Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of tropisetron in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and taxanes.
Tsavaris, N; Kosmas, C; Kopterides, P; Vadiaka, M; Kosmas, N; Skopelitis, H; Karadima, D; Kolliokosta, G; Tzima, E; Loukeris, D; Pagouni, E; Batziou, E; Xyla, V; Koufos, C.
Afiliação
  • Tsavaris N; Department of Pathophysiology, Oncology Unit, 'Laiko' General Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 17(2): 167-73, 2008 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18302654
ABSTRACT
Even though significant progress has been made, chemotherapy-induced emesis remains a challenging problem. Few studies focus on emesis in patients treated with carboplatin and the observation period is limited to the initial 24 h following chemotherapy. Thus, we investigated if tropisetron (T) monotherapy can adequately prevent acute and delayed emesis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving a moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) (carboplatin-containing) regimen. Furthermore, we explored the merits of adding dexamethasone (D) or alprazolam (A) to T, especially in the setting of a pre-existing high level of stress. We studied 60 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving carboplatin and taxanes in three consecutive cycles. During the first cycle, patients received 5 mg of T intravenously before chemotherapy and the same dose per os on each of the following 3 days. In the second cycle, T was co-administered with 8 mg of D once a day, while, during the third cycle, T was combined with per os A 0.25 mg every 12 h and continued over the following 3 days. Finally, we evaluated the impact of stress on the anti-emetic response achieved with the previously described regimens. The combination of T + A was superior to T monotherapy and the combination of T + D, regarding the prevention of acute and delayed emesis. Both T + A and T + D combinations led to appetite improvement, while patients receiving T + A experienced sedation more frequently. Interestingly, subgroup analysis revealed that patients without underlying stress obtained no further benefit by the addition of A or D, while both T + A and T + D combinations led to a better anti-emetic response in patients with stress. In conclusion, T monotherapy provides a satisfactory result in controlling nausea and emesis caused by a MEC regimen in patients without stress. However, the addition of D and, mainly, A improves its anti-emetic effect in patients with obvious stress.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Indóis / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Antieméticos Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Indóis / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Antieméticos Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia