Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attentional Bias Predicts Increased Reward Salience and Risk Taking in Bipolar Disorder.
Mason, Liam; Trujillo-Barreto, Nelson J; Bentall, Richard P; El-Deredy, Wael.
Afiliação
  • Mason L; School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Liam.Mason@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Trujillo-Barreto NJ; School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Bentall RP; Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • El-Deredy W; School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile.
Biol Psychiatry ; 79(4): 311-9, 2016 Feb 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25863360
BACKGROUND: There is amassing evidence that risky decision-making in bipolar disorder is related to reward-based differences in frontostriatal regions. However, the roles of early attentional and later cognitive processes remain unclear, limiting theoretical understanding and development of targeted interventions. METHODS: Twenty euthymic bipolar disorder and 19 matched control participants played a Roulette task in which they won and lost money. Event-related potentials and source analysis were used to quantify predominantly sensory-attentional (N1), motivational salience (feedback-related negativities [FRN]), and cognitive appraisal (P300) stages of processing. We predicted that the bipolar disorder group would show increased N1, consistent with increased attentional orienting, and reduced FRN, consistent with a bias to perceive outcomes more favorably. RESULTS: As predicted, the bipolar disorder group showed increased N1 and reduced FRN but no differences in P300. N1 amplitude was additionally associated with real-life risk taking, and N1 source activity was reduced in visual cortex but increased activity in precuneus, frontopolar, and premotor cortex, compared to those of controls. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate an early attentional bias to reward that potentially drives risk taking by priming approach behavior and elevating reward salience in the frontostriatal pathway. Although later cognitive appraisals of these inputs may be relatively intact in remission, interventions targeting attention orienting may also be effective in long-term reduction of relapse.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recompensa / Assunção de Riscos / Atenção / Transtorno Bipolar / Encéfalo / Potenciais Evocados Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recompensa / Assunção de Riscos / Atenção / Transtorno Bipolar / Encéfalo / Potenciais Evocados Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos