Combining robotics and 3D printing facilitates closed reduction of humeral shaft fractures using a minimally invasive plate as a reduction template: A proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures (HSFs) has limitations due to malreduction and radiation exposure. To address these limitations, we integrated robotics and 3D printing by incorporating plates as reduction templates. METHOD: The innovative technology facilitated closed reduction of HSFs in the operating theatre using 18 models with cortical marking holes. The dataset of the precontoured plate was imported into 3D planning software for virtual fixation and screw path planning. The models were divided into half to simulate transverse fractures. During the operation, the software generated drilling trajectories for robot navigation, and precise plate installation achieved automatic fracture reduction. RESULTS: The evaluation results of reduction accuracy revealed variations in length, apposition, alignment, and rotation that meet the criteria for anatomic reduction. High interoperator reliabilities were observed for all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technology achieved anatomic reduction in simulated bones.

Eliminating rote postoperative radiographs for surgically managed pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: Use of postoperative radiographs after surgical management of supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures is often based on rote practice rather than evidence. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which 3-week postoperative radiographs at the time of pin removal altered management plans in pediatric SCH fractures that were intraoperatively stable after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). METHODS: We prospectively recruited pediatric patients with SCH fractures managed by CRPP at our institution from June 2020 until June 2022, and reviewed retrospective data on pediatric SCH fractures managed surgically at our institution between April 2008 and March 2015. Patients were assessed for post-CRPP fracture alignment and stability. For prospective patients, we asked clinicians to document their management decision at the 3-week follow-up visit before evaluating the postoperative radiographs. Our primary outcome was change in management because of radiographic findings. RESULTS: Overall, 1066 patients in the retrospective data and 446 prospectively recruited patients met the inclusion criteria. In the prospective group, radiographic findings altered management for 2 patients (0.4%). One patient had slow callus formation and 1 patient was identified as having cubitus varus. Altered management included prolonged immobilization or additional radiographic follow-up. Radiographic findings altered management in 0 (0%) of 175 type II fractures, in 2 (0.9%) of 221 type III fractures, and in 0 (0%) of 44 type IV fractures. We obtained similar findings from retrospective data. CONCLUSION: Rote use of 3-week postoperative radiographs after surgical management of SCH fractures that are intraoperatively stable has minimal utility. Eliminating rote postoperative radiographs for SCH fractures can decrease the time and financial burdens on families and health care systems without affecting patient outcomes.

Refraining from closed reduction of displaced distal radius fractures in the emergency department-in short: the RECORDED trial.

BACKGROUND: With roughly 45,000 adult patients each year, distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in the emergency department. Approximately 60% of all these fractures are displaced and require surgery. The current guidelines advise to perform closed reduction of these fractures awaiting surgery, as it may lead to post-reduction pain relief and release tension of the surrounding neurovascular structures. Recent studies have shown that successful reduction does not warrant conservative treatment, while patients find it painful or even traumatizing. The aim of this study is to determine whether closed reduction can be safely abandoned in these patients. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, we will randomize between closed reduction followed by plaster casting and only plaster casting. Patients aged 18 to 75 years, presenting at the emergency department with a displaced distal radial fracture and requiring surgery according to the attending surgeon, are eligible for inclusion. Primary outcome is pain assessed with daily VAS scores from the visit to the emergency department until surgery. Secondary outcomes are function assessed by PRWHE, length of stay at the emergency department, length of surgery, return to work, patient satisfaction, and complications. A total of 134 patients will be included in this study with follow-up of 1 year. DISCUSSION: If our study shows that patients who did not receive closed reduction experience no significant drawbacks, we might be able to reorganize the initial care for distal radial fractures in the emergency department. If surgery is warranted, the patient can be sent home with a plaster cast to await the call for admission, decreasing the time spend in the emergency room drastically. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on January 27, 2023.

The midterm psychological effect of cast removal procedures in children.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the course of anxiety change in children who used headphones during cast removal with controls in midterm follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients who underwent forearm fracture treatment with closed reduction and long arm casting between June 2021 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of headphones (n=27; 21 males, 6 females; mean age: 8.0±1.8 years; range, 6 to 12 years) or not (n=39; 27 males, 12 females; mean age: 8.9±1.8 years; range, 6 to 12 years) during cast removal with an oscillating saw. Primary outcome measures included preprocedure, postprocedure, and six-month anxiety assessments with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. RESULTS: There was an acute increase in the mean state anxiety scores after the procedure, which returned to below baseline at the six-month follow-up in the headphone (31.4±8.3, 33.3±8.7, and 25.1±4.1, respectively) and control groups (34.9±11.1, 37.4±9.5, and 27.3±5.3, respectively). The mean trait anxiety scores before the procedure, after the procedure, and at six months remained similar in the headphone (33.6±3.0, 34.6±3.2, and 32.4±2.8; p>0.05) and control groups (34.1±2.7, 33.7±3.0, and 33.7±3.0, p>0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the acute anxiety during cast removal did not create anxiety sequelae in the sixth month regardless of headphone use.

Comparison of closed percutaneous screw reduction versus open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of frontal sinus fractures: A retrospective study.

The aim of this study was to compare closed percutaneous screw reduction to traditional open reduction-internal fixation (OR-IF) for the treatment of anterior table fractures. Both groups were evaluated in terms of operative variables, complications, and treatment success. Of 32 patients included, 19 patients underwent OR-IF, while 13 underwent percutaneous screw reduction. The median operative time, length of hospital stays, and treatment cost of the OR-IF group were 100 min (range 60-130), 4 days (range 3-9), and $727 (range $642-$1291), respectively. The same variables for the closed reduction group were 30 min (range 20-40), 2 days (range 1-2), and $303 (range $252-$349), respectively. The closed reduction group exhibited a shorter operative time (p< 0.001), reduced length of hospital stays (p< 0.001), lower treatment cost (p< 0.001), and a lower complication rate (p = 0.025) compared to the OR-IF group. Late-term outcomes in both groups showed no visible contour changes or step deformities. In conclusion, the percutaneous screw reduction technique is a safe and effective option with minimal morbidity in the treatment of frontal sinus anterior table fractures. Therefore, traditional OR-IF should be reserved for fractures that are not suitable for reduction using minimally invasive techniques.

Positive buttress reduction in femoral neck fractures: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young adults are usually caused by high-energy trauma, and their treatment remains a challenging issue for orthopedic surgeons. The quality of reduction is considered an important factor in improving the poor prognosis of patients with FNFs. In recent years, positive buttress closed reduction technique has received widespread attention in the treatment of FNFs. This comprehensive literature review is designed to encapsulate the impacts of both non-anatomic and anatomic reduction on the biomechanical stability, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications in the management of FNFs, conjecture the efficacy of positively braced reduction techniques and provide a thorough summarization of the clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this literature review, we have examined all clinical and biomechanical studies related to the treatment of FNFs using non-anatomical reduction or positive and negative buttress reduction. PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Embase Library databases were searched systematically for studies published before September 1, 2023. Published literature on fracture reduction techniques for treating FNFs was reviewed. In addition, we evaluated the included literature using the MINORs tool. RESULTS: Although the "arch bridge" structure formed by the positive buttress reduction technique improved the support to the cortical bone and provided a more stable biomechanical structure, no significant differences were noted in the clinical efficacy and incidence of postoperative complications between the positive buttress reduction and anatomical reduction. CONCLUSION: Positive buttress reduction is an effective treatment method for young patients with FNFs. When facing difficult-to-reduce FNF, positive buttress reduction should be considered first, followed by anatomical reduction. However, negative buttress reduction should be avoided.

Closed Reduction for the Treatment of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracolumbar traumatic spondylolisthesis is a relatively rare phenomenon and has poor prognosis due to serious spinal cord or cauda equina injuries. In such cases, closed reduction is a method for restoring the vertebral sequence and may play an important role in the treatment process, although whether it is actually feasible for patients with this condition requires further investigation. The present study included 9 patients with serious thoracolumbar traumatic spondylolisthesis to determine the advantages of closed reduction over total reduction through open surgery. METHODS: Data from 9 patients (cases 1-9), diagnosed with severe thoracolumbar traumatic spondylolisthesis between June 2012 and August 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. Five patients were treated with closed reduction in an emergency department and subsequently underwent delayed internal fixation surgery at least 48 hours after the injury, and 4 with similar serious injuries underwent emergency surgery. The incidence of complications and recovery of the spinal cord or cauda equina were compared between groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or adverse events between the 2 groups. The reduction group had a shorter surgical duration and less blood loss than the surgery group. Although patients in the surgery group may have experienced more pain, there were no significant differences between the groups in Oswestry Disability Index or Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. Thus, regardless of whether closed reduction was chosen, patients experienced a similar quality of life for a relatively prolonged period. CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction may be feasible for serious thoracolumbar traumatic spondylolisthesis, although the safety of this method requires further research.

Does Preoperative Manual Reduction (Omoto Technique) Affect Surgical Outcomes for Calcaneal Fractures? A Multicenter (TRON Group) Retrospective Study.

The Omoto technique is a well-known method that is commonly used for noninvasive manual repair of calcaneal fractures. However, there have been no detailed studies on its clinical outcomes in preoperative closed reduction for surgical cases. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of calcaneal fractures treated with and without the preoperative Omoto technique, assessing its effectiveness. We extracted 335 patients with calcaneal fracture who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2020 from our multicenter database, named TRON. We evaluated the clinical outcomes using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, the Böhler angle (BA) for radiographic analysis, and noted any complications. We divided the patients into those managed with the Omoto technique (group O) and those managed without the Omoto technique (group N). Patients were matched by age, sex, and fracture type, resulting in 43 patients per group. The use of the Omoto technique at the time of injury significantly improved the Böhler angle (BA). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in AOFAS, postoperative complications, or BA values at the final follow-up. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the Omoto technique, when used preoperatively for calcaneal fractures, does not negatively impact the outcomes of subsequent surgical treatments. For patients who prefer to avoid surgery, the Omoto technique can be an effective initial intervention. Additionally, our findings suggest that the Omoto technique may facilitate less invasive surgical options in certain cases.

Pediatric Type I Open Both Bone Forearm Fractures: Predicting Failure of Nonoperative Management.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, nonoperative treatment of pediatric type I open both bone forearm fractures (OBBFFs) with bedside irrigation, antibiotics, closed reduction, and casting has yielded low infection rates. However, risk factors for failure of type I OBBFF closed reduction have not been well described. Our purpose was to describe management of patients with type I OBBFFs at our institution and determine what factors are associated with failure of closed reduction in this population. METHODS: This was a review of patients between 5 and 15 years of age who received initial nonoperative management for type I OBBFFs at one institution between 2015 and 2021. Primary outcome was success or failure of nonoperative management (defined as progression to surgical management). Secondary outcomes included infections, compartment syndromes, and neuropraxias. Other variables of interest were demographic information, prereduction and postreduction translation and angulation of the radius and ulna, cast index, and antibiotic administration. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (67.7% male) with 62 type I OBBFFs were included in this study. Following initial nonoperative management, 55 injuries (88.7%) were successfully treated in casts, while the remaining 7 (11.3%) required surgical intervention following loss of acceptable reduction in cast. Median cast index (0.84, IQR 0.8 to 0.9 vs. 0.75, IQR 0.7-0.8, P =0.020) and postreduction radius translation on anteroposterior films (32.0%, IQR 17.0% to 40.0% vs. 5.0%, IQR 0.0% to 26.0%, P =0.020) were higher among those who failed nonoperative management. Multivariable logistic regression models identified increased odds of failure for every SD (0.7) increase in cast index (OR 3.78, P =0.023, 95% CI: 1.4-14.3) and 25% increase in postreduction radius translation on anteroposterior films (OR 7.39, P =0.044, 95% CI 1.2-70.4). No infections or compartment syndromes and 2 transient ulnar neuropraxias occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction of type I OBBFFs was successful in 88.7% of cases. There were no infections after nonoperative management. Increases in cast index of 0.7 and postreduction radius translation on anteroposterior radiographs of 25% were associated with increased likelihood of failure, thus requiring surgery; age was not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective comparative study.

Radiologic, clinical, and functional evaluation of children with displaced T-condylar fractures treated by closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

PURPOSE: T-condylar (T-C) fractures of the distal humerus are rare in children. There is no accepted treatment for such an injury, and there is a lack of reports evaluating the outcome of T-C fractures treated by closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire and screw (CRPKS) fixation in patients with type II and III T-C fractures according to the Toniolo-Wilkins classification modified by Canavese et al. (TWC classification). METHODS: The clinical data of 12 consecutive patients (8 males, 4 females) who were younger than 14 years of age and who had a T-C fracture that was managed by CRPKS were retrospectively evaluated. Fractures were classified according to the TWC classification. The baseline information of the patients, carrying angle (CA) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were used to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes; related complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of injury was 11.6 ± 1.8 years (range, 8-14). The time from injury to surgical treatment was 1.5 ± 1.0 days (range, 0-3), and the mean follow-up duration was 33.7 ± 12.3 months (range, 18-61). Surgery lasted 45.7 ± 7.6 min on average (range, 35-58). All fractures healed in 4.9 ± 1.0 weeks on average (range, 4-7). At the last follow-up visit, the CA was 12.6° ± 5.8° on the injured side and 13.8° ± 1.8° on the uninjured side (p=0.432). The MEPS was 100 (95, 100) on the injured side and 100 (100, 100) on the uninjured side (p=0.194). Three complications were recorded. CONCLUSION: Good functional and radiological outcomes can be expected in pediatric patients with type II and III T-C fractures treated by CRPKS. The technique is relatively simple to perform and has a lower rate of complications.

Satisfacción estética y funcional tras reducción cerrada de fracturas nasales: implementación de la escala NOSE / Aesthetic and functional satisfaction after closed reduction of nasal fractures: implementation of the NOSE scale

Introducción y objetivo: La fractura nasal es la lesión facial más común y más del 50 % de todas las fracturas faciales en adultos. Debido a que en muchas ocasiones no es diagnosticada y tratada oportunamente, puede generar diferentes grados de limitación funcional y resultados estéticos indeseables. Pocos estudios evalúan la satisfacción de los pacientes tratados con técnica cerrada de reducción de fractura nasal. Nuestro objetivo es valorar la satisfacción funcional y estética posterior a reducción cerrada de fractura de huesos nasales en un hospital de Colombia, mediante la escala de evaluación de síntomas de obstrucción nasal (NOSE, por sus siglas en inglés - nasal obstruction symptom evaluation) y la escala estética subjetiva. Material y método: Estudio observacional analítico prospectivo de pacientes con fractura nasal llevados a reducción cerrada en el Hospital Universitario de Santander, Colombia. Se registraron las puntuaciones de las escalas NOSE y estética subjetiva, antes y 2 meses después de la cirugía. Resultados: Evaluamos 55 pacientes, 90.9% hombres. La mediana de edad fue de 31 años (RIC 24-48). El contexto de lesión principal fue violencia física (40%), seguido de accidente de tránsito (32.7%). Tras el procedimiento, los pacientes presentaron mejoría de obstrucción nasal medida con la escala NOSE (p<0.001); antes de la cirugía el 89% presentaba obstrucción nasal moderada-severa, posteriormente descendió a 14.5%. La escala NOSE mostró fabilidad por consistencia interna con alfa de Cronbach de 0.8317. Tras la cirugía hubo aumento de la satisfacción respecto al aspecto nasal (p<0.001). Conclusiones: En nuestro estudio, el cuestionario NOSE permitió cuantificar la mejora de síntomas de obstrucción nasal en pacientes con reducción cerrada por fractura de huesos nasales. Observamos mejoría de síntomas obstructivos nasales y aumento de satisfacción estética.Nivel de evidencia científica 4c Terapéutico.(AU)

Background and objective: Nasal fracture is the most common facial injury, accounting for more than 50% of all facial fractures in adults. Because it is often not diagnosed and treated promptly, it can generate different degrees of functional limitation and undesirable aesthetic results. Few studies evaluate the satisfaction of patients treated with the closed nasal fracture reduction technique. Our objective is to evaluate functional and aesthetic satisfaction after closed reduction of a nasal bone fracture in a hospital in Colombia, using the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) and subjective aesthetic scales. Methods: Prospective analytical observational study of patients with nasal fractures undergoing closed reduction at the University Hospital of Santander, Colombia. The scores of the NOSE scales and subjective aesthetics were recorded, before and 2 months after surgery. Results: We evaluated 55 patients, 90.9% men. Median age 31 years (IQR 24-48). The main injury context was physical violence (40%), followed by traffic accident (32.7%). After the procedure, the patients presented improvement in nasal obstruction measured with the NOSE scale (p<0.001); before surgery, 89% had moderate-severe nasal obstruction, later it decreased to 14.5%. The NOSE scale showed reliability due to internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.8317. After surgery, there was an increase in satisfaction regarding the nasal appearance (p<0.001). Conclusions: The NOSE questionnaire allows us to quantify the improvement of nasal obstruction symptoms in patients with closed reduction due to nasal bone fracture. Improvement of nasal obstructive symptoms and increased aesthetic satisfaction was observed.Level of evidence 4c Terapeutic.(AU)

Four weeks versus six weeks of immobilization in a cast following closed reduction for displaced distal radial fractures in adult patients: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Aims: There is no level I evidence dealing with the optimal period of immobilization for patients with a displaced distal radial fracture following closed reduction. A shorter period might lead to a better functional outcome due to less stiffness and pain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this period could be safely reduced from six to four weeks. Methods: This multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) included adult patients with a displaced distal radial fracture, who were randomized to be treated with immobilization in a cast for four or six weeks following closed reduction. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score after follow-up at one year. Secondary outcomes were the abbreviated version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score after one year, the functional outcome at six weeks, 12 weeks, and six months, range of motion (ROM), the level of pain after removal of the cast, and complications. Results: A total of 100 patients (15 male, 85 female) were randomized, with 49 being treated with four weeks of immobilization in a cast. A total of 93 completed follow-up. The mean PRWE score after one year was 6.9 (SD 8.3) in the four-week group compared with 11.6 (SD 14.3) in the six-week group. However, this difference of -4.7 (95% confidence interval -9.29 to 0.14) was not clinically relevant as the minimal clinically important difference of 11.5 was not reached. There was no significant difference in the ROM, radiological outcome, level of pain, or complications. Conclusion: In adult patients with a displaced and adequately reduced distal radial fracture, immobilization in a cast for four weeks is safe, and the results are similar to those after a period of immobilization of six weeks.

Radial Nerve Supracondylar Block Versus Fracture Hematoma Block. Comparison of Their Efficacy in Cases of Fractures of the Distal Third of the Radius / Bloqueio supracondilar de nervo radial versus bloqueio de hematoma de fratura. Comparativo de sua eficácia em casos de fraturas do terço distal do rádio

Abstract Objective The present study compares the analgesic efficacy of two techniques to perform non-surgical reduction: fracture hematoma block and radial nerve supracondylar block. Methods Forty patients with fractures of the distal third of the radius, who required reduction, were selected in a quasi-randomized clinical trial to receive one of the anesthetic techniques. All patients signed the informed consent form, except for those who did not wish to participate in the study, had neurological injury, had contraindication to the procedure in the emergency room, or with contraindication to the use of lidocaine. To measure analgesia, the numerical pain rate scale was used at four different moments: preblock, postblock, during reduction, and after reduction; then three differences were calculated: the first between before and after blocking; the second between during reduction and after blockade; and the third between before blocking and after reduction. Results The fracture hematoma and supracondylar block groups showed the following mean values, respectively: 3.90 (1-10) and 3.50 (-6-10) in difference 1; 4.35 (-5-10) and 5.00 (-3-10) in difference 2; and 4.65 (1-10) and 3.80 (-3-10) in difference 3. Conclusion Both techniques proved to be efficient for analgesia, with mild superiority of hematoma block, but without statistical significance.

Resumo Objetivo O estudo compara a eficácia analgésica de duas técnicas para realizar redução incruenta: o bloqueio de hematoma da fratura e o bloqueio supracondilar de nervo radial. Métodos Quarenta pacientes com fraturas do terço distal do rádio, que necessitassem redução, foram selecionados em um ensaio clínico quasi-randomizado, para receber uma das técnicas anestésicas. Todos os pacientes assinaram o termo de consentimento ou assentimento, com exceção daqueles que não desejassem participar do estudo, tivessem lesão neurológica, com contraindicação ao procedimento na sala de emergências, ou com contraindicação ao uso da lidocaína. Para aferir a analgesia foi utilizada a escala numérica da dor em quatro momentos distintos: pré-bloqueio, pós-bloqueio, durante a redução e após a redução; em seguida, foram calculadas três diferenças: a primeira entre antes e após o bloqueio; a segunda entre durante a redução e após o bloqueio; e a terceira entre antes do bloqueio e após a redução. Resultados Os grupos do bloqueio de hematoma de fratura e bloqueio supracondilar apresentaram respectivamente os seguintes valores médios: 3.90 (1-10) e 3.50 (-6-10) na diferença 1; 4.35 (-5-10) e 5.00 (-3-10) na diferença 2; e 4.65 (1-10) e 3.80 (-3-10) na diferença 3. Conclusão As duas técnicas se provaram eficientes para analgesia, com discreta superioridade do bloqueio de hematoma, mas sem significância estatística.

Fracturas supracondíleas en pacientes pediátricos tratados quirúrgicamente con Técnica de Cruzada. Hospital Central San Cristóbal / Supracondylar humerus fractures in childrens surgically treated by Crossed Wiring Technique. San Cristóbal Central Hospital

Las fracturas supracondíleas en niños se asocian con algunas complicaciones. Su tratamiento estándar es la reducción cerrada y la fijación con alambres en distintas configuraciones. Se realizó un estudio observacional, analítico, prospectivo y longitudinal con pacientes pediátricos que ingresaron con fracturas supracondíleas de húmero tratados quirúrgicamente con alambres de Kirschner con "Técnica Cruzada" en el Hospital Central San Cristóbal enero a junio de 2022. Se incluyeron 30 pacientes. La edad promedio fue 6,3±2,2(3-10) años. La causa más frecuente del traumatismo fue la precipitación de altura en 63,3% de los casos. La posición del codo al momento del accidente fue en extensión en 90%. Todas las fracturas fueron cerradas. El tiempo promedio desde el accidente hasta su atención en emergencia fue de 8,5±13,4(2-72) horas. Los signos clínicos más frecuentes fueron dolor en 100,0%, limitación funcional en 96,7%, aumento de volumen 73,3% y deformidad 50,0%. Según la clasificación AO la más frecuente fue del tipo 13-M/3. 1 III en el 50% de los casos y según Gartland, las tipo IIIA en 53,3%. A las 4 semanas, 100,0% de las fracturas consolidaron, 13,3% presentó valgo y 6,7% varo en la radiografía anteroposterior. Mientras que, en la lateral, 33,3% antecurvatum. La media del ángulo de Baumann fue de 20,27±1,39 grados. La tasa de complicaciones fue de 16,66%, 2(6,7%) casos presentaron neuropraxia y 3(10,0%) granuloma. En conclusión, la Técnica Cruzada es segura en términos de reducción, funcionalidad y tasas de complicaciones en el seguimiento a medio plazo(AU)

Supracondylar fractures in children are associated with some complications. Its standard treatment is closed reduction and fixation with wires in different configurations. An observational, analytical, prospective and longitudinal study was made, with pediatric patients admitted with supracondylar humeral fractures surgically treated with Kirschner wires with the "Cross Technique" at the Hospital Central San Cristóbal from January to June 2022. 30 patients were included. The mean age was 6,3±2,2(3-10) years. The most frequent cause of trauma was high altitude precipitation in 63,3% of the cases. The position of the elbow at the time of the accident was 90% extended. All fractures were closed. The mean time from the accident to emergency care was 8,5±13,4(2-72) hours. The most frequent clinical signs were pain in 100,0%, functional limitation in 96.7%, volume increase in 73,3%, and deformity in 50,0%. According to the AO classification, the most frequent was type 13-M/3. 1 III in 50% of cases and according to Gartland, type IIIA in 53,3%. At 4 weeks, 100,0% of the patients consolidated, 13,3% presented valgus and 6,7% varus on the anteroposterior radiograph. While, on the side, 33,3% antecurvatum. The mean Baumann angle was 20,27 ± 1.39 degrees. The rate of complications was 16,66%, 2 (6,7%) cases presented neuropraxia and 3 (10,0%) granuloma. In conclusion, the Crossover Technique is safe in terms of reduction, functionality, and complication rates in medium-term follow-up(AU)

The Efficacy of Sequential Intranasal Packing Removal in Overcorrected Nasal Bone Fracture: Evaluation With Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: Despite the evolution of new techniques to treat nasal bone fractures, closed reduction with appropriate palpation and inspection is one of the critical basic tools to treat nasal bone fractures properly. Despite its rarity, overcorrection after closed reduction of the nasal bone fracture could happen even with experienced surgeons. This study hypothesized that sequential packing removal is mandatory for optimal outcomes based on the preoperative and postoperative Computed Tomography scans in overcorrected cases. This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of sequential nasal packing removal assessed by facial CT scans. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the medical records and preoperative and postoperative facial Computed Tomography scans of 163 patients with nasal bone fractures treated with a closed reduction from May 2021 to December 2022. Preoperative and Postoperative CT scan was routinely used to assess the outcome. Merocels were used for intranasal packing. In overcorrected cases based on immediate postoperative CT scan, we routinely removed the intranasal packing on the overcorrected side first immediately. On postoperative day 3, we removed the remaining intranasal packing on the other side. We assessed additional postoperative CT scans on postoperative two to three weeks. RESULTS: With sequential packing removal starting on the day of surgery, all overcorrected cases were successfully corrected clinically and radiologically without noticeable complications. Two representative cases were presented. CONCLUSION: Sequential nasal packing removal provides significant benefits in overcorrected cases. An immediate postoperative CT scan is also vital to do this procedure. This strategy is advantageous if the fracture is significant and there is a substantial possibility of overcorrection.

POINT-OF-CARE ULTRASOUND FOR GUIDANCE OF CLOSED REDUCTION OF FIFTH METACARPAL NECK (BOXER'S) FRACTURE.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound has been used previously in fracture identification, analgesia delivery, and fracture reduction for patients in the emergency department. It has not been previously described as a tool for the guidance of closed fracture reduction in fifth metacarpal neck fractures ("boxer's fractures"). CASE REPORT: A 28-year-old man presented with hand pain and swelling after punching a wall. Point-of-care ultrasound revealed a significantly angulated fifth metacarpal fracture, which was confirmed with a subsequent hand x-ray study. After an ultrasound-guided ulnar nerve block, closed reduction was performed. Ultrasound was used to assess reduction and ensure improvement in bony angulation during the closed reduction attempts. Post-reduction x-ray study confirmed improved angulation and adequate alignment. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? Point-of-care ultrasound has previously had efficacy in fracture diagnosis and anesthesia delivery for fifth metacarpal fractures. Ultrasound can also be used at the bedside to assist in the determination of adequate fracture reduction when performing closed reduction of a boxer's fracture.