Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implantation of peritoneal catheters by laparotomy: nephrologists obtained similar results to general surgeons.
Restrepo, Cesar A; Buitrago, Carlos Alberto; Holguin, Cielo.
Afiliação
  • Restrepo CA; Division of Nephrology, Department of Health Sciences, Caldas University. Caldas, Colombia.
  • Buitrago CA; Division of Nephrology, Department of Health Sciences, Caldas University. Caldas, Colombia.
  • Holguin C; Division of Nephrology, Department of Health Sciences, Caldas University. Caldas, Colombia.
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis ; 7: 383-90, 2014.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25364270
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To analyze the complications and costs of minilaparotomies performed by a nephrologist (group A) compared with conventional laparotomies performed by a surgeon (group B) for peritoneal catheter implantation.

SETTING:

Two university hospitals (Santa Sofia and Caldas) in Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.

METHODS:

The study included stage 5 chronic kidney disease patients, with indication of renal replacement therapy, who were candidates for peritoneal dialysis and gave informed consent for a peritoneal catheter implant. Minilaparotomies were performed by a nephrologist in a minor surgery room under local anesthesia. Conventional laparotomies were performed by a surgeon in an operating room under general anesthesia.

RESULTS:

Two nephrologists inserted 157 peritoneal catheters, and seven general surgeons inserted 185 peritoneal catheters. The groups had similar characteristics the mean age was 55 years, 49.5% were men, and the primary diagnoses were diabetic nephropathy, hypertensive nephropathy, and unknown etiology. The implant was successful for 98.09% of group A and 99.46% of group B. There was no procedure-related mortality. The most frequent complications in the first 30 days postsurgery in group A versus group B, respectively, were peritonitis (6.37% versus 3.78%), exit-site infection (3.82% versus 2.16%), tunnel infection (0% versus 0.54%), catheter entrapment by omentum (1.27% versus 3.24%), peritoneal effluent spillover (1.91% versus 2.16%), draining failure (4.46% versus 6.49%), hematoma (0% versus 1.08%), catheter migration with kinking (3.18% versus 2.70%), hemoperitoneum (1.27% versus 0%), and hollow viscera accidental puncture (1.91% versus 0.54%). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of complications between groups. In 2013, the cost of a surgeon-implanted peritoneal dialysis catheter in Colombia was US $366 (666,000 COP), whereas the cost of a nephrologist-implanted catheter was US $198 (356,725 COP).

CONCLUSION:

Nephrologist-performed minilaparotomies had similar effectiveness to surgeon-performed conventional laparotomies and were cost-effective; however, the nonuse of general anesthesia may be related with hollow viscera puncture during the procedure.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia