Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority study of the CONSORT algorithm for individualized dosing of follitropin alfa.
Olivennes, F; Trew, G; Borini, A; Broekmans, F; Arriagada, P; Warne, D W; Howles, C M.
Afiliação
  • Olivennes F; Centre d'Assistance Médicale à la Procréation Eylau-La Muette, Paris, France. Electronic address: francois.olivennes@gmail.com.
  • Trew G; Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
  • Borini A; TECNOBIOS Procreazione, Center for Reproductive Health, Bologna, Italy.
  • Broekmans F; Department Reproductive Medicine, Female and Baby Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Arriagada P; Abbott, Allschwil, Switzerland.
  • Warne DW; Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Howles CM; ARIES Consulting Sarl, Geneva, Switzerland.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 30(3): 248-57, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25596910
ABSTRACT
In this randomized, controlled, open-label, phase IV study, ovarian response after a follitropin alfa starting dose determined by the CONSORT calculator was compared with a standard dose (150 IU). Normo-ovulatory women (aged 18-34 years) eligible for assisted reproductive techniques were recruited (23 centres nine European countries and Chile); 200 women were randomized (CONSORT [n = 96]; standard dosing [n = 104]). Significantly lower mean daily (121.5 versus 167.4 IU; P < 0.001) and total (1288.5 versus 1810.0 IU; P < 0.001) doses of follitropin alfa were administered in the CONSORT group. Clinical pregnancy rates were CONSORT (36.0%) and standard dosing (35.5%); estimated difference (confidence interval 0.6%; -13.5 to 14.6). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in 6.3% and 12.5% of patients in the CONSORT and standard-dosing groups, respectively. The primary efficacy analysis found a significantly lower mean [SD] number of oocytes retrieved in the CONSORT (10.0 [5.6]; P = 0.037) versus standard-dosing group (11.8 [5.3]). Although the CONSORT calculator was statistically inferior to standard dosing in the number of oocytes retrieved, clinical pregnancy rates (fresh embryo transfers) were similar in both groups, and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was lower in the CONSORT group.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Indução da Ovulação / Fertilização in vitro / Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana / Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano / Medicina de Precisão / Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina / Infertilidade Feminina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Chile / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Biomed Online Assunto da revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Indução da Ovulação / Fertilização in vitro / Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana / Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano / Medicina de Precisão / Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina / Infertilidade Feminina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Chile / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Biomed Online Assunto da revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article