"Bottoms-up" minimally-invasive approach to inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer management. A single-center comparative study versus open approach and review.

PURPOSE: Open inguinal lymph node dissection (OILND) plays a crucial role in penile cancer management, but in order to improve patient outcomes, minimally-invasive (MILND) approaches were developed. Our "bottoms-up" MILND is a novel endoscopic technique, changing the way the sequence of dissection is performed. This study aims to compare our approach to the current standard of OILND in terms of oncologic and perioperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our database, from 2016 to 2023, 12 patients underwent OILND and 16 had a "bottoms-up" MILND, which is performed with a three port configuration, starting the dissection under the fascia lata, dissecting the femoral vessels in the most distal part of the femoral fossa, followed by dissection of the proximal and superficial lymph nodes at the top of thefemoral triangle. RESULTS: For MILND, median operation time per groin was shorter (58 vs 64 minutes, p=0.34), patients presented shorter hospital stays (10 vs 18 days, p=0.32) and fewer days with drains (14 vs 24 days, p=0.01). Median lymph node yield per groin was higher for MILND (10 vs 9 nodes, p=0.7), but OILND had a higher median of positive lymph nodes (4 vs 3 nodes, p=0.63). MILND patients experienced a lower incidence of major complications (33% vs 58%, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: We have proved that our technique of MILND is not inferior to the current standard and we believe that it can further improve patient outcomes with a safer, simplified and easily reproducible approach.

Para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node metastasis.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to explore the efficiency of para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) with pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastasis. METHODS: A total of 171 LACC patients with imaging-confirmed pelvic lymph node metastasis were included in this study. These patients were divided into two groups: the surgical staging group, comprising 58 patients who had received para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy (surgical staging) along with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), and the imaging staging group, comprising 113 patients who had received only CCRT. The two groups' progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related complications were compared. RESULTS: The surgical staging group started radiotherapy 10.2 days (range 9-12 days) later than the imaging staging group. The overall incidence of lymphatic cysts was 9.30%. In the surgical staging group, para-aortic lymph node metastasis was identified in 34.48% (20/58) of patients, while pathology-negative PLN was observed in 12.07% (7/58). Over a median follow-up period of 52 months, no significant differences in PFS and OS rates were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis of patients with lymph node diameters of ≥ 1.5 cm revealed a five-year PFS rate of 75.0% and an OS rate of 80.0% in the surgical staging group, compared to 41.5% and 50.1% in the imaging staging group, respectively, showing statistically significant differences (p = 0.022, HR:0.34 [0.13, 0.90] and p = 0.038, HR: 0.34 [0.12,0.94], respectively for PFS and OS). Additionally, in patients with two or more metastatic lymph nodes, the five-year PFS and OS rates were 69.2% and 73.1% in the surgical staging group, versus 41.0% and 48.4% in the imaging staging group, with these differences also being statistically significant (p = 0.025, HR: 0.41[0.19,0.93] and p = 0.046, HR: 0.42[0.18,0.98], respectively). CONCLUSION: Performing surgical staging before CCRT is safe and delivers accurate lymph node details crucial for tailoring radiotherapy. This approach merits further investigation, particularly in women with pelvic lymph nodes measuring 1.5 cm or more in diameter or patients with two or more imaging-positive PLNs.

Comparison of three-dimensional vs. two-dimensional assisted thoracoscopy for recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes dissection in esophagectomy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the clinical value of 3D video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in dissecting recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 205 patients, including 120 males, who underwent esophagectomy from May 2018 to May 2020 in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at the Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Perioperative parameters, including intraoperative blood loss, operation time, the number of dissected recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes, the incidence and degree of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, the volume of postoperative thoracic drainage, and postoperative complications, were compared between the 3D and 2D groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the preoperative baseline data between these two groups (P > 0.05). The number of dissected recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in the 3D group was significantly higher than in the 2D group (P < 0.05). The operation times were significantly shorter in the 3D group than in the 2D group (P < 0.05). The volume of thoracic drainage in the first 2 days was significantly less in the 3D group than in the 2D group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the 2D system, the application of 3D video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in minimally invasive esophagectomy can increase the number of dissected recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes and ensure safety. Additionally, it can reduce the duration of the operation, decrease early postoperative thoracic drainage volume, and promote patient recovery.

Safety and practicality of an excisional lymph node study driving HIV cure research in South Africa.

Introduction: Studying diseased human tissues offers better insights into the intricate interactions between pathogens and the human host. In conditions such as HIV and cancers, where diseases primarily manifest in tissues, peripheral blood studies are limited in providing a thorough understanding of disease processes and localized immune responses. Methods: We describe a study designed to obtain excisional lymph nodes from volunteers for HIV reservoir studies. Since study commencement in 2015, 181 lymph node excisions have been performed, resulting in collection of 138 lymph node tissues. Lymph nodes were surgically excised from study volunteers using a minimally invasive procedure, performed in a minor theater under local anesthesia. Results: The surgery takes less than 30 minutes to complete, minimizing risk and stress on the volunteer. The small incision made during the procedure typically heals within a week. The associated discomfort is generally manageable, and participants are often able to resume their regular activities within a day. Only 5.5% of the study participants experienced minor adverse events, such as swelling and prolonged wound healing, recovering within 2 weeks with no serious adverse events reported. Discussion: Our study demonstrates that when done with outmost care, obtaining excised lymph nodes for research is relatively safe and practical.

Managing malignant sublingual gland tumors: a single institution experience with 23 patients.

BACKGROUND: Due to the relative rarity of malignant sublingual gland tumors, diagnosing and treating them clinically pose challenges. Hence, there's a need to explore the pathological types, characteristics, treatment methods, and prognosis of primary malignant tumors of the sublingual gland to improve our understanding and management of these rare yet highly malignant conditions. METHODS: This study reviewed cases of primary malignant sublingual gland tumors, analyzing their characteristics. The treatment methods included surgical excision, with additional radiotherapy, or brachytherapy for advanced stages or positive surgical margins. The study also summarized different treatment approaches, including lymph node dissection and soft tissue reconstruction using free flaps such as the anterolateral thigh flap and forearm flap. RESULTS: We have gathered 23 cases of sublingual gland malignancies treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, from January 2013 to May 2024. The most common pathological types were adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma, with rare cases of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and nonspecific salivary gland clear cell carcinoma. Early diagnosis and surgical intervention were crucial for a favorable prognosis. Marginal mandibulectomy was necessary for cases involving the mandible. Patients with positive preoperative lymph node detection required cervical lymph node dissection. Extensive tissue defects in the floor of the mouth were effectively reconstructed with free flaps to prevent oral-mandibular fistula. CONCLUSION: Surgical excision remains the preferred treatment for malignant sublingual gland tumors. Early diagnosis and comprehensive surgical management are essential for improving prognosis. The study's limitations include a small sample size and short follow-up duration, necessitating further research with larger clinical samples to confirm these findings.

Duodenal stenosis due to small lymphocele after para-aortic lymphadenectomy: A case report and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: We present an unusual case of a small para-aortic lymphocele causing duodenal stenosis after lymphadenectomy and discuss its treatment. CASE REPORT: Our case involved a 57-year-old woman with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery, including para-aortic lymphadenectomy. On postoperative day 7, projectile vomiting occurred. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a small lymphocele in the dorsal duodenum, causing duodenal stenosis. Transpercutaneous and transduodenal puncture or surgical procedures were difficult because the cyst was too small. Per endoscopic and gastrointestinal series findings on the postoperative day 22, a liquid diet was presumed to be able to pass through the narrow portion. Hence, concentrated liquid food was administered orally; no vomiting occurred. At 2 months postoperatively, CT showed no lymphocele. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment involving waiting for spontaneous lymphocele reduction with a concentrated fluid diet may be considered in such cases if fluid passage is confirmed with endoscopy and gastrointestinal series.

Thoracoscopic three-port single versus multiple intercostal for radical resection of esophageal cancer: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the safety and feasibility of single-intercostal totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIIE) with those of multiple-intercostal MIIE. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2022, clinical data were collected for 528 patients who successfully underwent totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. Among these patients, 294 underwent MIIE, with 200 undergoing the single-intercostal approach and 94 undergoing the multiple-intercostal approach. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to the cohort of 294 patients. Subsequently, perioperative outcomes and other pertinent clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients were subjected to PSM, and 89 groups of patient data (178 persons in total) were well balanced and included in the follow-up statistics. Compared to the multiple intercostal group, the single intercostal group had a shorter operative time (280 min vs. 310 min; p < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the incidence of major perioperative complications (p > 0.05). The total number of lymph nodes sampled (25.30 vs. 27.55, p > 0.05) and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes sampled on the both sides (p > 0.05) did not significantly differ. The single intercostal group had lower postoperative long-term usage of morphine (0,0-60 vs. 20,20-130; p < 0.01), total temporary addition (10,0-30 vs. 20,20-40; p < 0.01) and temporary usage in the first 3 days after surgery (0,0-15 vs. 10,10-20; p < 0.01) than did the multicostal group.There were no significant differences in age, sex, tumor location or extent of lymphadenectomy or in the clinical factors between the single-intercostal group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques can be used for the treatment of esophageal cancer. Compared to multiple intercostal MIIE, the feasibility of which has been proven internationally, the single intercostal technique can also be applied to patients of different age groups and sexes and with different tumor locations. It can provide surgeons with an additional surgical option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and written informed consent was exempted from ethical review. The registration number was 20,230,326. The date of registration was 2023.03.26.

A comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis of the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy using the DaVinci vs the Hugo RAS surgical platforms.

Because of the increasing popularity of Hugo RAS as a surgical platform, a comparison examination of intraoperative and oncological outcomes across DaVinci and Hugo RAS robotic surgery platforms is urgently needed. We carried out a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature of current research, comprehensively searching PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for eligible studies comparing the results between the DaVinci and Hugo RAS. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria were followed in the conduct of this study, with language restricted to English and a final search date of June 2024. We excluded articles composed solely of conference abstracts and irrelevant content. Composite outcomes were assessed using weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios (ORs). The risk of bias in individual research was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and heterogeneity and bias risk were controlled for using a sensitivity analysis. Six studies in all were considered, comprising 1025 patients, including 626 DaVinci patients and 399 Hugo RAS patients. Review Manager V5.4.1 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was utilized to conduct the meta-analysis, including 6 trials, which demonstrated that compared to Hugo RAS, DaVinci was associated with statistically significant differences in several outcomes: a reduction in operative time (OT) (WMD - 8.46, 95% CI - 13.56 to 3.36; p = 0.001), an increase in estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD 41.68, 95% CI 23.59 to 59.77; p < 0.00001), and an increased pelvic lymphadenectomy ratio (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.05-2.05; p = 0.01). On the contrary, there were no statistically noteworthy differences in the length of hospital stay (LOS) between the two teams (WMD - 0.05, 95% CI - 0.14 to 0.04; p = 0.25), nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68-1.35; p = 0.8), postoperative complications (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.50-2.64; p = 0.75), or positive surgical margins (PSM) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.76-1.54; p = 0.68). Although DaVinci offers shorter operating times (OT) and increased pelvic lymph node dissection rates, Hugo RAS demonstrates lower estimated blood loss (EBL). Overall, Hugo RAS Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) results seem to be similar to those obtained with the DaVinci system. Further research and long-term follow-up are necessary to ascertain durable oncological and functional outcomes, allowing doctors to switch between robotic systems and use their skills. These findings are crucial for patients, surgeons, and healthcare policymakers and warrant future studies with extended follow-up.

[Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancer (2024 edition)].

In the past two decades, with the development and application of laparoscopic technique and the promotion of the concept of complete mesocolic excision, significant changes have occurred in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancer. The Chinese Society of Colorectal Surgery and Chinese Colorectal Research Consortium (CCRC) Organized national experts in colorectal surgery to form a consensus on 14 key clinical issues related to right hemicolectomy, taking into account the preferences of Chinese doctors and patients as well as the pros and cons of intervention measures, with a view to standardizing the surgical treatment of right colon cancer. The consensus recommendations were focused on three main aspects: (1) surgical anatomy: the key structures and its definitions related to the mesentery and vascular anatomy were clarified. It is recommended that the left side of the superior mesenteric artery be considered the medial boundary for complete mesocolic excision; (2) surgical technique: laparoscopy is recommended as the preferred surgical approach for right-sided colon cancer; (3) surgical principles: D2 lymph node dissection could be considered as the standard of care for right-sided colon cancer. Standard D2 could be considered as routine procedure unless preoperative imaging or intraoperative exploration revealed suspected regional lymph node metastasis. Dissection of infrapyloric lymph node is not recommended unless it is suspected as metastasis. Additionally, consensus recommendations were made regarding the location of vascular ligation, the extent of bowel resection, and anastomosis techniques.

[Thinking about the extent and technique of lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].

The incidence of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma is increasing gradually. The surgical procedures mainly include radical resection of the primary tumor, lymph node dissection, and digestive tract reconstruction. Due to the special anatomical location of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, the pattern of lymph node metastasis is not clear, and regional lymph nodes dissection especially in the lower mediastinum is still controversial, and awaits further high-quality evidence. Meanwhile, due to the special anatomical location of the lower mediastinum, it is often difficult to perform lower mediastinal lymph node dissection. How to complete the lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection more safely and effectively is the key point for gastric cancer surgeons. In this paper, the progress, consensus, and controversy on the extent of lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection in patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma were discussed. Based on our own experience, the current clinically techniques for lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection were summarized to further improve the quality control of lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection in patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

[Research progress on the distribution patterns and surgical dissection of central lymph nodes in left-sided colon cancer].

Lymphatic metastasis is one of the main pathways of colorectal cancer spread and also a crucial factor in patient long-term prognosis. Lymph node dissection in the possible tumor drainage area, particularly the central group of lymph nodes at the root of the tumor-associated supplying artery, is a key and challenging aspect of surgical techniques. Currently, the patterns of lymphatic drainage and the distribution of central lymph nodes in left-sided colon cancer are not well illustrated, and there is no consensus on the necessity and extent of central lymph node dissection. This has led to significant variability in the extent of lymph node dissection among different surgeons in clinical practice, a lack of quality control standards for surgical procedures, and impacts on postoperative treatment strategy and long-term outcomes. Moreover, current research on lymphatic drainage and metastasis is primarily based on traditional anatomy, whereas individualized, precise approaches to lymph node dissection have not been realized. The application of preoperative and intraoperative lymph node imaging techniques based on functional anatomy in colorectal cancer patients is still under exploration.

Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection experiences in endometrial cancer at our tertiary cancer treatment institution.

OBJECTIVE: In endometrial cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node dissection is used instead of staging surgery, particularly in advanced disease that is limited to the uterus. The aim of this study is to evaluate our practice of robotic sentinel lymph node dissection, which is applied to endometrial cancer patients in our tertiary cancer treatment center, according to the current literature, and to share our own data. METHODS: Included in our analysis are patients who underwent robotic sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer utilizing indocyanine green in our center between January 2018 and January 2024. RESULTS: In all, of the 93 endometrial carcinoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 63 were classified as low-risk, while 30 were high-risk according to the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We found sentinel lymph nodes in both low-risk and high-risk patients, with an overall sensitivity of 96.32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.12-99.71), specificity of 100% (95%CI, 92.20-99.8), negative predictive value of 96.72% (95%CI, 87.03-99.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 (95%CI, 0.01-0.36). CONCLUSION: After evaluating our data retrospectively, we determined that we were compatible with the current literature.

Prophylactic para-aortic lymph node dissection in Colo-rectal cancer; pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the 3rd most common cancer worldwide, representing 10% of all cancer types, and is considered the 2nd leading cause of cancer-related deaths. It usually metastasizes to the liver or lung. Para-aortic lymph node metastasis is considered a metastatic disease (stage 4) according to the AJCC and is considered a regional disease (stage 3) according to the JSCCR. Para-aortic lymph node metastases occur in about 1% of cases. Neoadjuvant CTH, followed by PALN, is the best option for metastatic para-aortic LNs in colorectal cancer patients. This study addresses the value of prophylactic para-aortic LN dissection among colon-rectal cancer patients (overtreatment protocol). METHODOLOGY: This is a prospective study that included patients attending NCI, Cairo University, from December 2020 to December 2023 who were complaining of left colonic cancer or recto-sigmoid cancer and underwent left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or LAR. All patients underwent formal mesenteric LN dissection and prophylactic para-aortic LN dissection. RESULTS: Among 60 patients who underwent colorectal surgery with prophylactic para-aortic LN dissection, 21 cases (35%) were in the descending colon, 22 cases (36.7%) were in the sigmoid colon, 11 cases (18.3%) were in the recto-sigmoid, and 6 cases (10%) were in the upper rectum. 55 cases (91.7%) were in grade 2, and 5 cases (8.3%) were in grade 3. Neoadjuvant CTH was given in 3 cases (5%) while neoadjuvant RTH was given in 6 cases (10%). Regarding reported postoperative complications, lymphorrhea was reported in 2 patients (3.3%) and wound infection occurred in 6 patients (10%). A recurrence was reported among 8 cases (13.4%). CONCLUSIONS: We aimed in this study to highlight the value of prophylactic para-aortic lymph node dissection among colorectal cancer patients (over-treatment protocol) and report its reflection on predicting the behavior of the disease and subsequently selecting the patients who will be suitable to do this procedure.

Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in T1-2 sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy following neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard axillary management for breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant therapy. Nevertheless, when that happens, the frequency of additional positive nodes is not properly evaluated. We aim to develop a prediction model to assess the frequency of additional nodal disease after a positive sentinel lymph node following neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the ultrasound and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) undergoing mastectomy after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) at our institution, and performed univariate and multivariate logistic analyses to confirm the factors affecting non-SLN metastasis. These factors were included to establish a nomogram, and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were utilized to assess the validity of this model. RESULTS: A total of 126 breast cancer patients were ultimately included in our study, 38 (53.5%) patients were diagnosed with non-SLN metastases of all 71 patients in training set. The results of multifactorial logistic analysis suggested that lymph node metastasis ratio (LNR), short axis of lymph node and progesterone receptor (PR) were strongly associated with non-SLN metastasis. We established a nomogram using the above three variables as predictors, which yielded an area under the curve of 0.795, and validated with a favorable AUC of 0.876. CONCLUSION: The nomogram we constructed can accurately predict the likelihood of non-SLN metastasis in our patients with 1-3 positive SLN after NAT, which may help guide decision making regarding axillary management.

New insights in breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer treatment including axillary dissection occurs in almost 20% of women. Its treatment consists of complete decongestive physiotherapy based on low-stretch bandage to reduce volume, followed by elastic compression to maintain it. In this article, we will detail recent data on lymphedema risk factors with possible genetic predisposition, prevention (surgical, compression), manual lymphatic drainage, physical activity, weight, advice, and treatments including gene therapy.

A 3†M Evaluation Protocol for Examining Lymph Nodes in Cancer Patients: Multi-Modal, Multi-Omics, Multi-Stage Approach.

Through meticulous examination of lymph nodes, the stage and severity of cancer can be determined. This information is invaluable for doctors to select the most appropriate treatment plan and predict patient prognosis; however, any oversight in the examination of lymph nodes may lead to cancer metastasis and poor prognosis. In this review, we summarize a significant number of articles supported by statistical data and clinical experience, proposing a standardized evaluation protocol for lymph nodes. This protocol begins with preoperative imaging to assess the presence of lymph node metastasis. Radiomics has replaced the single-modality approach, and deep learning models have been constructed to assist in image analysis with superior performance to that of the human eye. The focus of this review lies in intraoperative lymphadenectomy. Multiple international authorities have recommended specific numbers for lymphadenectomy in various cancers, providing surgeons with clear guidelines. These numbers are calculated by applying various statistical methods and real-world data. In the third chapter, we mention the growing concern about immune impairment caused by lymph node dissection, as the lack of CD8 memory T cells may have a negative impact on postoperative immunotherapy. Both excessive and less lymph node dissection have led to conflicting findings on postoperative immunotherapy. In conclusion, we propose a protocol that can be referenced by surgeons. With the systematic management of lymph nodes, we can control tumor progression with the greatest possible likelihood, optimize the preoperative examination process, reduce intraoperative risks, and improve postoperative quality of life.

Surgery-based radiation-free multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.

The current review described a 55-year woman using 28 months to finish her surgery-based radiation-free multimodality treatment journey to fight International Federation of Gynaecology & Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 clinical stage IIA2 (cT2aN0M0) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix. She received six cycles of perioperative adjuvant therapy, including three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and three cycles of postoperative adjuvant therapy by using combination of dose-dense chemotherapy (CT, weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2+triweekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2), immunotherapy (IO, triweekly pembrolizumab 200 mg) and half-dose anti-angiogenic agent (triweekly bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg) plus interval radical surgery (radical hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy + bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection + para-aortic lymph node sampling) and following maintenance therapy with monthly 22 cycles of half-dose of IO (pembrolizumab 100 mg) and concomitant 4 cycles of single-agent CT (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2) and 18 cycles of half-dose anti-angiogenic agent (bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg). During the cervical SCC fighting journey, two unwanted adverse events (AEs) occurred. One was pseudo-progressive disease during the NAT treatment and pathology-confirmed upgrading FIGO stage IIIC1p (ypT2a1N1M0) after radical surgery and the other was the occurrence of hypothyroidism during the post operative adjuvant therapy. Based on this case we presented, we review the recent trend in the management of women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) using the radiation-free but surgery-based multimodality strategy and highlight the strengths and limitations about perioperative adjuvant therapy with dose-dense CT + IO + half-dose anti-angiogenic agent and maintenance treatment of half-dose IO combining with short-term single agent CT and following long-term half-dose anti-angiogenic agent. All underscore the possibility that women with LACC have an opportunity to receive surgery-based RT-free multi-modality strategy to manage their diseases with satisfactory results. Additionally, the evolving role of IO plus CT with/without anti-angiogenic agent functioning as either primary treatment or adjuvant therapy for the treatment of advanced CC has been in process continuously. Moreover, the patient's positive response to IO, pembrolizumab as an example, both during the primary and maintenance therapy, highlights the importance of integrating IO into CT regimens for CC, especially in cases where conventional therapies, RT as an example, are insufficient or who do not want to receive RT-based treatment. The sustained disease-free status of the patient over several years reinforces the potential of IO to significantly increase long-term survival outcomes in CC patients, particularly for those with LACC.

RATIO OF METASTATIC LYMPH NODES VS. RESECTED LYMPH NODES (N-RATIO) HAS PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS IN GASTRIC CANCER.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node status is vital for gastric cancer (GC) prognosis, but the conventional pN stage may be limited by variations in lymphadenectomy and stage migration. The N-Ratio, which assesses the ratio of metastatic to resected lymph nodes, emerges as a promising prognostic tool. AIMS: To assess N-Ratios prognostic value in GC, particularly in patients with <25 resected lymph nodes. METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent for GC were retrospectively evaluated. The N-Ratio categories were determined using the ROC curve method, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used as a measure of performance in predicting recurrence/death. RESULTS: A total of 561 GC patients were included in the study, 57% had pN+ status, and 17.5% had <25 resected lymph nodes. N-Ratio, with a mean of 0.12, predicted survival with 74% accuracy (AUC=0.74; 95%CI 0.70-0.78, p<0.001). N-Ratio categories included: N-Ratio 0 (43%); N-Ratio 1 (12.3%); N-Ratio 2 (31.6%); and N-Ratio 3 (13.2%). Disease-free survival (DFS) varied among all N-Ratio groups, with N-Ratio 3 showing worse survival than pN3 cases (DFS=21.8 vs. 11 months, p=0.022, p<0.05). In cases with <25 resected lymph nodes, DFS was not significantly worse in N-Ratio 0 (68.8 vs. 81.9%, p=0.061, p>0.05) and N-Ratio 1 (66.2 vs. 50%, p=0.504, p>0.05) groups. The DFS of N-Ratio-0 cases with <25 lymph nodes was similar to N-Ratio 1 cases. CONCLUSIONS: N-Ratio influenced survival in GC patients, especially in advanced lymph node disease (N-Ratio 3). Considering that N-Ratio does not impact pN0 cases, individualized prognosis assessment is essential for patients with <25 resected lymph nodes.