Relationships between stenosis severity, functional limitation, pain, and quality of life in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

Background/aim: This study aimed to examine the relationships between severity of stenosis, pain, functional limitation, disability, and quality of life in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Materials and methods: Patients (45 female, 19 male) with radiculopathy due to spondylotic changes in the cervical spine were included in this study. Stenosis severity (thecal sac cross-sectional area (CSA)), numbness, neck and arm pain severity, functional limitation (Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale), disability, and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L General Quality of Life Scale) were evaluated. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT06001359. Results: According to CSA values, 28 (43.75%) patients had severe stenosis and 36 (56.25%) had moderate stenosis, and the average CSA was 81.65 ± 10.08 mm2. Positive correlations were found between both neck and arm pain and neck disability (r = 0.597, r = 0.359), and negative correlations were found for the General Quality of Life Scale index score and EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale (r = -0.787, r = -0.518). There were significant positive correlations between Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale subscales and severity of stenosis, neck and arm pain, numbness, and disability (p < 0.05 for all). A significant negative correlation was observed between Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale subscales and quality of life (p < 0.01). Stenosis severity was correlated with pain, neck disability, and quality of life (p < 0.01 for all). Conclusion: There are direct relationships between cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and neck and arm pain, numbness, disability, and quality of life. Additionally, an increase in the severity of cervical stenosis is associated with an increase in pain and disability.

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery for symptomatic double-level lumbar spinal stenosis with ossification.

This study aimed to explore the short-term effects of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression (PETD) for the treatment of symptomatic double-level lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with ossification. Twenty-eight patients diagnosed with double-level lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent double-level PETD surgery between January 2021 and January 2023 at our institution. General information, such as age, sex, disease duration, hospitalization time, and operation time, was recorded. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) was recorded to assess the degree of spinal canal decompression. The White-Panjabi scoring system (WP) was used to assess preoperative and postoperative lumbar spine stability. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were recorded to assess symptom improvement, and surgical efficacy was evaluated using the modified Macnab evaluation criteria at the 1-year postoperative follow-up. The types and risks of complications were also recorded. The patient's 1-year postoperative follow-up MRI showed that both L3/4 and L4/5 DSCA were significantly enlarged compared with preoperative values (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the WP scores at 3 months postoperatively compared with those preoperatively (P > .05). The VAS scores for hip and lower extremity pain at 3 days, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively were significantly lower than those preoperatively (P < .001), and the ODI scores at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively were significantly lower than those preoperatively (P < .001). There were no significant differences in hip pain, lower extremity pain VAS scores, or ODI scores between the postoperative follow-up time points (P > .05). There was 1 case of lower limb numbness and 1 case of neuroedematous pain in the postoperative period, and all patients had no complications, such as dural sac tear, infection, or recurrence. The 1-year postoperative follow-up was assessed as excellent in 17 cases, good in 9 cases, and possible in 2 cases using the modified Macnab criteria, with an excellent rate of 92.9%. The efficacy of double-level PETD for symptomatic double-level LSS is clear, the local stability of the lumbar spine is less affected, and the risk is low, which can reduce the chances of reoperation in patients. Thus, it is a recommended surgical procedure.

CLINICAL AND IMAGING OUTCOMES OF XLIF SURGERY FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of lateral interbody bone graft surgery and posterior percutaneous screws for lumbar spinal stenosis Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. There were 27 patients with 30 segments of surgery diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis that were surgically treated with the XLIF method. Clinical outcomes measured included VAS scores for lower back pain and leg pain, ODI, and JOA scores. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine after surgery was used to evaluate indirect decompression. X-ray or CT scan to evaluate bone fusion after 6 months of surgery. Differences were determined by independent T-test. RESULTS: There were 27 patients with 30 segments of surgery. They were 12 males and 15 females with an average age of 58.81±8.1. There was significant improvement in VAS for lower back pain from 7.11±1.31 to 3.67±1.3, VAS for leg pain from 6.81±2.19 to 1.59±1.89, ODI from 26.41±8.95 to 13.69±8.34, and JOA score from 7.63±2.87 to 13.5±1.73. A-P diameter increased 134%, lateral diameter increased 120%, lateral recess depth increased 166%, disc height increased 126%, foraminal height increased 124%, spinal canal area increased 30%. The p-values were all <0.001. The average hospital stay was 6.79±3.01 days. Complications included 1 pedicle screw malformation, 1 ALL avulsion fracture, 1 abdominal herniation, 1 venous damage, 1 failure. CONCLUSION: XLIF surgery presents a favorable option for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. This is a minimally invasive surgical method that reduces pain, reduces bleeding, and is effective in indirectly decompressing the spinal canal both clinal and imaging.

Causal relationship between multiple sclerosis and spinal stenosis: Two-sample Mendelian randomization.

To investigate the causal relationship between multiple sclerosis and spinal stenosis using Mendelian randomization (MR). Genetic loci independently associated with multiple sclerosis and spinal stenosis in people of European origin were selected as instrumental variables using pooled data from genome wide association studies (GWAS). Three MR analyses, MR-Egger, Weighted median and inverse variance weighting (IVW), were used to investigate the causal relationship between multiple sclerosis and spinal stenosis. Heterogeneity and multiplicity tests were performed, and sensitivity analyses were performed using the "leave-one-out" method to explore the robustness of the results. The IVW results showed an OR (95% CI) of 1.05 (1.01-1.08), P = .016, indicating a causal relationship between MS and spinal stenosis. And no heterogeneity and multiplicity were found by the test, and sensitivity analysis also showed robust results. In this study, genetic data were analyzed and explored using 2-sample MR analysis, and the results showed a causal relationship between multiple sclerosis and the occurrence of spinal stenosis.

A breakthrough in lumbar surgery: ipsilateral interlaminar endoscopy and its impact on spinal stability and patient outcomes.

Lumbar stenosis (LS) often leads to debilitating symptoms due to nerve compression in the spinal canal. As this condition becomes increasingly prevalent among the elderly, innovative surgical techniques are crucial. This letter examines a recent advancement introduced by Marco Aurélio Moscatelli et al., who have developed an ipsilateral interlaminar endoscopic approach for decompression at the L5-S1 level. Their study, involving 30 patients with degenerative stenosis, reports significant improvements in quality-of-life metrics, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain. The new approach not only overcomes anatomical challenges specific to the L5-S1 region but also offers enhanced visualization and extensive decompression without destabilizing the spine. This letter highlights the promising results of this technique, the utility of the FAPDIS algorithm in guiding surgical choices, and the broader implications for minimally invasive lumbar surgery. The findings underscore a potential shift towards more effective and safer interventions for lumbar stenosis, paving the way for better patient outcomes in spinal decompression.

Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous endoscopic techniques in unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) has yielded positive results in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Unilateral biportal ULBD (UB-ULBD) and percutaneous endoscopic ULBD (PE-ULBD) are gaining popularity because of the progress that has been made in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the radiographic and clinical results of UB-ULBD and PE-ULBD. METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent ULBD surgery for LSS. The patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of the surgical method: the UB-ULBD group and the PE-ULBD group. Data on the general demographic data, surgical details, clinical efficacy, radiography and complications were compared between the two groups were compared. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 113 LSS patients who had undergone ULBD at our institution were included, of whom 61 patients underwent UB-ULBD surgery and 52 underwent PE-ULBD surgery. The UB-ULBD group had a significantly shorter operation time (P < 0.05). The facet was significantly better preserved in the UB-ULBD group than in the PE-ULBD group, and the angle of ipsilateral facet joint resection in the UE-ULBD group was significantly smaller (P < 0.05). The ODI score, VAS score and modified Macnab criteria improved postoperatively in both groups. The UB-ULBD group had a 95.08% rate of excellent or good patient outcomes, whereas the PE-ULBD group had a 92.30% rate. CONCLUSION: Both UB-ULBD and PE-ULBD can provide favourable clinical outcomes when used to treat LSS. UB-ULBD is beneficial because of its shorter operation time, smaller angle of ipsilateral facet joint resection and better facet preservation, making it a viable and safe option for treating LSS while ensuring spinal stability.

Analyses of imaging presentations, full endoscopic and pathological features of a novel interlaminar ligament.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the characteristics of an unnamed interlaminar ligaments(ILL) through magnetic resonance image (MRI), endoscopy and pathological examination. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of patients who underwent posterior endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis from January 2021 to February 2022 at our medical center. The height, width and cross-sectional thickness of the ligament was analyzed using T2 weighted MRI. Meanwhile, the morphological and pathological characteristics were also compared with those of the ligamentum flavum to highlight the differences between above mentioned ligaments. RESULT: Forty-three patients were included in this study, including 27 males and 16 females, with an average age of 46.6 ± 12.1y. There were 20 cases of lumbar disc herniation and 23 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis. The width, length, thickness of the ILL, the thickness of LF and surgical time in the lumbar disc group were 17.7 ± 3.5 mm, 4.3 ± 1.3 mm, 18.3 ± 3.5 mm, 5.3 ± 1.9 mm, 53.2 ± 14.5 min, respectively. In the lumbar spinal stenosis group, the corresponding parameters were 16.0 ± 3.1 mm, 4.1 ± 1.6 mm, 17.6 ± 4.8 mm, 6.3 ± 0.8 mm, 61.8 ± 12.4 min, respectively. The intergroup difference in thickness of the ligamentum flavum was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The difference in surgical time was also established(P = 0.04). Endoscopic differences were identified as to the location of the anchor points and appearances among the two ligaments. Significant differences in the density and direction of fibrous structures were also observed under biopsy. Under endoscopy, significant difference as to the grade of ILL thickness was established when compared regarding disease spectrum (P = 0.09.) CONCLUSION: The interlaminar ligament is a structure that has not yet been officially named, which has significant structural differences from those of the ligamentum flavum. For posterior endoscopic procedure, its clinical significance lies in its ability to serve as the endpoint of soft tissue channel establishment. The thickness of the ligamentum flavum in MRI and the thickness of ILL under endoscopy vary according to the disease spectrum.

Role of unilateral partial facet joint preservation in postero-lateral approach lumbar interbody fusion for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis presenting bilateral lower limb symptoms: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Posterolateral decompression and fusion with internal fixation is a commonly used surgical approach for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). This study aims to evaluate the impact of preserving a portion of the unilateral facet joint during decompression on surgical outcomes and long-term recovery in patients. METHODS: This study analyzed 73 patients with DLSS accompanied by bilateral lower limb neurological symptoms who underwent single-level L4/5 posterolateral decompression and fusion surgery from January 2022 to March 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of surgery received: Group A comprised 31 patients who underwent neural decompression without facet joint preservation, while Group B consisted of 42 patients who underwent neural decompression with preservation of partial facet joints on one side. Regular follow-up evaluations were conducted, including clinical and radiological assessments immediately postoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months thereafter. Key patient information was documented through retrospective chart reviews. RESULTS: Most patients in both groups experienced favorable surgical outcomes. However, four cases encountered complications. Notably, during follow-up, Group B demonstrated superior 1-year postoperative interbody fusion outcomes (P < 0.05), along with a trend towards less interbody cage subsidence and slower postoperative intervertebral disc height loss. Additionally, Group B showed significantly reduced postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Under strict adherence to surgical indications, the posterior lateral lumbar fusion surgery, which preserves partial facet joint unilaterally during neural decompression, can offer greater benefits to patients.

Decompression alone or fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis? A systematic review and meta analysis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review and metaanalysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Ovid Medline databases was conducted to find randomized control trials (RCTs) or cohort studies that compared decompression alone and decompression plus fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis. Operation time; reoperation; postoperative complications; postoperative Oswestry disability index(ODI) scores and scores related to back and leg pain were collected from eligible studies for meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 3 randomized controlled trials and 9 cohort studies with 6182 patients. The decompression alone group showed less operative time(P < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss(p = 0.000), and no significant difference in postoperative complications was observed in randomized controlled trials(p = 0.428) or cohort studies(p = 0.731). There was no significant difference between the other two groups in reoperation(P = 0.071), postoperative ODI scores and scores related to back and leg pain. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that the decompression alone group performed better in terms of operation time and intraoperative blood loss, and there was no significant difference between the two surgical methods in rate of reoperation and postoperative complications, ODI, low back pain and leg pain. Therefore, we come to the conclusion that decompression alone is not inferior to decompression and fusion in patients with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis.

Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy.

Conventional open laminectomy has long been considered one of the important surgical options for lumbar central stenosis owing to its positive outcomes. However, newer approaches have emerged as alternatives, including full-endoscopic and biportal endoscopic laminectomy. Therefore, a comparison of the outcomes that are associated with each of these surgical methods is warranted. This prospective multicenter trial, initiated in February 2019, compared the outcomes of three lumbar central stenosis surgical approaches: open laminectomy (OPEN), uniportal endoscopy (UNIPORT), and biportal endoscopy (BIPORT). Among 115 participants from seven centers, one-year follow-ups assessed laboratory, radiological, and clinical outcomes. Despite all groups showing adequate decompression and clinical improvement, the OPEN group exhibited less improvement in Visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain scores (p < 0.05) and significant postoperative increases in most laboratory markers. Furthermore, the OPEN group experienced a significant decrease in multifidus muscle cross-sectional area compared to endoscopic groups (p < 0.001). Each surgical techniques produced similar clinical outcomes and dural space expansion. However, endoscopic surgery was associated with better muscle preservation and better relief of back pain. Endoscopic surgery is a reasonable alternative to conventional laminectomy for treating lumbar central stenosis.This trial was registered on CRIS (Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0004355).

The strategic use of Big Data - A study protocol for a multicenter clinical trial testing if the use of the Swespine Dialogue Support alter outcomes in degenerative spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients surgically treated for lumbar spinal stenosis or cervical radiculopathy report improvement in approximately two out of three cases. Advancements in Machine Learning and the utility of large datasets have enabled the development of prognostic prediction models within spine surgery. This trial investigates if the use of the postoperative outcome prediction model, the Dialogue Support, can alter patient-reported outcome and satisfaction compared to current practice. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Patients referred to a spine clinic with cervical radiculopathy or lumbar spinal stenosis will be screened for eligibility. Participants will be assessed at baseline upon recruitment and at 12 months follow-up. The Dialogue Support will be used on all participants, and they will thereafter be placed into either a surgical or a non-surgical treatment arm, depending on the decision made between patient and surgeon. The surgical treatment group will be studied separately based on diagnosis of either cervical radiculopathy or lumbar spinal stenosis. Both the surgical and the non-surgical group will be compared to a retrospective matched control group retrieved from the Swespine register, on which the Dialogue Support has not been used. The primary outcome measure is global assessment regarding leg/arm pain in the surgical treatment group. Secondary outcome measures include patient satisfaction, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for pain. In the non-surgical treatment group primary outcome measures are EQ-5D and mortality, as part of a selection bias analysis. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study may provide evidence on whether the use of an advanced digital decision tool can alter patient-reported outcomes after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on April 17th, 2023, NCT05817747. PROTOCOL VERSION: 1. TRIAL DESIGN: Clinical multicenter trial.

Psoas attenuation is associated with early postoperative complications in geriatric patients undergoing multilevel lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Morphometric analysis of the psoas major muscle has shown utility in predicting postoperative morbidity in various surgical fields, but its usefulness in predicting complications in elderly patients undergoing multilevel lumbar fusion surgery has not been studied. The study aimed to investigate if psoas major parameters are independent risk factors of early postoperative complication among elderly patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent multilevel lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) were included. The psoas major was measured at the lumbar 3/4 intervertebral disc level in three ways on computed tomography image: psoas muscle mass index, mean muscle attenuation, and morphologic change of the psoas major. Early complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system and the Comprehensive complication index (CCI). A CCI ≥ 26.2 indicated severe complications. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: This retrospective study reviewed 108 patients (mean age 70.9 years, female to male ratio 1.8:1). Complications were observed in 72.2% of patients, with allogeneic blood transfusion being the most frequent (66.7%), followed by wound infection, acute heart failure (2.8% each). Severe complications occurred in 13.9% of patients. After multivariable regression analysis, those in the lowest psoas muscle attenuation tertile had higher odds of experiencing early postoperative complications (OR: 3.327, 95% CI 1.134-9.763, p = 0.029) and severe complications (OR: 6.964, 95% CI 1.928-25.160, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The psoas muscle attenuation can be used as a predictor of early postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing multilevel lumbar fusion surgery for DLSS.

Clinical and radiological outcome of stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (SAPF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). A propensity-matched cohort study.

In adult patients affected by degenerative disc disease with lumbar instability and chronic low back pain, spine surgery with lumbar fixation aims to reduce segmental instability and pain. Different techniques have been developed, but the optimal surgical technique remains controversial. No studies have compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between stand-alone pedicle screw fixation (SAPF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). This was a retrospective study. All patients who underwent surgery for single-level L4-L5 or L5-S1 lumbar stenosis, associated with minor lumbar instability and treated with SAPF or MI-TLIF techniques were included in the study. Data were collected preoperatively and at 24 monts follow-up. Clinical primary outcomes were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, walking ability and self reported back and leg pain. In addition, perioperative data and complications were recorded. Segmental lordosis (L4-L5 and L5-S1) and overall lumbar lordosis (L1-S1) were measured on lumbar X-Rays preoperatively and at least 24 months postoperatively. 277 patients were firstly identified. Baseline data and a minimum of two-year follow-up were available for 62 patients. After the propensity score matching, 44 patients (22 patients in the SAPF group and 22 patients in the MI-TLIF group) were matched. At 24 months follow-up, no difference between the two groups of patients in NRS (p = 0.11) and ODI scores (p = 0.21) were observed. Patients' satisfaction at follow-up was also not significantly different between the two groups. In both groups, a significant improvement in the walked distance was observed after surgery (p = 0.05) while no difference was observed regarding the type of surgery performed (p = 1.00). No differences were found in the pre- and post-operative median lumbar lordosis (p = 0.91 and p = 0.67) and the same findings were observed for lumbar segmental lordosis (p = 0.65 and p = 0.41 respectively). Significant improvements in ODI and NRS-scores were recorded after 24 months follow-up with both SAPF and MI-TLIF. No significant differences in postoperative PROMs and patients' satisfaction were observed between the groups. The results of our study indicate no superiority of either surgical technique concerning pain and functional outcomes after 24 months.

Tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is a condition characterized by the narrowing of the spinal canal in multiple segments of the spine. Predominantly observed in the cervical and lumbar regions, TSS also manifests in the conjunction of the cervical and thoracic spine. The simultaneous occurrence of cervical and thoracic spinal stenosis engenders intricate symptoms, potentially leading to missed and delayed diagnosis. Furthermore, the presence of tandem cervical and thoracic stenosis (TCTS) introduces a notable impact on the decision-making calculus of surgeons when contemplating either one-staged or two-staged surgery. Currently, there is no agreed-upon strategy for surgical intervention of TCTS in the literature. METHODS: Medical databases in English (Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP CMJD) were searched using Medical Subject Heading queries for the terms "tandem cervical and thoracic stenosis", "cervical stenosis AND thoracic stenosis", "tandem spinal stenosis" and "concomitant spinal stenosis" from January 1980 to March 2023. We included studies involving adult individuals with TCTS. Articles exclusively focused on disorders within a single spine region or devoid of any mention of spinal disorders were excluded. RESULTS: Initially, a total of 1625 literatures underwent consideration for inclusion in the study. Following the elimination of the duplicates through the utilization of EndNote, and a meticulous screening process involving scrutiny of abstracts and full-texts, 23 clinical studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Of these, 2 studies solely focused on missed diagnosis, 19 studies exclusively discussed surgical strategy for TCTS, and 2 articles evaluated both surgical strategy and missed diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a missed diagnosis rate of 7.2% in TCTS, with the thoracic stenosis emerging as the predominant area susceptible to oversight. Therefore, the meticulous identification of TCTS assumes paramount significance as the inaugural step in its effective management. While both one-staged and two-staged surgeries have exhibited efficacy in addressing TCTS, the selection of the optimal surgical plan should be contingent upon the individualized circumstances of the patients.

Prediction of transforaminal epidural injection success in sciatica (POTEISS): a protocol for the development of a multivariable prediction model for outcome after transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar radicular pain due to disc herniation or stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal epidural injections (TEI) can alleviate symptoms and help to maintain physical functioning and quality of life in patients with lumbar radicular pain. We aim to develop a prediction model for patient outcome after TEI in patients suffering from unilateral lumbar radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) or single-level spinal stenosis (LSS). The secondary aim is to estimate short-term patient outcome differences between LDH and LSS patients, the association between psychological variables and patient outcome, the rate of additional injections, surgery and complications, and to explore the short-term cost-effectiveness of TEI. METHODS: This study is designed as a multi-centre, observational, prospective cohort study in two large regional hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients diagnosed with unilateral lumbar radicular pain secondary to LDH or LSS and congruent with MRI findings, who are referred for TEI along usual care pathways, are eligible for study participation. A total of 388 patients with LDH or LSS will be included. A pre-defined set of demographic, clinical and radiological variables will be used as the predictors in the model. The primary outcome measure is the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg pain. Secondary outcome measures include back pain, physical functioning, perceived recovery, pain coping strategies, anxiety and depression and use of analgesics and physical therapy. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 weeks after treatment. NRS leg pain and Likert perceived recovery data will be used as the dependent variables in a generalized linear mixed model for prediction of TEI outcome, with internal validation of performance (explained variation) by bootstrap resampling. Cost-effectiveness for a period of 6 weeks prior to and after treatment will be performed with decision-analytic modelling. DISCUSSION: Patients with severe lumbar radicular pain often request additional treatment when conservative care is insufficient. TEI can offer relief of symptoms. Currently, it is not possible to predict responsiveness to this treatment for individual patients. This study is designed to explore predictors that can differentiate between patients that will and will not have a positive outcome after TEI. This information may support treatment strategies for this patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov database under registry number NCT04540068 on September 1, 2020.

New ipsilateral full endoscopic interlaminar approach for L5-S1 foraminal and extraforaminal decompression: technique description and initial case series.

BACKGROUND: The L5-S1 interlaminar access described in 2006 by Ruetten et al. represented a paradigm shift and a new perspective on endoscopic spinal approaches. Since then, the spinal community has shown that both the traditional ipsilateral and novel contralateral interlaminar approaches to the L5-S1 foramen are good alternatives to transforaminal access. This study aimed to provide a technical description and brief case series analysis of a new endoscopic foraminal and extraforaminal approach for pathologies at the lumbar L5-S1 level using a new ipsilateral interlaminar approach. METHODS: Thirty patients with degenerative stenotic conditions at the L5-S1 disc level underwent the modified interlaminar approach. The surgical time, blood loss, occurrence of complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. The data were compiled in Excel and analyzed using R software version 4.2. All continuous variables are presented as the mean, median, minimum, and maximal ranges. For categorical variables, data are described as counts and percentages. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the study. The cohort showed significant improvements in all quality-of-life scores (ODI, visual analog scale of back pain, and visual analog scale of leg pain). Five cases of postoperative numbness and three cases of postoperative dysesthesia have been reported. No case of durotomy or leg weakness has been reported. CONCLUSIONS: The fundamental change proposed by this procedure, the new ipsilateral approach, presents potential advantages to surgeons by overcoming anatomical challenges at the L5-S1 level and by providing surgeon-friendly visualization and access. This approach allows for extensive foraminal and extraforaminal decompression, including the removal of hernias and osteophytosis, without causing neural retraction of the L5-S1 roots while maintaining the stability of the operated level.

[Study on related influencing factors on the occurrence of redundant sign in the cauda equina in lumbar spinal stenosis].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relational factors influencing the formation of cauda equina redundant nerve roots (RNRs) of the lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: Clinical data of 116 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated from January 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into redundant nerve roots(RNRs) group and non-RNRs group based on the presence or absence of RNRs on sagittal T2-weighted MRI. In the non-RNRs group, there were 74 patients, including 38 males and 36 females with an average age of (62.00±10.41) years old, the body mass index (BMI) was (23.09±2.22) kg·m-2;the maximum stenosis segment was L2-L3 in 12 cases, L3-L4 in 38, L4-L5 in 20, and L5S1 in 4, respectively. In the RNRs group, there were 42 patients, including 18 males and 24 females with an average age of (63.36±8.73) years old, the BMI was (22.63±2.60) kg·m-2;the maximum stenosis segment was L2-L3 in 3 cases, L3-L4 in 9, L4-L5 in 27 and L5S1 in 3, respectively. MRI was performed in the supine position to observe the conshape and morphology of the redundant nerve in the sagittal position. The preoperative low back and leg pain visual analogue scale(VAS), and preoperative Oswestry disability index(ODI) were analyzed, and the rate of spondylolisthesis and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy were compared. Simultaneously, the inter-vertebral height, intervertebral foramen height, inter-vertebral height+vertebral height, median sagittal diameter at the inter-vertebral space level(DIW-MSD), median sagittal diameter at the pedicel level(DV-MSD), range of motion(ROM) of the stenotic segment were measured and analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 116 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, 42 patients developed RNRs, with an incidence of 36.2%. There were no significant differences in gender, age, BMI, preoperative VAS for lumbar and leg pain and ODI between two groups(P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences regard to the duration of symptoms and the rate of spondylolisthesis and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (P<0.05);the inter-vertebral height, intervertebral foramen height, inter-vertebral height+vertebral height, DIW-MSD, ROM of the stenotic segment were also significantly different between two groups(P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in DV-MSD between two groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The inter-vertebral height, inter-vertebral foramen height, inter-vertebral height+vertebral height, DIW-MSD and ROM of the stenotic segment were the crucial factors related to RNRs in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Can magnetic resonance imaging findings effectively diagnose the instability observed on radiographs in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis?

BACKGROUND: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition that involves the narrowing of the spinal canal. Diagnosing instability traditionally requires standing lateral radiographs to detect dynamic translation, but there is debate about relying solely on radiographs due to challenges like patient discomfort and radiation exposure. This study aimed to evaluate if Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings could effectively diagnose instability observed on radiographs. METHODS: We reviewed 478 consecutive patients with degenerative LSS who had surgery at our institution. Instability was defined as a sagittal translation exceeding 3 mm on standing lateral radiographs in both extension and flexion. Patients were divided into stable (those with < 3 mm translation) and unstable groups (those with > 3 mm translation). The study assessed potential variables for instability, including MRI findings like facet joint effusion, facet joint angle, disk height index, intradiscal vacuum presence, endplate sclerosis, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, and multifidus muscle fatty degeneration, comparing these factors between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 478 consecutive patients diagnosed with degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) were included. The average age of the patients was 66.32 years, with 43.3% being male. Approximately 27.6% of the cases exhibited signs of instability on the standing lateral radiograph during extension and flexion. The multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression revealed that facet joint effusion (odds ratio [OR] 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-3.94; P = 0.002), disk height index (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.68-3.35; P = 0.009), and the presence of the Vacuum sign (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.32-2.84; P = 0.021) were identified as factors associated with instability. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed thata higher facet joint effusion, the presence of Vacuum sign, and a greater Disk Height Index were associated with the presence of instability on the standing lateral radiograph in extension and flexion in patients with degenerative LSS.