Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Forgiveness-reconciliation and communication-conflict-resolution interventions versus retested controls in early married couples.
Worthington, Everett L; Berry, Jack W; Hook, Joshua N; Davis, Don E; Scherer, Michael; Griffin, Brandon J; Wade, Nathaniel G; Yarhouse, Mark; Ripley, Jennifer S; Miller, Andrea J; Sharp, Constance B; Canter, David E; Campana, Kathryn L.
Afiliação
  • Worthington EL; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
  • Berry JW; Department of Psychology, Samford University.
  • Hook JN; Department of Psychology, University of North Texas.
  • Davis DE; Department of Counseling and Psychological Services, Georgia State University.
  • Scherer M; Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation.
  • Griffin BJ; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
  • Wade NG; Department of Psychology, Iowa State University.
  • Yarhouse M; Department of Psychology, Regent University.
  • Ripley JS; Department of Psychology, Regent University.
  • Miller AJ; Department of Psychology, Hollins University.
  • Sharp CB; Washington State Department of Social and Health Services.
  • Canter DE; Private Practice.
  • Campana KL; University Counseling Services, Catholic University of America.
J Couns Psychol ; 62(1): 14-27, 2015 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25264599
ABSTRACT
The first 6 months of marriage are optimal for marriage enrichment interventions. The Hope-Focused Approach to couple enrichment was presented as two 9-hr interventions--(a) Handling Our Problems Effectively (HOPE), which emphasized communication and conflict resolution, and (b) Forgiveness and Reconciliation through Experiencing Empathy (FREE). HOPE and FREE were compared with repeated assessment controls. Couples were randomly assigned and were assessed at pretreatment (t1); 1 month posttreatment (t2) and at 3- (t3), 6- (t4), and 12-month (t5) follow-ups using self-reports. In addition to self-report measures, couples were assessed at t1, t2, and t5 using salivary cortisol, and behavioral coding of decision making. Of 179 couples who began the study, 145 cases were analyzed. Both FREE and HOPE produced lasting positive changes on self-reports. For cortisol reactivity, HOPE and FREE reduced reactivity at t2, but only HOPE at t5. For coded behaviors, control couples deteriorated; FREE and HOPE did not change. Enrichment training was effective regardless of the focus of the training.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Casamento / Negociação / Comunicação / Cônjuges / Empatia / Perdão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Couns Psychol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Casamento / Negociação / Comunicação / Cônjuges / Empatia / Perdão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Couns Psychol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article