Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 7.600
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 8(1)2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823800

RESUMO

The impact of schools closing for in-person instruction in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of prescription medications is not known. In this study, we examined changes in the total prescriptions filled, specifically for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications, among school-aged children and adolescents aged 10-19 years during periods before and after complete school closures between October 2019 and September 2022. Our findings indicate that complete school closures were associated with declines in the use of ADHD medications among younger populations in the USA. These findings suggest that the underuse of ADHD medications may be an overlooked contributor to declines in academic performance observed during periods of school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , COVID-19 , Instituições Acadêmicas , Humanos , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Jovem , Pandemias , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/provisão & distribuição , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
N Z Med J ; 137(1595): 48-63, 2024 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754113

RESUMO

AIMS: A NZ$5 co-payment prescription charge was removed in July 2023 but may be reinstated. Here we quantify the health impact and cost of not being able to afford this charge. METHODS: We linked New Zealand Health Surveys (2013/2014-2018/2019) to hospitalisation data using data available in Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI). Cox proportional-hazards models compared time to hospitalisation between those who had faced a cost barrier to collecting a prescription and those who had not. RESULTS: Of the 81,626 total survey respondents, 72,243 were available for analysis in IDI. A further 516 were excluded to give an analysis dataset of 71,502. Of these, 5,889 (8.2%) reported not collecting a prescription due to cost in the previous year. Among people who faced a cost barrier, 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.7-61.2%) were admitted to hospital during the study period, compared to 43.9% (95% CI 43.6-44.3%) of those who did not. Having adjusted for socio-demographic variables, people who faced a cost barrier were 34% (hazard ratio 1.34; 95% CI 1.29-1.39) more likely to be admitted to hospital than those who did not. Annual avoidable hospitalisation costs-were prescription co-payments to remain free-are estimated at $32.4 million per year based on the assumption of a causal relationship between unmet need for prescription medicines and subsequent hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: The revenue to the health system from co-payments may be offset by the costs associated with avoidable hospitalisations.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Humanos , Nova Zelândia , Masculino , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Estudos de Coortes , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Honorários por Prescrição de Medicamentos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia
3.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(5): 155, 2024 May 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734769

RESUMO

Topical adapalene gel is an effective and well tolerated acne treatment that transitioned from prescription to over-the-counter (OTC) availability in 2016. Historically, prescription to OTC transitions have lowered costs to patients and payers and increased access to medications. This study used sales and prescriber data to assess access to topical retinoid therapies and their costs in the pre- and post- Rx-to-OTC transition. We demonstrate that the prescription to OTC transition of adapalene gel increased access to this medication, while lowering costs to patients and payers, including Medicare patients. These results provide a necessary call to action for future OTC shifts with other high safety profile, well-tolerated medications in ultimate efforts and hopes of cost savings for patients, insurers, and Medicare within our healthcare industry.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Adapaleno , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Medicamentos sem Prescrição , Humanos , Adapaleno/administração & dosagem , Adapaleno/economia , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/economia , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Acne Vulgar/economia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos , Administração Tópica , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Custos de Medicamentos , Medicare/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Redução de Custos
4.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(5): e241188, 2024 May 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787543

RESUMO

Importance: Prices for brand-name drugs affect both federal spending and out-of-pocket liability for Medicare Part D enrollees. Objective: To examine how prices for brand-name drugs, net of rebates and discounts, have changed from 2010 to 2019 and to examine the role of specialty drugs in those changes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study involved a descriptive analysis of prescription drug spending and prices between 2010 and 2019. The universe of prescription drug event data from those years were combined with confidential data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on rebates and discounts that manufacturers and pharmacies pay to Medicare Part D plans to calculate rebate percentages, net spending, and net prices at the drug level. Specialty drugs were identified using information from IQVIA, allowing for a stratified analysis by specialty status. Data were analyzed from March 2019 to March 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Average prices (net of rebates and discounts in 2019 US dollars) and average annual price growth for brand-name prescription drugs, overall and separately for specialty and nonspecialty drugs. Results: Average net prices for brand-name drugs doubled from 2010 to 2019 (from $167 to $370). Growth in specialty drug prices was an underlying factor in those increases: average annual price growth was 13.2% for specialty drugs compared with 2.6% for nonspecialty drugs. Price growth for specialty drugs over the decade was smaller than what the Congressional Budget Office reported for the 2010 to 2015 period (increase of 22.3% per year vs 4.5% per year for nonspecialty drug prices), suggesting that price growth slowed after 2015. Drugs that treat hepatitis C contributed to that difference because prices for those drugs were initially high and then subsequently fell. Absent those drugs, price growth for specialty drugs averaged 18.1% in the first half of the decade and 6.9% in the second half. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study show that prices for specialty drugs have continued to increase over time in the Medicare Part D program, which contributes to high out-of-pocket liability for users of those drugs in addition to US federal budgetary expenditures.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos , Medicare Part D , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Estados Unidos , Medicare Part D/economia , Medicare Part D/tendências , Humanos , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Custos de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Gastos em Saúde/tendências
5.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 21: E34, 2024 May 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753526

RESUMO

Introduction: Haven is a student-run free clinic in New Haven, Connecticut, that serves more than 500 patients annually. Haven's pharmacy department helps patients obtain medications by providing discount coupons or medications from the clinic's in-house pharmacy, directly paying for medications at local pharmacies, and delivering medications to patients' homes. This study aimed to identify prescriptions that have the highest cost among Haven patients. Methods: Our sample consisted of all Haven patients who attended the clinic from March 2021 through March 2023. Patients were eligible to be seen at Haven if they were aged 18 to 65 years, lacked health insurance, and lived in New Haven. We determined the lowest cost of each medication prescribed to Haven patients by comparing prices among local pharmacies after applying a GoodRx discount. We defined expensive medication as more than $20 per prescription. We excluded medical supplies. Results: Of the 594 Haven patients in our sample, 64% (n = 378) required financial assistance and 22% (n = 129) were prescribed at least 1 expensive medication. Among 129 patients prescribed an expensive medication, the mean (SD) age was 45.0 (12.3) years; 65% were women, and 87% were Hispanic or Latino. Median (IQR) household annual income was $14,400 [$0-$24,000]. We identified 246 expensive medications; the median (IQR) price per prescription was $31.43 ($24.00-$52.02). The most frequently prescribed expensive medications were fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (accounting for 6% of all expensive medications), medroxyprogesterone acetate (6%), albuterol sulfate (5%), and rosuvastatin (5%). Conclusion: The average Haven patient has an income well below the federal poverty level, and many have chronic cardiovascular and respiratory conditions that require expensive medications. Future research should work toward making medications universally affordable.


Assuntos
Clínica Dirigida por Estudantes , Humanos , Connecticut , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Clínica Dirigida por Estudantes/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Adolescente , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia
6.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0299163, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630653

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opioid overdose was declared a public health emergency in the United States, but much of the focus has been on adults. Child and adolescent exposure and access to unused prescription-opioid medications is a big concern. More research is needed on the trend of pediatric (age 0-17) prescription-opioid overdose emergency department (ED) visits in the United States, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic year. METHODS: This retrospective epidemiological study used the 2008-2020 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample to provide a national estimate of ED visits related to prescription-opioid overdose. Inclusion criteria were 0-17-year-old patients treated at the ED due to prescription-opioid overdose. Eligible visits were identified if their medical records included any administrative billing codes for prescription-opioid overdose. National estimates were broken down by age groups, sex, geographic region, primary payer, median household income by zip code, ED disposition, and hospital location/teaching status. Incidence rate per 100,000 U.S. children was calculated for age groups, sex, and geographic region. RESULTS: Overall, the prescription-opioid overdose ED visits for patients from 0-17 years old in the United States decreased by 22% from 2008 to 2019, then increased by 12% in 2020. Most patients were discharged to home following their ED visit; however, there was a 42% increase in patients admitted from 2019 to 2020. The prescription-opioid overdose rate per 100,000 U.S. children was highest in the 0 to 1 and 12 to 17 age groups, with the 12 to 17 group increasing by 27% in 2020. ED visits in the West and Midwest saw prescription-opioid visits increase by 58% and 20%, respectively, from 2019-2020. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription-opioid overdose ED visits among U.S. children and adolescents decreased over the past decade until 2019. However, there was a substantial increase in ED visits from 2019 to 2020, suggesting the potential impact due to the then-emerging COVID-19 pandemic. Findings suggest focusing on young children and adolescents to reduce further prescription-opioid overdoses in the United States.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Overdose de Drogas , Overdose de Opiáceos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Analgésicos Opioides , Overdose de Opiáceos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Prescrições , COVID-19/epidemiologia
7.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(5): 507-513, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38651983

RESUMO

Prescription drug contracting in the United States has evolved over decades from discounts provided to members of early health maintenance organization plans to rebate contracts to more complex value-based purchasing arrangements. This primer describes the history of contracting between pharmaceutical manufacturers and managed care pharmacy organizations and details the various contracting methods used today.


Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/economia , Contratos , Assistência Farmacêutica/organização & administração , Assistência Farmacêutica/economia
8.
Urol Pract ; 11(3): 454-460, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640418

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients who seek urologic care have recently reported a high degree of financial toxicity from prescription medications, including management for nephrolithiasis, urinary incontinence, and urological oncology. Estimating out-of-pocket costs can be challenging for urologists in the US because of variable insurance coverage, local pharmacy distributions, and complicated prescription pricing schemes. This article discusses resources that urologists can adopt into their practice and share with patients to help lower out-of-pocket spending for prescription medications. METHODS: We identify 4 online tools that are designed to direct patients toward more affordable prescription medication options: the Medicare Part D Plan Finder, GoodRx, Amazon, and the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company. A brief historical overview and summary for patients and clinicians are provided for each online resource. A patient-centered framework is provided to help navigate these 4 available tools in clinic. RESULTS: Among the 4 tools we identify, there are multiples tradeoffs to consider as financial savings and features can vary. First, patients insured by Medicare should explore the Part D Plan Finder each year to compare drug plans. Second, patients who need to urgently refill a prescription at a local pharmacy should visit GoodRx. Third, patients who are prescribed recurrent generic prescriptions for chronic conditions can utilize the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company. Finally, patients who are prescribed 3 or more chronic medications can benefit from subscribing to Amazon RxPass. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription medications for urologic conditions can be expensive. This article includes 4 online resources that can help patients access medications at their most affordable costs. Urologists can provide this framework to their patients to help support lowering out-of-pocket drug costs.


Assuntos
Medicare Part D , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Idoso , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Urologistas , Custos e Análise de Custo , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Prescrições
9.
Isr J Health Policy Res ; 13(1): 17, 2024 Apr 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570850

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite Israel's increased use of prescription opioids, reported deaths resulting or associated with opioids have decreased, in fact dramatically, since 2005. This contrast is unique and difficult to explain. We sought to examine whether higher prescribed opioid dosages among adults without oncologic diagnoses were associated with higher all-cause mortality rates. METHODS: A historical cohort study in Clalit Health Services, using a data repository including all adult patients prescribed opiates between 2010 and 2020, excluding patients with oncologic diagnoses. Patients were classified into three groups according to opioid use: below 50 Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day, 50 to 90 MME per day, and above 90 MME per day. Sex, Charlson comorbidity score, age and socioeconomic status were recorded. Mortality rates were compared between the dosage groups and compared to age-standardized mortality rates in the general population. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, patients receiving 90 or more MME per day were 2.37 (95%CI 2.1 to 2.68) more likely to have died compared to patients receiving below 50 MME per day. The respective hazard ratio among patients receiving between 50 and 90 MME per day was 2.23 (2.01 to 2.46). Among patients aged 18 to 50, standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) compared to the general population ranged between 5.4 to 8.6 among women, receiving between 50 and 90 MME per day, and between 8.07 and 10.7 among women receiving 90 or more MME per day. The respective SMRs among men were 1.2 to 3.8 and 2.7 to 5.4. CONCLUSION: Increased opioid use is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality among non-oncological patients. This result is most notable among young adults with little or no known comorbidities. These findings are consistent with results in other countries and seem more credible than previous Israeli reports. Healthcare regulators and providers should, therefore, act to curtail the increasing opioid prescriptions and devise and enhance controls in the healthcare system, which, until 2020, had very limited mechanisms in place.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Endrin/análogos & derivados , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Feminino , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Israel/epidemiologia , Prescrições
11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38673338

RESUMO

This study is the first to examine factors in the utilization of physician services, dentist services, hospital care, and prescribed medications focusing exclusively on insured children in the United States. Data describing 48,660 insured children were extracted from the 2021 National Survey of Children's Health. Children in the present sample were covered by private health insurance, public health insurance, or other health insurance. Logistic regression results showed self-reported health to be negatively associated with physician visits, hospital-care use, and prescription use, but teeth condition to be positively associated with dentist visits. Physician visits were associated negatively with age, Hispanic ethnicity, Asian ethnicity, family income at or below 200% of the federal poverty level, and other health insurance, but positively with parental education and metropolitan residency. Dentist visits were associated positively with girls, age, and parental education, but negatively with Asian ethnicity and public health insurance. Use of hospital care was associated negatively with age and Asian ethnicity, but positively with parental education and public health insurance. Use of prescriptions was associated positively with age, Black ethnicity, parental education, and public health insurance, but negatively with Hispanic ethnicity, Asian ethnicity, and family income at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. Implications included the expansion of public health insurance, promotion of awareness of medicine discount programs, and understanding of racial/ethnic minorities' cultural beliefs in health and treatment.


Assuntos
Seguro Saúde , Humanos , Criança , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Adolescente , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico
12.
J Anal Toxicol ; 48(4): 242-251, 2024 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676414

RESUMO

The NC Office of the Chief Medical Examiner regularly assumes jurisdiction over deaths that are suspicious, unusual or unattended by a medical professional. In recent years, the presence of counterfeit pills is occasionally suggested by investigatory notes and/or scene findings that document reported consumption of prescription drugs, or prescription drugs on scene, which are not reflected in the final autopsy findings after toxicological analysis of the decedent's blood samples. Counterfeit pill consumption is a major public health hazard worthy of attention from the forensic toxicology community. Seventy-five cases from January 2020 to December 2022 serve as a convenience sample of cases where prescription pills including formulations of alprazolam, oxycodone and hydrocodone were specifically referenced during the death scene investigation as recently consumed, yet an unexpected substance was found during toxicological analysis rather than the expected pharmaceutical drug. Of note, novel benzodiazepines detected included flualprazolam, etizolam, clonazolam metabolite (8-aminoclonazolam), bromazolam, flubromazolam and desalkylflurazepam. Decedents' ages ranged from 16 to 69, across 33 different NC counties. Case notes indicated that eight of the decedents obtained pills through direct personal relationships, six decedents obtained them from "the street" and one decedent likely purchased pills online. Pills were largely consumed orally or through insufflation. Seven case reports contained indication that decedents knew or suspected the counterfeit nature of their pills. This study describes the context and characteristics of 2020-2022 suspected counterfeit pill-involved deaths in NC to further the understanding of the forensic science community, law enforcement partners, public health stakeholders and those potentially at risk through the consumption of counterfeit pills.


Assuntos
Medicamentos Falsificados , Toxicologia Forense , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Benzodiazepinas/análise , Adolescente , Oxicodona/análise , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Alprazolam/análise , Hidrocodona
13.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(4): e113-e115, 2024 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564391

RESUMO

Immunosuppressive medications are commonly used to manage dermatological conditions, including atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and bullous diseases. However, cost and adverse effect profile, including increased risk of infections, are important considerations.


Assuntos
Medicare , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Idoso , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Prescrições
14.
Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) ; 22(1): 1-6, Ene-Mar, 2024. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-231375

RESUMO

Background: The global population of elderly has substantially increased in recent years due to heightened life expectancy and improved survival rates for numerous diseases, including cancer. Cancer treatment often entails complex regimens involving multiple medications. Additionally, advancing age is associated with a higher prevalence of co-morbidities, rendering older individuals more susceptible to inappropriate medications use and adverse drug events. Objective: We aimed in our study to examine the extent of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) prescribing and factors associated with more PIMs instances in elderly cancer patients. Methods: The data of this study was evaluated utilizing medical records of included study subjects and was conducted over more than 3 years period (January 1, 2019 to January 31, 2022) at King Abdullah University Hospital, Al Ramtha, Jordan. Beer’s criteria 2019 was used to evaluate and identify the potentially inappropriate drugs prescribed and used among elderly cancer patients. Results: A total number of 250 geriatric cancer patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 73.4 years. Males represented 50.4% of the total patients (n=126). The average number of medications reported was 10.7 medications. Eighty three percent (n=203) of patients had polypharmacy (prescribed at least five medications or more), A total of 179 medications were considered inappropriate according to the 2019 updated BEERS criteria and 71.6% of patients (n=179) received at least one PIM. The most common classes of PIMs were gastrointestinal medications (e.g., metoclopramide). Conclusion:According to this study, the incidence of PIMs in geriatric oncology practice is concerning, and extra consideration should be given to reduce any risks associated with this kind of prescribing in elderly cancer patients. Polypharmacy was found to be a major predictor of PIM prescription in this research. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Expectativa de Vida , Taxa de Sobrevida , Neoplasias , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Polimedicação , Comorbidade , Jordânia
15.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 144(3): 311-328, 2024.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432941

RESUMO

When I graduated from university, my aim was to become a pharmacist capable of recommending prescription medicines to doctors and teaching others to do the same. To achieve this goal, I developed comprehensive curricula incorporating progressive educational tools such as problem-based learning and small group discussions. Subsequently, the effectiveness of these tools and curricula was evaluated, and the findings of these assessments were published in various peer-reviewed journal articles. Consequently, a body of evidence on the most effective ways to recommend prescription medicines to doctors was gradually established. This paper aims to summarize this comprehensive body of research spanning over 43 years, with the objective of highlighting the valuable insights gained thus far, identifying the best practice techniques, and exploring potential avenues for future research.


Assuntos
Médicos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Humanos , Farmacêuticos , Currículo , Escolaridade , Prescrições
16.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 103(6): 1210-1223, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491733

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Maternal demographics have evolved, and more women than ever enter pregnancy with preexisting comorbidity and with potentially complex medication exposure, including polypharmacy (concomitant intake of multiple medications). This study aims to describe the evolution of medication use in pregnancy in Denmark from 1998 to 2018 with special focus on polypharmacy, patterns of use, and underlying demographics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Danish nationwide historical registry study based on all clinically recognized pregnancies with a gestation ≥10 weeks between 1998 and 2018. Medication use was estimated by redemption of prescriptions during pregnancy. RESULTS: Among a total of 1 402 327 clinically recognized pregnancies, redemption of at least one prescription medication during pregnancy increased from 56.9% in 1998 to 63.3% in 2018, coinciding with an increased use of polypharmacy (from 24.8% in 1998 to 35.2% in 2018). The prevalence of pregnant women who used medications for chronic conditions increased more than the prevalence of women treated for occasional or short-time conditions. Redemption of one or multiple prescription medications during pregnancy was mostly seen among pregnant women ≥35 years of age. However, pregnant women <25 years old exhibited the largest increase in medication use during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Medication use in general, and polypharmacy in particular, increased from 1998 to 2008, possibly as the result of an increased prevalence of pregnant women with chronic conditions requiring pharmacological treatment. Notably, a marked maternal age-based discrepancy in usage pattern was observed, highlighting the need for further research in this area. The rise in the prevalence of polypharmacy during pregnancy underscores the need for pharmacovigilance to monitor adverse effects. Future studies should investigate the patterns of polypharmacy and the accompanying maternal and fetal risks.


Assuntos
Polimedicação , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Adulto , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
17.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 399, 2024 Mar 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553765

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rural-urban differences in health service use among persons with prevalent dementia are known. However, the extent of geographic differences in health service use over a long observation period, and prior to diagnosis, have not been sufficiently examined. The purpose of this study was to examine yearly rural-urban differences in the proportion of patients using health services, and the mean number of services, in the 5-year period before and 5-year period after a first diagnosis of dementia. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study used linked administrative health data from the Canadian province of Saskatchewan to investigate the use of five health services [family physician (FP), specialist physician, hospital admission, all-type prescription drug dispensations, and short-term institutional care admission] each year from April 2008 to March 2019. Persons with dementia included 2,024 adults aged 65 years and older diagnosed from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014 (617 rural; 1,407 urban). Matching was performed 1:1 to persons without dementia on age group, sex, rural versus urban residence, geographic region, and comorbidity. Differences between rural and urban persons within the dementia and control cohorts were separately identified using the Z-score test for proportions (p < 0.05) and independent samples t-test for means (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Rural compared to urban persons with dementia had a lower average number of FP visits during 1-year and 2-year preindex and between 2-year and 4-year postindex (p < 0.05), a lower likelihood of at least one specialist visit and a lower average number of specialist visits during each year (p < 0.05), and a lower average number of all-type prescription drug dispensations for most of the 10-year study period (p < 0.05). Rural-urban differences were not observed in admission to hospital or short-term institutional care (p > 0.05 each year). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified important geographic differences in physician services and all-type prescription drugs before and after dementia diagnosis. Health system planners and educators must determine how to use existing resources and technological advances to support care for rural persons living with dementia.


Assuntos
Demência , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hospitalização , População Rural , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/terapia , Saskatchewan/epidemiologia , População Urbana
18.
Harm Reduct J ; 21(1): 72, 2024 Mar 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People who use drugs experience pain at two to three times the rate of the general population and yet continue to face substantial barriers to accessing appropriate and adequate treatment for pain. In light of the overdose crisis and revised opioid prescribing guidelines, we sought to identify factors associated with being denied pain medication and longitudinally investigate denial rates among people who use drugs. METHODS: We used multivariable generalized estimating equations analyses to investigate factors associated with being denied pain medication among people who use drugs reporting pain in three prospective cohort studies in Vancouver, Canada. Analyses were restricted to study periods in which participants requested a prescription for pain from a healthcare provider. Descriptive statistics detail denial rates and actions taken by participants after being denied. RESULTS: Among 1168 participants who requested a prescription for pain between December 2012 and March 2020, the median age was 47 years and 63.0% were male. Among 4,179 six-month observation periods, 907 (21.7%) included a report of being denied requested pain medication. In multivariable analyses, age was negatively associated with prescription denial (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.97-0.99), while self-managing pain (AOR = 2.48, 95%CI:2.04-3.00), experiencing a non-fatal overdose (AOR = 1.51, 95%CI:1.22-1.88), engagement in opioid agonist therapy (AOR = 1.32, 95%CI:1.09-1.61), and daily use of heroin or other unregulated opioids (AOR = 1.32, 95%CI:1.05-1.66) were positively associated with being denied. Common actions taken (n = 895) after denial were accessing the unregulated drug supply (53.5%), doing nothing (30.6%), and going to a different doctor/emergency room (6.1%). The period following the introduction of new prescribing guidelines was not associated with a change in denial rates. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of people who use drugs continue to be denied prescriptions for pain, with such denial associated with important substance use-related harms, including non-fatal overdose. Guidelines specific to the pharmaceutical management of pain among people who use drugs are needed.


Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Canadá/epidemiologia , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Dor , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Prescrições
19.
Sr Care Pharm ; 39(4): 132-136, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528338

RESUMO

Older people are over-represented among individuals that experience adverse drug reactions (ADR) and adverse drug events (ADE). Furthermore, older people are over-represented among individuals that visit emergency departments and are hospitalized because of ADRs. Moreover, older people are overrepresented among those who suffer ADEs while hospitalized. Finally, older people are among those most likely to have an anaphylactic response to prescription medications. Therefore, older people are prime candidates for efforts aimed at optimizing pharmacotherapeutic outcomes. Pharmacogenomics is an approach of using genetic data to optimize pharmacotherapeutic outcomes. Over the last two decades, pharmacogenomics grew from research initiatives into the current environment of pharmacogenomics implementation. Specifically, implementing pharmacogenomics into clinical settings or within health care systems has proven beneficial in optimizing pharmacotherapeutic outcomes. Therefore, pharmacists focused on optimizing pharmacotherapeutic outcomes for older people should be aware of the approaches to and resources available for implementing pharmacogenomics. KEY WORDS: Drug labeling biomarkers, Genes, Older adults, Pharmacogenomics.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Humanos , Idoso , Farmacogenética , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/genética , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Farmacêuticos
20.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(3): e240198, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38517423

RESUMO

Importance: On January 1, 2022, New Mexico implemented a No Behavioral Cost-Sharing (NCS) law that eliminated cost-sharing for mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) treatments in plans regulated by the state, potentially reducing a barrier to treatment for MH/SUDs among the commercially insured; however, the outcomes of the law are unknown. Objective: To assess the association of implementation of the NCS with out-of-pocket spending for prescription for drugs primarily used to treat MH/SUDs and monthly volume of dispensed drugs. Design, Settings, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used a difference-in-differences research design to examine trends in outcomes for New Mexico state employees, a population affected by the NCS, compared with federal employees in New Mexico who were unaffected by NCS. Data were collected on prescription drugs for MH/SUDs dispensed per month between January 2021 and June 2022 for New Mexico patients with a New Mexico state employee health plan and New Mexico patients with a federal employee health plan. Data analysis occurred from December 2022 to January 2024. Exposure: Enrollment in a state employee health plan or federal health plan. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were mean patient out-of-pocket spending per dispensed MH/SUD prescription and the monthly volume of dispensed MH/SUD prescriptions per 1000 employees. A difference-in-differences estimation approach was used. Results: The implementation of the NCS law was associated with a mean (SE) $6.37 ($0.30) reduction (corresponding to an 85.6% decrease) in mean out-of-pocket spending per dispensed MH/SUD medication (95% CI, -$7.00 to -$5.75). The association of implementation of NCS with the volume of prescriptions dispensed was not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the implementation of the New Mexico NCS law was successful in lowering out-of-pocket spending on prescription medications for MH/SUDs, but that there was no association of NCS with the volume of medications dispensed in the first 6 months after implementation. A key challenge is to identify policies that protect from high out-of-pocket spending while also promoting access to needed care.


Assuntos
Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro , Gastos em Saúde , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/tratamento farmacológico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...