Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A multi-modal approach to training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery accelerates proficiency gain.
Jenkins, John T; Currie, Andrew; Sala, Stefano; Kennedy, Robin H.
Afiliação
  • Jenkins JT; St. Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, London, HA1 3UJ, UK.
  • Currie A; St. Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, London, HA1 3UJ, UK. a.currie@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Sala S; St. Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, London, HA1 3UJ, UK.
  • Kennedy RH; St. Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, London, HA1 3UJ, UK.
Surg Endosc ; 30(7): 3007-13, 2016 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26487223
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

How to efficiently train and transfer skills in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is unclear. Errors are rarely avoidable during learning but may incur patient morbidity. Multi-modality training with a modular operative approach provides proficiency-based structured task-specific training in a sequential manner, fragmenting complex laparoscopic colorectal procedures by difficulty allowing more than one trainee to gain experience irrespective of prior experience. This study assessed multi-modality training and its effect on proficiency gain in laparoscopic colorectal fellows.

METHODS:

A prospective study of 750 consecutive laparoscopic colon and rectal resection training cases assessing proficiency gain using a modified direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) (behaviors-assessment) and weighted global modular attainment score (GMAS) (maneuvers-assessment) was carried out. Two mentors delivered training in a standardized format from 2008. Consequential intra-operative errors (requiring a corrective maneuver to permit further progression of the operation) were recorded. Eight Laparoscopic Fellows were assessed in six-month periods over 4 years. Primary outcome was proficiency gain measured by cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis with boot-strapping comparing weighted GMAS and modified DOPS assessment. Morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification), and consequential errors were submitted to similar analysis to assess significant variations during the training period.

RESULTS:

Fellows were trained on over 100 laparoscopic colorectal resections in a six Fellowship month period. Proficiency gain was identifiable in the DOPS and GMAS with 32 (99 % CI 25-37) and 39 (99 % CI 32-44) cases, respectively. Two- versus single-mentor training improved proficiency gain 35 (99 % CI 30-43) versus 55 (99 % CI 50-60). Overall consequential error rate and major morbidity rate (CD III-IV) were stable over time at 25 and 8.7 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Multi-modality training with modular operative training and technique standardization shortens the time to proficiency gain with low morbidity accepting an intra-operative consequential error rate of 25 %.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Clínica / Laparoscopia / Cirurgia Colorretal / Bolsas de Estudo Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Clínica / Laparoscopia / Cirurgia Colorretal / Bolsas de Estudo Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido