Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 105.830
Filtrar
1.
J Transl Med ; 22(1): 432, 2024 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715088

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are highly immunogenic in people living with HIV (PLWH) on effective antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, whether viro-immunologic parameters or other factors affect immune responses to vaccination is debated. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based model able to predict the humoral response to mRNA vaccines in PLWH and to assess the impact of demographic and clinical variables on antibody production over time. METHODS: Different machine learning algorithms have been compared in the setting of a longitudinal observational study involving 497 PLWH, after primary and booster SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Both Generalized Linear Models and non-linear Models (Tree Regression and Random Forest) were trained and tested. RESULTS: Non-linear algorithms showed better ability to predict vaccine-elicited humoral responses. The best-performing Random Forest model identified a few variables as more influential, within 39 clinical, demographic, and immunological factors. In particular, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, BMI, CD4 T-cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio were positively associated with the primary cycle immunogenicity, yet their predictive value diminished with the administration of booster doses. CONCLUSIONS: In the present work we have built a non-linear Random Forest model capable of accurately predicting humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, and identifying relevant factors that influence the vaccine response in PLWH. In clinical contexts, the application of this model provides promising opportunities for predicting individual vaccine responses, thus facilitating the development of vaccination strategies tailored for PLWH.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Infecções por HIV , Imunidade Humoral , Imunização Secundária , Aprendizado de Máquina , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinação , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Vacinas de mRNA , Estudos Longitudinais , RNA Mensageiro/genética , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo
2.
Vet Res ; 55(1): 57, 2024 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715138

RESUMO

Streptococcus suis is a bacterial pathogen that causes important economic losses to the swine industry worldwide. Since there are no current commercial vaccines, the use of autogenous vaccines applied to gilts/sows to enhance transfer of passive immunity is an attractive alternative to protect weaned piglets. However, there is no universal standardization in the production of autogenous vaccines and the vaccine formulation may be highly different among licenced manufacturing laboratories. In the present study, an autogenous vaccine that included S. suis serotypes 2, 1/2, 5, 7 and 14 was prepared by a licensed laboratory and administrated to gilts using a three-dose program prior to farrowing. The antibody response in gilts as well as the passive transfer of antibodies to piglets was then evaluated. In divergence with previously published data with an autogenous vaccine produced by a different company, the increased response seen in gilts was sufficient to improve maternal antibody transfer to piglets up to 5 weeks of age. However, piglets would still remain susceptible to S. suis disease which often appears during the second part of the nursery period. Vaccination did not affect the shedding of S. suis (as well as that of the specific S. suis serotypes included in the vaccine) by either gilts or piglets. Although all antibiotic treatments were absent during the trial, the clinical protective effect of the vaccination program with the autogenous vaccine could not be evaluated, since limited S. suis cases were present during the trial, confirming the need for a complete evaluation of the clinical protection that must include laboratory confirmation of the aetiological agent involved in the presence of S. suis-associated clinical signs. Further studies to evaluate the usefulness of gilt/sow vaccination with autogenous vaccines to protect nursery piglets should be done.


Assuntos
Autovacinas , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus suis , Doenças dos Suínos , Animais , Streptococcus suis/imunologia , Suínos , Doenças dos Suínos/prevenção & controle , Doenças dos Suínos/microbiologia , Doenças dos Suínos/imunologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/veterinária , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estreptocócicas/imunologia , Feminino , Imunidade Materno-Adquirida , Vacinas Estreptocócicas/imunologia , Vacinas Estreptocócicas/administração & dosagem , Sorogrupo , Vacinação/veterinária
3.
Elife ; 122024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716629

RESUMO

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been used worldwide to combat COVID-19 pandemic. To elucidate the factors that determine the longevity of spike (S)-specific antibodies, we traced the characteristics of S-specific T cell clonotypes together with their epitopes and anti-S antibody titers before and after BNT162b2 vaccination over time. T cell receptor (TCR) αß sequences and mRNA expression of the S-responded T cells were investigated using single-cell TCR- and RNA-sequencing. Highly expanded 199 TCR clonotypes upon stimulation with S peptide pools were reconstituted into a reporter T cell line for the determination of epitopes and restricting HLAs. Among them, we could determine 78 S epitopes, most of which were conserved in variants of concern (VOCs). After the 2nd vaccination, T cell clonotypes highly responsive to recall S stimulation were polarized to follicular helper T (Tfh)-like cells in donors exhibiting sustained anti-S antibody titers (designated as 'sustainers'), but not in 'decliners'. Even before vaccination, S-reactive CD4+ T cell clonotypes did exist, most of which cross-reacted with environmental or symbiotic microbes. However, these clonotypes contracted after vaccination. Conversely, S-reactive clonotypes dominated after vaccination were undetectable in pre-vaccinated T cell pool, suggesting that highly responding S-reactive T cells were established by vaccination from rare clonotypes. These results suggest that de novo acquisition of memory Tfh-like cells upon vaccination may contribute to the longevity of anti-S antibody titers.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Vacinação , Humanos , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , Vacina BNT162/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Masculino , Epitopos de Linfócito T/imunologia , Adulto , Linfócitos T Auxiliares-Indutores/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
Int J Public Health ; 69: 1606791, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721474

RESUMO

Objectives: To describe a suspected diphtheria outbreak in a Swiss asylum seeker reception centre, and to analyse its management response regarding testing and vaccination. Methods: We retrospectively analysed clinical, microbiology, and case management data of all asylum seekers tested for C. diphtheriae between 28th August and 31st December 2022 while residing at the centre. Results are reported descriptively. Results: Among 265 individuals tested, ten cases of cutaneous diphtheria, one simultaneous respiratory and cutaneous case, and nine respiratory carriers were identified. Mass throat screening, targeted throat testing and targeted wound testing yielded 4.8%, 4.3%, and 17.4% positive results, respectively. No respiratory carrier was identified among cutaneous cases undergoing a throat swab, and no symptomatic case was identified among individuals with unspecific throat symptoms. Rates of vaccination implementation of newly arriving asylum seekers before and after the outbreak were low (17.5% and 15.5%, respectively), as were rates of targeted vaccination among cases and close contacts. Conclusion: We provide evidence for transmission both prior to arrival and within the setting, suboptimal practices and timeliness of testing, and implementation gaps in vaccination.


Assuntos
Difteria , Surtos de Doenças , Refugiados , Humanos , Suíça , Refugiados/estatística & dados numéricos , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Difteria/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas de Rastreamento
5.
Cell Host Microbe ; 32(5): 632-634, 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723601

RESUMO

Inducing HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) through vaccination poses exceptional challenges. In this issue of Cell Host & Microbe, Wiehe and colleagues report the elicitation of affinity-matured bnAbs in knock-in mice through boosting immunogen vaccination, which selects for key improbable mutations.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra a AIDS , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Anti-HIV , Infecções por HIV , HIV-1 , Desenvolvimento de Vacinas , Vacinas contra a AIDS/imunologia , Vacinas contra a AIDS/genética , HIV-1/imunologia , HIV-1/genética , Animais , Camundongos , Anticorpos Anti-HIV/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Humanos , Técnicas de Introdução de Genes , Imunização Secundária , Vacinação
6.
Ann Ig ; 36(4): 462-475, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747080

RESUMO

Background: Language barriers are one of the main obstacles faced by migrants in accessing healthcare services. A compromised communication between migrants and Healthcare Providers in vaccination setting can result in increased vaccine hesitancy and decreased vaccine uptake. The objective of the current study is to investigate Healthcare Providers' perceptions about linguistic barriers faced during both routinary vaccination practice and the extraordinary vaccination program for Ukrainian refugees in the Local Health Authorities of Bologna and Romagna (Italy). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted through the administration of a questionnaire examining Healthcare Providers' perceptions. A descriptive analysis and a multiple logistic regression model were adopted to analyze the collected data. Results: Language barriers resulted as an obstacle to informed consent and to doctor-patient relationship. The strategies adopted were perceived as helpful in increasing vaccination adherence, despite communication difficulties were still experienced during refugees' vaccinations. Results suggest that the implementation of translated material and the use of professional interpreters may represent important strategies to overcome linguistic barriers, along with Healthcare Providers' training. Healthcare Providers' opinions could assist the implementation of new tools capable of countering language barriers. Conclusions: The current study represents an example of providers' involvement in understanding the complexities behind the issue of language barriers in vaccination practice.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Barreiras de Comunicação , Refugiados , Vacinação , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Itália , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Médico-Paciente , Hesitação Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Idioma , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido
7.
Pak J Pharm Sci ; 37(1(Special)): 215-222, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747272

RESUMO

This study was aimed to assess the type and severity of COVID vaccine-induced menstrual disorders and also to investigate the risk factors for menstrual changes following COVID-19 vaccination in Pakistani females. A cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted in females between 12 -70 years of age from February to July 2022. The survey was conducted via in-person interviews as well as via social media. The data was analyzed using standard descriptive statistical parameters, the sociodemographic and clinical features were evaluated and reported as frequencies (percentages). The study comprised a total of 1023 female subjects. Approximately 36.9% of women reported menstrual abnormalities following immunization, with 30.5% experiencing them following their second dose. However, in majority of these women (21%) the symptoms were resolved after 3 months of irregularity. Vaccine type significantly influenced the incidence of menstrual disorders (p <0.001) which were linked to Pfizer-Biontech, Sinopahrm, Sinovac, Moderna at rates of 14.9%, 9.5%, 4.7% and 2.7%, respectively. Both AstraZeneca and Moderna were implicated in postmenopausal bleeding (1.6% and 0.8%, respectively). The study showed that females receiving COVID-19 vaccines experienced menstrual irregularities such as short duration of periods, decreased volume of bleeding, and frequent menstrual cycles. However, the symptoms were temporary and self-limiting.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Distúrbios Menstruais , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Distúrbios Menstruais/epidemiologia , Idoso , Criança , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
8.
Cien Saude Colet ; 29(5): e20042022, 2024 May.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747780

RESUMO

Measles is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population and it can be prevented with 100% effectiveness by vaccination. However, the disease remains active in throughout Brazil. The scope of this article is to evaluate the population's adherence to vaccination and the potential connection with hospitalizations and mortality in relation to measles in Brazil. This is an ecological study based on secondary data on mortality and hospitalizations due to measles and vaccination coverage against the disease in Brazil from 2013 to 2022. The peak of adherence to the measles vaccination schedule occurred in the 3 years that preceded the eradication of the disease in the country, which occurred in 2016. In this interval, there are the lowest hospitalization rates, with zero mortality from 2014 to 2017. On the other hand, there has been a marked drop in vaccination rates since 2019, when the disease resurfaced in Brazil. Concomitantly, hospitalization and mortality rates reach the highest recorded values. Population adherence to the complete measles vaccination schedule, which is essential to control the disease and related deaths, is insufficient, which is reflected in hospitalization and mortality rates.


O sarampo é uma das principais causas de morbidade e mortalidade na população pediátrica e pode ser prevenido com 100% de eficácia pela vacinação. No entanto, a doença permanece ativa no território brasileiro. O objetivo do artigo é avaliar a adesão da população à vacinação e a possível relação com hospitalização e mortalidade em relação ao sarampo no Brasil. Trata-se de um estudo ecológico realizado a partir de dados secundários de mortalidade e internações acerca do sarampo e da cobertura vacinal contra a doença no Brasil nos anos de 2013 a 2022. O ápice de adesão ao calendário vacinal contra o sarampo se deu nos três anos que precederam a erradicação da doença no país, ocorrida em 2016. Nesse intervalo, tem-se as menores taxas de internação, com a mortalidade zerada de 2014 a 2017. Em contrapartida, verifica-se, desde então, queda na taxas de vacinação, acentuadas a partir de 2019, quando a doença reaparece no Brasil. Concomitantemente, as taxas de internação e mortalidade atingem os valores mais altos registrados. A adesão populacional ao calendário vacinal completo contra o sarampo, essencial ao controle da doença e dos óbitos relacionados, está insuficiente, o que se reflete nas taxas de internações e mortalidade.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Programas de Imunização , Vacina contra Sarampo , Sarampo , Cobertura Vacinal , Vacinação , Humanos , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Sarampo/mortalidade , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Esquemas de Imunização , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Lactente
9.
Malar J ; 23(1): 142, 2024 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734664

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The newly developed malaria vaccine called "R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine" showed a high safety and efficacy level, and Ghana is the first country to approve this new vaccine. The present study aimed to evaluate the rate of vaccine hesitancy (VH) towards the newly developed malaria vaccine among parents who currently have children who are not eligible for the vaccine but may be eligible in the near future. Additionally, the study aimed to identify the factors that could potentially influence VH. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using both online-based questionnaires and face-to-face interviews was conducted in Ghana from June to August 2023. The survey specifically targeted parents of ineligible children for vaccination, including those aged less than 5 months or between 3 and 12 years. The Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccination (PACV) scale was used to assess parental VH. RESULTS: A total of 765 people participated in this study. Their median age was 36.0 years with an interquartile range of 31.0-41.0 years, 67.7% were females, 41.8% completed their tertiary education, 63.3% were married, 81.6% worked in non-healthcare sectors, and 59.7% reported that their monthly income was insufficient. About one-third (34.5%) of the parents were hesitant to give their children the R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine. The following predictors were associated with VH: working in the healthcare sector (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.80; p = 0.005), having the other parent working in the healthcare sector (AOR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.30-0.94; p = 0.034), and not taking scheduled routine vaccinations (AOR = 1.90; 95% CI 1.27-2.84; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Addressing VH is crucial for optimizing R21/Matrix-M vaccine coverage in Ghana's malaria control strategy. By tackling VH issues, Ghana can effectively safeguard children's health in malaria-prone areas.


Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas , Pais , Humanos , Gana , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Masculino , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Pais/psicologia , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Hesitação Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Lactente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/psicologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
10.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10813, 2024 05 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734805

RESUMO

To evaluate the development of neutralizing Anti-Spike Protein IgG (Anti-S-IgG) during twin pregnancies before conception vs. during pregnancy. In this prospective study, three blood samples were collected from pregnant women and subjected to anti-S-IgG immunodiagnostics. The patient's medical records, including vaccination and PCR test results, were collected from the hospital's electronic database. Age-matched non-pregnant women were used as a control group. We enrolled 83 women with twin pregnancies. 49 women were vaccinated before conception, 21 women were vaccinated during pregnancy, and 13 were not vaccinated. Of the 13 women who weren't vaccinated, three became positive during pregnancy, and all three were severely ill. By contrast, in women who were vaccinated during or before pregnancy, COVID-19 infection during pregnancy caused only mild symptoms. A ten-fold lower level of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG in the 3rd trimester was observed in healthy women who were vaccinated before conception and remained healthy until discharge from the hospital after delivery 1605 (IQR: 763-2410) compared to the healthy women who were vaccinated during pregnancy 152 AU/mL (IQR: 54-360). This difference was higher among women who were infected by COVID-19 (as verified by a positive PCR test). The third-trimester level of neutralizing Ant-S-IgG in the infected group was 4770 AU/mL (4760-6100) in infected women vaccinated before conception compared to those vaccinated during pregnancy who had 70 AU/mL (IQR: 20-170) (p < 0.001). In women vaccinated at 13-16 weeks gestation, neutralizing Anti-S-IgG at 20-22 weeks went up to 372 AU/mL (IQR: 120-1598) but rapidly dropped to 112 AU/mL (IQR: 54-357) at 28-30 weeks, (p < 0.001), a faster decline than in women vaccinated at a median 22 weeks before conception. Being infected by COVID-19 before conception was linked to having low Anti-S-IgG levels during pregnancy, whereas being infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy led to a very high response in the 3rd trimester. In twin pregnancies, significantly lower neutralizing Anti-S-IgG levels were observed in women vaccinated during pregnancy compared to those vaccinated before conception, whether infected or not infected by COVID-19. A full course of vaccination before conception is recommended.Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: October 4, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ID: NCT04595214.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Imunoglobulina G , Gravidez de Gêmeos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Gravidez de Gêmeos/imunologia , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia
11.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3856, 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719852

RESUMO

The Modified Vaccinia Ankara vaccine developed by Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) was widely deployed to prevent mpox during the 2022 global outbreak. This vaccine was initially approved for mpox based on its reported immunogenicity (from phase I/II trials) and effectiveness in animal models, rather than evidence of clinical efficacy. However, no validated correlate of protection after vaccination has been identified. Here we performed a systematic search and meta-analysis of the available data to test whether vaccinia-binding ELISA endpoint titer is predictive of vaccine effectiveness against mpox. We observe a significant correlation between vaccine effectiveness and vaccinia-binding antibody titers, consistent with the existing assumption that antibody levels may be a correlate of protection. Combining this data with analysis of antibody kinetics after vaccination, we predict the durability of protection after vaccination and the impact of dose spacing. We find that delaying the second dose of MVA-BN vaccination will provide more durable protection and may be optimal in an outbreak with limited vaccine stock. Although further work is required to validate this correlate, this study provides a quantitative evidence-based approach for using antibody measurements to predict the effectiveness of mpox vaccination.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vaccinia virus , Humanos , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vaccinia virus/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Vacínia/imunologia , Vacínia/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antivariólica/imunologia , Vacina Antivariólica/administração & dosagem , Animais
12.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1259, 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720278

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, it has been reported that fully vaccinated people still die of COVID-19-associated symptoms, generating public uncertainty about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Hence, this research is aimed at assessing the incidence of COVID-19 breakthrough infection among vaccinated Health Workers and the possible effect of changes in the practice of post-vaccination safety precautions. METHOD: This was a Health facility-based descriptive cross-sectional study. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires distributed at the participant's work unit across the selected health facilities. The nasopharyngeal specimen was also obtained from the participants and analysed using STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test rapid chromatographic immunoassay for the detection of antigens to SARS-CoV-2. All data were input and analyzed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant relationship between the vaccination status of respondents and the post-vaccination test result (χ2 = 6.816, df = 1, p = 0.009). The incidence of COVID-19 infection among the vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs was 2% and 8% respectively. 5 of the 15 respondents who tested positive for COVID-19 had been fully vaccinated. However, all 5 of them did not practice safety measures after vaccination. None of the respondents who practised safety measures after vaccination tested positive for COVID-19. The remaining 10 respondents that tested positive for COVID-19 had not been vaccinated though they practised safety precautions. CONCLUSION: Vaccination and the practice of safety precautions will go a long way to preventing future COVID-19 breakthrough infections.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Nigéria , Estudos Transversais , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Incidência , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Irruptivas
13.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 411, 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720296

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Impaired immune response in multiple myeloma renders the patients vulnerable to infections, such as COVID-19, and may cause worse response to vaccines. Researchers should analyze this issue to enable the planning for special preventive measures, such as increased booster doses. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the response and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS: This meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, conducting a comprehensive database search using specified keywords. Study selection involved a two-phase title/abstract and full-text screening process. Data extraction was performed by two researchers, and statistical analysis involved meta-analysis, subgroup analysis based on vaccine dosage and study time, random effects meta-regression, and heterogeneity testing using the Q test. RESULTS: The meta-analysis revealed that patients with multiple myeloma (MM) had a lower likelihood of developing detectable antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination compared to healthy controls (Log odds ratio with 95% CI: -3.34 [-4.08, -2.60]). The analysis of antibody response after different doses showed consistent lower seropositivity in MM patients (after first dose: -2.09, [-3.49, -0.69], second: -3.80, 95%CI [-4.71, -3.01], a booster dose: -3.03, [-5.91, -0.15]). However, there was no significant difference in the mean level of anti-S antibodies between MM patients and controls (Cohen's d -0.72, [-1.86, 0.43]). Evaluation of T-cell responses indicated diminished T-cell-mediated immunity in MM patients compared to controls. Seven studies reported clinical response, with breakthrough infections observed in vaccinated MM patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the impaired humoral and cellular immune responses in MM patients after COVID-19 vaccination, suggesting the need for further investigation and potential interventions.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Mieloma Múltiplo , Mieloma Múltiplo/imunologia , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos
14.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(4): 532-541, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728645

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the incidence and severity of side effects associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination among healthcare workers registered with the Medical Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on the healthcare workers focusing on the side-effects of COVID-19 vaccines from March to June 2021. Data were collected using online questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between side effects of the vaccines and demographic variables, comorbidities, vaccine type, and history of COVID-19. RESULTS: Out of 42,018 people who were included, 55.85% reported at least one side effect after receiving the first vaccine dose. 4.59% of those with side effects sought diagnostic intervention or were referred to treatment centers. Multivariable logistic regression indicated that being a woman, higher education, having a history of COVID-19 infection, and having comorbidities increased the risk of side effects. The AstraZeneca vaccine significantly increased the risk of side effects compared to the Sputnik vaccine, while the Sinopharm vaccine decreased this risk. The risk of developing a side effect decreased with age. The risk of moderate and severe side effects was significantly associated with gender, younger age, comorbidities, and a history of COVID-19 infection. Moderate and severe side effects were less reported by those who received the Sinopharm vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical complications after COVID-19 vaccination, directly or indirectly caused by the vaccines, are common. However, the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines greatly outweigh the risk of reversible side effects, especially among the high-risk population.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto Jovem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
15.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(4): 609-617, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728646

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Influenza is a serious underestimated viral infection in Pakistan and influenza vaccination and vaccination awareness are low. The current work aimed to develop consensus on influenza epidemiology, prevention, vaccination, and awareness in Pakistan. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature search was conducted to develop recommendations on influenza vaccines in Pakistan. Experts' feedback was incorporated using the modified Delphi method. A three-step process was used, with 18 experts from different specialties from Pakistan who participated in voting rounds to achieve a minimum 75% agreement level. RESULTS: Pakistan has a low-immunization-rate and is susceptible to serious influenza outbreaks and influenza-related complications. Influenza circulates year-round in Pakistan but peaks during January and February. The subtype A/H1N1 is predominant. The experts urged vaccination in all individuals ≥ 6 months of age and with no contraindications. They highlighted special considerations for those with comorbidities and specific conditions. The experts agreed that the inactivated influenza vaccine is safe and efficient in pregnant women, immunocompromised, and comorbid respiratory and cardiovascular patients. Finally, the experts recommended conducting promotional and educational programs to raise awareness on influenza and vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first regional consensus on influenza and influenza vaccination in Pakistan with experts' recommendations to increase influenza vaccination and decrease influenza cases and its associated detrimental effects.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Vacinação , Humanos , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Feminino
16.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(4): 513-519, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728641

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination against coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is highly effective in preventing severe disease and mortality. Adenoviral vector and mRNA vaccines were effective against intensive care unit (ICU) admission, but the effectiveness of inactivated vaccine on ICU admission was unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of vaccination status on ICU admission in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in a country with heterologous vaccination policy. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective multicenter study conducted in three hospitals in Izmir, Turkey between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2022. Patients aged ≥ 18 years and hospitalized due to COVID-19 were included in the study. Patients who had never been vaccinated and patients who had been vaccinated with a single dose were considered unvaccinated. A logistic regression analysis was performed for evaluating risk factors for ICU admission. RESULTS: A total of 2,110 patients were included in the final analysis. The median age was 66 years (IQR, 53-76 years) and 54% of the patients were vaccinated. During the study period, 407 patients (19.3%) were transferred to the ICU due to disease severity. Patients who were admitted to the ICU were older (median age 68 vs. 65 years, p < 0.001); and the number of unvaccinated individuals was higher among ICU patients (57% vs. 45%, p < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, being unvaccinated was found to be the most important independent risk factor for ICU admission with an OR of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.64-2.59). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination against COVID-19 is effective against ICU admission and hospital mortality.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Turquia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Fatores de Risco
17.
Med Care ; 62(6): 380-387, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728678

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although federal legislation made COVID-19 vaccines free, inequities in access to medical care may affect vaccine uptake. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether health care access was associated with uptake and timeliness of COVID-19 vaccination in the United States. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: 2021 National Health Interview Survey (Q2-Q4). SUBJECTS: In all, 21,532 adults aged≥18 were included in the study. MEASURES: Exposures included 4 metrics of health care access: health insurance, having an established place for medical care, having a physician visit within the past year, and medical care affordability. Outcomes included receipt of 1 or more COVID-19 vaccines and receipt of a first vaccine within 6 months of vaccine availability. We examined the association between each health care access metric and outcome using logistic regression, unadjusted and adjusted for demographic, geographic, and socioeconomic covariates. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, each metric of health care access was associated with the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination and (among those vaccinated) early vaccination. In adjusted analyses, having health coverage (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.60; 95% CI: 1.39, 1.84), a usual place of care (AOR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.42, 1.75), and a doctor visit within the past year (AOR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.31, 1.62) remained associated with higher rates of COVID-19 vaccination. Only having a usual place of care was associated with early vaccine uptake in adjusted analyses. LIMITATIONS: Receipt of COVID-19 vaccination was self-reported. CONCLUSIONS: Several metrics of health care access are associated with the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. Policies that achieve universal coverage, and facilitate long-term relationships with trusted providers, may be an important component of pandemic responses.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Adulto , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , SARS-CoV-2 , Fatores Socioeconômicos
18.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303244, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728294

RESUMO

To predict protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2, cellular immunity seems to be more sensitive than humoral immunity. Through an Interferon-Gamma (IFN-γ) Release Assay (IGRA), we show that, despite a marked decrease in total antibodies, 94.3% of 123 healthcare workers have a positive cellular response 6 months after inoculation with the 2nd dose of BNT162b2 vaccine. Despite the qualitative relationship found, we did not observe a quantitative correlation between IFN-γ and IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2. Using stimulated whole blood from a subset of participants, we confirmed the specific T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 by dosing elevated levels of the IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α. Through a 20-month follow-up, we found that none of the infected participants had severe COVID-19 and that the first positive cases were only 12 months after the 2nd dose inoculation. Future studies are needed to understand if IGRA-SARS-CoV-2 can be a powerful diagnostic tool to predict future COVID-19 severe disease, guiding vaccination policies.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde , Testes de Liberação de Interferon-gama , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Interferon gama/sangue , Vacinação , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Imunidade Celular , Interleucina-10/sangue , Interleucina-10/imunologia , Interleucina-6/sangue , Interleucina-6/imunologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/sangue
19.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303371, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728352

RESUMO

Marek's disease (MD) is an important neoplastic disease caused by serotype 1 Marek's disease virus (MDV-1), which results in severe economic losses worldwide. Despite vaccination practices that have controlled the MD epidemic, current increasing MD-suspected cases indicate the persistent viral infections circulating among vaccinated chicken farms in many countries. However, the lack of available information about phylogeny and molecular characterization of circulating MDV-1 field strains in Taiwan reveals a potential risk in MD outbreaks. This study investigated the genetic characteristics of 18 MDV-1 strains obtained from 17 vaccinated chicken flocks in Taiwan between 2018 and 2020. Based on the sequences of the meq oncogene, the phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the circulating Taiwanese MDV-1 field strains were predominantly in a single cluster that showed high similarity with strains from countries of the East Asian region. Because the strains were obtained from CVI988/Rispens vaccinated chicken flocks and the molecular characteristics of the Meq oncoprotein showed features like vvMDV and vv+MDV strains, the circulating Taiwanese MDV-1 field strains may have higher virulence compared with vvMDV pathotype. In conclusion, the data presented demonstrates the circulation of hypervirulent MDV-1 strains in Taiwan and highlights the importance of routine surveillance and precaution strategies in response to the emergence of enhanced virulent MDV-1.


Assuntos
Galinhas , Herpesvirus Galináceo 2 , Doença de Marek , Proteínas Oncogênicas Virais , Filogenia , Animais , Galinhas/virologia , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Doença de Marek/virologia , Doença de Marek/prevenção & controle , Herpesvirus Galináceo 2/genética , Herpesvirus Galináceo 2/patogenicidade , Virulência/genética , Proteínas Oncogênicas Virais/genética , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/virologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/epidemiologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Doença de Marek/genética , Vacinas contra Doença de Marek/imunologia , Vacinação/veterinária
20.
Salud Colect ; 20: e4541, 2024 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733976

RESUMO

Following the authorization the use of COVID-19 vaccines in babies age six months through children four years old in the United States, some individuals (parents, pediatricians, and communicators) framed COVID-19 vaccination as an issue of access, while many others expressed hesitancy and some resisted recommendations from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In this context, this study aimed to explore: 1) divergent reactions to the authorization of COVID-19 vaccine use in children aged six months to four years; and 2) opposing logics underlying attitudes towards pro-vaccination, anti-vaccination, and vaccine hesitancy regarding COVID-19 vaccines. To achieve this, a digital ethnography was conducted, involving monitoring of 5,700 reactions to a series of eight infographics published on social media by the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and participant observation in an online focus group over a one-year period, from December 2021 to December 2022, consisting of 18 mothers. The findings suggest that healthcare professionals should consider different notions of "risk" when interacting with patients, especially those who are hesitant to vaccinate.


Luego de que se autorizara en EEUU el uso de la vacuna contra el covid-19 en bebés de seis meses a niños y niñas de cuatro años, algunas personas (padres, madres, pediatras y comunicadores) plantearon la vacunación contra el covid-19 como una cuestión de acceso; sin embargo, muchas otras se mostraron reacias y otras se resistieron a las recomendaciones de los Centers for Disease Control and Prevention de EEUU. En este contexto, este estudio se propuso explorar: 1) reacciones divergentes ante la autorización de uso de la vacuna contra el covid-19 en niños y niñas de seis meses a cuatro años; y 2) lógicas contrapuestas que subyacen a las actitudes provacunación, antivacunación y vacilación ante las vacunas contra el covid-19. Para ello, se realizó una etnografía digital, con monitoreo de 5.700 reacciones a una serie de ocho infografías publicadas en las redes sociales por la John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, y observación participante en un grupo focal en línea a lo largo de un año, desde diciembre de 2021 hasta diciembre de 2022, conformado por 18 madres. Los resultados indican que el personal médico debe considerar diferentes nociones de "riesgo" al interactuar con los pacientes, especialmente aquellos que dudan en vacunarse.


Assuntos
Antropologia Cultural , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Hesitação Vacinal , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos , Lactente , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Grupos Focais , Masculino , Vacinação , Adulto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...