[Direct anterior bone block grafting for treatment of bone defects and dysplasia of the coronoid process]. / Direkte anteriore Knochenblocktransplantation zur Behandlung von Knochendefekten und Dysplasie des Processus coronoideus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the surgery was to treat an elbow instability caused by critical coronoid bone loss (CCBL), lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) insufficiency,and general hyperlaxity by performing a direct anterior coronoid bone graft (CBG) and LUCL reconstruction in the same setting. INDICATIONS: In cases with CCBL isolated ligament reconstruction harbors a high failure rate, necessitating supplementary bony procedures. The diagnosis of CCBL is confirmed through lateral radiographs and further quantified through computed tomography (CT) imaging. Objective assessment of instability is conducted with standardized arthroscopic tests. Performing an anterior approach for CBG offers distinct advantages, notably in terms of achieving precise positioning of plates and screws and providing access to the proximal radioulnar joint. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Usual contraindications to surgery, coronoid bone loss less than 40%. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The surgical procedure is thoroughly illustrated with a video of the operation that can be accessed online: reconstruction of the LUCL with a semitendinosus allograft, harvesting of the graft from the iliac crest, exposure of the coronoid process with a direct anterior approach, freshening up of the graft bed. Temporary fixation of the graft with a Kirschner wire. Assessment of joint congruency, stability and range of motion (ROM) prior to definitive fixation with a 2.4 mm buttress plate and screws. FOLLOW-UP: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) to prevent heterotopic ossification. Elbow mobilization in pronation from day 1 with an overhead motion protocol. Removable splint for 4 weeks, free mobilization at 6 weeks, return to sport at 3 months. RESULTS: Durable elbow stability was achieved along with free ROM and high patient satisfaction.

A Surgical Approach to a Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joint Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury without Dividing the Adductor Aponeurosis.

An injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) of the thumb is a common injury, widely referred to as a skier's thumb. The rupture usually occurs at the distal insertion. In the classical technique, the adductor aponeurosis is divided to access the torn UCL and the MCPJ and repaired after ligament repair/reinsertion. We describe a surgical approach to the UCL that does not require division of the adductor aponeurosis. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Fastball Quality After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Baseball Pitchers.

BACKGROUND: The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is essential for elbow stability during pitching. In professional baseball, the fastball (FB) is the most commonly used pitch, making postrecovery FB performance after UCL reconstruction (UCLR) a crucial aspect to consider. HYPOTHESES: (1) Pitchers undergoing UCLR would show no significant changes in performance metrics compared with nonoperated pitchers with similar FB velocity and spin rate, and (2) no significant variance would be found in these metrics within the operated pitchers concerning their preinjury anthropometric characteristics and pitching performance metrics. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The study included 91 Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers who underwent primary UCLR between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. A matched 1:1 control group of MLB pitchers without UCLR injuries was established. Publicly available pitch metrics and anthropometric data were compared between the study and control groups. RESULTS: Disparities in several performance metrics emerged during the first postreturn year (PRY1), including FB use percentage (P = .029), fielder independent pitching (FIP) (P = .021), and standardized FB runs above average per 100 pitches (wFB/C) (P < .001). Subgroup analysis within the UCLR group revealed a negative correlation between presurgery mean FB velocity and its subsequent change (P < .001) and a positive correlation with changes in FIP (P = .025) from the index year to PRY1. A negative correlation was observed between FB use percentage in the index year and its change by PRY1 (P = .002). By the second postreturn year, no significant differences were found in these performance metrics. No factors were significantly related to prolonged recovery time. CONCLUSION: Although FB velocity and spin rate remained consistent, significant differences were observed in FB use percentage, FIP, and wFB/C in PRY1. However, by second postreturn year, these differences were no longer significant. No specific risk factors were identified concerning prolonged recovery time between pre-UCLR FB pitching metrics and the physical anthropometric data. These results suggest that although the short-term postsurgery period may affect more specialized pitching metrics, the basic pitching performance metrics, as hypothesized, remain largely unaffected by UCLR.

Microscopic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparing Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Baseball Players.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between abnormalities of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and elbow symptoms in baseball players remains unclear. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to compare findings of the UCL on microscopic MRI between asymptomatic and symptomatic elbows in baseball players. We hypothesized that the MRI grade of UCL injuries would exhibit no correlation with medial elbow symptoms in baseball players. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The study participants were skeletally mature baseball players who underwent high-resolution microscopic MRI of the medial elbow including for medical checkups. Elbows with previous surgical treatment or traumatic UCL injuries were excluded. The patients were divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. The UCL appearance on microscopic MRI was categorized into 4 grades and compared between the groups. Abnormal findings in the medial elbow including bony fragments at the medial epicondyle, osteophytes or bony fragments in the sublime tubercle, and bone marrow edema (BME) in the sublime tubercle were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 426 baseball players (426 elbows) with a mean age of 20 years (range, 14-41 years) were included. The asymptomatic and symptomatic groups included 158 and 268 elbows, respectively. In the asymptomatic group, based on MRI grading of the UCL, 46 (29%) elbows were rated as grade I, 64 (41%) as grade II, 40 (25%) as grade III, and 8 (5%) as grade IV. In the symptomatic group, 75 (28%) elbows were rated as grade I, 118 (44%) as grade II, 61 (23%) as grade III, and 14 (5%) as grade IV. There was no significant difference in the MRI grades between the groups (P = .9). BME in the sublime tubercle was more frequently seen in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in MRI grades of the UCL between symptomatic and asymptomatic elbows in baseball players; approximately 30% of elbows demonstrated high-grade UCL injuries in both groups. BME in the sublime tubercle was more frequently seen in symptomatic elbows than in asymptomatic elbows. BME in the sublime tubercle was a better indicator of symptoms than was MRI grading of the UCL.

Early Surgery for Partial Tears of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament May Be More Cost-Effective and Result in Longer Playing Careers Than Nonoperative Management for High-Level Baseball Pitchers: A Decision-Analytic Markov Model-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management versus early reconstruction for partial tears of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) remains controversial, with the most common treatment options for partial tears consisting of rest, rehabilitation, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and/or surgical intervention. However, whether the improved outcomes reported for treatments such as MUCL reconstruction (UCLR) or nonoperative management with a series of PRP injections justifies their increased upfront costs remains unknown. PURPOSE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of an initial trial of physical therapy alone, an initial trial of physical therapy plus a series of PRP injections, and early UCLR to determine the preferred cost-effective treatment strategy for young, high-level baseball pitchers with partial tears of the MUCL and with aspirations to continue play at the next level (ie, collegiate and/or professional). STUDY DESIGN: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A Markov chain Monte Carlo probabilistic model was developed to evaluate the outcomes and costs of 1000 young, high-level, simulated pitchers undergoing nonoperative management with and without PRP versus early UCLR for partial MUCL tears. Utility values, return to play rates, and transition probabilities were derived from the published literature. Costs were determined based on the typical patient undergoing each treatment strategy at the authors' institution. Outcome measures included costs, acquired playing years (PYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: The mean total costs resulting from nonoperative management without PRP, nonoperative management with PRP, and early UCLR were $22,520, $24,800, and $43,992, respectively. On average, early UCLR produced an additional 4.0 PYs over the 10-year time horizon relative to nonoperative management, resulting in an ICER of $5395/PY, which falls well below the $50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Overall, early UCLR was determined to be the preferred cost-effective strategy in 77.5% of pitchers included in the microsimulation model, with nonoperative management with PRP determined to be the preferred strategy in 15% of pitchers and nonoperative management alone in 7.5% of pitchers. CONCLUSION: Despite increased upfront costs, UCLR is a more cost-effective treatment option for partial tears of the MUCL than an initial trial of nonoperative management for most high-level baseball pitchers.

Proximal radioulnar joint, but not posterolateral, instability in patients with symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow.

BACKGROUND: The elbow joint is stabilized laterally by a complex of bony and ligamentous structures, such as the lateral ulnar collateral ligament and radial lateral collateral ligament (RLCL). Pathogenesis of many elbow conditions like symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow (SMILE) is based on ligamentous incompetency. The aim of this study is to measure ligament elongation in SMILE patients and determine the correlation with the development of this pathologic condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were included in this study: half of them were operated for suspected SMILE whereas the others were affected by other elbow diseases. All the patients underwent elbow arthroscopy. During this procedure, 4 parameters were analyzed: annular drive through (ADT), ulnar-humeral stressed distance (UHSD) at 45° and 30° of flexion, and loose collar sign (LCS). A dedicated arthroscopic mini-spreader introduced through an arthroscopic portal was used to take measurements. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found for LCS (P = .0003) and ADT (P = .000002). UHSD at 30° and 45° elbow flexion was slightly higher in SMILE patients, but not significantly. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Progressive stretching of the RLCL and annular ligament may lead to their elongation, resulting in a pathologic anteroposterior shifting of the radial head and a lower congruence between the inner surface of the annular ligament and the radial head cartilage, resulting in proximal radioulnar instability. The study shows how RLCL and annular ligament are elongated in SMILE patients compared with controls, causing instability of the proximal radioulnar joint and confirming that ligament incompetency is involved in the SMILE condition.

Advances in the Treatment of Hand and Wrist Injuries in the Elite Athlete.

Caring for hand and wrist injuries in the elite athlete brings distinct challenges, with case-by-case decisions regarding surgical intervention and return-to-play. Metacarpal fractures, thumb ulnar collateral ligament tears, and scaphoid fractures are common upper-extremity injuries in the elite athlete that can be detrimental to playing time and future participation. Treatment should therefore endure the demand of accelerated rehabilitation and return-to-activity without compromising long-term outcomes. Fortunately, the literature has supported emerging management options that support goals specific to the athlete. This review examined the advances in surgical and perioperative treatment of metacarpal fractures, thumb ulnar collateral ligament injuries, and scaphoid fractures in the elite athlete.

Avulsion and Soft Tissue Injuries of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament in Children and Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Although pediatric medial epicondylar fractures and apophysitis are well studied, patterns of subapophyseal avulsion and ligamentous injuries of the medial elbow in this population merit investigation to inform optimal treatment strategies. PURPOSE: To describe the occurrence and demographic correlates of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) avulsion and soft tissue injuries of the pediatric and adolescent elbow. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved review was conducted to identify consecutive patients with medial elbow injuries treated in a tertiary pediatric sports medicine practice between 2016 and 2021. Radiographs were obtained during injury evaluation, and patients with nondisplaced medial epicondylar apophysitis and complete epicondylar fracture were excluded, resulting in 150 patients with soft tissue injuries occurring distal to the medial epicondyle apophysis (subapophyseal) for study. Radiographs were evaluated for bony avulsion of the UCL from either the medial epicondyle proximally or the ulnar sublime tubercle distally. Injuries without radiographic evidence of bony avulsion, but with clinical examination findings consistent with ligamentous injury, were classified as radiographically negative UCL injuries, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to further evaluate these injuries if moderate to severe medial swelling of the elbow or significant concern for medial structural injury was present on examination. These MRI scans were evaluated to classify the UCL injury and assess for periosteal or cartilaginous avulsions. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (mean age, 12.5 ± 3.4 years; 70 female), 55% (150/274) of the entire medial elbow injury population, had a subapophyseal injury. Of these patients, 62 had a bony avulsion detected on radiograph, and 88 had a radiographically negative injury. In addition to the 62 radiographic avulsions, the 61 MRI scans obtained on those radiographically negative injuries revealed 33 complete UCL disruptions, resulting in 63.3% (95/150) of patients sustaining a complete ligamentous disruption. With the MRI scans, 37 (61%) cases of cartilaginous or periosteal avulsion of the UCL were diagnosed. Overall, 66% of all 150 subapophyseal injuries had a bony, cartilaginous, or periosteal UCL avulsion. Patients with cartilaginous (mean age, 10.3 years) and bony (mean age, 10.6 years) avulsions were younger than those with central ligament injury (mean age, 14.2 years) or periosteal (mean age, 14.2 years) avulsions (P = .005). There was a significant association between the mechanism of injury and the location of UCL tear identified on MRI scans: traumatic falls were associated with distal tears, and throwing injuries were associated with proximal tears (P < .001). CONCLUSION: UCL central ligament and avulsion lesions may be frequently diagnosed after injury to the pediatric medial elbow, the majority of which are complete injuries, and may require MRI for diagnosis. The mechanism of injury may predict the location of ligamentous injury, and osteocartilaginous avulsions are more likely to present at younger ages than injuries to the soft tissue of the UCL or periosteum. The prevalence of these injuries merits further investigation into best protocols of nonoperative treatment or surgical repair techniques and outcomes.

Rehabilitation following ulnar collateral ligament injury of the elbow in a female acrobatic athlete: A case report.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of injury and the conservative rehabilitation of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow (UCL) are well studied and reported in overhead athletes, while research on gymnastic athletes is sparse. Evidence suggests exercise as the mainstay in UCL injury rehabilitation. With this report, we aimed to provide a complete rehabilitation protocol following a partial UCL tear of an acrobatic athlete, where exercise and adjunct treatments, such as manual therapy, were used in a progressive staged rehabilitation. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 16-year-old female acrobatic athlete was diagnosed with partial tear of the anterior band of UCL. The rehabilitation included progressive exercise loading in conjunction with manual therapy for 10 sessions in 8 weeks. Pain, UCL special tests, the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score Questionnaire (DASH), and the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) were assessed and administered at baseline and at 3, 6, 10 weeks, and 3 months. RESULTS: Improvement in all outcome measures was noted at the 3-month follow-up indicating a substantial reduction in pain and disability, and an increase in stability of the elbow joint. Return to training was achieved at 8 weeks from the initial visit, while return to sport at the pre-injury level was achieved at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Progressive exercise loading along with the addition of manual therapy is an effective intervention for the rehabilitation and return to sport following a partial UCL tear. A progressive staged rehabilitation guideline for acrobatic athletes with UCL injuries has been provided to be used and guide clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Volar dislocation of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb: open reduction and repair of the ulnar collateral ligament. A case report.

INTRODUCTION: metacarpophalangeal dislocations of the thumb are not very frequent injuries, it is necessary to know the anatomy of the region to know possible causes of interposition that prevent a closed reduction of this pathology. CASE PRESENTATION: we present the case of a 75-year-old woman with a post-traumatic metacarpophalangeal dislocation of the thumb that required open reduction and surgical repair. In this procedure, we performed reduction of the dislocation, mobilization of the interposed structures, repair of the capsule and reinsertion of the ulnar collateral ligament. The early mobilization protocol helped to obtain very good results. CONCLUSION: it is imperative to consider possible associated injuries during the acute phase to achieve optimal short, medium, and long-term outcomes for our patients. A comprehensive and proactive approach to diagnosis and treatment is vital in effectively addressing this pathology and minimizing its potential sequelae.

INTRODUCCIÓN: las luxaciones metacarpofalángicas del pulgar no son lesiones muy frecuentes, es necesario conocer la anatomía de la región para conocer posibles causas de interposición que impidan una reducción cerrada de esta patología. PRESENTACIÓN DEL CASO: presentamos el caso de una mujer de 75 años con luxación metacarpofalángica postraumática del pulgar que requirió reducción abierta y reparación quirúrgica. En este procedimiento realizamos reducción de la luxación, movilización de las estructuras interpuestas, reparación de la cápsula y reinserción del ligamento colateral cubital. El protocolo de movilización temprana ayudó a obtener muy buenos resultados. CONCLUSIÓN: es imperativo considerar posibles lesiones asociadas durante la fase aguda para lograr resultados óptimos a corto, mediano y largo plazo para nuestros pacientes. Un enfoque integral y proactivo del diagnóstico y tratamiento es vital para abordar eficazmente esta patología y minimizar sus posibles secuelas.

Editorial Commentary: The Difficulties of Assessing Return to Play and Return to Performance After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears have moved from a career-ending injury to one in which success is almost expected from reconstruction. In reality, however, success from a UCL reconstruction is not guaranteed. As we have attempted to assess the true success rate of UCL reconstructions, we have also learned the difficulties of this assessment. Rates of return to sport after UCL reconstruction vary by level of play, the primary or revision status of the repair, along with the specific surgical techniques performed, the chronicity of the tear, the rehabilitation protocols associated with the surgery, and more. Return to sport is difficult to assess, as high school, collegiate, and even professional careers can be variable and there are no standard definitions of "returning to play." These variables also affect our assessments of performance after UCL reconstruction. Decisions for UCL reconstructions and appropriate counseling of patients regarding the likelihood of success currently remain an individual process.

Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Structural Bioinductive Scaffold: A Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: Elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair with suture brace augmentation shows good time-zero biomechanical strength and a more rapid return to play compared with UCL reconstruction. However, there are concerns about overconstraint or stress shielding with nonabsorbable suture tape. Recently, a collagen-based bioinductive absorbable structural scaffold has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for augmentation of soft tissue repair. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to assess the initial biomechanical performance of UCL repair augmented with this scaffold. We hypothesized that adding the bioinductive absorbable structural scaffold to primary UCL repair would impart additional time-zero restraint to the valgus opening. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight cadaveric elbow specimens-from midforearm to midhumerus-were utilized. In the native state, elbows underwent valgus stress testing at 30o, 60o, and 90o of flexion, with a cyclical valgus rotational torque. Changes in valgus rotation from 2- to 5-N·m torque were recorded as valgus gapping. Testing was then performed in 4 states: (1) native intact UCL-with dissection through skin, fascia, and muscle down to an intact UCL complex; (2) UCL-transected-distal transection of the ligament off the sublime tubercle; (3) augmented repair with bioinductive absorbable scaffold; and (4) repair alone without scaffold. The order of testing of repair states was alternated to account for possible plastic deformation during testing. RESULTS: The UCL-transected state showed the greatest increase in valgus gapping of all states at all flexion angles. Repair alone showed similar valgus gapping to that of the UCL-transected state at 30° (P = .62) and 60° of flexion (P = .11). Bioinductive absorbable scaffold-augmented repair showed less valgus gapping compared with repair alone at all flexion angles (P = .021, P = .024, and P = .024 at 30°, 60°, and 90°, respectively). Scaffold-augmented repair showed greater gapping compared with the native state at 30° (P = .021) and 90° (P = .039) but not at 60° of flexion (P = .059). There was no difference when testing augmented repair or repair alone first. CONCLUSION: UCL repair augmented with a bioinductive, biocomposite absorbable structural scaffold imparts additional biomechanical strength to UCL repair alone, without overconstraint beyond the native state. Further comparative studies are warranted. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As augmented primary UCL repair becomes more commonly performed, use of an absorbable bioinductive scaffold may allow for improved time-zero mechanical strength, and thus more rapid rehabilitation, while avoiding long-term overconstraint or stress shielding.

Clinical outcomes after primary repair for thumb ulnar collateral ligament ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is no consensus on the best surgical technique for treating thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) ruptures. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates which primary repair technique and postoperative immobilization protocol result in the best clinical outcomes. A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline ALL Ovid, Web of Science Core Selection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Pain, stability, tip pinch strength, key pinch strength, grip strength, return to work and metacarpophalangeal joint range of motion were collected as postoperative outcomes. In total, 29 studies were included. All surgical techniques resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes, with no significant differences between bone anchor reinsertion, suture fixation, K-wire fixation and a combination of techniques. K-wire immobilization resulted in worse postoperative pain, but similar stability compared to immobilization without a K-wire. Clinical outcomes after thumb UCL repair are excellent, with no differences in clinical outcomes noted among surgical techniques.

Biological Versus Nonbiological Reconstruction of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joint: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes of biological ligament reconstruction (BLR) versus nonbiological ligament reconstruction (NBLR) for chronic injuries involving the ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb's metacarpophalangeal joint. METHODS: Forty-two patients who underwent static BLR (n = 24) or NBLR (n = 18) were included in this retrospective analysis. Preoperative, postoperative, and contralateral thumb measurements (clinical evaluation, radiographs, and subjective outcome questionnaires) were compared over a mean of 38 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Average postoperative thumb metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joint ranges of motion were 2° to 54° and 0 to 71°, respectively, for BLR and 0° to 58° and 0° to 71°, respectively, for NBLR. Average grip and pinch strengths, relative to the unaffected hand, were 102% and 84% versus 103% and 89%, respectively. All patients demonstrated stability with a firm end point, compared with the unaffected thumb. The average Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score among all patients was 12 for the disability/symptom module, 0 for the sports module, and 17 for the work module. Stiffness was reported among four patients, and no patient sustained wound-related issues or other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Nonbiological ligament reconstruction of the thumb ulnar collateral ligament generates short-term outcomes comparable with those of BLR, potentially allowing for expedited recovery and rehabilitation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The Utility of Stress Ultrasound in Identifying Risk Factors for Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear: A Longitudinal Study of 203 Professional Baseball Players.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) are common among baseball pitchers due to repetitive stress on the soft tissue stabilizers of the elbow during pitching. Dynamic stress ultrasound (SUS) can be used to evaluate the UCL and ulnohumeral joint to identify anatomic risk factors of those who will require UCL reconstruction (UCLR). PURPOSE: To determine whether any adaptive or morphological changes detectable on SUS can predict injury to the UCL in professional baseball pitchers. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 203 professional baseball pitchers who underwent SUS at preseason training sessions over the course of 18 years were categorized into 1 of 2 groups: those without a history of shoulder, arm, elbow, or forearm surgery or injuries (healthy cohort; n = 184) and those who underwent UCLR the same season as SUS (UCLR cohort; n = 19). Ligament thickness, joint spacing, and laxity were compared. An additional matched cohort analysis was conducted using 10 players from each group to detect differences in the progression of UCL and ulnohumeral joint measures in the year before injury. RESULTS: The UCLR cohort, when compared with the healthy cohort, had higher relative (ie, nondominant-side measurements subtracted from dominant-side measurements) resting ulnohumeral joint space (median, 0.50 vs 0.20 mm, respectively; P = .006) and higher rates of hypoechoic foci (57.9% vs 30.4%, respectively; P = .030). Players of both groups had similar dominant UCL thickness (P = .161), ulnohumeral joint space at rest (P = .321), space under stress (P = .498), and laxity (P = .796). Groups did not differ in terms of relative UCL thickness, ulnohumeral joint space under stress, or relative laxity. In the year before UCL injury, the UCLR cohort, compared with the matched healthy cohort, had a greater increase in mean dominant UCL thickness (0.94 vs -0.60 mm, respectively; P = .038) and a greater increase in relative median UCL thickness (1.35 vs -0.35 mm, respectively; P = .045). Players in the healthy cohort were statistically older than those in the UCLR cohort (23 vs 22 years, respectively; P = .004). No differences in ulnohumeral stress spacing or laxity were detected. CONCLUSION: SUS of players who underwent UCLR demonstrated a progressive increase in UCL thickness over 1 year, higher rates of hypoechoic foci, and increased ulnohumeral rest space compared with SUS of uninjured players.

Dynamic Stress Ultrasound Assessment of Professional Baseball Players' Elbows After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data analyzing dynamic stress ultrasound (SUS) findings in elite pitchers who have undergone ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) and returned to sport. PURPOSE: To identify longitudinal, perioperative changes in the elbows of professional baseball pitchers who have undergone UCLR and to compare these findings with a matched cohort of healthy pitchers. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This study used prospectively collected data from dynamic elbow SUS analyses of professional baseball pitchers within a single Major League Baseball organization. Pitchers were divided into 2 cohorts: a UCLR cohort and healthy cohort. The UCLR cohort eligibility included availability of (1) SUS from preseason of injury/UCLR and (2) SUS from ≥2 years after surgery. These players were 1:1 matched to players with no history of upper extremity injury to form the healthy cohort. Ligament thickness and ulnohumeral joint space at rest and under stress were directly measured. Joint laxity was calculated by subtracting joint space at rest from joint space under stress. The term "relative" was used to describe calculated differences where nondominant measurements were subtracted from dominant-side measurements. RESULTS: Eight pitchers were included in the UCLR group and matched to 8 healthy pitchers (mean age at initial SUS examination, 19.6 years). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of relative or dominant arm rest space, stress space, or laxity. Longitudinally (final measurements - baseline measurements), the mean relative ulnohumeral rest space decreased in the UCLR group and increased in the healthy group (-0.36 mm vs +0.50 mm; P = .032). The finding of increased UCL thickness in the UCLR group was expected, as UCL grafts are typically thicker than native ligaments. CONCLUSION: Ulnhohumeral joint stability was achieved after UCLR as indicated by similar rest space, stress space, and joint laxity in dominant arms compared with a matched healthy cohort. A significant decrease in relative rest space after UCLR may represent the achievement of stability in surgery patients. Alternatively, the increase in ulnohumeral rest space seen in the healthy cohort may represent adaptive changes from pitching at a professional level.

Performance-Based Outcomes after Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Professional Pitchers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare performance in baseball pitchers before and after revision ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery using performance metrics. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Public online database. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Players who underwent revision UCL surgery between 2015 and 2021 were identified. Players were included if they were Minor League (MiLB) or Major League (Major League baseball [MLB]) pitchers. Players were excluded if they were not pitchers, if they underwent their revision surgery as an amateur, or if there is no record of their primary reconstruction surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Revision UCL surgery (repair or reconstruction). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Return to sport (RTS) rate, RTS time, pitch velocity, and pitch spin rate. RESULTS: Sixty-five pitchers underwent revision UCL surgery. MiLB pitchers had a shorter RTS time after their primary surgery (15.62 vs 20.77 months, P < 0.01) compared with MLB pitchers but similar RTS times after their revision reconstruction (19.64 vs 18.48 months, P = 0.44). There was also no difference in return to play (RTP) rate overall after primary versus revision reconstruction ( P = 1.00). Major League baseball pitchers also had decreased RTS time after primary compared with revision reconstruction (15.62 vs 19.64 months, P < 0.01) but similar RTP rates ( P = 0.28). Finally, MLB pitchers had similar pitch breakdowns, velocities, and spin rates before and after their primary and revision repair or reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Both revision UCL repair and reconstruction can return pitchers to preinjury performance levels. Pitchers and teams should be properly counseled on realistic RTP times and postsurgery performance when discussing revision UCL surgeries.

Variable Return to Play and Sport Performance After Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate return to play (RTP) and return to same level of play (RTSP) rates as well as preoperative and postoperative in-game performance metrics in baseball pitchers who underwent ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR). Secondarily, this review sought to assess outcomes based on primary versus revision UCLR as well as level of competition. METHODS: This review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried to identify articles evaluating UCLR in baseball players between January 2002 and October 2022. Data included RTP, RTSP, and performance metrics including earned run average, innings pitched, walks and hits per inning pitched, batting average against, strikeouts per 9 innings, walks per 9 innings, percentage of fastballs thrown, and average fastball velocity. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria were used for quality assessment. RESULTS: Analysis included 25 articles reporting on 2,100 elbows. After primary UCLR, RTP ranged from 336 to 615 days (57% to 100% achieved) and RTSP ranged from 330 to 513 days (61% to 95%). After revision UCLR, RTP ranged from 381 to 631 days (67% to 98%) and RTSP ranged from 518 to 575 days (42% to 78%). When stratifying primary UCLR outcomes by competitive level, RTP and RTSP ranged respectively from 417 to 615 days (75% to 100%) and 513 days (73% to 87%) for Major League Baseball only, 409 to 615 days (57% to 100%) and 470 to 513 days (61% to 95%) for Major League Baseball plus Minor League Baseball, and 336 to 516 days (73% to 85%) and 330 days (55% to 74%) for college plus high school. Heterogeneity was seen in postoperative sports performance metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Although more than half of baseball players appear able to RTP after primary and revision UCLR, RTSP rates after revision UCLR were as low as 42% in the literature. Preoperative and postoperative performance metrics varied. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

Biomechanical Characteristics of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Treated With and Without Augmentation: A Network Meta-analysis of Controlled Laboratory Studies.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears with suture tape augmentation has gained interest given preliminary reports of favorable biomechanical characteristics. No study to date has quantitatively assessed the biomechanical effects of multiple augmentation techniques relative to the native UCL. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled laboratory studies to assess and comparatively rank biomechanical effects of UCL repair or reconstruction with or without augmentation. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in January 2023. A frequentist network meta-analytic approach was used to perform mixed-treatment comparisons of UCL repair and reconstruction techniques with and without augmentation, with the native UCL as the reference condition. Pooled treatment estimates were quantified under the random-effects assumption. Competing treatments were ranked in the network meta-analysis by using point estimates and standard errors to calculate P scores (greater P score indicates superiority of treatment for given outcome). RESULTS: Ten studies involving 206 elbow specimens in which a distal UCL tear was simulated were included. UCL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation (AugRecon) restored load to failure to a statistically noninferior magnitude (mean difference [MD], -1.99 N·m; 95% CI, -10.2 to 6.2 N·m; P = .63) compared with the native UCL. UCL reconstruction (Recon) (MD, -12.7 N·m; P < .001) and UCL repair with suture tape augmentation (AugRepair) (MD, -14.8 N·m; P < .001) were both statistically inferior to the native UCL. The AugRecon condition conferred greater load to failure compared with Recon (P < .001) and AugRepair (P = .002) conditions. AugRecon conferred greater torsional stiffness relative to all other conditions and was not statistically different from the native UCL (MD, 0.32 N·m/deg; 95% CI, -0.30 to 0.95 N·m/deg; P = .31). Medial ulnohumeral gapping was not statistically different for the AugRepair (MD, 0.30 mm; 95% CI, -1.22 to 1.82 mm; P = .70), AugRecon (MD, 0.57 mm; 95% CI, -0.70 to 1.84 mm; P = .38), or Recon (MD, 1.02 mm; 95% CI, -0.02 to 2.05 mm; P = .055) conditions compared with the native UCL. P-score analysis indicated that AugRecon was the most effective treatment for increasing ultimate load to failure and torsional stiffness, whereas AugRepair was the most effective for minimizing medial gapping. CONCLUSION: AugRecon restored load to failure and torsional stiffness most similar to the parameters of the native UCL, whereas Recon and AugRepair did not restore the same advantageous properties at time zero. Medial ulnohumeral gapping during a valgus load was minimized by all 3 treatments. Based on network interactions, AugRecon was the superior treatment approach for restoring important biomechanical features of the UCL at time zero that are jeopardized during a complete distal tear.