Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Junior medical students' notions of a 'good doctor' and related expectations: a mixed methods study.
Maudsley, Gillian; Williams, Evelyn M I; Taylor, David C M.
Afiliação
  • Maudsley G; Division of Public Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. phenq@liverpool.ac.uk
Med Educ ; 41(5): 476-86, 2007 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17470077
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore junior medical students' notions of a 'good doctor', given their ideas about success in Year 1, house jobs, and their attraction to medicine.

METHODS:

Study participants were junior medical students (1999 and 2001 entry cohorts studied thrice and twice, respectively) and prospective students of the University of Liverpool's 5-year, problem-based, community-orientated curriculum. Data collection and analysis used a 'mixed methods' approach, cross-sectional design, and brief questionnaire surveys. In an index survey, open questions (analysed inductively) explored house jobs and Year 1 success. They also generated 'good doctor' themes, which a second survey confirmed and 3 surveys ranked. A sixth survey explored motivation for choosing medicine (open question). Good doctor rankings were analysed by postcode for prospective medical students classified as school-leaver residents of England and Wales.

RESULTS:

Response rates were 91.4% (973) of the 2001-02 admission candidates, on interview days; 68.0% (155), 61.2% (137) and 77.9% (159) of the 1999 cohort (at entry, end-Year 1 and mid-Year 3, respectively), and 71.0% (201) and 71.0% (198) of the 2001 cohort (at entry and end-Year 1, respectively). From 9 themes generally compatible with self-reported motivations and expectations, junior and prospective medical students consistently valued a good doctor as a 'compassionate, patient-centred carer' and a 'listening, informative communicator' over an 'exemplary, responsible professional'. Prospective students from less affluent English and Welsh postcodes valued 'efficient, organised self-manager' very slightly more highly (r(s) = - 0.140, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS:

This research provided empirical evidence to support ongoing commentary about patients mostly seeking qualities related to communication, caring, and competence in doctors. Weak evidence that socio-economic status might affect notions of a good doctor is worth pursuing.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Competência Clínica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Med Educ Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Competência Clínica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Med Educ Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido