Sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril for patients with acute myocardial infarction: win-ratio analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial.

AIM: The win ratio can incorporate different types of outcomes and enhance statistical power, making it a useful method for analysing composite outcomes in cardiovascular trials. The application of this approach to the PARADISE-MI trial provides an additional perspective into understanding the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial, which randomly assigned patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary congestion, or both to receive either sacubitril/valsartan (97 mg of sacubitril and 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or ramipril (5 mg twice daily) in addition to guideline-recommended therapy. The principal composite outcome was analysed in the hierarchical order of death due to cardiovascular causes, first hospitalization for heart failure, and first outpatient episode of symptomatic heart failure. We included events confirmed by the clinical events classification (CEC) committee as well as events identified by investigators that did not meet study definitions. Results were analysed by the unmatched win-ratio method. A win ratio that exceeds 1.00 reflects a better outcome. A total of 5661 patients underwent randomization; 2830 were assigned to receive sacubitril/valsartan and 2831 to receive ramipril. The hierarchical analysis of the principal composite outcome demonstrated a larger number of wins (1 265 767 [15.7%]) than losses (1 079 502 [13.4%]) in the sacubitril/valsartan group (win ratio of 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.33; p = 0.015). Sensitivity analyses using alternative definitions of the composite outcome showed results similar to those of the principal analysis, except for analysis restricted to events that met CEC definitions (win ratio of 1.11, 95% CI 0.96-1.30; p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: In this post-hoc analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial using the win ratio and including investigator-identified events not having CEC confirmation, sacubitril/valsartan was superior to ramipril among high-risk survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Ramipril Improves Endothelial Function and Increases the Number of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Endothelial dysfunction and reduced number of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in peripheral blood are contributing factors to cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Endothelial progenitor cell proliferation is regulated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce cardiovascular mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. METHODS: This was a randomized trial including 37 female SLE patients without cardiovascular risk factors allocated into 2 groups: 19 patients received ramipril 10 mg/d for 12 weeks (IG) and 18 patients maintained without ramipril (CG). Endothelial function was assessed by brachial artery ultrasound measuring flow-mediated dilation, and EPCs were quantified by flow cytometry and cell culture, at baseline and after 12 weeks. Serum VEGF levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Statistical analysis was intention to treat. p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, higher flow-mediated dilation (6.17% vs. 11.14%, p < 0.001) was observed in IG, without change in CG (5.37% vs. 5.02%, p = 0.630). Higher number of EPC colony-forming units was also observed in IG (21.3 ± 10.4 vs. 31.6 ± 8.5, p < 0.001), without difference in CG ( p = 0.714). No difference was found in EPCs evaluated by flow cytometry. Vascular endothelial growth factor level increased after 12 weeks in IG ( p = 0.048), with no difference in CG ( p = 0.661). CONCLUSION: Ramipril improved endothelial function and increased the numbers of EPCs evaluated by cell culture and VEGF levels in SLE patients without cardiovascular risk factors. These data suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor bring an extra benefit beyond the hypotensive action and should be considered as a preferred antihypertensive drug in SLE patients.

Multicap to improve adherence after acute coronary syndromes: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to treatment after a myocardial infarction (MI) is poor, even in the early postinfarction period. Combining evidence-based drugs into a multicap could improve adherence in this population. No previous randomized trial assessing fixed-dose combination therapy has included patients early after a MI. We aimed to assess if a multicap containing four secondary prevention drugs increases adherence to treatment at 6 months after MI hospitalization. The study was designed as a randomized, parallel, open-label, controlled trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized within 7 days of a MI to either multicap or control group. The multicap group received a capsule containing aspirin, atenolol, ramipril, and simvastatin. The control group received each drug in separate pills. The primary outcome was adherence at 6 months. We also measured blood pressure, heart rate, serum cholesterol levels, C-reactive protein, and platelet aggregation. RESULTS: The study was stopped prematurely when 100 patients were included for futility. At 6 months, 92 (95.8%) patients were adherent to medical treatment: 98.0% in the multicap group and 93.5% in the control group [relative risk (RR) 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.14; p = 0.347]. There were no differences between groups in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.662), diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.784), heart rate (p = 0.533), total cholesterol (p = 0.760), LDL-c (p = 0.979), C-reactive protein (p = 0.399), or in the proportion of patients with adequate platelet aggregation inhibition (p = 0.600). CONCLUSIONS: The study did not find any improvement in the adherence at 6 months after a MI with a multicap-based strategy (Multicap for Increase Adherence After Acute Myocardial Infarction; [ ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02271178]).

Ramipril can alleviate the accumulation of renal mesangial matrix in rats with diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting insulin-like growth factor-1.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of Ramipril (RAM) on the expressions of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and renal mesangial matrix (RMM) in rats with diabetic nephropathy (DN). METHODS: The Sprague Dawley rats were divided into normal control (NC) group (n = 12), DN group (n = 11), and DN+RAM group (n = 12). The ratio of renal weight to body weight (RBT), fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, 24-h urine protein (TPU), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), renal pathological changes, the levels of IGF-1, fibronectin (FN), type IV collagen (Col-IV), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Compared with NC group, the RBT, FBG, HbA1c, TPU, BUN, Cr, and RMM in DN group were significantly increased (P < 0.05), the IGF-1, FN, and Col-IV were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05), while MMP was significantly downregulated (P < 0.05). Compared with DN group, the indexes except for the FBG and HbA1c in DN+RAM group were significantly improved (P < 0.05), among which IGF-1 exhibited significant positive correlation with TPU(r=0.937), FN(r=0.896) and Col-IV(r=0.871), while significant negative correlation with MMP-2 (r=-0.826) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: RAM may protect the kidneys by suppressing IGF-1 and mitigating the accumulation of RMM.

Ramipril can alleviate the accumulation of renal mesangial matrix in rats with diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting insulin-like growth factor-1

Purpose:To investigate the impact of Ramipril (RAM) on the expressions of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and renal mesangial matrix (RMM) in rats with diabetic nephropathy (DN).Methods:The Sprague Dawley rats were divided into normal control (NC) group (n = 12), DN group (n = 11), and DN+RAM group (n = 12). The ratio of renal weight to body weight (RBT), fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, 24-h urine protein (TPU), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), renal pathological changes, the levels of IGF-1, fibronectin (FN), type IV collagen (Col-IV), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 were compared among the groups.Results:Compared with NC group, the RBT, FBG, HbA1c, TPU, BUN, Cr, and RMM in DN group were significantly increased (P < 0.05), the IGF-1, FN, and Col-IV were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05), while MMP was significantly downregulated (P < 0.05). Compared with DN group, the indexes except for the FBG and HbA1c in DN+RAM group were significantly improved (P < 0.05), among which IGF-1 exhibited significant positive correlation with TPU(r=0.937), FN(r=0.896) and Col-IV(r=0.871), while significant negative correlation with MMP-2 (r=-0.826) (P<0.05).Conclusion:RAM may protect the kidneys by suppressing IGF-1 and mitigating the accumulation of RMM.(AU)

Ramipril can alleviate the accumulation of renal mesangial matrix in rats with diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting insulin-like growth factor-1

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the impact of Ramipril (RAM) on the expressions of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and renal mesangial matrix (RMM) in rats with diabetic nephropathy (DN). Methods: The Sprague Dawley rats were divided into normal control (NC) group (n = 12), DN group (n = 11), and DN+RAM group (n = 12). The ratio of renal weight to body weight (RBT), fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, 24-h urine protein (TPU), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), renal pathological changes, the levels of IGF-1, fibronectin (FN), type IV collagen (Col-IV), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 were compared among the groups. Results: Compared with NC group, the RBT, FBG, HbA1c, TPU, BUN, Cr, and RMM in DN group were significantly increased (P < 0.05), the IGF-1, FN, and Col-IV were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05), while MMP was significantly downregulated (P < 0.05). Compared with DN group, the indexes except for the FBG and HbA1c in DN+RAM group were significantly improved (P < 0.05), among which IGF-1 exhibited significant positive correlation with TPU(r=0.937), FN(r=0.896) and Col-IV(r=0.871), while significant negative correlation with MMP-2 (r=-0.826) (P<0.05). Conclusion: RAM may protect the kidneys by suppressing IGF-1 and mitigating the accumulation of RMM.

Efeitos do ramipril sobre a doença periodontal induzida experimentalmente em ratos / Effect of ramipril on periodontal disease experimentally induced in rats

A doença periodontal (DP) corresponde a um grupo de doenças inflamatórias que acomete as estruturas periodontais de proteção e de suporte e pode levar à perda dentária. A etiologia está relacionada à placa dentobacteriana que leva à produção de grande quantidade de citocinas pró-inflamatórias importantes na destruição tecidual. A angiotensina (Ang) II também pode contribuir para a inflamação e destruição tecidual no periodonto agindo como mediador chave. A utilização de drogas que atuem na cascata do sistema renina-angiotensina (SRA) poderia interferir no estado de saúde ou inflamação do tecido mole, na perda óssea alveolar e na expressão gênica dos componentes do SRA e mediadores inflamatórios. Portanto, o objetivo do presente trabalho foi investigar se o ramipril, um inibidor da enzima conversora de angiotensina (ECA), altera a progressão da DP induzida experimentalmente em ratos. Foi utilizado o modelo de indução da DP por colocação de ligadura ao redor do primeiro molar inferior direito de ratos. Os grupos com 10 animais cada, foram divididos em tratados com ramipril (via gavagem 10mg/kg/dia) ou água (veículo) durante 14 e 21 dias e o grupo Sham submetido à indução fictícia da DP. Outros quatro grupos foram submetidos ao pré-tratamento com ramipril durante os períodos de 7 e 14 dias e após a indução da DP e tratados por 14 ou 21 dias. As metodologias de avaliação foram: extração de RNA total, transcrição reversa seguida de reação em cadeia da polimerase quantitativa (RTqPCR),análises histológica e da perda óssea alveolar. Os dados foram analisados por meio de gráficos e os resultados foram submetidos à análise unidirecional de variância (ANOVA) e representaram médias e respectivos desvios-padrão. Diferenças entre os grupos foram consideradas estatisticamente significativas quando p < 0,05. Com base nos resultados obtidos pode-se concluir que o ramipril foi capaz de reduzir a progressão da perda óssea no grupo tratado por 21 dias (DP-21d-Rami)...

Periodontitis (PD) consists of a group of inflammatory diseases that affect the protecting and supporting periodontal structures, and may lead to tooth loss. Theetiology is related to the dentobacterial plaque that produces a large amount of proinflammatory cytokines with an important action on tissue destruction. Angiotensin(Ang) II may also contribute to the inflammation and periodontal tissue destruction byacting as a key mediator. The use of drugs that affect the cascade of the reninangiotensin system (RAS) might interfere with the healthy or inflammatory status ofthe soft tissue, alveolar bone loss and gene expression of RAS components and inflammatory mediators. Therefore, the aim of this work was to evaluate whether ramipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, alters the progression of experimentally-induced PD in rats. The model of PD induction by placement of a silk ligature around the right lower first molar was used. Groups with 10 animals each were divided into ramipril-treated (10 mg/kg/day, via gavage), water (vehicle) and thesham surgery group (sham) for 7 or 14 days previously to PD induction and after this period the drug was administered for 14 and 21 days. The techniques employed were: total RNA extraction, reverse transcription followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as well as histological and alveolar bone loss analyses. Data were analyzed by means of graphs and the results submitted to unidirectional analysis of variance (ANOVA) and represent the means with respective standard deviations. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant whenp < 0.05. Based on the results obtained in this work, it was concluded that ramipril was able to reduce the progression of alveolar bone loss in the group treated for 21...

Efeitos do ramipril sobre a doença periodontal induzida experimentalmente em ratos / Effect of ramipril on periodontal disease experimentally induced in rats

A doença periodontal (DP) corresponde a um grupo de doenças inflamatórias que acomete as estruturas periodontais de proteção e de suporte e pode levar à perda dentária. A etiologia está relacionada à placa dentobacteriana que leva à produção de grande quantidade de citocinas pró-inflamatórias importantes na destruição tecidual. A angiotensina (Ang) II também pode contribuir para a inflamação e destruição tecidual no periodonto agindo como mediador chave. A utilização de drogas que atuem na cascata do sistema renina-angiotensina (SRA) poderia interferir no estado de saúde ou inflamação do tecido mole, na perda óssea alveolar e na expressão gênica dos componentes do SRA e mediadores inflamatórios. Portanto, o objetivo do presente trabalho foi investigar se o ramipril, um inibidor da enzima conversora de angiotensina (ECA), altera a progressão da DP induzida experimentalmente em ratos. Foi utilizado o modelo de indução da DP por colocação de ligadura ao redor do primeiro molar inferior direito de ratos. Os grupos com 10 animais cada, foram divididos em tratados com ramipril (via gavagem 10mg/kg/dia) ou água (veículo) durante 14 e 21 dias e o grupo Sham submetido à indução fictícia da DP. Outros quatro grupos foram submetidos ao pré-tratamento com ramipril durante os períodos de 7 e 14 dias e após a indução da DP e tratados por 14 ou 21 dias. As metodologias de avaliação foram: extração de RNA total, transcrição reversa seguida de reação em cadeia da polimerase quantitativa (RTqPCR),análises histológica e da perda óssea alveolar. Os dados foram analisados por meio de gráficos e os resultados foram submetidos à análise unidirecional de variância (ANOVA) e representaram médias e respectivos desvios-padrão. Diferenças entre os grupos foram consideradas estatisticamente significativas quando p < 0,05. Com base nos resultados obtidos pode-se concluir que o ramipril foi capaz de reduzir a progressão da perda óssea no grupo tratado por 21 dias (DP-21d-Rami)...

Periodontitis (PD) consists of a group of inflammatory diseases that affect the protecting and supporting periodontal structures, and may lead to tooth loss. Theetiology is related to the dentobacterial plaque that produces a large amount of proinflammatory cytokines with an important action on tissue destruction. Angiotensin(Ang) II may also contribute to the inflammation and periodontal tissue destruction byacting as a key mediator. The use of drugs that affect the cascade of the reninangiotensin system (RAS) might interfere with the healthy or inflammatory status ofthe soft tissue, alveolar bone loss and gene expression of RAS components and inflammatory mediators. Therefore, the aim of this work was to evaluate whether ramipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, alters the progression of experimentally-induced PD in rats. The model of PD induction by placement of a silk ligature around the right lower first molar was used. Groups with 10 animals each were divided into ramipril-treated (10 mg/kg/day, via gavage), water (vehicle) and thesham surgery group (sham) for 7 or 14 days previously to PD induction and after this period the drug was administered for 14 and 21 days. The techniques employed were: total RNA extraction, reverse transcription followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as well as histological and alveolar bone loss analyses. Data were analyzed by means of graphs and the results submitted to unidirectional analysis of variance (ANOVA) and represent the means with respective standard deviations. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant whenp < 0.05. Based on the results obtained in this work, it was concluded that ramipril was able to reduce the progression of alveolar bone loss in the group treated for 21...

Efficacy and safety of two ramipril and hydrochlorothiazide fixed-dose combination formulations in adults with stage 1 or stage 2 arterial hypertension evaluated by using ABPM.

BACKGROUND: Fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive agents demonstrate advantages in terms of efficacy, tolerability, and treatment adherence. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 ramipril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) fixed-dose combinations in patients with hypertension stage 1 or 2. Patients' blood pressure (BP) profiles were evaluated by using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, noninferiority trial of adult patients (age ≥18 years) with hypertension stage 1 or 2 and systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 140 to 179 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90 to 109 mm Hg. After a 2-week washout period, eligible patients were randomized to receive 1 of 2 ramipril/HCTZ fixed-dose combination formulations (5/25 mg/d) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the difference in 24-hour ABPM SBP/DBP mean reductions between groups after 8 weeks of treatment. The secondary end points were the changes in daytime and nighttime ABPM and in office BP. Safety profile and tolerability assessments included monitoring of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients with hypertension (54 in group A [test formulation] and 48 in group B [reference formulation]), aged 27 to 85 years, completed the 8-week treatment period. The decreases in SBP and DBP according to 24-hour ABPM from baseline to week 8 were significant and similar in both groups. SBP decreased from 149.1 to 133.0 mm Hg (-16.1 mm Hg) in group A and from 146.2 to 130.6 mm Hg in group B (-15.6 mm Hg) (P = 0.8537); DBP was reduced by 8.8 mm Hg in group A and by 8.5 mm Hg in group B (P = 0.8748). Because the lower 95% CI limit for the difference between groups A and B of 3.96 mm Hg in SBP and 3.54 mm Hg in DBP was lower than that preestablished by the trial protocol (4 mm Hg), noninferiority of the test formulation was demonstrated compared with the reference formulation. For the secondary end points, there was no significant difference between groups in SBP and DBP during daytime or nighttime at the end of week 8. Office BP was significantly reduced in both treatment groups, with no significant differences between groups. The incidence of adverse events was 23.7% in group A and 21.7% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment options were well tolerated and equally reduced BP. The results support the conclusion that group A (new fixed-dose combination of ramipril/HCTZ) was noninferior to group B (reference medication in Brazil). ISRCTN Register: ISRCTN05051235.

Análisis crítico de un artículo: La suspensión de inhibidores de la bomba de protones induciría síntomas de reflujo / Critically appraised article

Background & Aims: Rebound acid hypersecretion (RAHS) has been demonstrated after 8 weeks of treatment with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). IfRAHS induces acid-related symptoms, this might lead to PPI dependency and thus have important implications. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 120 healthy volunteers was conducted. Participants were randomized to 12 weeks of placebo or 8 weeks of esomeprazole 40 mg/d followed by 4 weeks with placebo. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) was filled out weekly. A score of >2 on 1 of the questions regarding heartburn, acid regurgitation, or dyspepsia was defined as a clinically relevant acid-related symptom. Results: There were no significant differences between groups in GSRS scores at baseline. GSRS scores for acid-related symptoms were significantly higher in the PPIgroup at week 10 (1.4 ± 1.4 vs 1.2 ± 0.9; P = .023), week 11 (1.4 ± 1.4 vs 1.2 ± 0.9; P = .009), and week 12 (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.0 ± 0.3; P = .001). Forty-four percent (26/59) of those randomized to PPI reported >1 relevant, acid-related symptom in weeks 9-12 compared with 15% (9/59; P < .001) in the placebo group. The proportion reporting dyspepsia, heartburn, or acid regurgitation in the PPIgroup was 13 of 59 (22%) at week 10,13 of59 (22%) at week 11, and 12 of 58 (21%) at week 12. Corresponding figures in the placebo group were 7% at week 10 (P = .034), 5% at week 11 (P = .013), and 2% at week 12 (P = .001). Conclusions: PPI therapy for 8 weeks induces acid-related symptoms in healthy volunteers after withdrawal. This study indicates unrecognized aspects of PPI withdrawal and supports the hypothesis that RAHS has clinical implications.

Avaliação da segurança e eficácia da combinação ramipril/ anlodipino versus anlodipino em monoterapia no tratamento da hipertensão arterial pela monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial: estudo ATAR-MAPA / Evaluation of security and efficiency of the combination ramipril/amlopidine versus amlopidine in monotherapy for the treatment of arterial hypertension by the outpatient monitoring of blood pressure: study ATAR-ABPM

O objetivo do estudo é comparar a eficácia e a tolerabilidade da combinação fixa ramipril/anlodipino e do anlodipino em monoterapia para o tratamento de hipertensão arterial. Após um período de duas semanas de retirada de anti-hipertensivos e uso de placebo (washout), 265 pacientes hipertensos com idades entre 40 e 79 anos foram randomizados para iniciar tratamento com 2,5/2,5 mg de ramipril/anlodipino em combinação fixa ou 2,5 mg de anlodipino, que foram titulados para 5/5 mg e 10/10 mg de ramipril/anlodipino, ou 5 e 10 mg de anlodipino, se necessário. No total, 131 pacientes foram randomizados para terapia combinada e 134 para monoterapia sem diferenças significativas entre os grupos nas características basais e nos níveis de pressão arterial (PA) inicial. A redução média da PA sistólica nos períodos do dia (20,36 ± 13,42 versus 15,86 ± 12,71 mmHg; p = 0,003) e da noite (17,6 ± 17,61 versus 14,09 ± 14,32 mmHg; p = 0,051), avaliada pela monitorização ambulatorial de pressão arterial (MAPA), foi significativamente maior no grupo tratamento com combinação fixa. A redução média da PA diastólica durante o dia à MAPA (11,28 ± 8,29 versus 8,96 ± 8,16 versus mmHg; p = 0,009) foi maior no grupo terapia combinada, mas não durante a noite (8,42 ± 11,16 mmHg versus 7,70 ± 8,63; p = 0,567). A redução média da PA sistólica e diastólica em 24 horas à MAPA também foi maior no grupo tratamento combinado. Ambas as opções terapêuticas promoveram redução significativa da PA sistólica e diastólica; porém, os resultados observados foram melhores no grupo de combinação fixa ramipril/anlodipino

This study aims to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose ramipril/amlodipine combination and amlodipine monotherapy for the treatment of hypertension. After a 2-week placebo washout, 265 hypertensive patients aged 40 to 79 years were randomized for 2.5/2.5 mg ramipril/amlodipine or 2.5 mg amlodipine, titrated to ramipril/amlodipine 5/5 mg and 10/10 mg , or amlodipine 5 and 10 mg, if necessary. A total of 131 patients were assigned to combination therapy, and 134 to monotherapy with no significant differences among them in basal characteristics and blood pressure (BP) levels at the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Mean reduction in daytime (20.36 ± 13.42 versus 15.86 ± 12.71 mmHg; p = 0.003) and night-time systolic BP on ABPM (17.6 ± 17.61 versus 14.09 ± 14.32 mmHg; p = 0.051) were significantly higher in the combination therapy. Mean daytime diastolic BP reduction on ABPM (11.28 ± 8.29 versus 8.96 ± 8.16 versus mmHg; p = 0.009) was greater in the combination group, but not at night-time (8.42 ± 11.16 mmHg versus 7.70 ± 8.63; p = 0.567). Mean change in 24-h systolic and diastolic BP on ABPM were also greater in the combination treatment. Both treatments promoted a marked reduction in systolic and diastolic BP, and the results observed were better in the ramipril/amlodipine combination group.

[Critically appraised article]. / Análisis crítico de un artículo: La adición de antagonistas del receptor de angiotensina 2 al tratamiento con inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina en pacientes con riesgo de enfermedad renal, aumenta la incidencia de falla renal y la necesidad de diálisis.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are known to reduce proteinuria. Their combination might be more effective than either treatment alone, but long-term data for comparative changes in renal function are not available. We investigated the renal effects of ramipril (an ACE inhibitor), telmisartan (an ARB), and their combination in patients aged 55 years or older with established atherosclerotic vascular disease or with diabetes with end-organ damage. METHODS: The trial ran from 2001 to 2007. After a 3-week run-in period, 25,620 participants were randomly assigned to ramipril 10 mg a day (n = 8,576), telmisartan 80 mg a day (n = 8,542), or to a combination of both drugs (n = 8,502; median follow-up was 56 months), and renal function and proteinuria were measured. The primary renal outcome was a composite of dialysis, doubling of serum creatinine, and death. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153101. FINDINGS: 784 patients permanently discontinued randomised therapy during the trial because of hypotensive symptoms (406 on combination therapy, 149 on ramipril, and 229 on telmisartan). The number of events for the composite primary outcome was similar for telmisartan (n = 1,147 [13.4%]) and ramipril (1,150 [13.5%]; hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09), but was increased with combination therapy (1,233 [14.5%]; HR 1.09, 1.01-1.18, p = 0.037). The secondary renal outcome, dialysis or doubling of serum creatinine, was similar with telmisartan (189 [2.21%]) and ramipril (174 [2.03%];HR 1.09, 0.89-1.34) and more frequent with combination therapy (212 [2.49%]: HR 1.24,1.01-1.51, p = 0.038). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined least with ramipril compared with telmisartan (-2.82 [SD 17.2] mL/min/1.73 m² vs -4.12 [17.4], p < 0.0001) or combination therapy (-6.11 [17.9], p < 0.0001). The increase in urinary albumin excretion was less with telmisartan (p = 0.004) or with combination therapy (p=0.001) than with ramipril. INTERPRETATION: In people at high vascular risk, telmisartans effects on major renal outcomes are similar to ramipril. Although combination therapy reduces proteinuria to a greater extent than monotherapy, overall it worsens major renal outcomes.

Long-term effect of rosiglitazone and/or ramipril on the incidence of diabetes: DREAM On (Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication Ongoing Follow-up) Investigators

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) trial reported that 3 years of therapy with rosiglitazone reduced the primary outcome of diabetes or death by 60%. Here we investigated whether an effect on diabetes prevention persists more than 1.5 years after therapy has been discontinued. METHODS: The DREAM On passive follow-up study was conducted at 49 of the 191 DREAM sites. Consenting participants were invited to have a repeat OGTT 1-2 years after active therapy ended. A diagnosis of diabetes at that time was based on either a fasting or 2 h plasma glucose level of ¡Ý7.0 mmol/l or ¡Ý11.1 mmol/l, respectively, or a confirmed diagnosis by a non-study physician. Regression to normoglycaemia was defined as a fasting and 2 h plasma glucose level of <6.1 mmol/l and <7.8 mmol/l, respectively. RESULTS: After a median of 1.6 years after the end of the trial and 4.3 years after randomisation, rosiglitazone participants had a 39% lower incidence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.70; p < 0.0001) and 17% more regression to normoglycaemia (95% CI 1.01-1.34; p = 0.034). When the analysis was restricted to the passive follow-up period, a similar incidence of both the primary outcome and regression was observed in people from both treatment groups (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81-1.24 and HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.97-1.32, respectively). Similar effects were noted when new diabetes was analysed separately from death. Ramipril did not have any significant long-term effect. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Time-limited exposure to rosiglitazone reduces the longer term incidence of diabetes by delaying but not reversing the underlying disease process.

Maintenance of blood-pressure-lowering effect following a missed dose of aliskiren, irbesartan or ramipril: results of a randomized, double-blind study.

Most patients inadvertently miss an occasional dose of antihypertensive therapy, and hence drugs that provide sustained blood-pressure (BP) reduction beyond the 24-h dosing interval are desirable. The primary objective of this study was to compare the 24-h mean ambulatory BP reductions from baseline after a simulated missed dose of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren, irbesartan or ramipril. In this double-blind study, 654 hypertensive patients (24-h mean ambulatory diastolic BP (MADBP) >or=85 mm Hg) were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily aliskiren 150 mg, irbesartan 150 mg or ramipril 5 mg. Doses were doubled after 2 weeks. At day 42, patients were again randomized equally within each group to receive 1 day of placebo ('missed dose') on either day 42 or day 49. Patients with a successful 24-h ambulatory BP measurement at baseline and on day 42/49 were included in the analyses. The 24-h mean ambulatory systolic BP (MASBP)/MADBP reductions from baseline after a missed dose of aliskiren 300 mg (9.3/7.0 mm Hg) were similar to irbesartan 300 mg (9.5/7.3 mm Hg) and significantly larger than ramipril 10 mg (7.1/5.0 mm Hg, P

Reduced cortical renal GLUT1 expression induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetic spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Diabetes in spontaneously hypertensive rats is associated with cortical renal GLUT1 and GLUT2 overexpression. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme blockade on cortical renal GLUT1 and GLUT2 expression, urinary albumin and urinary TGF-beta1. Streptozotocin, 50 mg/kg, or citrate buffer (N = 16) was administered as a single injection into the tail vein in adult spontaneously hypertensive rats (approximately 260 g). Thirty days later, these diabetic spontaneously hypertensive rats received ramipril by gavage: 0.01 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) (D0.01, N = 14), 1 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) (D1, N = 9) or water (D, N = 11) for 15 days. Albumin and TGF-beta1 (24-h urine), direct arterial pressure, renal tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme activity (fluorometric assay), and GLUT1 and GLUT2 protein levels (Western blot, renal cortex) were determined. Glycemia and glycosuria were higher (P < 0.05) in the diabetic rats compared with controls, but similar between the diabetic groups. Diabetes in spontaneously hypertensive rats lowered renal tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme activity (40%), which was reduced further when higher ramipril doses were used. Diabetes associated with hypertension raised GLUT1 by 28% (P < 0.0001) and GLUT2 by 76% (P = 0.01), and both doses of ramipril equally reduced cortical GLUT1 (D vs D1 and vs D0.01, P < or = 0.001). GLUT2 levels were reduced in D0.01 (P < 0.05 vs D). Diabetes increased urinary albumin and TGF-beta1 urinary excretion, but the 15-day ramipril treatment (with either dose) did not reduce them. In conclusion, ramipril is effective in lowering renal tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme activity, as well as blocking cortical GLUT1 overexpression, which may be beneficial in arresting the development of diabetic nephropathy.

[Effects of ramipril and simvastatin on the oxidative stress of diabetic rats]. / Efeito do ramipril e da sinvastatina sobre o estresse oxidativo de ratos diabéticos.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if ramipril, with or without simultaneous use of simvastatin, would be capable of reducing oxidative stress of streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic rats. METHODS: The drugs were given to the diabetic rats for 2 weeks; oxidative stress was measured by dosage of total plasma antioxidant capacity (TRAP) and malondialdehyde (MDA). RESULTS: Ramipril, used alone, was capable of significantly increasing the antioxidative defenses of the diabetic rat; simvastatin, given alone or combined with ramipril in separate administrations, did not produce any significant effect on the oxidative stress; concomitant administration of ramipril and simvastatin significantly reduced the antioxidative plasmatic defenses of rats with chemically induced diabetes mellitus CONCLUSIONS: Our data corroborate the positive effect of ramipril upon plasma antioxidative defenses but did not confirm a possible beneficial effect of simvastatin in the model. More research is needed to clarify the paradoxal TRAP reduction verified with simultaneous administration of the drugs.

Telmisartan improves insulin resistance in high renin nonmodulating salt-sensitive hypertensives.

BACKGROUND: Nonmodulating (NMHT) is a high-renin subtype of salt sensitive hypertension, which additionally develops insulin resistance and oxidative stress. Conversely, modulating hypertensives (MHT) normally regulates renal hemodynamics after high sodium intake without metabolic impairment. We postulate that telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker with partial peroxisome proliferators-activated receptorgamma partial agonist, may improve insulin resistance compared with ramipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) in NMHT. METHODS: We studied 18 NMTH (32 +/- 5y nine men, BMI 29 +/- 3 kg/m2) and 16 MHT (34 +/- 4, 10 men, BMI 28 +/- 5 kg/m2) before and after the crossover administration of ramipril 10 mg (3 months) or telmisartan 80 mg (3 months). In each patient studied we measured, before and after each treatment period, office blood pressure, glycemia and insulinemia before and 60 and 120 min after a glucose overload (75 g), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein fractions, triglycerides and highly sensitive C-protein-reactive protein. After that, HOMA-IR Index was calculated. RESULTS: Plasma renin activity was higher in NMHT 4.4 +/- 0.5 than MHT 2.6 +/- 0.9 ng.ml.h; P < 0.01. Blood pressure was similarly reduced either in MHT or NMHT by ramipril (MHT: from 159 +/- 10/102 +/- 4 to 142 +/- 6/93 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05; NMHT: from 162 +/- 12/97 +/- 4 to 139 +/- 7/89 +/- 2 mmHg, P < 0.05) or telmisartan (MHT: from 154 +/- 8/96 +/- 5 to 137 +/- 6/88 +/- 4 mmHg, P < 0.05; NMHT: from 161 +/- 9/96 +/- 5 to 137 +/- 5/86 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). In NMHT, fasting glycemia (99 +/- 10 mg%) and insulinemia (16 +/- 4 microU%) and 120 min glycemia (110 +/- 2 mg%) and insulinemia (57 +/- 9 microU%) were higher than in MHT (fasting: 92 +/- 8 mg% and 9.2 +/- 2 mU%; 120 min: 95 +/- 5 and 21 +/- 5 microU%, P < 0.05). In MHT, after 3 months treatment with either ramipril or telmisartan no changes were found in fasting and 120 min glycemia and insulinemia. In NMHT, telmisartan, after 3 months treatment, significantly reduced fasting and 120 min insulinemia (fasting: 8.4 +/- 2, 120 min: 25 +/- 10 microU%; P < 0.01) compared either to basal values or ramipril treatment. Similarly, only in NMHT, compared with basal values and ramipril treatment, telmisartan improved the HOMA-IR index in both MHT (2.76 +/- 0.16 to 2.24 +/- 0.18, P < 0.05) and NMHT (from: 4.4 +/- 1 to 2.3 +/- 0.7) and triglyceride plasma levels (MHT: from 139 +/- 1.85 to 122 +/- 2.4 mg%, P < 0.05; NMHT: from: 223 +/- 12 to 146 +/- 10 mg%, P < 0.01). Finally, highly sensitive C-protein-reactive protein values were higher in NMHT (0.33 +/- 0.07 mg.dl) than in MHT (0.14 +/- 0.06 mg.dl; P < 0.01). Both treatments reduced highly sensitive C-protein-reactive protein in NMHT. (ramipril from 0.32 +/- 0.05 mg.dl to 0.26 +/- 0.06 m.dl (P < 0.05) and telmisartan from 0.34 +/- 0.05+/- to 0.20 +/- 0.05 mg.dl (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the improvement of the insulin sensitivity by telmisartan, instead of a similar effect on blood pressure shown by both drugs, could be ascribed to the PPAR agonistic action of telmisartan. This opens an interesting therapeutic approach for patients with hypertension and altered glycemic metabolism.

Reduced cortical renal GLUT1 expression induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetic spontaneously hypertensive rats

Diabetes in spontaneously hypertensive rats is associated with cortical renal GLUT1 and GLUT2 overexpression. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme blockade on cortical renal GLUT1 and GLUT2 expression, urinary albumin and urinary TGF-¦Â1. Streptozotocin, 50 mg/kg, or citrate buffer (N = 16) was administered as a single injection into the tail vein in adult spontaneously hypertensive rats (~260 g). Thirty days later, these diabetic spontaneously hypertensive rats received ramipril by gavage: 0.01 mg¡¤kg-1¡¤day-1 (D0.01, N = 14), 1 mg¡¤kg-1¡¤day-1 (D1, N = 9) or water (D, N = 11) for 15 days. Albumin and TGF-¦Â1 (24-h urine), direct arterial pressure, renal tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme activity (fluorometric assay), and GLUT1 and GLUT2 protein levels (Western blot, renal cortex) were determined. Glycemia and glycosuria were higher (P < 0.05) in the diabetic rats compared with controls, but similar between the diabetic groups. Diabetes in spontaneously hypertensive rats lowered renal tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme activity (40 percent), which was reduced further when higher ramipril doses were used. Diabetes associated with hypertension raised GLUT1 by 28 percent (P < 0.0001) and GLUT2 by 76 percent (P = 0.01), and both doses of ramipril equally reduced cortical GLUT1 (D vs D1 and vs D0.01, P ¡Ü 0.001). GLUT2 levels were reduced in D0.01 (P < 0.05 vs D). Diabetes increased urinary albumin and TGF-¦Â1 urinary excretion, but the 15-day ramipril treatment (with either dose) did not reduce them. In conclusion, ramipril is effective in lowering renal tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme activity, as well as blocking cortical GLUT1 overexpression, which may be beneficial in arresting the development of diabetic nephropathy.

An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.

BACKGROUND: A combination of antihypertensive agents of different drug classes in a fixed-dose combination (FDC) may offer advantages in terms of efficacy, tolerability, and treatment compliance. Combination of a calcium channel blocker with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor may act synergistically to reduce blood pressure (BP). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of an amlodipine/ramipril FDC with those of amlodipine monotherapy. METHODS: This 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted at 8 centers across Brazil. Patients with stage 1 or 2 essential hypertension were enrolled. After a 2-week placebo run-in phase, patients received amlodipine/ramipril 2.5/2.5 mg or amlodipine 2.5 mg, after which the doses were titrated, based on BP, to 5/5 then 10/10 mg (amlodipine/ramipril) and 5 then 10 mg (amlodipine). The primary end point was BP measured in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Hematology and serum biochemistry were assessed at baseline and study end. Tolerability was assessed using patient interview, laboratory analysis, and physical examination, including measurement of ankle circumference to assess peripheral edema. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients completed the study (age range, 40-79 years; FDC group, 117 patients [mean dose, 7.60/7.60 mg]; monotherapy, 105 patients [mean dose, 7.97 mg]). The mean (SD) changes in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), as measured using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and in the physician's office, were significantly greater with combination therapy than monotherapy, with the exception of office DBP (ABPM, -20.76 [1.25] vs -15.80 [1.18] mm Hg and -11.71 [0.78] vs -8.61 [0.74] mm Hg, respectively [both, P = 0.004]; office, -27.51 [1.40] vs -22.84 [1.33] mm Hg [P = 0.012] and -16.41 [0.79] vs -14.64 [0.75] mm Hg [P = NS], respectively). In the ITT analysis, the mean changes in ambulatory, but not office-based, BP were statistically significant (ABPM: SBP, -20.21 [1.14] vs -15.31 [1.12] mm Hg and DBP, -11.61 [0.72] vs -8.42 [0.70] mm Hg, respectively [both, P = 0.002]; office: SBP, -26.60 [1.34] vs -22.97 [1.30] mm Hg and DBP, -16.48 [0.78] vs -14.48 [0.75] mm Hg [both, P = NS]). Twenty-nine patients (22.1%) treated with combination therapy and 41 patients (30.6%) treated with monotherapy experienced > or =1 adverse event considered possibly related to study drug. The combination-therapy group had lower prevalence of edema (7.6% vs 18.7%; P = 0.011) and a similar prevalence of dry cough (3.8% vs 0.8%; P = NS). No clinically significant changes in laboratory values were found in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of patients with essential hypertension, the amlodipine/ramipril FDC was associated with significantly reduced ambulatory and office-measured BP compared with amlodipine monotherapy, with the exception of office DBP. Both treatments were well tolerated.