of SSc.

Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to inflammation and scarring of the skin and internal organs, especially the lungs. Systemic sclerosis and lupus are both associated with increased interferon signalling, which is usually triggered by viral infections, but is related to damaging inflammation in these diseases. Anifrolumab, a drug that blocks interferon signalling, is already used to treat patients with lupus (also known as SLE), so it could potentially be used to treat patients with systemic sclerosis. This publication details the DAISY study design and explains why it is needed. This study will follow 2 groups of 153 patients with systemic sclerosis over 2 years. During the first year, in addition to any standard immunosuppressant therapy, the groups will receive weekly injections of either anifrolumab or "dummy drug" (placebo). In the second year, all patients will receive anifrolumab with their standard immunosuppressant therapy. Multiple factors will be considered to evaluate the efficacy of anifrolumab treatment, including clinical measurements of skin thickness and lung function, and questionnaires completed by clinicians and patients to report on patient health and their everyday function during treatment. The DAISY study will investigate the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab treatment in a diverse group of patients with systemic sclerosis who currently have limited options for effective treatment. The study will evaluate the impact of anifrolumab treatment on multiple aspects of the disease, and how patients feel about their overall health-related quality of life.

The effectiveness of intratympanic injections with methylPREDnisolon versus placebo in the treatment of vertigo attacks in MENière's disease (PREDMEN trial): a study protocol for a phase-3 multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intratympanic corticosteroids are commonly used in the treatment of Menière's disease (MD). However, few and small randomised controlled trials (RCT) on the effectiveness of intratympanic corticosteroids have been performed. A recent Cochrane review suggested that a well-conducted placebo-controlled RCT with a large study population is required to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of intratympanic corticosteroids in MD. The following protocol describes a phase-3 multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of methylprednisolone (62.5 mg/mL) to a placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We aim to recruit 148 patients with unilateral MD from six hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the methylprednisolone or the placebo group. Two injections will be given, one at baseline and one after 2 weeks. Follow-up assessments will be done at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome will be the frequency of vertigo attacks. Attacks will be evaluated daily with the DizzyQuest app. Secondary outcomes include hearing loss, tinnitus, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and escape medication, (serious) adverse events and cost-effectiveness. These will be evaluated with audiometry and multiple commonly used, validated questionnaires. For the primary and secondary outcomes mixed model analysis, generalised estimating equation analysis and logistic regression analysis will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was submitted via the Clinical Trials Information System, reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden The Hague Delft and the local institutional review board of each participating centre. All data will be presented ensuring the integrity and anonymity of patients. Results will be published in scientific journals and presented on (inter)national conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System, with the registration ID: NCT05851508.

Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Hematological Malignancies Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Phase 2 and Phase 3 Clinical Trials.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy uses genetically engineered T-cells with specific binding sites. This therapy allows for tumor specificity and durable treatment responses for patients with hematological malignancies. In this review, we study the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with CAR-T therapy. We searched the National Institutes of Health library, Cochrane Library Databases, ClinicalTrials.gov database, and medical literature search engines PubMed and Google Scholar for Phase 2 and Phase 3 drug-efficacy and safety trials to determine the aggregate incidence and risk of VTE treated with CAR-T. Of 1127 search results, nine studies were identified and included in our meta-analysis. Of the 1017 patients who received therapy, 805 patients (79.15%) experienced some degree of CRS, and 122 patients (11.9%) experienced severe CRS (higher than grade 3). Only three out of one thousand and seventeen patients were reported to have experienced venous thromboembolism. Our study did not find a statistically significant association between increased VTE incidence (OR = 0.0005, 95% CI [0.0001, 0.0017]) and CRS/ICANS (p < 0.0001). There was a 0.0050 (95% confidence interval [0.0019, 0.0132]) relative risk for VTE. In our study, we did not find a statistically significantly increased risk of developing VTE despite CRS and underlying malignancy, which have been associated with increased risk of VTE.

CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy vs. placebo plus endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a phase III RCTs based meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Does incorporating Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors into endocrine therapy (ET) effectively enhance survival outcomes, notably overall survival (OS), among individuals with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer? This remains a clinical controversy. We compared the antitumor efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) between CDK4/6 inhibitors + ET (CET) and placebo + ET (PET) by conducting a phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based meta-analysis. METHODS: Seven databases were searched to identify eligible studies, comprising Phase III RCTs comparing CET to PET. The primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including responses and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Seven RCTs (DAWNA-2, MONALEESA-2, MONALEESA-3, MONALEESA-7, MONARCH-3, PALOMA-2, and PALOMA-4) were included. The CET group exhibited significantly improved OS (HR: 0.81 [0.74, 0.88]), PFS (HR: 0.57 [0.52, 0.63]), objective response rate (RR: 1.31 [1.20, 1.43]), and clinical benefit rate (RR: 1.11 [1.07, 1.15]). These benefits were consistent across almost all subgroups. Additionally, the CET group showed better overall survival rates (OSR) from 24 to 60 months (OSR 24-60 m) and progression-free survival rates (PFSR) from 6 to 60 months (PFSR 6-60 m). However, more total AEs, grade 3-5 AEs, and serious AEs were found in CET group. The top 5 grade 3-5 AEs in the CET group were neutropenia (59.39%), leukopenia (24.11%), decreased white blood cell count (12.99%), hypertension (7.03%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (5.91%). CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of CET over PET in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer is evident, showing improved survival and responses. Nonetheless, the higher incidence of AEs, specifically hematologic AEs, requires cautious attention.

The role of early-phase trials and real-world evidence in drug development.

Phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while the gold standard for treatment efficacy and safety, are not always feasible, are expensive, can be prolonged and can be limited in generalizability. Other under-recognized sources of evidence can also help advance drug development. Basic science, proof-of-concept studies and early-phase RCTs can provide evidence regarding the potential for clinical benefit. Real-world evidence generated from registries or observational datasets can provide insights into the treatment of rare diseases that often pose a challenge for trial recruitment. Pragmatic trials embedded in healthcare systems can assess the treatment effects in clinical settings among patient populations sometimes excluded from trials. This Perspective discusses potential sources of evidence that may be used to complement explanatory phase 3 RCTs and to speed the development of new cardiovascular medications. Content is derived from the 19th Global Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists meeting (December 2022), involving clinical trialists, patients, clinicians, regulators, funders and industry representatives.

The World Needs a Staph Vaccine-New Research Could Bring It a Step Closer.

This Medical News article discusses recent findings that help explain Staphylococcus aureus vaccine failures.

Increasing Power in Phase III Oncology Trials With Multivariable Regression: An Empirical Assessment of 535 Primary End Point Analyses.

PURPOSE: A previous study demonstrated that power against the (unobserved) true effect for the primary end point (PEP) of most phase III oncology trials is low, suggesting an increased risk of false-negative findings in the field of late-phase oncology. Fitting models with prognostic covariates is a potential solution to improve power; however, the extent to which trials leverage this approach, and its impact on trial interpretation at scale, is unknown. To that end, we hypothesized that phase III trials using multivariable PEP analyses are more likely to demonstrate superiority versus trials with univariable analyses. METHODS: PEP analyses were reviewed from trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated by logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of the 535 trials enrolling 454,824 patients, 69% (n = 368) used a multivariable PEP analysis. Trials with multivariable PEP analyses were more likely to demonstrate PEP superiority (57% [209 of 368] v 42% [70 of 167]; aOR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.18 to 2.72]; P = .007). Among trials with a multivariable PEP model, 16 conditioned on covariates and 352 stratified by covariates. However, 108 (35%) of 312 trials with stratified analyses lost power by categorizing a continuous variable, which was especially common among immunotherapy trials (aOR, 2.45 [95% CI, 1.23 to 4.92]; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Trials increasing power by fitting multivariable models were more likely to demonstrate PEP superiority than trials with unadjusted analysis. Underutilization of conditioning models and empirical power loss associated with covariate categorization required by stratification were identified as barriers to power gains. These findings underscore the opportunity to increase power in phase III trials with conventional methodology and improve patient access to effective novel therapies.

DOSAGE study: protocol for a phase III non-inferiority randomised trial investigating dose-reduced chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer in older patients.

INTRODUCTION: Treating older adults with chemotherapy remains a challenge, given their under-representation in clinical trials and the lack of robust treatment guidelines for this population. Moreover, older patients, especially those with frailty, have an increased risk of developing chemotherapy-related toxicity, resulting in a decreased quality of life (QoL), increased hospitalisations and high healthcare costs. Phase II trials have suggested that upfront dose reduction of chemotherapy can reduce toxicity rates while maintaining efficacy, leading to fewer treatment discontinuations and an improved QoL. The DOSAGE aims to show that upfront dose-reduced chemotherapy in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is non-inferior to full-dose treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), with adaption of the treatment plan (monotherapy or doublet chemotherapy) based on expected risk of treatment toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DOSAGE study is an investigator-initiated phase III, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in patients aged≥70 years with metastatic colorectal cancer eligible for palliative chemotherapy. Based on toxicity risk, assessed using the Geriatric 8 (G8) tool, patients will be stratified to either doublet chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin) or fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Patients classified as low risk will be randomised between a fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction of 25%. Patients classified as high risk will be randomised between fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction. In the dose-reduced arm, dose escalation after two cycles is allowed. The primary outcome is PFS. Secondary endpoints include grade≥3 toxicity, QoL, physical functioning, number of treatment cycles, dose reductions, hospital admissions, overall survival, cumulative received dosage and cost-effectiveness. Considering a median PFS of 8 months and non-inferiority margin of 8 weeks, we shall include 587 patients. The study will be enrolled in 36 Dutch Hospitals, with enrolment scheduled to start in July 2024. This study will provide new evidence regarding the effect of dose-reduced chemotherapy on survival and treatment outcomes, as well as the use of the G8 to choose between doublet chemotherapy or monotherapy. Results will contribute to a more individualised approach in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, potentially leading to improved QoL while maintaining survival benefits. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has received ethical approval by the ethical committee Leiden Den Haag Delft (P24.018) and will be approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the participating institutions. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06275958.

Neoadjuvant therapy of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib for single huge hepatocellular carcinoma (NEO-START): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The high recurrence rate after liver resection emphasizes the urgent need for neoadjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to enhance the overall prognosis for patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, camrelizumab combined with an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) apatinib, have emerged as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC, yet its neoadjuvant application in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant therapy for single, huge HCC. METHODS: This multi-center, open-label randomized phase 3 trial will be conducted at 7 tertiary hospitals. Patients with single huge (≥ 10 cm in diameter), resectable HCC will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to arm of surgery alone or arm of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. In the neoadjuvant therapy group, patients will receive TACE within 1 week after randomization, followed by camrelizumab (200 mg q2w, 4 cycles), along with apatinib (250 mg qd, 2 months). Patients will receive liver resection after neoadjuvant therapy unless the disease is assessed as progressive. The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 1 year. The planned sample size of 60 patients will be calculated to permit the accumulation of sufficient RFS events in 1 year to achieve 80% power for the RFS primary endpoint. DISCUSSION: Synergistic effects provided by multimodality therapy of locoregional treatment, TKI, and anti-programmed cell death 1 inhibitor significantly improved overall survival for patients with unresectable HCC. Our trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination of TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant strategy for huge, resectable HCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chitr.org.cn ChiCTR2300078086. Registered on November 28, 2023. Start recruitment: 1st January 2024. Expected completion of recruitment: 15th June 2025.

Immunity in digestive diseases: new drugs for inflammatory bowel disease treatment-insights from Phase II and III trials.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), continues to challenge treatment paradigms. Advancements in therapeutic options have been have been driven by Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of new drug classes, particularly sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators and interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitors. METHODS: This review synthesizes findings from Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials conducted up to early 2024, focusing on the impact of S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors on IBD management. Drugs such as ozanimod, etrasimod, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab, and brasikumab were evaluated for their efficacy and safety profiles. RESULTS: S1P modulators, such as ozanimod and etrasimod, effectively regulate immune cell trafficking to reduce inflammation and several trials highlight their clinical effectiveness in both inducing and maintaining remission in IBD, highlighting its long-term safety and sustained therapeutic effects. Additionally, IL-23 inhibitors including risankizumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab, which disrupt key inflammatory cytokine pathways, have already shown significant effectiveness in inducing and maintaining remission in both CD and UC, with favorable safety profiles across multiple studies, suggesting their potential as critical components in managing IBD. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical trials indicate that both S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors offer promising therapeutic benefits and maintain strong safety profiles, positioning them as potential cornerstone treatments for IBD. Despite these advancements, further exploration into long-term safety and the development of personalized treatment strategies is essential for maximizing clinical outcomes.

Effects of luseogliflozin on suspected MASLD in patients with diabetes: a pooled meta-analysis of phase III clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Luseogliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, potentially exerts pleiotropic effects on the liver. However, the sufficient evidence is still lacking. We aimed to investigate the effects of luseogliflozin on hepatic steatosis, fibrosis, and cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetic patients by a pooled meta-analysis. METHODS: In this pooled meta-analysis, we enrolled diabetic patients who participated in phase III clinical trials of luseogliflozin (luseogliflozin group n = 302, placebo group n = 191). The primary outcomes were changes in fatty liver index (FLI) and Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS) after 24 weeks. The secondary outcomes were changes in cardiometabolic risk factors after 24 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using propensity scoring analysis by the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. RESULTS: Primary outcomes: Luseogliflozin significantly decreased FLI compared to placebo after 24 weeks (adjusted coefficient - 5.423, 95%CI - 8.760 to - 2.086, P = 0.0016). There was no significant difference in changes in HFS between the two groups. However, luseogliflozin significantly decreased HFS compared to placebo in diabetic patients with ALT > 30 U/L (adjusted coefficient - 0.039, 95%CI - 0.077 to - 0.001, P = 0.0438) and with FIB-4 index > 1.3 (adjusted coefficient - 0.0453, 95%CI - 0.075 to - 0.016, P = 0.0026). Secondary outcom8es: Luseogliflozin significantly decreased HbA1c level, HOMA-IR value, BMI, and uric acids level, and increased HDL cholesterol level compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled meta-analysis demonstrated that 24-week treatment with luseogliflozin improved hepatic steatosis and fibrosis indexes in diabetic patients, especially those with liver injury. Furthermore, luseogliflozin improved various cardiometabolic risk factors. Thus, luseogliflozin may be useful for improving MASLD in diabetic patients.

From Plan to Pivot: How Model-Informed Drug Development Shaped the Dose Strategy of the Zibotentan/Dapagliflozin ZENITH Trials.

Getting the dose right is a key challenge in drug development; model-informed drug development (MIDD) provides powerful tools to shape dose strategies and inform decision making. In this tutorial, the case study of the ZENITH trials showcases how a set of clinical pharmacology and MIDD approaches informed an impactful dose strategy. The endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan, combined with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin, has yielded a robust and significant albuminuria reduction in the Phase IIb trial ZENITH-CKD and is being investigated for reduction of kidney function decline in a high-risk chronic kidney disease population in the Phase III trial ZENITH High Proteinuria. Endothelin antagonist treatment has, until now, been limited by the class effect fluid retention. ZENITH-CKD investigated a wide range of zibotentan doses based on pharmacokinetics in renal impairment, competitor-data exposure-response modeling, and clinical trial simulations. Recruitment delays reduced interim analysis data availability; here, supportive dose-response modeling recovered decision-making confidence. At trial completion, the low-dose arm enabled Phase III dose selection between Phase IIb doses. Dose-response modeling of efficacy and Kaplan-Meier analyses of tolerability identified a kidney-function-based low-dose strategy of 0.25 or 0.75 mg zibotentan (with 10 mg dapagliflozin) to balance benefit/risk in ZENITH High Proteinuria. The applied clinical pharmacology and MIDD principles enabled successful Phase IIb dose finding, rationalized and built confidence in the innovative Phase III dosing strategy and identified a potential therapeutic window for zibotentan/dapagliflozin, providing the opportunity for a significant improvement in the treatment of chronic kidney disease with high proteinuria.