Reduced red blood cell transfusion in cardiothoracic surgery after implementation of a novel clinical decision support tool.

BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion can increase short- and long-term adverse outcomes and health care costs. We compared the transfusion practices in cardiothoracic surgery before and after implementation of a novel clinical decision support (CDS) tool. STUDY DESIGN: The transfusion CDS tool was implemented within computerized provider order entry of a multi-institutional urban hospital system in September 2012. Data were queried for 12 months pre-intervention and for another 12 months post-intervention to compare transfusion practices for all adult patients having isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). RESULTS: The total number of patients undergoing either isolated CABG or isolated SAVR was 744 pre-intervention and 765 post-intervention (p = 0.84). There was no significant difference in age (64 ± 11.4 years vs 64.5 ± 11.2 years, p = 0.37) or sex (30.2% vs 32.2% female, p = 0.42) between the 2 groups. The number of postoperative transfusions (374 [50.3%] vs 312 [40.8%], p < 0.001), postoperative PRBC units given (1.59 ± 2.9 vs 1.25 ± 2.5, p = 0.01), pre-transfusion hemoglobin level (8.09 ± 1.5 g/dL vs 7.65 ± 1.4 g/dL, p < 0.001), and incidence of surgical site infection (3.1% vs 1.1%; p = 0.005) were significantly reduced after implementation of the transfusion CDS tool. There were no significant differences in intraoperative transfusions (206 [27.7%] vs 180 [23.5%], p = 0.06), intraoperative PRBC units given (0.73 ± 1.5 vs 0.65 ± 1.4, p = 0.28), ICU length of stay (3.29 ± 3.9 days vs 3.37 ± 4.8 days, p = 0.74), or in-hospital mortality (1.3% vs 1.4%, p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a transfusion CDS tool was associated with lower pre-transfusion hemoglobin levels, fewer transfusions, decreased infection rates, and decreased health care costs, without an increase in short-term mortality.