Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of guideline-consistent antiemetic therapy on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): the Pan European Emesis Registry (PEER).
Aapro, M; Molassiotis, A; Dicato, M; Peláez, I; Rodríguez-Lescure, Á; Pastorelli, D; Ma, L; Burke, T; Gu, A; Gascon, P; Roila, F.
Afiliação
  • Aapro M; Medical Oncology and Radiation, IMO Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland. Electronic address: maapro@genolier.net.
  • Molassiotis A; School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Dicato M; Hematology-Oncology, Luxembourg Medical Center, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
  • Peláez I; Hospital de Cabuenes, Gijón, Spain.
  • Rodríguez-Lescure Á; Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain.
  • Pastorelli D; Oncologic Institute of the Veneto, Padova, Italy.
  • Ma L; Global Health Outcomes, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, USA.
  • Burke T; Global Health Outcomes, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, USA.
  • Gu A; Global Health Outcomes, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, USA.
  • Gascon P; Institute of Hematology and Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Roila F; Medical Oncology, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Ann Oncol ; 23(8): 1986-1992, 2012 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22396444
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

While guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are widely available, clinical uptake of guidelines remains low. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis (GCCP) on patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This prospective, observational multicenter study enrolled chemotherapy-naive adults initiating single-day highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer. Patients completed 6-day daily diaries beginning with cycle 1 for up to three chemotherapy cycles. The primary study end point, complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue therapy) during 120 h after cycle 1 chemotherapy, was compared between GCCP and guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis (GICP) cohorts using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS:

In cycle 1 (N=991), use of GCCP was 55% and 46% during acute and delayed phases, respectively, and 29 % for the overall study period (acute plus delayed phases). Complete response was recorded by 172/287 (59.9%) and 357/704 (50.7%) patients in GCCP and GICP cohorts, respectively (P=0.008). The adjusted odds ratio for complete response was 1.43 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.97; P=0.027) for patients receiving GCCP versus GICP.

CONCLUSION:

GCCP reduces the incidence of CINV after single-day HEC and MEC.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vômito / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Antieméticos / Náusea / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vômito / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Antieméticos / Náusea / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM