Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements
PEREIRA, Jefferson Ricardo; ROSA, Ricardo Abreu da; SÓ, Marcus Vinícius Reis; AFONSO, Daniele; KUGA, Milton Carlos; HONÓRIO, Heitor Marques; VALLE, Accácio Lins do; VIDOTTI, Hugo Alberto.
Afiliação
  • PEREIRA, Jefferson Ricardo; Dental School. Dental School. BR
  • ROSA, Ricardo Abreu da; Dental School. Dental School. BR
  • SÓ, Marcus Vinícius Reis; Dental School. Dental School. BR
  • AFONSO, Daniele; Dental School. Dental School. BR
  • KUGA, Milton Carlos; Dental School. Dental School. BR
  • HONÓRIO, Heitor Marques; Dental School. Dental School. BR
  • VALLE, Accácio Lins do; Dental School. Dental School. BR
  • VIDOTTI, Hugo Alberto; Dental School. Dental School. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 22(5): 390-396, Sep-Oct/2014. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: lil-729841
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin after cementation with glass ionomer (GICs) and resinmodified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty human maxillary canines were transversally sectioned at 15 mm from the apex. Canals were prepared with a step back technique until the application of a #55 K-file and filled. Post spaces were prepared and specimens were divided into five groups according to the cement used for post cementation: Luting & Lining Cement; Fuji II LC Improved; RelyX Luting; Ketac Cem; and Ionoseal. After cementation of the glass fiber posts, all roots were stored at 100% humidity until testing. For push-out test, 1-mm thick slices were produced. The push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute and the values (MPa) were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene's tests and by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Fiber posts cemented using Luting & Lining Cement, Fuji II LC Improved, and Ketac Cem presented the highest bond strength to root dentin, followed by RelyX Luting. Ionoseal presented the lowest bond strength values (P>0.05). The post level did not influence the bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin (P=0.148). The major cause of failure was cohesive at the cement for all GICs and RMGICs. CONCLUSIONS: Except for Ionoseal, all cements provided satisfactory bond strength values. .
Assuntos


Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Base de dados: BBO - Odontologia / LILACS Assunto principal: Raiz Dentária / Técnica para Retentor Intrarradicular / Cimentos de Resina / Dentina / Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro Tipo de estudo: Ensaio clínico controlado / Estudo de avaliação Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: J. appl. oral sci Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: Dental School/BR

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Base de dados: BBO - Odontologia / LILACS Assunto principal: Raiz Dentária / Técnica para Retentor Intrarradicular / Cimentos de Resina / Dentina / Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro Tipo de estudo: Ensaio clínico controlado / Estudo de avaliação Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: J. appl. oral sci Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: Dental School/BR
...