Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cross-reactivity of skin rashes with current antiepileptic drugs in Chinese population.
Wang, Xiang-qing; Lang, Sen-yang; Shi, Xiao-bin; Tian, Hui-jun; Wang, Rong-fei; Yang, Fei.
Afiliação
  • Wang XQ; Department of Neurology, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China. bjxqwang@yahoo.com.cn
Seizure ; 19(9): 562-6, 2010 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20888266
OBJECTIVE: Due to less experience with the cross-reactivity of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in Chinese population, we surveyed the rates of cross- reactivity of rash among commonly used AEDs in Chinese patients with epilepsy, particularly between the traditional and the new compounds. METHODS: We have retrospectively reviewed the medical records concerning all antiepileptic drug treatment in consecutive Chinese patients with epilepsy in our center. The incidence of AED-related rash was determined in 3793 outpatients, taking at least one of the AEDs-carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), clonazepam (CZP), oxcarbazepine (OXC), lamotrigine (LTG), gabapentin (GBP), topiramate (TPM), levetiracetam (LEV) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). We have performed telephone interviews among all patients with AEDs-related rash. We described the clinical characteristics of the 18 patients with cross-reactivity involving the AEDs, and the cross- reactivity pattern for CBZ, PHT, OXC, and LTG. RESULTS: A total of 3.61% (137/3793) of patients experienced a skin rash to at least one AEDs, of these patients, 73 (53.28%) were female and 64 were males (46.72%). While 18 patients had a rash to two or more AEDs. Of patients who had a rash to CBZ and were also prescribed PHT (n = 17), 52.9% had a rash to PHT (abbreviated as CBZ → PHT: 52.9%); of patients who had a rash to PHT and were also prescribed CBZ (n = 13), rate of rash was 69.2% (i.e., PHT → CBZ: 69.2%). Other results: CBZ → LTG: 25% (n = 16); LTG → CBZ: 44.4% (n = 9); CBZ→ OXC: 40% (n = 10); OXC → CBZ: 66.7% (n = 6); LTG → PHT: 20% (n = 5); PHT → LTG: 16.7% (n = 6); OXC → LTG: 25% (n=4); LTG → OXC: 33.3% (n = 3); OXC → PHT: 25% (n = 4); PHT → OXC: 16.7% (n = 6). There was a highly significant mutual risk for cross- reactivity for CBZ and PHT, and OXC, and LTG (p<0.001), mutual risk reached statistical significance for LTG and CBZ (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Cross-reactivity rates between certain AEDs are high, especially when involving carbamazepine and phenytoin. There were also too few patients with rash to reach definitely conclusions about possible cross-reactivity. Larger numbers of patients would be needed to assess this and the mechanism. Caution should be exercised when prescribing certain AEDs (especially CBZ and PHT, but also OXC, and LTG).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exantema / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Seizure Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exantema / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Seizure Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Reino Unido