Medical Costs and Caregiver Burden of Delivering Disease-Modifying Alzheimer's Treatments with Different Duration and Route of Administration.

BACKGROUND: Multiple disease modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease are currently in clinical development or have been recently approved for use. They have vastly different treatment properties but so far, little work has been done to quantify the impact of treatment properties on the treatment's value in terms of medical and social care costs and caregiver burden. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze how the mode of treatment administration, treatment frequency and duration, and monitoring requirements affect the value of disease modifying treatments. In order to isolate these effects, we compare five hypothetical disease modifying treatments with equal efficacy and safety: (1) chronic bi-weekly intravenous infusion, (2) chronic four-weekly intravenous infusion, (3) 52 weeks fixed duration four-weekly intravenous infusion, (4) chronic subcutaneous injections, and (5) chronic oral prescription on their direct medical costs, caregiver burden, and preservation of treatment value. DESIGN: Survey of Alzheimer's disease treatment clinics and retrospective data analysis. SETTING: United States. MEASUREMENTS: Direct medical cost and caregiver burden of treatment administration and monitoring compared to gross treatment benefit. RESULTS: Chronic bi-weekly infusion treatment had the highest direct medical cost ($45,208) and caregiver burden ($6,095), reducing the treatment value by 44%, while oral treatment with the lowest direct medical cost ($1,983) and caregiver burden ($457) reduced the treatment value by only 2%. Substantial caregiver burden was reported from the survey, with a reported average of 2.3 hours for an office visit and infusion, 44 minutes of round-trip travel time, and 78% of patients being accompanied by a caregiver for treatment. CONCLUSION: Burden of chronic intravenous treatments exceed the gross medical and social care cost savings and value of caregiver benefit. The results suggest the need for less complex treatments that require fewer clinic visits to preserve the economic value of disease modifying treatments.

Bi-weekly irinotecan is an effective and convenient regimen in the treatment of relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite initial dramatic responses, metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) invariably recurs. Irinotecan is one of the active agents for patients with recurrent SCLC. In the second line, weekly or three-weekly irinotecan regimens have been adopted, however, the optimal dose and schedule is not defined. In our institution, we use a bi-weekly regimen of irinotecan. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the bi-weekly irinotecan in the second- or third-line treatment of SCLC patients. METHODS: The study population consisted of advanced stage SCLC patients who were followed at Hacettepe University Cancer Institute between January 2007 and March 2021 and received salvage irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every two weeks, following progression after platinum-etoposide treatment. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included. At diagnosis, nineteen patients (19%) had limited stage and 81 patients (81%) had extensive stage SCLC. Objective response rates (ORR) were 44.6% and 46.2% for patients who received irinotecan treatment in second line, and in third line, respectively. Seventeen percent of all the patients had grade 3 and above adverse events during irinotecan treatment. In our study, 45.8% of patients were able to complete at least 6 cycles of irinotecan treatment and 69.8% were able to receive at least 3 cycles of irinotecan treatment without any dose interruption or reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every two weeks appears to be safe and effective in the 2nd- and 3rd-line treatment of advanced stage SCLC. Bi-weekly administration allows G-CSF prophylaxis in between doses, leading to an uninterrupted administration.

A single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-weekly sirolimus (rapamycin) on muscle strength and endurance in older adults following a 13-week exercise program.

BACKGROUND: Aging leads to a decline in muscle mass and strength, contributing to frailty and decreased quality of life. Sirolimus (rapamycin) , an mTOR inhibitor, has shown potential in preclinical studies to extend lifespan and improve health span. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of once-weekly sirolimus (rapamycin) administration on muscle strength and endurance in older adults engaged in a 13-week exercise program. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will enroll 40 participants aged 65-85. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sirolimus (rapamycin) 6 mg/week or placebo for 13 weeks, in conjunction with an at-home exercise program. The primary outcome measure is the change in muscle strength and endurance, assessed by the 30-Second Chair-Stand Test. Secondary outcome measures include adverse events, changes in muscle strength and endurance as measured by the 6-min walk test, handgrip strength, and participant-reported outcomes using the SF-36 survey. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (week 6), and post-intervention (week 13). Blood samples will be collected for hematology and biochemistry analyses, including full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, HbA1c, lipids, serum IGF-1, and hs-CRP. DNA methylation will be analyzed using TruDiagnostic™ to explore changes in biological age. DISCUSSION: This study aims to provide insights into the potential benefits of intermittent sirolimus (rapamycin) administration on muscle performance in older adults. By alternating periods of mTOR inhibition through rapamycin and activation via exercise, this study will explore a novel approach to enhancing muscle strength and endurance in the aging population. The results could have significant implications for developing interventions to improve physical function and overall health outcomes in older adults. Safety and tolerability will also be closely monitored to ensure the feasibility of this regimen for wider application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12624000790549. Registered on 26 June 2024 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12624000790549 .

A randomized, multicenter phase III Study of once-per-cycle administration of efbemalenograstim alfa (F-627), a novel long-acting rhG-CSF, for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: F-627 (efbemalenograstim alfa) is a novel long acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) that contains two human G-CSF fused to a human immunoglobulin G2 (hIgG2) -Fc fragment with a peptide linker. This studyevaluated the efficacy and safety of F-627, also known as efbemalenograstim alfa (Ryzneuta®) in reducing neutropenia compared with filgrastim (GRAN®). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled non-inferiority study. Two hundred thirty nine (239) patients were enrolled in thirteen centers and received the chemotherapy with epirubicin (100 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of four cycles. Patients were randomized to receive either a single 20 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of F-627 on day 3 of each cycle or daily s.c. injection of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/d starting from day 3 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was the duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1. The safety profile was also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean (SD) duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 0.68 (1.10) and 0.71 (0.95) days for the F-627 and the filgrastim groups, respectively. The Hodges-Lehmann estimate of the between-group median difference (F-627 vs filgrastim) in the duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 0 day and the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% CI was 0 day, which was within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1-day. Results for all efficacy endpoints in cycles 2 - 4 were consistent with the results in cycle 1, however a trend towards a lower incidence and a shorter duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia was observed in the F-627 group compared with the filgrastim group. The ANC nadir in the F-627 group was significantly higher than that in the filgrastim group in each cycle. A single fixed dose of F-627 was well tolerated and as safe as standard daily filgrastim. CONCLUSIONS: A single fixed dose of 20 mg of F-627 in each cycle was as safe and effective as a daily dose of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/d in reducing neutropenia and its complications in patients who received four cycles of EC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04174599, on 22/11/2019.

Cofrogliptin once every 2 weeks as add-on therapy to metformin versus daily linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes in China: A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

AIM: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cofrogliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor taken once every 2 weeks (Q2W), compared with linagliptin (taken daily) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase 3 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study, patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cofrogliptin 10 mg Q2W, cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W, or linagliptin 5 mg daily, all as an add-on treatment to metformin, for 24 weeks. Eligible patients could enter an open-label extension period and receive cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W for an additional 28 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to 24 weeks, with a non-inferiority margin of 0.4% for cofrogliptin versus linagliptin treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 465 patients entered the 24-week treatment period (median age: 57.0 years). The least-squares mean (standard error) change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was -0.96 (0.063), -0.99 (0.064) and -1.07 (0.065) for the cofrogliptin 10 mg, cofrogliptin 25 mg and linagliptin 5 mg groups, respectively. The between-group difference met the predefined margin for non-inferiority of cofrogliptin (10 and 25 mg) versus linagliptin treatment. The incidence of common adverse events (≥5% patients) during the 24-week treatment period was similar between treatment groups. There were no serious hypoglycaemic events. CONCLUSION: In Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin, the glucose-lowering effect of cofrogliptin (Q2W) was non-inferior to linagliptin (daily), with a similar safety profile maintained over 52 weeks of treatment.

Thromboprophylaxis in oesophageal cancer patients-a study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial (TOP-RCT).

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to examine if prolonged thromboprophylaxis decreases the risk of thrombosis after intended curative surgery for oesophageal cancer. Study results are expected to inform a guideline for thromboprophylaxis after oesophageal cancer surgery. The perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this critically ill patient group. Thrombosis is the second-most common cause of cancer death after the cancer itself. The risk of thrombosis depends on the cancer type, and upper gastrointestinal cancers are considered high risk. This risk is further increased when patients undergo surgery. However, only few studies have investigated the peri- and postoperative coagulation profile in oesophageal cancer patients. Due to this lack of knowledge, prophylaxis is currently restricted to 5000 IU (international units) low-molecular weight heparin daily from surgery until discharge from hospital (approximately 10 days), whereas patients with gastric cancer receive 30 days of treatment. The present study examines whether a 30-day treatment is superior and safe, compared with the current standard treatment. METHODS: The study is a randomised controlled trial. Inclusion is ongoing, and we aim to include 100 patients. Blood samples are drawn before and after surgery, and the coagulation is extensively examined. The primary endpoint is the difference in plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) 30 days after surgery between the intervention and the standard group. Furthermore, patients are examined with ultrasound to screen for asymptomatic venous thrombotic events (VTE). Secondary endpoints are incidence of bleeding, symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE and mortality 30 days 1 one year after surgery. DISCUSSION: The study will provide valuable information on the perioperative coagulation profile and VTE risk of oesophageal cancer patients. The study seeks to aid in optimising the postoperative thromboprophylaxis, and the perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this at-risk patient population. TRIALS REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register with ID 2021-001335-24 on 30 June 2021 and at ClinicalTrials.gov with study identifier NCT05067153.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of imidafenacin administered twice daily for continency recovery following radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: Prospective open-label case-controlled randomized trial.

PURPOSE: This study aims to prospectively analyze the effects of anticholinergic therapy using imidafenacin on detrusor overactivity occurring after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were followed-up at outpatient visits 2-4 weeks post-surgery (visit 2) to confirm the presence of urinary incontinence. Those confirmed with urinary incontinence were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the anticholinergic medication group (imidafenacin 0.1 mg twice daily) or the control group. Patients were followed-up at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery for observational assessments, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS). RESULTS: A total of 49 patients (25 in the treatment group and 24 in the control group) were randomized for the study. There were no differences observed between the groups in terms of age, comorbidities, prostate size, or pathological staging. According to the IPSS questionnaire results, there was no statistically significant difference between the medication and control groups (p=0.161). However, when comparing storage and voiding symptoms separately, there was a statistically significant improvement in storage symptom scores (p=0.012). OABSS also revealed statistically significant improvement in symptoms from 3 months post-surgery (p=0.005), which persisted until 6 months post-surgery (IPSS storage: p=0.023, OABSS: p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: In the case of urinary incontinence that occurs after RARP, even if the function of the intrinsic sphincter is sufficiently preserved, if urinary incontinence persists due to changes in the bladder, pharmacological therapy using imidafenacin can be beneficial in managing urinary incontinence.

In sepsis or septic shock, prolonged vs. intermittent infusion of ß-lactam antibiotics reduces mortality at 90 d.

SOURCE CITATION: Abdul-Aziz MH, Hammond NE, Brett SJ, et al. Prolonged vs intermittent infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics in adults with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 12 June 2024. [Epub ahead of print.] 38864162.

Once-weekly insulin efsitora alfa versus once-daily insulin degludec in adults with type 1 diabetes (QWINT-5): a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Insulin efsitora alfa (efsitora) is a once-weekly basal insulin. This phase 3 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of efsitora compared with insulin degludec (degludec) in adults with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: This randomised, 52-week, parallel-design, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority study conducted at 82 global health-care centres, randomly assigned (1:1) adults (ie, those aged ≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7·0-10·0% (53·0-85·8 mmol/mol) to efsitora (n=343) or, degludec (n=349), both in combination with insulin lispro. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week-26 (non-inferiority margin=0·4%). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05463744) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Aug 12, 2022, and May 7, 2024, of 893 participants enrolled, 692 (77%) participants were randomly assigned to once-weekly efsitora or once-daily degludec, and 623 (90%) participants completed the study. Mean HbA1c decreased from 7·88% (62·66 mmol/mol) at baseline to 7·41% (57·5 mmol/mol) at week 26 with efsitora and from 7·94% (63·3 mmol/mol) at baseline to 7·36% (56·9 mmol/mol) at week 26 with degludec. Mean HbA1c change from baseline to week 26 was -0·51% with efsitora and -0·56% with degludec (estimated treatment difference 0·052%, 95% CI -0·077 to 0·181; p=0·43), confirming a non-inferiority margin of 0·4% for efsitora compared with degludec. Rates of combined level 2 (<54 mg/dL [3·0 mmol/L]) or level 3 severe hypoglycaemia were higher with efsitora compared with degludec (14·03 vs 11·59 events per patient year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 1·21, 95% CI 1·04 to 1·41; p=0·016) during weeks 0-52, with the highest rates during weeks 0-12. Severe hypoglycaemia incidence was higher with efsitora (35 [10%] of 343) versus degludec (11 [3%] of 349) during weeks 0-52. Overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar across treatment groups. One death not related to the study treatment occurred in the degludec group. INTERPRETATION: In adults with type 1 diabetes, once-weekly efsitora showed non-inferior HbA1c reduction compared with daily insulin degludec. Higher rates of combined level 2 or level 3 hypoglycaemia and greater incidence of severe hypoglycaemia in participants treated with efsitora compared with participants treated with degludec might suggest the need for additional evaluation of efsitora dose initiation and optimisation in people with type 1 diabetes. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.

Local cefuroxime tissue concentrations in the hand after single and repeated administration to 16 patients undergoing trapeziectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:  The duration of antibiotic coverage in hand tissues during surgery is unknown. We investigated the time the free concentration of cefuroxime was above the minimal inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) of 4 µg/mL in hand tissues after single and repeated administration. METHODS:  In a prospective, unblinded randomized study 16 patients (13 female, age range 51-80 years) underwent trapeziectomy. Microdialysis catheters were placed in the metacarpal bone (primary effect parameter), synovial sheath, and subcutaneous tissue. Patients were randomized to postoperative administration of either intravenous single administration of cefuroxime (1,500 mg) (Group 1, n = 8) or repeated dosing (2 x 1,500 mg) with a 4 h interval (Group 2, n = 8). Samples were taken over 8 h. RESULTS: The fT>MIC of 4 µg/mL was found to be significantly longer in the metacarpal bone in Group 2 compared with Group 1 with a mean difference of 199 min (95% confidence interval 158-239). The same trend was evident in the remaining compartments. A concentration of 4 µg/mL was reached in all compartments in both groups within a mean time of 6 min (range 0-27 min). In Group 1, the mean concentrations decreased below 4 µg/mL between 3 h 59 min and 5 h 38 min. CONCLUSION:  The fT>MIC was longer after repeated administration compared with single administration in all compartments. A single administration of cefuroxime 1,500 mg provided antimicrobial hand tissue coverage for a minimum of 3 h 59 min. Cefuroxime administration in hand surgeries should be done minimum 27 min prior to incision to achieve sufficient coverage in all individuals. Cefuroxime readministration should be considered in hand surgeries lasting longer than 4 h from time of administration.

In sepsis, continuous and intermittent infusion of ß-lactam antibiotics did not differ for mortality at 90 d.

SOURCE CITATION: Dulhunty JM, Brett SJ, De Waele JJ, et al; BLING III Study Investigators. Continuous vs intermittent ß-lactam antibiotic infusions in critically ill patients with sepsis: the BLING III randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 12 June 2024. [Epub ahead of print.] 38864155.

Ten-day vonoprazan-based versus fourteen-day proton pump inhibitor-based therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: A shorter treatment duration potentially offers the advantage of reducing adverse events (AEs) and enhancing patient compliance for Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, the difference in eradication rates between short-duration vonoprazan-based regimens and fourteen-day proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy remained unknown. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ten-day vonoprazan-based regimens with fourteen-day conventional PPI-based therapy for H. pylori eradication. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search up to November 28, 2023, using PubMed. A random-effects model was applied to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the pooled Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: This meta-analysis included four randomized controlled clinical trials with 1560 patients. The H. pylori eradication rate of ten-day vonoprazan-based regimens was comparable to that of fourteen-day PPI-based therapy (88.7% vs 82.9%, OR 1.53, 95% CI [0.85-2.75], p = .16) in ITT analysis. The incidence of AEs in ten-day vonoprazan-based therapy was also similar to the control group (11.2% vs 17.6%, OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.33-1.31], p = .24). Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that the ten-day vonoprazan-based regimen is as effective as fourteen-day PPI-based therapy in eradicating H. pylori, with comparable AEs. However, additional research is required for confirmation.

Impact of oral azithromycin and intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine regimen on child mortality in Sierra Leone: trial protocol for a randomised, two-arm, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial (ICARIA).

BACKGROUND: Azithromycin has been shown to be beneficial in preventing infectious diseases, including malaria, infectious diarrhoea and pneumonia. A cluster randomised control trial on azithromycin MDA in children in Niger, Malawi and Tanzania found a reduction in all-cause under-five (U5) mortality in communities who received azithromycin compared to placebo. However, the reduction was largest and statistically significant only in Niger. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the impact of azithromycin plus intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi), recently renamed by the World Health Organisation as perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC), with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) on all-cause mortality up to 18 months of age in children living in areas of high mortality burden through the Expanded Program on Immunisation (EPI) in Sierra Leone. METHODS: The Improving Care through Azithromycin Research for Infants in Africa (ICARIA) trial is a phase III two-arm, individually randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial administering oral AZI (20 mg/kg bodyweight) at three time points to children attending EPI visits in Sierra Leone. A total of 20,560 infants attending the first EPI contact at around 6 weeks of age are recruited and randomised to AZI or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The second and third AZI/placebo doses are given at 9 and 15 months of age. The primary outcome of the trial is all-cause mortality rate at 18 months of age assessed through mortality surveillance. Other trial outcomes include the impact on antimicrobial resistance, and on the immune response to certain key routine EPI immunisations, the safety of the intervention, the prevalence of SP resistance markers and the feasibility, and acceptability of adding AZI to the EPI programme. DISCUSSION: The trial will provide the evidence needed to inform policy regarding the adoption and large-scale implementation of AZI in areas of high-mortality burden in sub-Saharan Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04235816. Registered on 22 January 2020. Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202004540256535. Registered on 14 April 2020.

The optimal antibiotic treatment duration for community-acquired pneumonia in adults diagnosed in general practice in Denmark (CAP-D): an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Use of antibiotics is the main driver of antimicrobial resistance which is considered one of the biggest threats to human health. In Denmark, most antibiotics are prescribed in general practice. Acute lower respiratory tract infections, including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), are among the most frequent indications for antibiotic prescribing. Phenoxymethylpenicillin is established as first-line treatment in general practice in Denmark. However, the treatment duration with phenoxymethylpenicillin is mostly based on traditions. Both 5 and 7 days of treatment is recommended in Danish guidelines, and when asking the general practitioners about what treatment duration, they prescribe the variation is even bigger. Several hospital-based studies have proven short course (≤ 6 days) antibiotic treatment non-inferior to long course (≥ 7 days) treatment of CAP. No evidence exists on the optimal treatment duration for CAP in non-hospitalised patients. This randomised controlled trial aim to investigate the optimal treatment duration with phenoxymethylpenicillin for CAP in adults diagnosed in general practice in Denmark. METHODS: This is an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled, five-arm DURATIONS trial. Participants will be recruited from at least 24 general practices in Denmark. Eligible participants are adults, with no pre-existing lung disease, presenting with symptoms of CAP, and in whom the general practitioner finds it relevant to treat with antibiotics. The study will compare treatment with phenoxymethylpenicillin 1.2 MIE q.i.d. in 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence for the optimal antibiotic treatment duration of CAP in general practice and inform future guidelines on CAP in all countries using phenoxymethylpenicillin for the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults. The results of this study might also be used to guide treatment recommendations in other countries using phenoxymethylpenicillin. Moreover, a (potential) reduction in antibiotic use might lower the development of antimicrobial resistance, increase patient treatment adherence, reduce risks of adverse events, and lower the economical exp TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06295120. Registered 28 February 2024.  The Scientific Ethics Committee for the North Denmark Region: N-20230039.

Timing of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients after acute ischaemic stroke and outcome after 3 months: results of the multicentre Berlin Atrial Fibrillation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is key in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) but there is uncertainty regarding the optimal timing of OAC (re)initiation after stroke, as recent large randomised controlled trials have methodological weaknesses and excluded stroke patients on therapeutic anticoagulation at stroke onset as well as patients started on a vitamin K antagonist after stroke. The '1-3-6-12 days rule', based on expert consensus and referring to stroke severity, was used in clinical practice to initiate OAC after acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) since publication in 2013. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed whether compliance to the '1-3-6-12 days rule' was associated with the composite endpoint (recurrent stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, major bleeding or all-cause death). RESULTS: Among 708 registry patients with known AF before stroke and hospitalisation within 72 hours after stroke, 432 were anticoagulated at stroke onset. OAC was started according to the '1-3-6-12 days rule' in 255 (39.2%) patients. Non-adherence to the '1-3-6-12 days rule' was not associated with the composite endpoint within 3 months in 661 patients who (re-)started on OAC (log-rank test: p=0.74).Results were similar for 521 patients (re)started on a non-vitamin K-dependent OAC. CONCLUSION: (Re)starting OAC after stroke followed the '1-3-6-12 days rule' in about 40% of all patients with AF, and more often in those anticoagulated at stroke onset. Adherence to the '1-3-6-12 days rule' did not reduce the composite clinical endpoint, if OAC was restarted within 3 months of stroke/TIA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02306824.

Early initiation of oral beta-blocker improves long-term survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for the initiation of oral beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains unclear within the context of current primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 412 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute MI between January 2007 and August 2016 who underwent successful primary PCI and were given oral carvedilol during hospitalization. Early and late carvedilol groups were based on initiation within the first 24 h or after. Propensity score matching (1:1) incorporating 21 baseline characteristics yielded 47 matched pairs. Timing of carvedilol initiation was evaluated in relation to patient outcomes including time to all-cause mortality, using Kaplan-Meier estimates on the matched cohort and additional confirmation in multivariable regression analysis among the entire cohort. RESULTS: Median follow-up period was 828 days. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients (4.7%) and 18 patients (15.8%) of the early and late carvedilol groups. After propensity score matching, initiation of oral carvedilol within the first 24 h was associated with lower all-cause mortality (6.4% vs. 25.5%, hazard ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.06 - 0.89, p = 0.036), as well as lower in-hospital mortality (0 vs. 14.9%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that initiation of oral carvedilol within the first 24 h reduces the risk of long-term mortality, in acute MI patients who underwent primary PCI, supporting current guidelines recommendation.

Optimized anti-tuberculosis duration for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis-diabetes mellitus comorbidities: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of tuberculosis (TB) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) presents unique challenges in treatment optimization and management, given the mutual exacerbation of disease processes. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different treatment durations (6-month versus 9-month regimens) regimen for patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis (DS-PTB) and concurrent type 2 diabetes (DM). METHODS: Patients with DS-PTB and type-2 DM from 22 hospitals in China are enrolled. They are randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either the 6-month regimen arm(2HRZE/4HR) or the 9-month regimen arm(2HRZE/7HR). At the end of the intensive phase (the 8th week), patients in both arms who with sputum positive smear will extent one more month of intensive treatment. The primary outcome is the proportion of unfavorable outcomes at 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include treatment success rate at the end of treatment, proportion of recurrence at 24 months after randomization, time to recurrence after treatment completion, proportion of intensive phrase extension, occurrence of adverse events grade 3 or above during treatment. DISCUSSION: The study focuses on assessing the optimal treatment duration to maximize treatment success while minimizing recurrence and adverse events. The trial is expected to provide vital insights into the appropriate treatment duration for patients with TB-DM, aiming to reduce recurrence rates and improve overall treatment outcomes in this vulnerable population. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100044663. Registered on March 25, 2021.

Predicting Individual Treatment Effects to Determine Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Stent Implantation.

BACKGROUND: After coronary stent implantation, prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) increases bleeding risk, requiring personalization of DAPT duration. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict optimal DAPT duration after contemporary drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: The One-Month DAPT, RESET (Real Safety and Efficacy of 3-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation), and IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesion) trials provided a derivation cohort (n=6568). Using the X-learner approach, an individualized DAPT score was developed to determine the therapeutic benefit of abbreviated (1-6 months) versus standard (12-month) DAPT using various predictors. The primary outcome was major bleeding; the secondary outcomes included 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and 1-year net adverse clinical events. The risk reduction with abbreviated DAPT (3 months) in the individualized DAPT-determined higher predicted benefit group was validated in the TICO (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial (n=3056), which enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor. The validation cohort comprised 1527 abbreviated and 1529 standard DAPT cases. Major bleeding occurred in 25 (1.7%) and 45 (3.0%) patients in the abbreviated and standard DAPT groups, respectively. The individualized DAPT score identified 2582 (84.5%) participants who would benefit from abbreviated DAPT, which was significantly associated with a lower major bleeding risk (absolute risk difference [ARD], 1.26 [95% CI, 0.15-2.36]) and net adverse clinical events (ARD, 1.59 [95% CI, 0.07-3.10]) but not major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ARD, 0.63 [95% CI, -0.34 to 1.61]), compared with standard DAPT in the higher predicted benefit group. Abbreviated DAPT had no significant difference in clinical outcomes of major bleeding (ARD, 1.49 [95% CI, -1.74 to 4.72]), net adverse clinical events (ARD, 2.57 [95% CI, -1.85 to 6.99]), or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ARD, 1.54 [95% CI, -1.26 to 4.34]), compared with standard DAPT in the individualized DAPT-determined lower predicted benefit group. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning using the X-learner approach identifies patients with acute coronary syndrome who may benefit from abbreviated DAPT after drug-eluting stent implantation, laying the groundwork for personalized antiplatelet therapy.