Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cu Nanoparticles Have Different Impacts in Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus brevis than Their Microsized and Ionic Analogues.
Kaweeteerawat, Chitrada; Chang, Chong Hyun; Roy, Kevin R; Liu, Rong; Li, Ruibin; Toso, Daniel; Fischer, Heidi; Ivask, Angela; Ji, Zhaoxia; Zink, Jeffrey I; Zhou, Z Hong; Chanfreau, Guillaume Francois; Telesca, Donatello; Cohen, Yoram; Holden, Patricia Ann; Nel, Andre E; Godwin, Hilary A.
Afiliação
  • Kaweeteerawat C; †University of California Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Chang CH; ‡California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Roy KR; §Molecular Toxicology Interdepartmental Degree Program, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Liu R; ⊥Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Li R; †University of California Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Toso D; ‡California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Fischer H; ∥Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Ivask A; †University of California Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Ji Z; ‡California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Zink JI; #Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90039, United States.
  • Zhou ZH; †University of California Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Chanfreau GF; ‡California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Telesca D; ∇Biomedical Engineering Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Cohen Y; ○Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Holden PA; †University of California Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Nel AE; ‡California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Godwin HA; ⊗Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia.
ACS Nano ; 9(7): 7215-25, 2015 Jul 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26168153
ABSTRACT
Copper formulations have been used for decades for antimicrobial and antifouling applications. With the development of nanoformulations of copper that are more effective than their ionic and microsized analogues, a key regulatory question is whether these materials should be treated as new or existing materials. To address this issue, here we compare the magnitude and mechanisms of toxicity of a series of Cu species (at concentration ranging from 2 to 250 µg/mL), including nano Cu, nano CuO, nano Cu(OH)2 (CuPro and Kocide), micro Cu, micro CuO, ionic Cu(2+) (CuCl2 and CuSO4) in two species of bacteria (Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus brevis). The primary size of the particles studied ranged from 10 nm to 10 µm. Our results reveal that Cu and CuO nanoparticles (NPs) are more toxic than their microsized counterparts at the same Cu concentration, with toxicities approaching those of the ionic Cu species. Strikingly, these NPs showed distinct differences in their mode of toxicity when compared to the ionic and microsized Cu, highlighting the unique toxicity properties of materials at the nanoscale. In vitro DNA damage assays reveal that both nano Cu and microsized Cu are capable of causing complete degradation of plasmid DNA, but electron tomography results show that only nanoformulations of Cu are internalized as intact intracellular particles. These studies suggest that nano Cu at the concentration of 50 µg/mL may have unique genotoxicity in bacteria compared to ionic and microsized Cu.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cobre / Escherichia coli / Levilactobacillus brevis / Nanopartículas Metálicas / Anti-Infecciosos Idioma: En Revista: ACS Nano Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cobre / Escherichia coli / Levilactobacillus brevis / Nanopartículas Metálicas / Anti-Infecciosos Idioma: En Revista: ACS Nano Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos