Trigeminal nerve injuries following dental procedures: A retrospective analysis of malpractice claims from 2016 to 2023 in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Dental malpractice claims, which pertain to legal actions against dentists accused of clinical negligence that caused harm to patients, have increased in the past ten years in South Korea. The claims are caused by complications, particularly trigeminal nerve injuries, resulting from various dental procedures. Medicolegal issues related to trigeminal nerve injury have not been previously described in South Korea. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to identify the general, dental, and judicial characteristics of closed dental malpractice claims. METHODS: This study was designed as a descriptive study. We collected the data of 51 closed claims related to trigeminal nerve injury resulting from dental procedures such as dental implant emplacement, tooth extraction, and local anesthesia. The claims were decided by courts in South Korea between 2016 and 2023. The general, dental, and judicial characteristics of the claims were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The average claim resolution period was 4.2 (range: 1.47-8.39) years post-adverse events that occurred more frequently in dental clinics (68.6 %) than in dental (25.5 %) or general hospitals (5.9 %). Inferior alveolar (66.7 %) and lingual (17.6 %) nerves were injured following dental procedures. The duty to inform was breached in 68.6 % of claims. The dental procedure performed (P < 0.001) and the injured nerve (P < 0.001) were associated with the violation of the duty to care. CONCLUSION: To improve the quality of dental care services, the analysis of the adverse events using various resources including judgments should be strongly addressed.

Non-neuronal cells act as crucial players in neuropathic orofacial pain.

BACKGROUND: Following peripheral nerve damage, various non-neuronal cells are activated, triggering accumulation in the peripheral and central nervous systems, and communicate with neurons. Evidence suggest that neuronal and non-neuronal cell communication is a critical mechanism of neuropathic pain; however, its detailed mechanisms in contributing to neuropathic orofacial pain development remain unclear. HIGHLIGHT: Neuronal and non-neuronal cell communication in the trigeminal ganglion (TG) is believed to cause neuronal hyperactivation following trigeminal nerve damage, resulting in neuropathic orofacial pain. Trigeminal nerve damage activates and accumulates non-neuronal cells, such as satellite cells and macrophages in the TG and microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes in the trigeminal spinal subnucleus caudalis (Vc) and upper cervical spinal cord (C1-C2). These non-neuronal cells release various molecules, contributing to the hyperactivation of TG, Vc, and C1-C2 nociceptive neurons. These hyperactive nociceptive neurons release molecules that enhance non-neuronal cell activation. This neuron and non-neuronal cell crosstalk causes hyperactivation of nociceptive neurons in the TG, Vc, and C1-C2. Here, we addressed previous and recent data on the contribution of neuronal and non-neuronal cell communication and its involvement in neuropathic orofacial pain development. CONCLUSION: Previous and recent data suggest that neuronal and non-neuronal cell communication in the TG, Vc, and C1-C2 is a key mechanism that causes neuropathic orofacial pain associated with trigeminal nerve damage.

Neurologischer Notfall nach dentaler Implantation - was nun?

Mit der Verbreitung von Zahnimplantaten ist die Zahl neurologischer Komplikationen gestiegen, wobei diese vor allem im Unterkiefer vorkommen. Verletzungen des Nervus alveo- laris inferior sind eine ernste Komplikation mit Inzidenzen für transiente Nervschäden bis zu 24% und persistierenden Schädigungen bis zu 11%.

Pharmacologic management of trigeminal nerve injury after endodontic treatment: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal nerve injury following endodontic treatment, leading to unpleasant sensations or partial sensory loss in the face or oral mucosa, is uncommon but significant when it occurs. OBJECTIVE: This study analysed the pharmacological management of trigeminal nerve injuries (TNI) in a university-based hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 47 patients who visited the Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine at Yonsei University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea, after TNI following endodontic procedures in primary clinics. Both objective tests and subjective evaluations, assessed the extent and duration of sensory injury during the initial visit. The patient's initial symptoms, presumed cause of TNI, referral delay (time interval between TNI and the first visit to our clinic), and medications were analysed to determine whether these factors affected the outcomes. RESULTS: Most patients with TNI experienced dysesthesia with hypoesthesia (70.2%). The mandibular molars were predominantly affected (72.3%), with the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN), lingual nerve (LN), both IAN and LN, and maxillary nerve compromised in 83.0, 12.8, 2.1, and 2.1% of cases, respectively. Causes of TNI included local anaesthesia (29.8%), overfilling/over-instrumentation (25.5%), endodontic surgery (17.0%), and unknown factors (27.7%). A shorter referral delay was associated with better outcomes, with an average delay of 8.6 weeks for symptom improvement compared with 44.1 weeks for no change. The medication regimens included steroids, NSAIDs, topical lidocaine, vitamin B complex, Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP), antiepileptics, antidepressants, and opioids administered alone or in combination, with a mean duration of 20.7 weeks. 53.2% of the patients reported improvement in their symptoms, 27.7% experienced no significant change, and 19.1% had unknown outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Swift referral to an orofacial pain specialist is recommended for effective recovery in cases of TNI arising from endodontic treatment.

Assessment of traumatic mandibular nerve using MR neurography sequence: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic mandibular nerve damage resulting from oral surgeries and dental procedures is painful and a formidable challenge for patients and oral surgeons alike, mainly because the absence of objective and quantitative methods for diagnosing nerve damage renders treatment and compensation ambiguous while often leading to medico-legal disputes. The aim of this study was to examine discriminating factors of traumatic mandibular nerve within a specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol and to suggest tangible diagnostic criteria for peripheral trigeminal nerve injury. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with ipsilateral mandibular nerve trauma underwent T2 Flex water, 3D short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquired by periodically rotating overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) pulse sequences; 26 injured nerves were thus compared with contra-lateral healthy nerves at anatomically corresponding sites. T2 Flex apparent signal to noise ratio (FSNR), T2 Flex apparent nerve-muscle contrast to noise ratio (FNMCNR) 3D STIR apparent signal to noise ratio (SSNR), 3D STIR apparent nerve-muscle contrast to noise ratio (SNMCNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and area of cross-sectional nerve (Area) were evaluated. RESULTS: Mixed model analysis revealed FSNR and FNMCNR to be the dual discriminators for traumatized mandibular nerve (p < 0.05). Diagnostic performance of both parameters was also determined with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC for FSNR = 0.712; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5660, 0.8571 / AUC for FNMCNR = 0.7056; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.011, 1.112). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in FSNR and FNMCNR within our MRI sequence seems to be accurate indicators of the presence of traumatic nerve. This prospective study may serve as a foundation for sophisticated model diagnosing trigeminal nerve trauma within large patient cohorts.

Risk Factors Associated With Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury After Extraction of Impacted Lower Mandibular Third Molars: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury is one of the complications of impacted lower mandibular third molar (LM3) extraction. Given the unknown prognosis of IAN injuries and limited treatment options, it is critical to understand the risk factors of IAN injury before LM3 extraction. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to identify risk factors associated with IAN injury after LM3 extraction. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This was a prospective cohort study including patients who underwent LM3 extraction from May to December 2021 at the authors' institution. Patients with systemic diseases, previous maxillofacial surgeries, or sensory abnormalities were excluded. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable is composed of several risk factors. The variables were grouped into four categories: demographic, radiographic, procedure-related, and surgeon experience. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The outcome variable was postoperative neurosensory disturbance coded as present or absent and was measured at 1-month (transient) and 1-year (permanent). COVARIATES: Not applicable. ANALYSES: The measurement data were represented by mean and standard deviation. The association of each variable with the presence of an IAN injury was tested by the χ2 test. Statistical significance was accepted at P < .05. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 705 patients (37.0% male) with an average age of 28.51 ± 6.51 years. A total of 17/705 (2.4%) and 4/705 (0.57%) patients developed transient and permanent IAN injuries. The results demonstrated that the following factors were associated with higher rates of transient injury: use of chisels during surgeries (6.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7 to 12.3; P = .02; relative risk (RR) = 11.4), LM3s located below the IAN canal (8.7%; 95% CI: 4.3 to 15.7; P < .01; RR = 7.3), compressed contact between LM3s and the IAN canal (36.4%; 95% CI: 12.3 to 78.2; P < .001; RR = 25.4), and not using corticosteroids after surgeries (3.8%; 95% CI: 1.9 to 6.5; P = .03; RR = 3.1). The only factor associated with permanent injury was compressed contact between LM3s and the IAN canal (18.2%; 95% CI: 2.2 to 62.3; P < .001; RR = 48.2). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Close proximity between LM3s and IAN canal and the use of chisels increase the risk of transient IAN injury. Corticosteroid treatment may promote nerve recovery. Compressed contact between LM3s and IAN canal is the only risk factor for permanent injury.

Innovative surgical approach for trigeminal trophic syndrome: Successful healing of facial ulcers through cross-face nerve grafts.

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal trophic syndrome (TTS) is a rare condition caused by damage to the trigeminal nervous system, resulting in sensory disturbances and ulcers on the face. Treating TTS is complex and often requires medical or surgical intervention like flap reconstruction. However, there is limited research on surgical treatments for TTS ulcers. METHODS: We report the case of a 19-year-old man with TTS. We employed an innovative surgical technique involving dual cross-face nerve grafts. In the initial procedure, corneal neuralization was accomplished using supraorbital and cross-face infraorbital nerve graft. The subsequent operation utilized auricular composite tissue flap transplantation repair and cross-face mental nerve graft. RESULTS: This procedure led to rapid and sustained healing, as well as aesthetic improvement. CONCLUSION: Cross-face nerve grafts is a promising tool in the treatment of refractory ulcers caused by diseases such as TTS.

Endoscopically-assisted extraction of broken roots or fragments within the mandibular canal: a retrospective case series study.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of endoscope-assisted fractured roots or fragments extraction within the mandibular canal, along with quantitative sensory testing (QST) alterations in the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). METHODS: Six patients with lower lip numbness following mandibular third molar extraction were selected. All patients had broken roots or fragments within the mandibular canal that were extracted under real-time endoscopic assistance. Follow-up assessments were conducted on postoperative days 1, 7, and 35, including a standardized QST of the lower lip skin. RESULTS: The average surgical duration was 32.5 min, with the IAN exposed in all cases. Two of the patient exhibited complete recovery of lower lip numbness, three experienced symptom improvement, and one patient remained unaffected 35 days after the surgery. Preoperative QST results showed that the mechanical detection and pain thresholds on the affected side were significantly higher than those on the healthy side, but improved significantly by postoperative day 7 in five patients, and returned to baseline in two patients on day 35. There were no significant differences in the remaining QST parameters. CONCLUSIONS: All endoscopic surgical procedures were successfully completed without any additional postoperative complications. There were no cases of deterioration of IAN injury, and lower lip numbness recovered in the majority of cases. Endoscopy allowed direct visualization and examination of the affected nerve, facilitating a comprehensive analysis of the IAN.

Coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars: a clinical and radiological retrospective case series study with 2-9 years of follow-up / Coronectomía de terceros molares mandibulares impactados: un estudio de serie de casos retrospectivo clínico y radiológico con 2-9 años de seguimiento

Background: Impacted mandibular third molars occasionally are in intimate relation to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Coronectomy has been proposed as a good alternative to prevent injury of the IAN. The present study evaluates the clinical and radiological outcomes of impacted mandibular third molars presenting radiographic signs associated with a high risk of IAN injury, and which were treated with the coronectomy technique. Material and Methods: A retrospective case series evaluated the outcomes of coronectomies of impacted mandibular third molars. The inclusion criteria were: available preoperative, immediate postoperative and two-year panoramic radiographs, preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and a complete case history. The clinical evaluation comprised intraoperative complications (mobilized fragments of root and damage to adjacent structures), short-term complications (sensory alterations and postoperative infection), and long-term complications (infection or oral exposure). The IAN position with respect to the roots, root shape, eruption status, third molar position, radicular-complex migration and bone above roots were radiographically evaluated as well. Results: Approximately a total of 2000 mandibular third molars were removed from 2011 to 2022. Of these, 39 molars in 34 patients were partially extracted using the coronectomy technique. The mean age was 36 years (range 22-77), and the mean follow-up was 28 months (range 24-84). There were two short-term postoperative infections. One of them was resolved through reintervention to remove the roots after antibiotic treatment, while the other required hospital admission and removal of the roots. One case of short-term transient lingual paresthesia was also recorded. Two long-term oral exposures were detected, and the root fragments had to be extracted. There were no permanent sensory alterations...(AU)

Is it possible to predict neurosensory alterations in impacted lower third molar removal based on preoperative imaging procedures? A prospective cohort study / ¿Es posible predecir alteraciones neurosensoriales en la extracción del tercer molar inferior impactado basándose en procedimientos de imagen preoperatorios? Un estudio de cohorte prospectivo

Background: Surgical extraction of the lower third molar (LTM) may trigger neurosensory injury of the inferioralveolar nerve, making extraction a real challenge. This study set out to assess whether is it possible to predictneurosensory alterations from preoperative imaging.Material and Methods: A total of 99 patients underwent 124 impacted lower third molar (ILTM) surgeries. Priorto surgery, panoramic and CBCT images were evaluated in an attempt to predict a neurosensory disturbance.Preoperative data (ILTM position, panoramic radiograph signs, inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) location and its con-tact with the ILTM roots) and intra/postoperative findings (extraction difficulty and sensitivity alterations) wererecorded. Descriptive and bivariate data analysis was performed. Statistical comparison applied the chi-squaretest, Fisher test, and one-way ANOVA test. Statistical significance was established with a confidence interval (CI)of 95%.Results: In 4.03% of cases, patients experienced neurosensory alterations. Of 124 ILTM positions in panoramicradiographs, 76 cases were considered to exhibit a potential neurosensory risk as they presented two or more typesof superimposed relationships between ILTM and mandibular canal. Of these, alterations were reported in onlythree cases (3.95%). Of the 48 remaining ILTM images presenting only one sign, neurosensory alterations wereobserved in two cases (4.17%). No permanent alterations were recorded in any of the five cases observed.Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, prediction of neurosensory alterations prior to ILTMextraction by means of preoperative imaging did not show a significant statistical correlation with post-surgicalincidence. Nevertheless, interruption of the canal´s white line (ICWL) or a diversion of the canal (DC) may predictan increased risk of IAN injury.(AU)

Assessing the Efficacy of Allogeneic Nerve Grafts in Trigeminal Nerve Repair: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Our primary objective was to assess the efficacy of allogeneic nerve grafts in inferior alveolar nerve or lingual nerve repair. We hypothesized that using allogeneic nerve grafts would be effective, as evidenced by achieving high rates of functional sensory recovery (FSR). Additionally, we looked if sex, time from injury to repair, etiology of nerve damage, and graft length affected outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched using specific search strategies to generate eligible studies. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies reporting use of allogeneic grafts, assessing FSR using either Medical Research Council Scale or Neurosensory Testing, and published within the past 15 years. RESULTS: Across 10 studies conducted between 2011 and 2023, analysis was performed on 149 patients and 151 reconstructed nerves. Allogeneic nerve grafts showed an average FSR rate of 88.0%. Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to FSR postoperatively revealed that of those achieving FSR, 80% achieved it within 6 months and 98% achieved it by 1 year. The mean graft length was 29.92 mm ± 17.94 mm. The most common etiology for nerve damage was third molar extractions (23.3%). Sex distribution among patients revealed that 85 were female (57.0%) and 64 were male (43.0%). CONCLUSION: Our primary hypothesis was supported as nerve allografts achieved high rates of FSR. FSR was achieved in normative timeframes, which is 6 to 12 months postoperatively. Furthermore, allografts reduced the risk of posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy. Time from injury to repair, graft length, etiology of nerve damage, and sex did not affect FSR. As the assessed variables in our study did not affect outcomes, there needs to be a more nuanced approach to understanding and addressing various factors influencing sensory recovery.

System for automatically assessing the likelihood of inferior alveolar nerve injury.

Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury is a severe complication associated with mandibular third molar (MM3) extraction. Consequently, the likelihood of IAN injury must be assessed before performing such an extraction. However, existing deep learning methods for classifying the likelihood of IAN injury that rely on mask images often suffer from limited accuracy and lack of interpretability. In this paper, we propose an automated system based on panoramic radiographs, featuring a novel segmentation model SS-TransUnet and classification algorithm CD-IAN injury class. Our objective was to enhance the precision of segmentation of MM3 and mandibular canal (MC) and classification accuracy of the likelihood of IAN injury, ultimately reducing the occurrence of IAN injuries and providing a certain degree of interpretable foundation for diagnosis. The proposed segmentation model demonstrated a 0.9 % and 2.6 % enhancement in dice coefficient for MM3 and MC, accompanied by a reduction in 95 % Hausdorff distance, reaching 1.619 and 1.886, respectively. Additionally, our classification algorithm achieved an accuracy of 0.846, surpassing deep learning-based models by 3.8 %, confirming the effectiveness of our system.

Preoperative imaging in third molar surgery - A prospective comparison of X-ray-based and radiation-free magnetic resonance orthopantomography.

This study aimed to compare preoperative data relevant to third molar surgery based on radiographic orthopantomography (OPG) and orthopantomogram-like MR images (MR-OPG), using five different MR protocols. X-ray-based OPG and OPG-like MRI reconstructions from DESS, SPACE-STIR, SPACE-SPAIR, T1-VIBE-Dixon, and UTE sequences were acquired in 11 patients undergoing third molar surgery, using a 15-channel mandibular coil. Qualitative (image quality, susceptibility to artifacts, positional relationship, contact/non-contact of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN), relationship to maxillary sinus, IAN continuity, root morphology) and quantitative (tooth length, retromolar distance, distance to the IAN, and distance to the mandible margin) parameters of the maxillary and mandibular third molars were assessed regarding inter-reader agreement and quantitative discrepancies by three calibrated readers. Radiation-free MR-OPGs generated within clinically tolerable acquisition times, which exhibited high image quality and low susceptibility to artifacts, showed no significant differences compared with X-ray-based OPGs regarding the assessment of quantitative parameters. UTE MR-OPGs provided radiographic-like images and were best suited for assessing qualitative preoperative data (positional relationship, nerve contact/non-contact, and dental root morphology) relevant to third molar surgery. For continuous and focal nerve imaging, DESS MR-OPG was superior. MR-OPGs could represent a shift towards indication-specific and modality-oriented perioperative imaging in high-risk oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Immediate Inferior Alveolar Nerve Reconstruction With Ablative Mandibular Resection Results in Functional Sensory Recovery.

BACKGROUND: Ablative mandibular resection with sacrifice of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) results in loss of sensation and decreased quality of life. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate functional sensory recovery (FSR) of immediate IAN allograft reconstruction performed during ablative mandibular resection at 1 year following surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study that included consecutive subjects who underwent mandibular resection with IAN discontinuity and used a nerve allograft of ≥40 mm. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The primary predictor variable is the use of an immediate nerve allograft in mandibular reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The main outcome variable is FSR at 1 year using the Medical Research Council Scale. COVARIATES: Covariates include subject age, sex, specific pathology, nerve gap length, and development of neuropathic pain. ANALYSES: Statistical analysis of comparison of neurosensory outcomes was measured by bivariate statistics, weighted values, repeated measures, analysis of variance, and McNemar test. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 164 subjects, of whom 55 (33.5%) underwent nerve allograft reconstruction and 30 (18.3%) did not have nerve reconstruction. Seventy-nine subjects (48.2%) did not meet the inclusion criteria. In the entire nerve allograft group of 55 subjects, FSR was achieved in 80% at 1 year; however, in benign disease alone, 31 of 33 (94%) achieved FSR at 1 year. In the nonallograft group (all benign disease), only 2 of 30 (7%) achieved FSR at 1 year. The significant covariates were age and pathology. Benign pathologic resections were 5.2 times more likely to achieve FSR than malignancies, and all subjects ≤ 18 years of age achieved FSR. After adjusting for age, sex, pathology, nerve gap length, nerve allograft was significantly associated with achieving FSR at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio = 5.52, 95% confidence interval = (1.03, 29.51), P value = .045 < .05). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Immediate long-span IAN allograft reconstruction is effective in restoration of sensation with an overall 80% of subjects achieving FSR at 1 year, while benign disease resulted in 94% FSR at 1 year. Immediate IAN reconstruction should be considered with mandibular resection involving the IAN, especially for children and benign disease.

Outcomes of Coronectomy and Total Odontectomy of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to evaluate the surgical complications and neurosensory deficits after coronectomy and the complete removal of mandibular third molars. METHODS: The study sample included patients requiring surgical removal of mandibular third molars. A coronectomy was conducted on 220 teeth showing signs of close proximity to the inferior alveolar canal. A complete extraction was performed on 218 teeth with no risk signs. The patients were evaluated at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery for pain, swelling, neurologic deficit, dry socket, postoperative bleeding, infection, root migration, and eruption. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in pain and swelling; however, bleeding and dry socket were significantly higher in the odontectomy group (P = .017). The inferior alveolar nerve deficit was higher in the odontectomy group (3.7%) than the coronectomy group (0.5%) (P = .017). The percentage and distance of root migration of coronectomised teeth at 3, 6, and 12 months were 60% (2.37 ± 0.96 mm), 66% (3.35 ± 0.86 mm), and 74% (3.85 ± 0.93 mm), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Coronectomy is a safe procedure and should be performed when the roots are closely associated with the mandibular canal. Although root migration is common, the likelihood of root exposure is low and roots rarely need removal.

Benefits of Coronectomy in Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare coronectomy versus extraction in patients at increased risk for inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injuries associated with third molar removal in terms of IAN injury and other complications. METHODS: The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses checklist. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across six databases and the gray literature from July 15 to August 01, 2022. We employed Rayyan software to identify and remove duplicate articles to ensure data integrity. Our research followed the strategy patient (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), outcome (O), and study (S): (P) patients needing lower third molar surgery at higher risk of IAN injury; (I) surgery options, coronectomy or complete extraction; (C) comparisons included reduced risks of nerve injuries, postoperative complications (pain, infection, alveolitis), and increased risks of reoperation, root migration, and extraction; (O) desired outcomes were preventing nerve injuries and reducing other surgical complications; and (S) observational study designs (cohort, case-control). Excluded from consideration were studies involving teeth other than lower third molars, as well as reviews, letters, conference summaries, and personal opinions. To gauge the certainty of evidence, we employed the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation instrument, selecting the most current papers with the highest levels of evidence for inclusion. The primary outcome variable of our study centered on evaluating the incidence of IAN injury, and secondly, the lingual nerve (LN) injury, the postoperative pain, infection, localized alveolitis, the necessity for surgical reintervention, root migration, and extraction. These assessments were carried out with respect to their chosen operative technique for managing third molars, either coronectomy or extraction, as predictor variables. We also considered covariates such as age, gender, and the presence of systemic diseases in our analysis to account for potential confounding factors. The pooled data underwent rigorous analysis utilizing an inverse variance method with both random and fixed effect models by the "metabin" function in the R program's meta-package. Additionally, we assessed the risk of bias in the selected studies by utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data and the Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports. RESULTS: Of the 1,017 articles found, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 42 were included in this study (29 cohort and 13 case-control studies), including 3,095 patients from 18 countries. The meta-analysis showed that coronectomy reduced the risk of IAN injury [OR (Odds Ratio): 0.14; 95% CI (confidence intervals): 0.06-0.30; I2 (inconsistency index) = 0%; P = .0001], postoperative pain (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.33-2.86; I2 = 81%; P = .01), and alveolitis (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.13-1.09; I2 = 32.2%; P = .01) when compared to complete tooth extraction. However, it also highlighted a greater risk of reintervention (OR: 5.38; 95% CI: 1.14-25.28; I2 = 0.0%; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that coronectomy is associated with a decreased risk for IAN injury and decreased pain and localized alveolitis when compared to complete tooth extraction. However, it is essential to acknowledge the higher likelihood of requiring reintervention with coronectomy. Therefore, clinicians should carefully consider the advantages and potential drawbacks of both techniques and tailor their choices to the unique clinical circumstances of each patient.

Relationship of the Degree of Nerve Exposure and Surgical Manipulation and Short-Term Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Neurosensory disturbance (NSD) is a common complication after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) due to inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. The impact of intraoperative nerve manipulation on NSD remains debated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IAN exposure and manipulation during SSRO on functional sensory recovery (FSR). STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of 40 patients undergoing SSRO at Mahidol University from December 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 20-34, ASA Class I-II. The exclusion criteria were patients with systemic bone disease, history of head and neck or neurological pathology, previous SSRO, or incomplete data collection. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: Degree of intraoperative nerve manipulation was divided by the attending surgeon as follows; 1) Nerve fully encased in distal segment and not visible (NS); 2) Nerve encased in distal segment but partially visible (DS); and 3) Nerve partially encased in proximal segment and fully dissected free (PS). OUTCOME VARIABLES: The area of interest was divided into the lip and chin. The primary outcome was time to FSR. The secondary outcome was subjective patient report, using a visual analogue scale, compared to FSR. COVARIATES: The covariates were sex, age, skeletal diagnosis, degree of movement, and concomitant genioplasty/subapical procedure. ANALYSES: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Mcnemar test were utilized. P-value < .05 was significant. RESULTS: In the lip, the median times to FSR were NS, 2 days; DS, 45 days; PS, 102 days. (Interquartile range: 77,127, 114, respectively) In the chin, the median times to FSR were NS, 23 days; DS, 92 days; PS, 87 days. (Interquartile range: 77, 161, 101, respectively.) Nerve manipulation significantly affected FSR in the lip and chin (P = .001, <0.001, respectively. Cox hazard ratios for DS and PS were lower compared to NS. Patients consistently reported more NSD compared to FSR as per Mcnemar test. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: After SSRO, FSR in the lip is prolonged when the IAN is partially encased in the proximal segment and released. This raises the question of the efficacy of surgically releasing a partially encased IAN.

Is it possible to predict neurosensory alterations in impacted lower third molar removal based on preoperative imaging procedures? A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical extraction of the lower third molar (LTM) may trigger neurosensory injury of the inferior alveolar nerve, making extraction a real challenge. This study set out to assess whether is it possible to predict neurosensory alterations from preoperative imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 99 patients underwent 124 impacted lower third molar (ILTM) surgeries. Prior to surgery, panoramic and CBCT images were evaluated in an attempt to predict a neurosensory disturbance. Preoperative data (ILTM position, panoramic radiograph signs, inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) location and its contact with the ILTM roots) and intra/postoperative findings (extraction difficulty and sensitivity alterations) were recorded. Descriptive and bivariate data analysis was performed. Statistical comparison applied the chi-square test, Fisher test, and one-way ANOVA test. Statistical significance was established with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. RESULTS: In 4.03% of cases, patients experienced neurosensory alterations. Of 124 ILTM positions in panoramic radiographs, 76 cases were considered to exhibit a potential neurosensory risk as they presented two or more types of superimposed relationships between ILTM and mandibular canal. Of these, alterations were reported in only three cases (3.95%). Of the 48 remaining ILTM images presenting only one sign, neurosensory alterations were observed in two cases (4.17%). No permanent alterations were recorded in any of the five cases observed. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, prediction of neurosensory alterations prior to ILTM extraction by means of preoperative imaging did not show a significant statistical correlation with post-surgical incidence. Nevertheless, interruption of the canal´s white line (ICWL) or a diversion of the canal (DC) may predict an increased risk of IAN injury.

Involvement of interferon gamma signaling in spinal trigeminal caudal subnucleus astrocyte in orofacial neuropathic pain in rats with infraorbital nerve injury.

Background: Trigeminal nerve injury causes orofacial pain that can interfere with activities of daily life. However, the underlying mechanism remains unknown, and the appropriate treatment has not been established yet. This study aimed to examine the involvement of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) signaling in the spinal trigeminal caudal subnucleus (Vc) in orofacial neuropathic pain. Methods: Infraorbital nerve (ION) injury (IONI) was performed in rats by partial ION ligation. The head-withdrawal reflex threshold (HWT) to mechanical stimulation of the whisker pad skin was measured in IONI or sham rats, as well as following a continuous intracisterna magna administration of IFN-γ and a mixture of IFN-γ and fluorocitrate (inhibitor of astrocytes activation) in naïve rats, or an IFN-γ antagonist in IONI rats. The IFN-γ receptor immunohistochemistry and IFN-γ Western blotting were analyzed in the Vc after IONI or sham treatment. The glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) immunohistochemistry and Western blotting were also analyzed after administration of IFN-γ and the mixture of IFN-γ and fluorocitrate. Moreover, the change in single neuronal activity in the Vc was examined in the IONI, sham, and IONI group administered IFN-γ antagonist. Results: The HWT decreased after IONI. The IFN-γ and IFN-γ receptor were upregulated after IONI, and the IFN-γ receptor was expressed in Vc astrocytes. IFN-γ administration decreased the HWT, whereas the mixture of IFN-γ and fluorocitrate recovered the decrement of HWT. IFN-γ administration upregulated GFAP expression, while the mixture of IFN-γ and fluorocitrate recovered the upregulation of GFAP expression. IONI significantly enhanced the neuronal activity of the mechanical-evoked responses, and administration of an IFN-γ antagonist significantly inhibited these enhancements. Conclusions: IFN-γ signaling through the receptor in astrocytes is a key mechanism underlying orofacial neuropathic pain associated with trigeminal nerve injury. These findings will aid in the development of therapeutics for orofacial neuropathic pain.