Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are the baseline chances of survival comparable between the candidates for kidney transplantation who actually receive a graft and those who never get one?
Vianello, Alberto; Spinello, Michela; Palminteri, Giuseppe; Brunello, Anna; Calconi, Gilberto; Maresca, Maria-Cristina.
Afiliação
  • Vianello A; Division of Nephrology, Feltre General Hospital, Italy. modevian@hotmail.com
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 17(6): 1093-8, 2002 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12032202
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The superiority of kidney transplantation over dialysis for patient survival often is assessed by comparing the survival rate of candidates who get a graft to that of those on the waiting list who do not. This study tries to ascertain if the two groups are comparable in terms of their chances of surviving.

METHODS:

Of the 187 non-diabetic patients who entered our waiting list during 1998 and 1999 for first cadaveric kidney transplants, 81 received a graft and 106 did not. We compared the two groups for factors which could affect survival and that were present at the moment of acceptance on the list. As one of those factors was the clinical score quantifying health status, as given by the transplant team and rated from 1 (high risk) to 4 (very good), we assessed its reliability by evaluating the survival of the patients we transplanted between 1988 and 1996, grouped according to that score.

RESULTS:

Transplanted patients had been immunized less frequently (2 vs 13%; P=0.02), had a lower dialytic age (16.9+/-2.1 vs 22.9+/-2.1 months; P<0.05), and better clinical scores (2.9+/-0.1 vs 2.6+/-0.1; P<0.05). The two groups did not differ in age, gender, or the presence of single specific diseases. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the results of univariate analysis. The clinical score was a very strong predictor of patient survival, as the survival of patients transplanted from 1988 to 1996 progressively improved with better scores (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Transplanted patients actually differ from non-transplanted candidates with respect to various factors potentially affecting survival. The difference is highly relevant clinically, yet it is not easily detected when considering mainly the presence or absence of specific diseases. A global quantitative clinical parameter based on a thorough medical evaluation is required to identify differences.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Nephrol Dial Transplant Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Nephrol Dial Transplant Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália