Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimal clinically important difference on the Motor Examination part of MDS-UPDRS.
Horváth, Krisztina; Aschermann, Zsuzsanna; Ács, Péter; Deli, Gabriella; Janszky, József; Komoly, Sámuel; Balázs, Éva; Takács, Katalin; Karádi, Kázmér; Kovács, Norbert.
Afiliação
  • Horváth K; Doctoral School of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Aschermann Z; Doctoral School of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Ács P; Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Deli G; Doctoral School of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Janszky J; Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; MTA-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Komoly S; Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Balázs É; Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Takács K; Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Karádi K; Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Pécs, Hungary.
  • Kovács N; Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; MTA-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group, Pécs, Hungary. Electronic address: kovacsnorbert06@gmail.com.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 21(12): 1421-6, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26578041
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recent studies increasingly utilize the Movement Disorders Society Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). However, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) has not been fully established for MDS-UPDRS yet.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the MCID thresholds for MDS-UPDRS Motor Examination (Part III).

METHODS:

728 paired investigations of 260 patients were included. At each visit both MDS-UPDRS and Clinician-reported Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scales were assessed. MDS-UPDRS Motor Examination (ME) score changes associated with CGI-I score 4 (no change) were compared with MDS-UPDRS ME score changes associated with CGI-I score 3 (minimal improvement) and CGI-I score 5 (minimal worsening). Both anchor- and distribution-based techniques were utilized to determine the magnitude of MCID.

RESULTS:

The MCID estimates for MDS-UPDRS ME were asymmetric -3.25 points for detecting minimal, but clinically pertinent, improvement and 4.63 points for observing minimal, but clinically pertinent, worsening.

CONCLUSIONS:

MCID is the smallest change of scores that are clinically meaningful to patients. These MCID estimates may allow the judgement of a numeric change in MDS-UPDRS ME on its clinical importance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Parkinson / Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Atividade Motora Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Hungria

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Parkinson / Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Atividade Motora Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Hungria