Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oncological strategies for locally advanced rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases, interval strategy versus rectum first strategy: a comparison of short-term outcomes
Salvador-Rosés, H; López-Ben, S; Casellas-Robert, M; Planellas, P; Gómez-Romeu, N; Farrés, R; Ramos, E; Codina-Cazador, A; Figueras, J.
Afiliação
  • Salvador-Rosés, H; Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital. Department of Digestive Surgery. Girona. Spain
  • López-Ben, S; Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital. Department of Digestive Surgery. Girona. Spain
  • Casellas-Robert, M; Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital. Department of Digestive Surgery. Girona. Spain
  • Planellas, P; Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital. Department of Digestive Surgery. Girona. Spain
  • Gómez-Romeu, N; Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital. Department of Digestive Surgery. Girona. Spain
  • Farrés, R; Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital. Department of Digestive Surgery. Girona. Spain
  • Ramos, E; University of Barcelona. Bellvitge Hospital. Department of Digestive Surgery. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat. Spain
  • Codina-Cazador, A; Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital. Department of Digestive Surgery. Girona. Spain
  • Figueras, J; University of Barcelona. Barcelona. Spain
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 20(8): 1018-1025, ago. 2018. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-173685
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: BNCS
ABSTRACT

Background:

The goal of treatment for patients with synchronous liver metastases (SLM) from rectal cancer is to achieve a complete resection of both tumor locations. For patients with symptomatic locally advanced rectal cancer with resectable SLM at diagnosis, our usual strategy has been the rectum first approach (RF). However, since 2014, we advocate for the interval approach (IS) that involves the administration of chemo-radiotherapy followed by the resection of the SLM in the interval of time between rectal cancer radiation and rectal surgery.

Methods:

From 2010 to 2016, 16 patients were treated according to this new strategy and 19 were treated according RF strategy. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed with an intention-to-treat perspective. Complete resection rate, duration of the treatment and morbi-mortality were the main outcomes.

Results:

The complete resection rate in the IS was higher (100%, n = 16) compared to the RF (74%, n = 14, p = 0.049) and the duration of the strategy was shorter (6 vs. 9 months, respectively, p = 0.006). The incidence of severe complications after liver surgery was 14% (n = 2) in the RF and 0% in the IS (p = 1.000), and after rectal surgery was 24% (n = 4) and 12% (n = 2), respectively (p = 1.000).

Conclusion:

The IS is a feasible and safe strategy that procures higher level of complete resection rate in a shorter period of time compared to RF strategy
RESUMEN
No disponible
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Fatores de risco Limite: Idoso / Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital/Spain / University of Barcelona/Spain
Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Fatores de risco Limite: Idoso / Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital/Spain / University of Barcelona/Spain
...