Emergency department visual urinalysis versus laboratory urinalysis.
CJEM
; 11(6): 540-3, 2009 Nov.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-19922714
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the results of nurse-performed urinalysis (NPU) interpreted visually in the emergency department (ED) with laboratory performed urinalysis (LPU) interpreted by reflectance photometry. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study based on a convenience sample from my emergency practice. Emergency nurses, who were unaware of the study, performed usual dipstick analysis before sending the same urine sample to the laboratory for testing. RESULTS: Of 140 urinalyses performed during the study period, 124 were suitable for analysis. When compared with the reference standard LPU, the NPU had an overall sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95%-100%) and a specificity of 49% (95% CI 33%-65%) for the presence of any 1 of blood, leukocyte esterase, nitrites, protein, glucose or ketones in the urine. Of 20 falsely positive NPUs, 18 were a result of the nurse recording 1 or more components as "trace" positive. CONCLUSION: Although NPU does not yield identical results to LPU, a negative LPU is expected when the initial NPU in the ED is negative.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Urinálise
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
CJEM
Assunto da revista:
MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA
Ano de publicação:
2009
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Canadá
País de publicação:
Reino Unido