Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of a resorbable collagen membrane COVA+™ for the prevention of postoperative adhesions in abdominal surgery.
Dabrowski, André; Lepère, Marc; Zaranis, Constantin; Coelio, Club; Hauters, Philippe.
Afiliação
  • Dabrowski A; Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Clinique de Saint-Omer, Blendecques, France.
  • Lepère M; General and Digestive Surgery, Clinique Saint-Charles, 11 Boulevard René Lévesque, 85000, La Roche-Sur-Yon, France. lepere.marc@orange.fr.
  • Zaranis C; Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Clinique du Mail, La Rochelle, France.
  • Coelio C; Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Clinique de Saint-Omer, Blendecques, France.
  • Hauters P; General and Digestive Surgery, Clinique Saint-Charles, 11 Boulevard René Lévesque, 85000, La Roche-Sur-Yon, France.
Surg Endosc ; 30(6): 2358-66, 2016 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26482156
BACKGROUND: This clinical study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of COVA+™, a collagen membrane (CM), for the prevention of postoperative adhesions in abdominal surgery. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study concerned one hundred and thirteen patients undergoing two-stage abdominal surgeries between 2011 and 2014: either bariatric surgery (BS) or reversal of a diverting stoma (DS). They were divided into two groups, according to whether a CM was placed at the end of the first procedure or not. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of adhesions (incidence, severity, and extent) on the operative site during the second surgery using standard grading scales and a combined adhesion score. Secondary endpoints were the duration of reoperation and the overall postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the BS group, and forty-eight patients in the DS group. Mean time interval between surgeries was 33.2 ± 51.1 weeks for BS and 14.1 ± 10 weeks for DS. In both indications, results in the CM group were better compared to the control group regarding incidence, severity, and extent of adhesions. Mean combined adhesion scores were lower in the CM group: respectively, 2.1 ± 1.6 versus 3.6 ± 1.7 (p < 0.001) for BS and 1.1 ± 1.7 versus 3.1 ± 2.2 (p < 0.005) for DS. In BS group, the operative duration at reoperation was significantly shorter if a CM was used: 56 ± 34 versus 77 ± 47 min (p < 0.03). No adverse events related to the use of the CM were observed. Overall complication rate was 13.5 % in the CM group versus 27.9 % in the control group. Ease of handling and application of the CM were rated as satisfying or very satisfying in the great majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS: In abdominal surgery, COVA+™ acts efficiently on the prevention of postoperative adhesions with lower incidence, severity, and extent levels. The CM can be used safely and might render reoperations less difficult.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Biocompatíveis / Aderências Teciduais / Colágeno / Membranas Artificiais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Biocompatíveis / Aderências Teciduais / Colágeno / Membranas Artificiais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França País de publicação: Alemanha