Comparative study of pain in women submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Acta cir. bras
; 32(6): 475-481, June 2017. tab, graf
Artigo
em Inglês
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-886205
Biblioteca responsável:
BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract Purpose:
To evaluate postoperative pain in patients submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with four ports versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with only one port.Methods:
Twenty-one patients were included in the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 19 other patients in the single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. A VAS was used for the assessment of postoperative pain at three time points. Differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05.Results:
Intergroup analysis showed no significant difference in VAS scores between the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups at any of the time points studied.Conclusion:
This study found no significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups.
Texto completo:
Disponível
Coleções:
Bases de dados internacionais
Base de dados:
LILACS
Assunto principal:
Dor Pós-Operatória
/
Colelitíase
/
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio clínico controlado
/
Estudo observacional
/
Estudo de prevalência
/
Fatores de risco
Limite:
Adulto
/
Feminino
/
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Acta cir. bras
Assunto da revista:
CIRURGIA GERAL
/
Procedimentos Cir£rgicos Operat¢rios
Ano de publicação:
2017
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
País de afiliação:
Brasil
Instituição/País de afiliação:
Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro/BR