Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electrical exposure risk associated with hands-on defibrillation.
Lemkin, Daniel L; Witting, Michael D; Allison, Michael G; Farzad, Ali; Bond, Michael C; Lemkin, Mark A.
Afiliação
  • Lemkin DL; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: dlemkin@em.umaryland.edu.
  • Witting MD; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Allison MG; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Farzad A; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Bond MC; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Lemkin MA; Linear Technology, Hayward, CA, United States.
Resuscitation ; 85(10): 1330-6, 2014 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24992873
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The use of hands-on defibrillation (HOD) to reduce interruption of chest compression after cardiac arrest has been suggested as a means of improving resuscitation outcomes. The potential dangers of this strategy in regard to exposing rescuers to electrical energy are still being debated. This study seeks to determine the plausible worst-case energy-transfer scenario that rescuers might encounter while performing routine resuscitative measures.

METHODS:

Six cadavers were acquired and prepared for defibrillation. A custom instrumentation-amplifier circuit was built to measure differential voltages at various points on the bodies. Several skin preparations were used to determine the effects of contact resistance on our voltage measurements. Resistance and exposure voltage data were acquired for a representative number of anatomic landmarks and were used to map rescuers' voltage exposure. A formula for rescuer-received dose (RRD) was derived to represent the proportion of energy the rescuer could receive from a shock delivered to a patient. We used cadaver measurements to estimate a range of RRD.

RESULTS:

Defibrillation resulted in rescuer exposure voltages ranging from 827V to ∼200V, depending on cadaver and anatomic location. The RRD under the test scenarios ranged from 1 to 8J, which is in excess of accepted energy exposure levels.

CONCLUSIONS:

HOD using currently available personal protective equipment and resuscitative procedures poses a risk to rescuers. The process should be considered potentially dangerous until equipment and techniques that will protect rescuers are developed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardioversão Elétrica / Traumatismos por Eletricidade / Auxiliares de Emergência / Traumatismos Ocupacionais Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Resuscitation Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardioversão Elétrica / Traumatismos por Eletricidade / Auxiliares de Emergência / Traumatismos Ocupacionais Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Resuscitation Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article