Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Impact of a training workshop on residents and senior registrar skill in diagnosis and repair of anal sphincter and rectal mucosae obstetrical injuries]. / Impact d'un atelier de formation au diagnostic et à la réparation des lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal et de la muqueuse rectale sur les compétences des internes et chefs de clinique.
Vieille, P; de Tayrac, R; Hudry, D; Boucoiran, I; Wafo, E; Badiou, W.
Afiliação
  • Vieille P; Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Carémeau, place du Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes cedex 9, France.
  • de Tayrac R; Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Carémeau, place du Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes cedex 9, France. Electronic address: renaud.detayrac@chu-nimes.fr.
  • Hudry D; Département de chirurgie oncologique, centre G.-F.-Leclerc, 31079 Dijon cedex, France.
  • Boucoiran I; Département de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Sainte-Justine, université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Wafo E; AGOF, 9, route de la Goulée, 95510 Villers-en-Arthies, France.
  • Badiou W; Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Purpan, 31029 Toulouse cedex 9, France.
Prog Urol ; 24(4): 240-6, 2014 Mar.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24560293
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the impact of a training workshop on residents and senior registrar skill in repair of anal sphincter and rectal mucosae obstetrical injury. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Residents and senior registrar practical and theoretical knowledge were evaluated by a questionnaire sent, using AGOF (association des gynécologues-obstétriciens en formation) mailing list. This questionnaire includes questions about epidemiology, risk factors and sutures types. Scores were compared according to the participation or not at the workshop.

RESULTS:

There were 106 residents or senior registrar (48.4%) in the workshop group and 113 (51.6%) in the control group. Scores were significantly higher in the workshop group than in the control group for theoretical knowledge (4.1 vs. 3.7), practical knowledge (17.6 vs. 15.9) and global scores (21.7 vs. 19.7). There was no difference according to the participation before or after the third residency semester. Residents global scores were statistically higher in the workshop group compared to the control group (21.8 vs. 19.5) but there was no significant difference between the senior registrar of the two group. Participants in the workshop group estimate themselves significantly more efficient than in the control group concerning anal sphincter injury repair and rectal mucosae repair.

CONCLUSION:

A training workshop seems to improve the theoretical and practical skill. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Canal Anal / Reto / Competência Clínica / Internato e Residência / Complicações do Trabalho de Parto / Obstetrícia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: Fr Revista: Prog Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Canal Anal / Reto / Competência Clínica / Internato e Residência / Complicações do Trabalho de Parto / Obstetrícia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: Fr Revista: Prog Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França