Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Towards changing healthcare workers' behaviour: a qualitative study exploring non-compliance through appraisals of infection prevention and control practices.
Shah, N; Castro-Sánchez, E; Charani, E; Drumright, L N; Holmes, A H.
Afiliação
  • Shah N; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Castro-Sánchez E; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: e.castro-sanchez@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Charani E; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Drumright LN; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
  • Holmes AH; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, London, UK.
J Hosp Infect ; 90(2): 126-34, 2015 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25820128
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Improving behaviour in infection prevention and control (IPC) practice remains a challenge, and understanding the determinants of healthcare workers' (HCWs) behaviour is fundamental to develop effective and sustained behaviour change interventions.

AIM:

To identify behaviours of HCWs that facilitated non-compliance with IPC practices, focusing on how appraisals of IPC duties and social and environmental circumstances shaped and influenced non-compliant behaviour. This study aimed to (1) identify how HCWs rationalized their own behaviour and the behaviour of others; (2) highlight challenging areas of IPC compliance; and (3) describe the context of the working environment that may explain inconsistencies in IPC practices.

METHODS:

Clinical staff at a National Health Service hospital group in London, UK were interviewed between December 2010 and July 2011 using qualitative methods. Responses were analysed using a thematic framework.

FINDINGS:

Three ways in which HCWs appraised their behaviour were identified through accounts of IPC policies and practices (1) attribution of responsibilities, with ambiguity about responsibility for certain IPC practices; (2) prioritization and risk appraisal, which demonstrated a divergence in values attached to some IPC policies and practices; and (3) hierarchy of influence highlighted that traditional clinical roles challenged work relationships.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, behaviours are not entirely independent of policy rules, but often an amalgamation of local normative practices, individual preferences and a degree of professional isolation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmacêuticos / Médicos / Infecção Hospitalar / Controle de Infecções / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Enfermeiros Obstétricos / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Hosp Infect Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmacêuticos / Médicos / Infecção Hospitalar / Controle de Infecções / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Enfermeiros Obstétricos / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Hosp Infect Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido