Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pediatric cochlear implantation in residual hearing candidates.
Gratacap, Maxime; Thierry, Briac; Rouillon, Isabelle; Marlin, Sandrine; Garabedian, Noel; Loundon, Natalie.
Afiliação
  • Gratacap M; Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Département d'otorhinolaryngologie, Paris, France gratacapm@gmail.com.
  • Thierry B; Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Département d'otorhinolaryngologie, Paris, France.
  • Rouillon I; Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Département d'otorhinolaryngologie, Paris, France.
  • Marlin S; Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Département d'otorhinolaryngologie, Paris, France.
  • Garabedian N; Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Département d'otorhinolaryngologie, Paris, France.
  • Loundon N; Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Département d'otorhinolaryngologie, Paris, France.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 124(6): 443-51, 2015 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25586946
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To propose categories for the various types of residual hearing in children and to review the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in children with these different hearing conditions.

METHODS:

We identified 53 children with residual hearing who had received a cochlear implant. Five groups were arbitrarily defined based on auditory features G1, characterized by low-frequency residual hearing (n=5); G2, characterized by severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and low speech discrimination (n=12); G3, characterized by asymmetric SNHL (n=9); G4, characterized by progressive SNHL (n=15); and G5, characterized by fluctuating SNHL (n=12). The main audiometric features and outcomes of the groups were analyzed.

RESULTS:

The mean age at implantation was 10.15 years (range, 2.5-21 years). The mean preoperative score for the discrimination of open-set words was 48%; this score increased to 74% at 12 months and 81% at 24 months after the CI procedure (G1 to G5, respectively 79/62/77%, 50/81/88%, 59/75/86%, 35/74/67%, and 39/69/80%). Children who were implanted after 10 years of age did not improve as much as those who were implanted at a younger age (open-set word list speech perception [OSW] score at 12 months 62% vs 83%; P=.0009). Shorter delays before surgery were predictive of better performance (P=.003). Inner ear malformation and SLC26A4 mutations were not predictive of the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS:

CIs provide better results compared with hearing aids in children with residual hearing. Factors that may impact the benefits of CIs in patients with residual hearing are age, delay in performing the CI procedure, which ear is implanted, and initial underestimation of the patient's hearing difficulties.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção da Fala / Implante Coclear / Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção da Fala / Implante Coclear / Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França