Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.
Beck, T M; Hesketh, P J; Madajewicz, S; Navari, R M; Pendergrass, K; Lester, E P; Kish, J A; Murphy, W K; Hainsworth, J D; Gandara, D R.
Afiliação
  • Beck TM; Mountain States Tumor Institute, Boise, ID 82712-6297.
J Clin Oncol ; 10(12): 1969-75, 1992 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1453211
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study compares the efficacy and safety of two single-dose regimens with the approved three-dose regimen of ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This multicenter study was a stratified, randomized, double-blind, and parallel group design. Chemotherapy-naive inpatients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg times three doses, every 4 hours or a single 8-mg or 32-mg dose followed by two saline doses that began 30 minutes before cisplatin administration. Cisplatin (high-dose > or = 100 mg/m2 or medium-dose 50 to 70 mg/m2) was given as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration.

RESULTS:

A total of 699 patients (359 high-dose, 340 medium-dose) were enrolled. Of these, 618 were assessable for efficacy (15 ineligible, 66 protocol deviations). The 32-mg dose was superior to the 8-mg single dose with regard to total number of emetic episodes (high-dose, P = .015; medium-dose, P < .001), complete response (no emetic episodes high-dose, 48% v 35%; P = .048; medium-dose, 73% v 50%; P = .001) and failure rate (> 5 emetic episodes, withdrawn or rescued high-dose, 20% v 34%; P = .018; medium-dose, 9% v 23%; P = .005). The 32-mg single dose was also superior to the 0.15 mg/kg times three dose regimen with regard to total number of emetic episodes (medium-dose, P = .033) and failure rate (high-dose, 20% v 36%; P = .009; medium-dose, 9% v 22%; P = .011). Ondansetron was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was headache. An approximate 10-fold increase in the incidence of clinically significant transaminase elevations was observed in the high-dose versus medium-dose cisplatin strata (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 6.5% v 0.7%; serum alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 5.0% v 0.3%).

CONCLUSION:

A 32-mg single dose of ondansetron is more effective than a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective as the standard regimen of 0.15 mg/kg times three doses in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vômito / Cisplatino / Ondansetron / Náusea Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 1992 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vômito / Cisplatino / Ondansetron / Náusea Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 1992 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA