Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized phase III study of fludarabine phosphate versus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone in patients with recurrent low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma previously treated with an alkylating agent or alkylator-containing regimen.
Klasa, Richard J; Meyer, Ralph M; Shustik, Chaim; Sawka, Carol A; Smith, Anne; Guévin, Raymond; Maksymiuk, Andrew; Rubinger, Morel; Samosh, Martin; Laplante, Suzanne; Grenier, Jean-François.
Afiliação
  • Klasa RJ; Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada. rklasa@bccancer.bc.ca
J Clin Oncol ; 20(24): 4649-54, 2002 Dec 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12488409
PURPOSE: To compare in a phase III study the safety and efficacy of fludarabine to that of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) in recurrent, low-grade, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after previous response to systemic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to fludarabine (25 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 to 5, every 28 days) or CVP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) and vincristine 1.2 mg/m(2) both intravenously on day 1 and prednisone 40 mg/m(2) orally on days 1 to 5, every 21 days). The primary outcome assessed was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes included treatment-free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 version 1.0 instrument. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were randomized, 47 to fludarabine and 44 to CVP. There was no difference in response rates, with 64% (complete response [CR], 9%) for fludarabine versus 52% (CR, 7%) for CVP (P =.72). With a median follow-up of 42 months, median PFS (11 months v 9.1 months; P =.03) and TFS (15 months v 11 months; P =.02) were superior in patients receiving fludarabine. No difference in median overall survival was detected (57 months for fludarabine v 44 months for CVP; P =.95). Three patients receiving fludarabine died of treatment-related toxicity compared with none of the patients receiving CVP. Peripheral neuropathy and alopecia were more common with CVP. Patients receiving fludarabine had higher scores for social function (P =.008); no other differences in QoL were detected. CONCLUSION: In recurrent low-grade lymphoma, fludarabine improves PFS, TFS, and social function scores in comparison with CVP but does not improve OS.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vidarabina / Vincristina / Linfoma não Hodgkin / Prednisona / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Ciclofosfamida Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá País de publicação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vidarabina / Vincristina / Linfoma não Hodgkin / Prednisona / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Ciclofosfamida Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá País de publicação: Estados Unidos