Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Revised classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome and the thrombotic risk in patients with autoimmune diseases.
Swadzba, J; Iwaniec, T; Szczeklik, A; Musial, J.
Afiliação
  • Swadzba J; Department of Medicine, Jagiellonian University School of Medicine, Kraków, Poland.
J Thromb Haemost ; 5(9): 1883-9, 2007 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17596131
BACKGROUND: The classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were updated in 2006. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze associations between clinical complications and laboratory test abnormalities typical for APS in a group of patients with autoimmune diseases, based on the recently updated criteria. PATIENTS/METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled into the study, with the majority (n = 235) suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus. Laboratory determinations included: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I (anti-beta(2)GPI) antibodies (ABs) [of both immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM class]. RESULTS: A significant association was found between laboratory and clinical features of APS; odds ratios (ORs) for thrombosis associated with the presence of LA, aCL, and anti-beta(2)GPI Abs were 4.04 [95% CI: 2.44-6.68], 3.71 (95% CI 2.32-5.92) and 2.57 (95% CI 1.60-4.1), respectively. Detailed analysis showed marked differences between the risk of clinical complications associated with the presence of an antibody in the IgG class (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.42-7.12, and OR 4.77, 95% CI 2.37-9.61 for aCL and anti-beta(2)GPI, respectively) and in the IgM class (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.31-3.70, and OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.15-3.14 for aCL and anti-beta(2)GPI, respectively). The postulated inclusion of anti-beta(2)GPI antibody positivity into the previous laboratory criteria changed only slightly the number of patients diagnosed with APS (from 112 to 117). CONCLUSIONS: The updated APS classification criteria clearly represent a step forward. However, our results argue against the use of overall positivity for aCL or anti-beta(2)GPI, and favor a clear distinction between the IgG and IgM classes of antiphospholipid ABs. Patients with both LA and anti-beta(2)GPI IgG or LA and aCL IgG positivity may represent the subgroups at the highest risk of thrombotic complications.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Autoimunes / Trombose / Síndrome Antifosfolipídica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Thromb Haemost Assunto da revista: HEMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Polônia País de publicação: Reino Unido
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Autoimunes / Trombose / Síndrome Antifosfolipídica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Thromb Haemost Assunto da revista: HEMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Polônia País de publicação: Reino Unido