Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantitative evaluation of the CEEM soil sampling intercomparison.
Wagner, G; Lischer, P; Theocharopoulos, S; Muntau, H; Desaules, A; Quevauviller, P.
Afiliação
  • Wagner G; Saarland University, Institute of Biogeography, Saarbrücken, Germany. g.wagner@rz.uni-sb.de
Sci Total Environ ; 264(1-2): 73-101, 2001 Jan 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11213190
The aim of the CEEM soil project was to compare and to test the soil sampling and sample preparation guidelines used in the member states of the European Union and Switzerland for investigations of background and large-scale contamination of soils, soil monitoring and environmental risk assessments. The results of the comparative evaluation of the sampling guidelines demonstrated that, in soil contamination studies carried out with different sampling strategies and methods, comparable results can hardly be expected. Therefore, a reference database (RDB) was established by the organisers, which acted as a basis for the quantitative comparison of the participants' results. The detected deviations were related to the methodological details of the individual strategies. The comparative evaluation concept consisted of three steps: The first step was a comparison of the participants' samples (which were both centrally and individually analysed) between each other, as well as with the reference data base (RDB) and some given soil quality standards on the level of concentrations present. The comparison was made using the example of the metals cadmium, copper, lead and zinc. As a second step, the absolute and relative deviations between the reference database and the participants' results (both centrally analysed under repeatability conditions) were calculated. The comparability of the samples with the RDB was categorised on four levels. Methods of exploratory statistical analysis were applied to estimate the differential method bias among the participants. The levels of error caused by sampling and sample preparation were compared with those caused by the analytical procedures. As a third step, the methodological profiles of the participants were compiled to concisely describe the different procedures used. They were related to the results to find out the main factors leading to their incomparability. The outcome of this evaluation process was a list of strategies and methods, which are problematic with respect to comparability, and should be standardised and/or specified in order to arrive at representative and comparable results in soil contamination studies throughout Europe. Pre-normative recommendations for harmonising European soil sampling guidelines and standard operating procedures have been outlined in Wagner G, Desules A, Muntau H, Theocharopoulos S. Comparative Evaluation of European Methods for Sampling and Sample Preparation of Soils for Inorganic Analysis (CEEM Soil). Final Report of the Contract SMT4-CT96-2085, Sci Total Environ 2001;264:181-186. Wagner G, Desaules A, Munatu H. Theocharopolous S, Quevauvaller Ph. Suggestions for harmonising sampling and sample pre-treatment procedures and improving quality assurance in pre-analytical steps of soil contamination studies. Paper 1.7 Sci Total Environ 2001b;264:103-118.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes do Solo / Monitoramento Ambiental Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2001 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Holanda
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes do Solo / Monitoramento Ambiental Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2001 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Holanda