Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Microwave thermal ablation of spinal metastatic bone tumors.
Kastler, Adrian; Alnassan, Hussein; Aubry, Sébastien; Kastler, Bruno.
Afiliação
  • Kastler A; Neuroradiology and MRI Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France; I4S Laboratory, EA 4268, IFR 133, Franche Comté University, Besançon. Electronic address: adriankastler@gmail.com.
  • Alnassan H; I4S Laboratory, EA 4268, IFR 133, Franche Comté University, Besançon.
  • Aubry S; I4S Laboratory, EA 4268, IFR 133, Franche Comté University, Besançon; Radiology and Interventional Pain Unit, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
  • Kastler B; I4S Laboratory, EA 4268, IFR 133, Franche Comté University, Besançon; Radiology and Interventional Pain Unit, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 25(9): 1470-5, 2014 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25000826
PURPOSE: To assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy of microwave ablation of spinal metastatic bone tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 17 patients with 20 spinal metastatic tumors treated with microwave ablation under computed tomographic guidance between March 2011 and August 2013 was performed. Ablations were performed under local anesthesia and nitrous oxide ventilation. Lesions were lumbar (n = 10), sacral (n = 7), and thoracic (n = 3) in location. Primary neoplastic sites were lung (n = 9), prostate (n = 4), kidney (n = 6), and uterus (n = 1). Adjunct cementoplasty was performed in nine cases, and a temperature-monitoring device was used in four cases. Procedure effectiveness was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) during a 6-month follow-up. Patient medical records were reviewed, and demographic and clinical data, tumor characteristics, and information on pain were assessed. RESULTS: Mean ablation time was 4.4 minutes ± 2.7 (range, 1-8 min), with an average of 3.8 cycles per ablation at 60 W (range, 30-70 W). The preprocedure mean VAS score was 7.4 ± 1.2 (range, 6-9). Pain relief was achieved in all but one patient. Follow-up VAS scores were as follows: day 0, 1.3 ± 1.8 (P < .001); day 7, 1.6 ± 1.7 (P < .001); month 1, 1.9 ± 1.6 (P < .001); month 3, 2.2 ± 1.5 (P < .001); and month 6, 2.3 ± 1.4 (P < .01). No complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Microwave ablation appears to be feasible, safe, and an effective treatment of painful refractory spinal metastases and may be considered as a potential alternative percutaneous technique in the management of spinal metastases.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral / Técnicas de Ablação / Micro-Ondas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral / Técnicas de Ablação / Micro-Ondas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos