Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preoperative and operative factors to predict incontinence, impotence and stricture after radical prostatectomy.
Moul, J W; Mooneyhan, R M; Kao, T-C; McLeod, D G; Cruess, D F.
Afiliação
  • Moul JW; [1] Urology Service, Department of Surgery & Department of Clinical Investigation, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001 [2] Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 1(5): 242-249, 1998 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12496883
The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of patient-self reported post prostatectomy incontinence, impotence, bladder neck contracture or stricture, better, same or worse quality of life and willingness for same treatment again in a large group of radical prostatectomy (RP) patients and to determine if these morbidities are predictable with demographic, surgical or prostate cancer (PC) factors. Methods: A patient self-reporting questionnaire was completed and returned by 374 out of 458 eligible (81.7%) RP patients from one center, 267 (72.2%) have been operated since 1990 and all of whom were a minimum six month postoperative (75%>1 y). Questionnaire results were independently analyzed by a third party and correlated to demographic, operative, and tumor factors in an ongoing comprehensive PC database. Results: The patient self-reported incidence of post prostatectomy incontinence (any degree), impotence, and bladder neck contracture or stricture was 72.2, 87.4, and 25.9%, respectively. The reported rate of incontinence requiring protection was 39.0% and only 2.4% had persistent bladder neck contracture/stricture. Pathologic stage (continuous variable) was the only factor to significantly predict incontinence and no factor could predict impotence or bladder neck contracture/stricture in univariate analysis. No factor was predictive of morbidity by multivariate analysis. Despite incontinence and impotence significantly affecting QOL self-reporting (P=0.001, 0.001, respectively) and willingness to undergo RP again (P=0.001, 0.067, respectively), the majority of patients would choose surgery again. Conclusions: Although radical prostatectomy morbidity is common and affects patient-reported overall QOL, most patients would choose the same treatment again. Demographic, preoperative, operative, and tumor factors did not reliably predict patient-reported morbidity in this series.
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido