[A comparison of the management of severe high blood pressure between 1999 and 2003 in France]. / Comparaison des prises en charge de l'hypertension artérielle sévère en France entre 1999 et 2003.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss
; 97(7-8): 793-8, 2004.
Article
em Fr
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-15506068
AIM: To measure the change in blood-pressure control in two populations of patients with severe high blood pressure between 1999 and 2003. METHOD: The French National Healthcare Fund performed two observational, cross-sectional surveys on the medical management of high blood pressure, the first in 1999 and the second in 2003. Each survey enrolled patients aged between 20 and 80 years old who filed a first-time request for exemption from co-payments for this long-term disorder. Study data was collected by the health fund's salaried physician advisors who directly examined the patients and from information gathered from each patient's attending physician. Adequate blood pressure control was defined according to the guidelines set out by the ANAES in 1997 and determined by calculating the average of the last three blood pressure figures recorded by the patient's attending physician (systolic [SBP] and diastolic [DBP] arterial blood pressures). RESULTS: 10,665 patients were enrolled in the 1999 survey and 2,584 were enrolled in the 2003 survey. The average age was 63.1 +/- 0.2 years in 1999 and 64.4 +/- 0.4 years in 2003. The proportion of diabetic patients in the two surveys remained stable: 27.5% +/- 1.0 in 1999 and 28.4% +/- 1.7 in 2003. Between 1999 and 2003, the percentage of patient who were treated for hypercholesterolemia increased from 44.0% +/- 1.1 to 54.3% +/- 1.9. Between 1999 and 2003, the proportion of patients who were considered well-controlled (SBP and DBP < 140/90 mmHg) or, if older than 60 years with isolated systolic high blood pressure (DBP < 90 mmHg and SBP < or = 160 mmHg) increased almost 5% points, going from 40.8% +/- 1.1 in 1999 to 45.5% +/- 1.9 in 2003. In diabetic patients, in whom the cut-off threshold is 130/85 mmHg, 6.7% +/- 1.1 were considered well-controlled in 1999 while 5.4% +/- 1.7 were deemed well-controlled in 2003. The proportion of well-controlled patients in the sub-group of hypertensive patients with renal failure (cut-off thresholds: 125/75 mmHg) remained relatively stable between 1999 and 2003: 5.2% [2.5; 7.9] versus 2.8% [0.5; 8.6]. CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in the proportion of well-controlled hypertensive patients between 1999 and 2003. This increase occurred at the same time as a number of initiatives (scientific societies, federal government as well as the National Health Fund) intended to sensitize physicians to the need to obtain adequate blood pressure control.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Padrões de Prática Médica
/
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
/
Fidelidade a Diretrizes
/
Hipertensão
/
Anti-Hipertensivos
Tipo de estudo:
Guideline
/
Observational_studies
/
Prevalence_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Qualitative_research
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País/Região como assunto:
Europa
Idioma:
Fr
Revista:
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss
Ano de publicação:
2004
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de publicação:
França