Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do the cardiovascular risk profile and the degree of arterial wall calcification influence the performance of MDCT angiography of lower extremity arteries?
Meyer, B C; Werncke, T; Foert, E; Kruschewski, M; Hopfenmüller, W; Ribbe, C; Wolf, K-J; Albrecht, T.
Afiliação
  • Meyer BC; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Charité-University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany. Bernhard.Meyer@charite.de
Eur Radiol ; 20(2): 497-505, 2010 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19789885
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the influence of arterial wall calcifications on the accuracy of run-off computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and to analyse whether cardiovascular risk factors are predictors of compromising calcifications. METHODS: In 200 consecutive patients who underwent run-off CTA, calcifications were assessed in pelvic, thigh and calf arteries using a four-point scale. Fifty-nine patients with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were assessed by both techniques to estimate a threshold of compromising calcifications, defined as a decrease of sensitivity, specificity, PPV or NPV below the lower 95% confidence interval of overall results. Regression analysis was performed to investigate a potential relationship between compromising calcifications and presence of cardiovascular risk factors, advanced patient age and severe peripheral arterial disease (PAD). RESULTS: The highest Ca(++)-score was chosen as the cut-off for the regression analysis, as a relevant decrease of specificity (0.91; overall: 0.95) above the knee and of sensitivity (0.66; overall: 0.83), specificity (0.65; overall: 0.93), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) below the knee was observed. In the pelvic and thigh arteries, severe PAD (Fontaine Stage >or=III) showed the highest odds ratio for compromising calcifications (2.9), followed by diabetes mellitus (2.4), renal failure (2.1) and smoking (1.7). In the calf, renal failure (12.2) and diabetes mellitus (3.3) were the strongest predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes and renal failure should be considered as candidates for alternative vessel imaging in order to avoid inconclusive examination results.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arteriopatias Oclusivas / Calcinose / Doenças Vasculares Periféricas / Extremidade Inferior Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arteriopatias Oclusivas / Calcinose / Doenças Vasculares Periféricas / Extremidade Inferior Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Alemanha