Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy.
Baco, Eduard; Rud, Erik; Eri, Lars Magne; Moen, Gunnar; Vlatkovic, Ljiljana; Svindland, Aud; Eggesbø, Heidi B; Ukimura, Osamu.
Afiliação
  • Baco E; Department of Urology, Division for Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: eduard.baco@medisin.uio.no.
  • Rud E; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Eri LM; Department of Urology, Division for Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Moen G; Department of Urology, Division for Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Vlatkovic L; Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Svindland A; Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Eggesbø HB; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Ukimura O; USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eur Urol ; 69(1): 149-56, 2016 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25862143
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prostate biopsy guided by computer-assisted fusion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images (MRI group) has not yet been compared with 12-core random biopsy (RB; control group) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the rate of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) between the two groups. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS:

This RCT included 175 biopsy-naïve patients with suspicion for prostate cancer, randomized to an MRI group (n=86) and a control group (n=89) between September 2011 and June 2013. INTERVENTION In the MRI group, two-core targeted biopsy (TB) guided by computer-assisted fusion of MRI/TRUS images of MRI-suspicious lesions was followed by 12-core RB. In the control group, both two-core TB for abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or TRUS-suspicious lesions and 12-core RB were performed. In patients with normal MRI or DRE/TRUS, only 12-core RB was performed. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

The detection rates for any cancer and csPCa were compared between the two groups and between TB and RB. RESULTS AND

LIMITATIONS:

Detection rates for any cancer (MRI group 51/86, 59%; control group 48/89, 54%; p=0.4) and csPCa (38/86, 44% vs 44/89, 49%; p=0.5) did not significantly differ between the groups. Detection of csPCa was comparable between two-core MRI/TRUS-TB (33/86, 38%) and 12-core RB in the control group (44/89, 49%; p=0.2). In a subset analysis of patients with normal DRE, csPCa detection was similar between two-core MRI/TRUS-TB (14/66, 21%) and 12-core RB in the control group (15/60, 25%; p=0.7). Among biopsy-proven csPCas in MRI group, 87% (33/38) were detected by MRI/TRUS-TB. The definition of csPCa was only based on biopsy outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Overall csPCa detection was similar between the MRI and control groups. Two-core MRI/TRUS-TB was comparable to 12-core RB for csPCa detection. PATIENT

SUMMARY:

Our randomized controlled trial revealed a similar rate of prostate cancer detection between targeted biopsy guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and 12-core random biopsy. The traditional 12-core random biopsy may be replaced by two-core MRI/TRUS targeted biopsy for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata / Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata / Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article