Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the Reichert Pt100, the Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff portable noncontact tonometers, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Hubanova, Ralitsa; Aptel, Florent; Zhou, Thierry; Arnol, Nathalie; Romanet, Jean-Paul; Chiquet, Christophe.
Afiliação
  • Hubanova R; *Joseph Fourier University †Department of Ophthalmology, CHU Grenoble ‡INSERM U1042, Lab Hypoxia and Physiopathology, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France.
J Glaucoma ; 24(5): 356-63, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24240887
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using 2 portable tonometers, the Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff and the Reichert PT100, with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on normotensive and hypertensive patients recruited from the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital of Grenoble. IOP was measured using 2 portable noncontact tonometers (NCTs) and GAT in one eye of each patient in a random order. Central corneal thickness was measured with the Accutome PachPen Pachymeter. The Wilcoxon and t tests were used to compare the differences between tonometers, the Pearson and the Spearman correlation tests to evaluate the correlation among the methods, and the Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the agreement among the methods. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the agreement among the methods in normotensive and hypertensive patients separately. RESULTS: A total of 137 eyes of 137 patients were included, 104 normotensive and 33 hypertensive eyes. We found an excellent agreement between PT100 and GAT (ICC=0.77) and between Intellipuff and GAT (ICC=0.75) in normotensive patients. We found a fair to good agreement (ICC=0.67) between PT100 and GAT in hypertensive patients. The agreement we found between Intellipuff and GAT was also excellent in hypertensive patients (ICC=0.86). Both NCTs significantly overestimated IOP measurements compared with GAT in normotensive and hypertensive eyes (mean of the differences between PT100 and GAT: 1.3±2.1 and 8.1±4.6 mm Hg in normotensive and in hypertensive patients, respectively (P<0.05), and between Pulsair Intellipuff and GAT: 1.5±1.8 and 2.3±4.8 mm Hg in normotensive and in hypertensive patients, respectively (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 2 NCTs agree well with GAT in normotensive patients. The Pulsair Intellipuff also agrees well with GAT in hypertensive patients.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tonometria Ocular / Glaucoma de Baixa Tensão / Pressão Intraocular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Glaucoma Assunto da revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tonometria Ocular / Glaucoma de Baixa Tensão / Pressão Intraocular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Glaucoma Assunto da revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França País de publicação: Estados Unidos