Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical Management of Large Spontaneous Portosystemic Splenorenal Shunts During Liver Transplantation: Splenectomy or Left Renal Vein Ligation?
Golse, N; Mohkam, K; Rode, A; Mezoughi, S; Demian, H; Ducerf, C; Mabrut, J-Y.
Afiliação
  • Golse N; Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Department, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France. Electronic address: nicolas.golse@wanadoo.fr.
  • Mohkam K; Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Department, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
  • Rode A; Radiology Department, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
  • Mezoughi S; Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Department, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
  • Demian H; Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Department, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
  • Ducerf C; Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Department, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
  • Mabrut JY; Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Department, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
Transplant Proc ; 47(6): 1866-76, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26293065
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Management of splenorenal shunt (SRS) during whole liver transplantation is still controversial. Splenectomy (SP) permits its radical removal, at the price of a specific related morbidity. Left renal vein ligation (LRVL) performs a downstream ligation with potential renal repercussions. This study aimed to compare these techniques regarding portal revascularization and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS:

From 1994 to 2012, 22 SPs and 7 LRVLs were performed for large SRS (>1 cm) management.

RESULTS:

There was no difference in operating times or transfusion rates. In both groups, efficient portal flow was initially obtained in all cases. After a median follow-up of 79 months, 2 patients in the SP group presented an altered portal flow owing to persistence of a not disconnected mesentericogonadic or splenorenal shunt. Postoperative morbidity, including infection and portal vein thrombosis, was not significantly different (32% vs 14%). SP allowed a faster correction of the thrombocytopenia. The LRVL group had a moderate and temporary impairment of renal function.

CONCLUSIONS:

SP and LRVL represent 2 effective procedures to avoid vascular steal in the presence of SRS, but they require a patent portal vein. SP appears to be associated to specific but acceptable intraoperative morbidity, permits treatment of associated splenic artery aneurysm, and enables a faster correction of thrombocytopenia. However, the presence of a remote hilum SRS or another large portosystemic shunt represents a cause of failure of the procedure. LRVL is a safer and less demanding procedure that can suppress portal steal whatever the location of the SRS, but at the price of moderate renal morbidity.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Veias Renais / Esplenectomia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares / Transplante de Fígado / Complicações Intraoperatórias Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Veias Renais / Esplenectomia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares / Transplante de Fígado / Complicações Intraoperatórias Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA