Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of a hydrogen peroxide-based system for high-level disinfection of vaginal ultrasound probes.
Johnson, Stephen; Proctor, Matthew; Bluth, Edward; Smetherman, Dana; Baumgarten, Katherine; Troxclair, Laurie; Bienvenu, Michele.
Afiliação
  • Johnson S; Department of Radiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, 1514 Jefferson Hwy, New Orleans, LA 70121 USA., ebluth@ochsner.org.
J Ultrasound Med ; 32(10): 1799-804, 2013 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24065261
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Because of the complex process and the risk of errors associated with the glutaraldehyde-based solutions previously used at our institution for disinfection, our department has implemented a new method for high-level disinfection of vaginal ultrasound probes the hydrogen peroxide-based Trophon system (Nanosonics, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia). The aim of this study was to compare the time difference, safety, and sonographers' satisfaction between the glutaraldehyde-based Cidex (CIVCO Medical Solutions, Kalona, IA) and the hydrogen peroxide-based Trophon disinfection systems.

METHODS:

The Institutional Review Board approved a 14-question survey administered to the 13 sonographers in our department. Survey questions addressed a variety of aspects of the disinfection processes with graded responses over a standardized 5-point scale. A process diagram was developed for each disinfection method with segmental timing analysis, and a cost analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

Nonvariegated analysis of the survey data with the Wilcoxon signed rank test showed a statistical difference in survey responses in favor of the hydrogen peroxide-based system over the glutaraldehyde-based system regarding efficiency (P = .0013), ease of use (P = .0013), ability to maintain work flow (P = .026), safety (P = .0026), fixing problems (P = .0158), time (P = .0011), and overall satisfaction (P = .0018). The glutaraldehyde-based system took 32 minutes versus 14 minutes for the hydrogen peroxide-based system; the hydrogen peroxide-based system saved on average 7.5 hours per week. The cost of the hydrogen peroxide-based system and weekly maintenance pays for itself if 1.5 more ultrasound examinations are performed each week.

CONCLUSIONS:

The hydrogen peroxide-based disinfection system was proven to be more efficient and viewed to be easier and safer to use than the glutaraldehyde-based system. The adoption of the hydrogen peroxide-based system led to higher satisfaction among sonographers.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transdutores / Vagina / Desinfecção / Ultrassonografia / Glutaral / Peróxido de Hidrogênio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Ultrasound Med Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transdutores / Vagina / Desinfecção / Ultrassonografia / Glutaral / Peróxido de Hidrogênio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Ultrasound Med Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article
...