Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tamoxifen plus tegafur-uracil (TUFT) versus tamoxifen plus Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and cyclophosphamide (ACT) as adjuvant therapy to treat node-positive premenopausal breast cancer (PreMBC): results of Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9404.
Shien, Tadahiko; Iwata, Hiroji; Fukutomi, Takashi; Inoue, Kenichi; Aogi, Kenjiro; Kinoshita, Takayuki; Ando, Jiro; Takashima, Seiki; Nakamura, Kenichi; Shibata, Taro; Fukuda, Haruhiko.
Afiliação
  • Shien T; Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan, tshien@md.okayama-u.ac.jp.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 74(3): 603-9, 2014 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25055938
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of tamoxifen plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared to tamoxifen plus tegafur-uracil as an adjuvant therapy to treat node-positive premenopausal breast cancer (PreMBC).

METHODS:

Eligibility criteria included pathologically node-positive (n = 1-9) preMBC with curative resection, in stages I-IIIA. Patients were randomized to receive either tamoxifen 20 mg/day plus tegafur-uracil 400 mg/day (TU) for 2 years or six courses of a 28-day cycle of doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 along with tamoxifen (ACT) given for 2 years as adjuvant therapy. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS:

In total, 169 patients were recruited (TU arm 87, ACT arm 82) between October 1994 and September 1999. The HR for OS was 0.76 (95 % CI 0.35, 1.66, log-rank p = 0.49) and that for RFS was 0.77 (95 % CI 0.44, 1.36, log-rank p = 0.37), with ACT resulting in a better HR. The 5-year OS was 79.7 % for patients in the TU arm and 83 % for those in the ACT arm. The 5-year RFS was 66.1 % for patients in the TU arm and 70.6 % for those in the ACT arm. A higher proportion of patients in the ACT arm experienced grade 3 leucopenia (0 % in the TU arm, 4 % in the ACT arm).

CONCLUSIONS:

There were no significant differences in the efficacy of TU and ACT as adjuvant therapy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: ALEMANHA / ALEMANIA / DE / DEUSTCHLAND / GERMANY

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: ALEMANHA / ALEMANIA / DE / DEUSTCHLAND / GERMANY