Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.
Golubic, Rajna; May, Anne M; Benjaminsen Borch, Kristin; Overvad, Kim; Charles, Marie-Aline; Diaz, Maria Jose Tormo; Amiano, Pilar; Palli, Domenico; Valanou, Elisavet; Vigl, Matthaeus; Franks, Paul W; Wareham, Nicholas; Ekelund, Ulf; Brage, Soren.
Afiliação
  • Golubic R; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • May AM; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Benjaminsen Borch K; Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Overvad K; Section for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark and Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Charles MA; Inserm, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Lifelong epidemiology of obesity, diabètes and chronic renal disease Team, F-94807, Villejuif, France; Univ Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018, F-94807, Villejuif, France.
  • Diaz MJ; Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Authority, Murcia, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Department Sociosanitary Sciences, Murcia School of Medicine, Murcia, Spain.
  • Amiano P; Subdirección de Salud Pública de Gipuzkoa, Gobierno Vasco, San Sebastian, Spain.
  • Palli D; Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, ISPO, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy.
  • Valanou E; Hellenic Health Foundation (HHF), Athens, Greece.
  • Vigl M; Department of Epidemiology, Deutsches Institut für Ernährungsforschung Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany.
  • Franks PW; Department of Clinical Sciences, Genetic & Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Genetic Epidemiology & Clinical Research Group, Department of Public Health & Clinical Medicine, Section for Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Wareham N; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Ekelund U; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Brage S; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 9(3): e92829, 2014.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24667343
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the validity of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) which assesses physical activity (PA) in 4 domains (leisure, work, commuting, home) during past month.

METHODS:

580 men and 1343 women from 10 European countries attended 2 visits at which PA energy expenditure (PAEE), time at moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and sedentary time were measured using individually-calibrated combined heart-rate and movement sensing. At the second visit, RPAQ was administered electronically. Validity was assessed using agreement analysis.

RESULTS:

RPAQ significantly underestimated PAEE in women [median(IQR) 34.9 (22.3, 52.8) vs. 40.6 (32.4, 50.9) kJ/kg/day, 95%LoA -44.4, 66.1 kJ/kg/day) and overestimated PAEE in men [45.9 (30.6, 71.1) vs. 45.5 (34.1, 57.6) kJ/kg/day, 95%LoA -44.8, 102.6 kJ/kg/day]. Using individualised definition of 1MET, RPAQ significantly underestimated MVPA in women [median(IQR) 63.7 (30.5, 126.9) vs. 73.6 (47.8, 107.2) min/day, 95%LoA -127.4, 311.9 min/day] and overestimated MVPA in men [90.0 (42.3, 188.6) vs. 83.3 (55.1, 125.0) min/day, 95%LoA -134.8, 427.3 min/day]. Correlations (95%CI) between subjective and objective estimates were statistically significant [PAEE women, rho = 0.20 (0.15-0.26); men, rho = 0.37 (0.30-0.44); MVPA women, rho = 0.18 (0.13-0.24); men, rho = 0.31 (0.24-0.38)]. When using non-individualised definition of 1MET (3.5 mlO2/kg/min), MVPA was substantially overestimated (16 min/day, and 32 min/day in women and men, respectively). Revisiting occupational intensity assumptions in questionnaire estimation algorithms with occupational group-level empirical distributions reduced median PAEE-bias in manual (38.8 kJ/kg/day vs. 6.8 kJ/kg/day, p<0.001) and heavy manual workers (63.6 vs. -2.8 kJ/kg/day, p<0.001) in an independent hold-out sample [corrected].

CONCLUSION:

Relative validity of RPAQ-derived PAEE and MVPA is comparable to previous studies but underestimation of PAEE is smaller. Electronic RPAQ may be used in large-scale epidemiological studies including surveys, providing information on all domains of PA.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inquéritos e Questionários / Metabolismo Energético / Atividade Motora Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inquéritos e Questionários / Metabolismo Energético / Atividade Motora Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido